[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Media Flips Over Tulsi & Matt Gaetz, Biden & Trump Take A Pic, & Famous People Leave Twitter!

4 arrested in California car insurance scam: 'Clearly a human in a bear suit'

Silk Road Founder Trusts Trump To 'Honor His Pledge' For Commutation

"You DESERVED to LOSE the Senate, the House, and the Presidency!" - Jordan Peterson

"Grand Political Theatre"; FBI Raids Home Of Polymarket CEO; Seize Phone, Electronics

Schoolhouse Limbo: How Low Will Educators Go To Better Grades?

BREAKING: U.S. Army Officers Made a Desperate Attempt To Break Out of The Encirclement in KURSK

Trumps team drawing up list of Pentagon officers to fire, sources say

Israeli Military Planning To Stay in Gaza Through 2025

Hezbollah attacks Israeli army's Tel Aviv HQ twice in one day

People Can't Stop Talking About Elon's Secret Plan For MSNBC And CNN Is Totally Panicking

Tucker Carlson UNLOADS on Diddy, Kamala, Walz, Kimmel, Rich Girls, Conspiracy Theories, and the CIA!

"We have UFO technology that enables FREE ENERGY" Govt. Whistleblowers

They arrested this woman because her son did WHAT?

Parody Ad Features Company That Offers to Cryogenically Freeze Liberals for Duration of TrumpÂ’s Presidency

Elon and Vivek BEGIN Reforming Government, Media LOSES IT

Dear Border Czar: This Nonprofit Boasts A List Of 400 Companies That Employ Migrants

US Deficit Explodes: Blowout October Deficit Means 2nd Worst Start To US Fiscal Year On Record

Gaetz Resigns 'Effective Immediately' After Trump AG Pick; DC In Full Blown Panic

MAHA MEME

noone2222 and John Bolton sitting in a tree K I S S I N G

Donald Trump To Help Construct The Third Temple?

"The Elites Want To ROB Us of Our SOVEREIGNTY!" | Robert F Kennedy

Take Your Money OUT of THESE Banks NOW! - Jim Rickards

Trump Taps Tulsi Gabbard As Director Of National Intelligence

DC In Full Blown Panic After Trump Picks Matt Gaetz For Attorney General

Cleveland Clinic Warns Wave of Mass Deaths Will Wipe Out Covid-Vaxxed Within ‘5 Years’

Judah-ism is as Judah-ism does

Danger ahead: November 2024, Boston Dynamics introduces a fully autonomous "Atlas" robot. Robot humanoids are here.

Trump names [Fox News host] Pete Hegseth as his Defense secretary


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: 2 new genetic links predispose people to autism, large study shows
Source: CBC News
URL Source: http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2007/02/18/autism.html
Published: Feb 18, 2007
Author: CBC News
Post Date: 2007-02-19 02:45:44 by scrapper2
Keywords: autism, genetic links, DNA studied
Views: 462
Comments: 44

An international team of scientists including several Canadians has discovered genetic links that put children at greater risk of developing autism.

About 1,500 families offered DNA to scientists searching for a cause for autism spectrum disorder. The results appear in Sunday's issue of Nature Genetics.

Stephen Scherer of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto led the Canadian arm of the research, identifying two key genetic causes for autism.

"Now we can think about this condition in a much different way," said Scherer. "We have an understanding of what's going on in the developing brain in these individuals so we can think about ways to actually deal with this issue."

The work involved abnormalities in chromosomes, gene codes and proteins. Between seven to 12 per cent of the families showed individuals sharing possibly detrimental chromosome abnormalities.

A linkage analysis that searched for regions of the genome that might be shared by individuals with autism spectrum disorder turned up a region on chromosome 11 that has not previously been linked to risk of developing autism.

Autism affects one in 160 children. The complexity of the genetics helps explain why it is described as a spectrum, with no two children exactly alike. Environmental factors may also play a role, scientists say.

The Fenton family of Halifax is a case in point. Liam, 14, has Asperger's syndrome. He is able to do Grade 8 schoolwork but has problems relating to others. His 10-year-old brother, Rhys, has a more classic form of autism and has difficulties with language, learning and social interactions.

"We need to find out why," said their mother, Jo-Lynn Fenton. "Obviously, I have two children with autism, somebody has no children with autism, so there's a reason, and the best way to find out is to look at what's different."

The findings may help steer scientists toward new drugs and behavioural therapies tailored to specific children or groups of children, said Dr. Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, director of the Autism Research Centre in Edmonton.

"At some point it may be that this kind of genetic research identifies subgroups of children with autism where the response to intervention may actually somehow relate to the genetics."

New treatments are years away, but the findings may help parents come to terms with why their children are different, and help them to understand that the disorder is not due to something they did during pregnancy.

The study also underlines that if one child is born with autism, there is a greater likelihood their siblings will be, as well.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 35.

#2. To: scrapper2 (#0)

They would be better served to look at all the vaccines that babies are given these days instead of wasting time on genetics.

Lod  posted on  2007-02-19   10:00:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: lodwick, angle, All (#2)

They would be better served to look at all the vaccines that babies are given these days instead of wasting time on genetics.

DNA was analyzed - the results were not pulled out of a hat courtesy of pharma. I think it's pretty hard to deny a genetic link although this may bring out a certain level of parental guilt now sadly enough.

But I'll grant you that perhaps the different variations of autism have a multi- factoral cause - there's a genetic predispositon to autism and it makes those kids more susceptical to negative reactions in varying degrees to certain vaccinations as well.

Here's another article from the Globe and Mail that gives some interesting facts not covered in the one I posted:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070219.wxautism19/B NStory/s pecialScienceandHealth/home

"Canadian breakthrough offers hope on autism: Project makes possible DNA test to identify children most likely at risk to condition"

By Carolyn Abraham

A massive international effort led by Canadian scientists has homed in on the genes behind autism - a breakthrough that could revolutionize how the mysterious and surprisingly common condition is both detected and treated.

Touting it as the most significant advance in the field in 30 years, researchers say the landmark project has put within reach a DNA test to identify children with autism early enough to counter the condition's worst effects.

"I don't think it's inconceivable that we're going to be able to prevent autism down the road," said study leader Peter Szatmari, director of the Offord Centre for Child Studies at McMaster Children's Hospital in Hamilton. "The clinical implications of this discovery are unprecedented."

Doctors currently rely on psychological tests to diagnose autism spectrum disorders in children at age 2 or 3. But a DNA test could identify those affected as babies, or perhaps even before they are born.

The findings, based on the largest autism DNA collection ever assembled, could also allow parents who have children with autism to learn through genetic screening their chances of having another affected child.

"If you know ahead [of time] of your predisposition to autism, you can make an informed decision," said Marie Jolicoeur, a Burlington, Ont., mother who has two sons with autism disorders and whose family contributed DNA to the project.

Using new genome scanning tools, researchers have found that several different autism-related genes can play a role in different families. This helps to explain why no two children - not even identical twins - have identical symptoms.

The researchers have pinpointed at least five areas of the genome that harbour genes linked to autism susceptibility, including those crucial for brain function. They have also found a genetic mutation tied to the disorder in girls - who are four times less likely than boys to develop autism disorders.

The work has also highlighted how autism can spring from genetic quirks not seen in either parent - suggesting that a genetic glitch has randomly emerged in the sperm or egg cells of the father or mother prior to conception.

Co-author Steve Scherer, senior scientist of genetics and genomic biology at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children, said, "It may be that 5 to 10 per cent of autism cases are arising from these de novo [new] mutations."

The research, released yesterday in an advance online publication of the journal Nature Genetics, is the first part of a two-phase study run by the Autism Genome Project. It involves more than 137 researchers from 50 academic institutions in eight countries and the study of nearly 8,000 people from 1,600 families who have at least two members diagnosed with an ASD.

Dr. Szatmari, who set the ground rules for the unprecedented collaboration that began in 2002, said "the effort has meant the putting aside of individual ambitions to work together as a team."

Autism disorders have only recently been recognized as the most common serious developmental condition of childhood, affecting roughly one in 165 children. Experts refer to it as a spectrum because the complex neurological condition can range so widely in severity.

Some suffer severe cognitive impairment, others are savants. Many battle gastrointestinal problems and show a strong preference for strict routines and repetitive behaviours. But social deficits are its hallmark, impaired language, communication and the ability to interact with others.

Once considered rare, autism disorders seem to have risen dramatically over the last two decades. But Dr. Szatmari said many experts believe the increase can largely be explained by greater awareness, different diagnostic criteria and the specialized resources often made available to those with an ASD compared with another form of developmental condition.

Despite the growing awareness, autism's causes have stumped experts. Many suspect environmental triggers - prenatal hormones, toxins, food allergies and infections. But experts have long known genes play a major role. Autism disorders tend to run in families; if one identical twin has an ASD, there is a 65- to 92-per-cent chance the other will also develop the disorder. Doctors also see subtle forms of autism in parents that may not have been diagnosed.

"Still, for 99 per cent of autism cases, we don't know the underlying genes," Dr. Scherer said.

But with onetime scientific competitors sharing their families, researchers say they had enough statistical power to make connections. They also had the technology to run genome-wide scans and detect a type of genetic mutation only recently discovered.

These mutations, known as copy number variations, or CNVs, involve vast stretches of genetic code that are misplaced, repeated or deleted.

Late last year, Dr. Scherer and other colleagues reported that these quirks were far more common in the general population than expected - that people can carry extra copies of genes or be missing them completely and still be healthy.

But in this study, the scientists found certain CNVs were linked to autism - particularly if it was not seen in either parent or 500 DNA control samples and if it encompassed a genome region believed to be involved in brain function.

"These CNVs arise randomly all the time," Dr. Scherer said, "but sometimes, [depending on where they arise] they result in ASD."

Among the key findings is the involvement of a gene called Neurexin1, which researchers believe has an impact on how neurons communicate with each other. They have also found a suspicious region of Chromosome 11 that houses genes involved in the brain chemical glutamate, an important neurotransmitter.

"Nobody knew glutamate was involved in autism," Dr. Szatmari said. But it is known to be involved in epilepsy, he said, "and 20 per cent of children with autism also have epilepsy.

"All these straggly little threads are beginning to tie together into a string."

The second phase of the project, is to map the specific genes that contribute to autism.

But in uncovering "the genetic architecture" in the first phase, Dr. Scherer said autism seems much like cancer, a condition with many faces, arising from many different types of genetic mutations.

"We have to be careful," he said, "not to overinterpret the results."

Genetic counsellors at Sick Kids are already preparing for questions from parents, many of whom heard the study results at a meeting last November.

Generally, parents with one affected child are told they have a 5- to 10-per- cent chance of having another child with an ASD.

But Ms. Shuman said that's a general estimate based on population averages, and for some parents the chances could be much higher or lower.

For Ms. Jolicoeur, it is too late to consider how she and her husband, Craig Marshall, would use the information, having already had their three children, two of whom have autism. Her eldest son, Eric, 18, who read the National Geographic with his father at the age of 3, was diagnosed at age 7 with Asperger syndrome, a high-functioning form of autism, usually characterized by normal intelligence, obsessive interests in particular subjects and striking talents. But Eric's diagnosis came only after his brother Luc, 14, was diagnosed at 3 with pervasive developmental disorder, a more severe form of autism.

Still, Ms. Jolicoeur believes the discoveries, and those ahead, will be important for her youngest son, Marc, 12, who does not have a spectrum disorder and was born before Luc and Eric were diagnosed. "Marc has already said he doesn't think he would have children," she said. "But then he says, 'No, I think I would maybe have one.'"

People often ask her how she and her husband cope. "I tell them life is chaotic, busy, but it's all we have ever known," Ms. Jolicoeur said. "It is also loud and fun."

Her family has been part of Dr. Szatmari's research for more than 10 years. Ms. Jolicoeur understands that talk of screening for autism traits is controversial, since those at the mild end of the spectrum, and their advocates, see their unusual personality traits as characteristics society should accept.

But she said "it is valid" for people to have all the information they can to make their own decisions. "I didn't sign up to raise children with special needs," she said, "but they are your kids, and you love them unconditionally."

scrapper2  posted on  2007-02-19   11:48:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: scrapper2 (#3)

"Still, for 99 per cent of autism cases, we don't know the underlying genes," Dr. Scherer said.

DNA was analyzed - the results were not pulled out of a hat courtesy of pharma.

Fact is, you don't know where they came up with their results any more than we do.

There's an awful lot riding on disproving the vaccine causation.

angle  posted on  2007-02-19   12:35:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: angle (#9)

"Still, for 99 per cent of autism cases, we don't know the underlying genes," Dr. Scherer said.

Scientists have not mapped the entire genome series for this disease. That will come in the future no doubt.

The scientists never claimed that this was a definitive study - but the results are "promising" showing a genetic link.

http://www.medpageto day.com/Neurology/Autism/tb/5082

I don't know why there's so much grousing on this forum about a break through in science which may actually help potential parents who carry these gene abnormalities make informed decisions.

Just because this does not support the alternative medicine mindset, is this a valid reason to dismiss anything coming out of conventional research labs as part of a conspiracy of big pharma?? What help do the "it's all vaccinations fault" sector give to prospective parents to assist them to make informed decisions prior to giving birth to an autistic child? Oh I get it - just don't do any vaccinations and your autitistic child will grow out of it by age 6, well as long as he does not die of small pox before that time. Come on people, smell the coffee. Vaccinations have been around for a very long time and I don't have autism,you don't have autism. Were we just "lucky?"

Fyi...."The study was funded by the non-profit organization Autism Speaks and by the National Institutes of Health. The authors disclosed no financial conflicts."

scrapper2  posted on  2007-02-19   12:53:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: scrapper2 (#14)

The study was funded by the non-profit organization Autism Speaks

Bob Wright, chairman and CEO of NBC Universal, and his wife, Suzanne, joined this fight last fall when their grandson was diagnosed with autism. (MSNBC.COM is a joint venture of Microsoft and NBC Universal.)

The Wrights are launching a new organization, Autism Speaks, which will focus on research, treatment and education.

...In 2006, Autism Speaks has already awarded 62 research grants, totaling $6.8 million dollars

http://www.naar.org/research/ r esearch.asp

"Autism Speaks like every other Autism organization in the U.S. has in my opinion, written off the existing half a million children that are alive today with Autism. These groups are looking only to a 'possible' halt to the future children yet to be born, and/or drugs to push to the current sufferers. Are we suppose to say Thank You? No Thanks."

angle  posted on  2007-02-19   15:55:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: angle (#15)

"Autism Speaks like every other Autism organization in the U.S. has in my opinion, written off the existing half a million children that are alive today with Autism. These groups are looking only to a 'possible' halt to the future children yet to be born, and/or drugs to push to the current sufferers. Are we suppose to say Thank You? No Thanks."

Well, first off, the founders of Autism Speaks, Bob and Suzanne Wright, have a grandson diagnosed with autism, so it find it unlikely that they would fund an organization that "writes off" the existing half million children with autism.

Secondly, Autism Speaks is non-profit like the medical article states - it's not owned or funded by big pharma that I can see. It's mainly funded by individuals'donations and the ongoing philanthropy of very rich folks like Suzanne and Bob Wright.

Thirdly, if drugs are being researched/tested to give autistic children a chance at leading a quality life, how is that not a blessing? I have no thyroid and without my medication, which fyi I must take daily for life, I would not be alive today and it would not matter how much magnesium I added to my diet, I would die. So from my perspective - having been given a second chance at leading a healthy existence due to big pharma, I view the possibility of discovering medication for autism as a beneficial event, not an evil to be feared.

Fourthly,if a pre-natal test comes from Autism Speaks research and allows a couple to make informed choices about whether to have autism-disabled children ( maybe they will adopt instead?) or whether to terminate a pregnancy, how is that your or my business? We are not walking in those couples' shoes, we will not be helping them with the costs and stresses put on their marriage if they knowingly have an autistic child, so we have no right to sit in judgement of what choices these couples will make for their family's futures.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-02-19   16:25:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: scrapper2 (#17)

Clearly, you missed the point of the writer's comments.

Do you have any close people with autism? I do.

My position is that I think that this research and the timing of its release should be scrutinized.

At this point, from my readings, autism has a statistical link with the mercury- laced vaccinations. I think this link should be aggresively "independently" researched as well. Could prevent a significant autism problem with the next generation, if linked and acted upon.

angle  posted on  2007-02-19   16:36:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: angle, robin, lodwick, Yertle Turtle (#19) (Edited)

Clearly, you missed the point of the writer's comments.

Do you have any close people with autism? I do.

My position is that I think that this research and the timing of its release should be scrutinized.

At this point, from my readings, autism has a statistical link with the mercury- laced vaccinations. I think this link should be aggresively "independently" researched as well. Could prevent a significant autism problem with the next generation, if linked and acted upon.

Because you and I have differing opinions on the quote you posted does not mean I "missed" the writer's point.

No I don't know anyone with autism. But how does having "someone close with autism" give your opinions more gravitas than mine? Unless you are a physician or research scientist with medical expertise and advanced knowledge about this disease, we both speak from a layman's vantage point.

As for your readings that suggest a statistical link between autism and mercury laced vaccinations...perhaps you did not read about the following independent study done in Denmark that found no statistical link between autism and thermiserol vaccines. The study covered "All children between 2 and 10 years old who were diagnosed with autism during the period from 1971–2000."

***Fyi, Denmark stopped using thimerosal-containing vaccines in 1991.***

Yet, inexplicably " From 1991 until 2000 the incidence increased and continued to rise after the removal of thimerosal from vaccines, including increases among children born after the discontinuation of thimerosal."

http ://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/112/3/604

scrapper2  posted on  2007-02-19   17:10:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: scrapper2 (#25)

give your opinions more gravitas than mine

No, just gives mine more experience.

angle  posted on  2007-02-19   17:40:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: angle (#28)

No, just gives mine more experience.

That is true but sometimes a personal connection to someone with a medical condition that has no straight forward answers can cause that person to view possibilities with myopic vision.

I am sorry for you to have someone close with autism. You must feel powerless to help. My cousin had a Down's Syndrome child. As I've said before all my family are devout Catholics ( except for me). My cousin would not consider amniocentesis even if she qualified for it because of course abortion is out of the question. Statistically she was too young to even have to worry about Down's but sometimes there is no explanation except that bad luck happens. Raising a mentally disabled child is very difficult for parents, possibly tougher on them than on the child affected by the condition.

Also I'm not an uncritical advocate for big pharma but my reasons for not liking big pharma are different from yours - I resent the fact that more new drugs to treat different diseases are not developed. Nowadays, big pharma just keeps re- inventing the wheel and narrowing their focus on tried and true money making diseases like depression, hypertension, and heart disease. There's been tons of variations of drugs to treat the same diseases over and over again and then we consumers are expected to pay "new research costs" for same old same old stuff that's been merely tweaked. Say what? How many new new new anti-depressents can we use in modern society?

Also, as I said from the start ( and I echo what was said by the autism researchers) this genetic link is not the end all and be all on the subject of autism by a long shot. I think the cause of autism might be multi-factoral, in which case it will be tough to ascertain all the causes all at once. But if scientists can narrow down some of the risk factors, including any genetic links, it would be very helpful.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-02-19   18:50:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: scrapper2 (#29)

The Age of Autism: Mercury and the Amish -

By Dan Olmsted --UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL submitted by Stacey Groder

Washington, DC, May. 20 (UPI) -- The cases of autism among the Amish that I've identified over the past several weeks appear to have at least one link -- a link made of mercury. That's not something I expected to encounter. I had been looking for an unvaccinated population to test the controversial idea that vaccines, and in particular the mercury-based preservative called thimerosal, could be behind the apparent rise in autism cases over the past decade. The concept: If the Amish have little or no autism, it might point a finger at something to which they have not been exposed. Most of the medical establishment, it must be stated upfront, considers the idea that thimerosal could have played a role in the rise of autism disproven and dangerous. As noted in the last column, however, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says she has "an open mind" about that possibility.

So do I, having come across correlations that made me want to look more closely at thimerosal. For instance, the first child diagnosed with autism in the United States was born in 1931, the same year thimerosal was first used in a vaccine. And autism diagnoses exploded in the 1990s, the same decade children got an increasing number of thimerosal-containing vaccines (it was phased out starting in 1999). Tantalizing, but proof of nothing.

So I turned to the 22,000 Amish in Lancaster County, Pa. I didn't expect to find many, if any, vaccinated Amish: they have a religious exemption from the otherwise mandatory U.S. vaccination schedule. When German measles broke out among Amish in Pennsylvania in 1991, the CDC reported that just one of 51 pregnant women they studied had ever been vaccinated against it.

To cut to the chase, what I've found to date is very little evidence of autism among the Amish in Lancaster County, far below the 1 in 166 rate of Autism Spectrum Disorders the CDC cites for children born in the United States today. I don't discount the idea that they might be more difficult to find or diagnose, and I'm still looking.

intotheabyss  posted on  2007-02-20   11:34:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: intotheabyss (#32)

Where are the unvaccinated people with autism?

I'm afraid that's too easy.

angle  posted on  2007-02-20   11:40:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: angle (#33)

I'm afraid that's too easy.

An article by Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.(Neurosurgeon)

Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics About Mercury, Part 1

[ Part 1, Part 2 ] References Next >>

Dr. Mercola's Comment:

Last fall, contributing editor Dr. Russell Blaylock penned a stunning, multi- part series on the results of a secret meeting between the CDC and scientists in 2000 to discuss, debate and ultimately defend the use of thimerosal in vaccines.

In a follow-up, Dr. Blaylock reviews a new report that sanitizes the use of mercury in dental amalgams, based on disregarding information on a whim that doesn’t fit a predetermined solution and “creating” experts expressly to build a case for a deadly element to which no one in his or her right mind would want to be exposed.

I urge you to review the various research and papers I have posted on my site regarding the issue, particularly if you are experiencing any of these symptoms:

Fatigue Irritability Feeling “foggy-headed”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Recently, I reported on the methodology and machinations involved in vaccine- related injury cover-ups by the top researchers in science and government at the Simpsonwood Conference on Thimerosal in vaccines.

Just as the smoke has cleared, however, a brand new scandal has recently come to light concerning the safety of mercury contained in dental amalgams, which is of equal magnitude and again shows the modus operandi of the government/elitist scientists’ coalition. The official name of the report is “Dental Amalgam: A Scientific Review and Recommended Public Health Service Strategy for Research, Education and Regulation.”

This report is described as the Trans-agency Working Group on the Health Effects of Dental Amalgam, which included representatives of the National Institutes of Health, the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Office of the Chief Dental Officer of the Public Health Service.

These organizations requested the Life Sciences Research Office (LSRO) as a subcontractor of BETAH Associates undertake an independent third-party review of the topic. BETAH received the contract from the Department of Health and Human Services without bidding, as is proscribed by law. To carry out this mandate, they were asked to consider peer-reviewed, primary scientific and medical literature published between 1996-2003 addressing this specific question.

Thus begins a lesson in how to cover-up a major health disaster using scientific, “evidence-based” methods meant to impress the media and public at large. (In this review, I will consider only the Executive Summary, which was written for the media and the lay public.)

Overwhelm Them with Your Credentials

Students of this methodology will always be impressed by the length the designers of these “independent studies” will go to convince the public and, particularly, the media they have assembled the world’s greatest experts to study the matter in question. As we saw in the case of the Simpsonwood Vaccine Study, they assembled similar “experts” to study the effects of mercury in vaccines, only to find out their experts were not so expert after all and that many of the true experts were not invited.

In the Executive Summary, they list the types of experts collected for this “independent study.” Invited were experts in the fields of immunotoxicology, immunology, allergy, neurobehavioral toxicology, neurodevelopment, pediatrics, developmental and reproductive toxicology; toxicokinetics and modeling; epidemiology; pathology; and general toxicology, all very impressive titles. Yet, most critical in all these specialties is their expertise in the area of mercury toxicology, pathology and developmental pathology. Or, perhaps, a lack of it...

You can be a world expert in immunology and not know a single thing about mercury toxicity, especially on neuronal and neuroglial systems. It is interesting to note, in the Executive Summary they state, “No member of the Expert Panel expressed a public opinion regarding the potential adverse effects of dental amalgam prior to or during the review period.”

While this might imply impartiality, it can also indicate a lack of expertise in the area of mercury and its pathophysiological effects. One would think that, if you were truly an expert in the field, sometime along the line you would have expressed an opinion publicly either on its safety or its danger. Even so, I will accept this as an expression of impartiality since the names and institutions of the review panel are not disclosed in the Executive Summary.

Now let’s look at some of the deceptive tactics these studies use.

Control the Information

As stated, the literature review was limited between January 1, 1996 and December 2003. Immediately, one has to ask the most obvious question: Why were the dates of the literature limited?

In fact, a number of very important studies concerning the immunological, as well as other addressed, effects of mercury appeared just before the beginning date. For example, Queiroz and Perlingeiro published a study in 1994 on the immunologic effects of inorganic mercury (the same kind found in dental amalgam) in workers exposed to mercury. 1 At least a half-dozen similar studies on both animals and humans were eliminated by this date-limitation method.

Similarly, a significant number of studies were excluded that concerned the effects of mercury on the brain. This was not only done by using an exclusionary dating limit, but also by severely restricting the types of studies that would be accepted. Out of some 961 studies found within these dates, more than two-thirds were excluded.

Dr. Boyd Halley’s studies were excluded, even though he has conducted some of the most important research on the biochemical effects of inorganic mercury, specifically from dental amalgams. His results have never been refuted.

In addition, Dr. Halley has proven, beyond any challenge, that mercury vapor is released from dental amalgam fillings in large concentrations, even in fillings more than 20 years old. Also, he has proven that mercury -- even in very low- concentrations -- can produce the very same pathological change seen in Alzheimer’s disease (neurofibrillary tangles). 2

It is interesting the “expert panel” excluded studies on organic mercury, citing the difference in toxicokinetics as the reason. They point out that they failed to find quantifiable amounts of inorganic mercury being converted to methylmercury in the body, which is strange since Charleston and Body reported the conversion of methylmercury to inorganic mercury within the brain’s microglial cells. 3 This study was reported in the 1996 issue of Neurotoxicology, an issue that should have been included in the study’s time frame.

What this means: Inorganic mercury can produce the very same damage in brain cells as methylmercury, which totally refutes their assertion. Likewise, other studies have shown (in 1995) that a portion of the inorganic mercury in dental amalgam is converted into methylmercury in the tissues of the mouth.

Another tactic was to exclude all studies in which mercury body burdens were measured by means other than urine mercury levels, This excluded all studies using saliva, hair and nail clippings, all of which have shown to be reliable. By doing so, they were able to exclude a major smoking gun. That is, research showing a baby’s hair mercury level correlated with the number of dental amalgam fillings in the mother.

Imply Unsupported “Facts”

Throughout this report, the authors imply that only chewing nicotine gum significantly increases mercury vapor release in the mouth. The purpose of this is to remove any concerns by those who chew ordinary gum. In fact, a number of studies have shown blood levels and oral levels of mercury are substantially increased by chewing ordinary gum and even a piece of rubber tubing. Hot liquids or foods also have been proven to substantially raise oral mercury vapor levels as well as blood levels.

Another example is their insistence that there are insufficient studies to indicate a correlation between mercury exposure from dental amalgams and human disease, especially autoimmunity. While recognizing allergic hypersensitivity in some individuals, they insist it is rare. A recent study completed just after their literature 2003 cut-off period, states patients with certain autoimmune diseases such as lupus, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune thyroiditis and allergic disease “often show increased lymphocyte stimulation by low doses of inorganic mercury in vitro.” 4

In their study, they removed amalgams from a group of 35 patients with autoimmune diseases and replaced them with composites. When examined six months later, 71 percent had shown an improvement in health, with the greatest improvement in those with multiple sclerosis. Their conclusion: “Mercury- containing amalgam may be an important risk factor for patients with autoimmune diseases.”

A similarly glaring manipulation of reality occurred when the writers of the Executive Summary stated the following:

In total, these studies failed to support the hypothesis that Hg0 (mercury vapor) exposure, at the levels released by dental amalgam interferes with human neuropsychological function or acts as an etiological factor for the neurodegenerative diseases-Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease.

This is a total lie based on cleverly worded distortions of study conclusions and the elimination of studies that really show a strong correlation.

In fact, a 1998 study by the prestigious Battelle Centers for Public Health Research found that mercury levels commonly seen among dental professionals with very low levels of mercury vapor exposure, demonstrated alterations in mood, motor function and cognition (thinking). 5 These, they emphasized, were symptoms that can be subtle and missed by conventional neuropsychological testing. These results have been confirmed by a number of other independent laboratories and reported in peer-reviewed journals.

As for the scientific connection to neurodegenerative disorders, a number of such studies abound in the literature. One of the most impressive lines of evidence is one pursued by Pendergrass and Haley in a 1997 study published in the journal Neurotoxicology.

In their study, they showed concentrations of mercury vapor, known to be released by dental amalgams in people, increased mercury concentrations in rat brains from 11- to 47-fold higher than controls. At this level, the mercury produced the identical lesions seen in Alzheimer’s disease (neurofibrillary tangles) by interfering with normal tubulin maintenance.

A second mechanism of producing neurodegenerative diseases is even more impressive, called excitotoxicity. Excitotoxicity, a mechanism by which excess glutamate accumulates outside the neuron, thereby leading to death of the cell by an excitation process, has been linked to mercury neurotoxicity as early as 1993. 6 More recent studies have confirmed this mechanism and clearly demonstrate, even in concentrations below that known to cause cell injury, mercury can paralyze the glutamate removal mechanism, leading to significant damage to synapses, dendrites and neurons themselves.

This glutamate removal mechanism is critical to brain protection. Additionally, mercury in very low concentrations increases glutamate release, primarily by stimulating the brain’s immune cell, the microglia. Chronic microglial activation, as seen with mercury exposure, has been solidly linked to all of the neurodegenerative diseases.

At least two studies have shown that mercury increases the toxicity of glutamate. 7,8 Interestingly, excess glutamate can also produce the same neurofibrillary tangles seen with mercury exposure.

In essence, we have the mechanism by which these diseases are produced by mercury vapor and know that it can occur in concentrations commonly found in people having dental amalgam fillings. The reason even more people are not devastated by these diseases: A number of nutritional and genetic factors offer substantial protection. For example, selenium has been shown to significantly lower brain mercury levels and reduce its toxicity.

intotheabyss  posted on  2007-02-20   11:48:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 35.

        There are no replies to Comment # 35.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 35.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]