See other Pious Perverts Articles
Title: BeAChooser Bozo Count at 40 Plus and Counting - A Possible Site Record
Source:
Minerva
URL Source: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=45820&Disp=409#C409
Published: Feb 19, 2007
Author: Minerva
Post Date: 2007-02-19 21:59:28 by Minerva
Keywords: None
Views: 27739
Comments: 375
Last night I took a guess at Beachy's bozo count. Today he spilled the beans and indicated that the number I guessed, between 40 and 50, was substantially correct. What does this mean? Well .... it means he is a piss poor excuse for excuse for an advocate. Nobody takes him serious. This is probably why Goldi booted him.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-257) not displayed.
.
.
.
#258. To: scrapper2, AGAviator, ALL (#249)
Has Roberts said or written anything, anywhere to contradict anything he is quoted saying in that rather long interview? No??? Who do you think Roberts meant by "colleagues"? Surely you aren't suggesting that it is Roberts "colleagues" at John Hopkins who "hate" Americans? ROTFLOL! You don't think doctors can be liberals with a cause? ROTFLOL! I imagine a police officer would have obeyed the rules and reported half a million deaths if they'd occurred. Why I imagine even a lowly Iraqi vender or cab driver would have had enough sense to do that. You really believe this? My, you are gullible. I suppose you also don't think Helen Thomas' liberalism (or that of the majority of those in the media) affects their work? ROTFLOL! Then you just proved that these John Hopkins' studies weren't "scientific". I've said no such thing. Nor have I implied it. What I've said is that John Hopkins' claims are clearly bogus and that you won't find the truth or build a better world on a foundation of misinformation (or lies).
Yes, there are. Since the ONLY effort to find death certificates only came up with about 50,000 and the John Hopkins' results require that some 600,000 have been issued if those results are to be viewed as representative of the population. You can't even explain a fraction of them with Anbar ... yet Anbar is clearly the most violent area of the country and the one that LATimes said was particularly undercounted. I'm confident that any rational person reading this thread will see that Anbar, contrary to what your side would like everyone to believe, has not lost half of its population. Otherwise someone would have noticed by now. And I'll point out once more that in that first year less than 100,000 of the claimed 655,000 died (and that's according to John Hopkins). So you can't use this to explain the absence of death certificates. No matter what excuse you come up with, you are still short hundreds and hundreds of thousands. Too bad that even CBS (whom I'm sure we all know is just dying to show how bloody Kurdistan is) doesn't agree with you. Sorry, but deaths in two cities in (and actually, just specific neighborhoods of two cities) is not going to make up your shortfall of death certificates. And as was pointed out, the John Hopkins researchers appear to have made a methodological error by having too few clusters in Kurdistan to properly represent the actual death rate of that and many other regions of the country. As was pointed out, John Hopkins approach would tend to seriously OVERestimate the death rates in many regions of Iraq. ROTFLOL! You didn't even understand what was being talked about. They were talking about the John Hopkins' study oversampling ... not the LATimes or Health Ministry. Now do you "get it"? You will never find the truth or build a better world if you insist on promoting a lie or misinformation. You can repeat that mantra till you are blue in the face. I'm betting that lurkers and visitors to this thread will now see through it. Prove it. You haven't offered ANYTHING to prove this other than a claim by Les Roberts. Want to bet? The second John Hopkins report states quite clearly that it estimates that 120,000 died in the timeframe in which the first report said 98,000 died ... the first 18 months after the invasion. Didn't you read the report or do we have ANOTHER example of you claiming you did but clearly not having done so? That's not what IraqBodyCount says and they've studied the reporting of deaths in the news media ratherly extensively. Dahr Jamail. Now there's a reliable source. ROTFLOL! Is that or is that not your claim? For some reason I don't that's the reason, AGAviator. But they do hate Americans, right? It was those Iraqi doctors Les was talking about when he mentioned "colleagues" "hating" Americans. Right? Tell us, do ALL doctors in Iraq hate Americans? Do even most?
I see that claim comes from this nice unbiased source: http://english.aljazeera.net/English/archive/archive?ArchiveId=5525 But let's dig a little deeper ... something you obviously didn't do. ************ http://www.iraqbodycount.org/editorial/defended/3.4.php "3.4.3. "Iraqi Kaffi/People's Kifah": no such study as described The mis-spelled "Iraqi Kaffi" study in the HPN table refers to a report of 37,000 Iraqi civilian deaths from the "People's Kifah", a political group in Iraq, and is correctly cited as such in MIT 05. The table describes the study as covering the period from March to October 2003. This is indeed how it was reported on July 31, 2004 by the English language edition of Aljazeera: An Iraqi political group says more than 37,000 Iraqi civilians were killed between the start of the US-led invasion in March 2003 and October 2003. The People's Kifah, or Struggle Against Hegemony, movement said in a statement that it carried out a detailed survey of Iraqi civilian fatalities during September and October 2003. The report then lists in detail the deaths recorded in various towns, eg., 6103 in Baghdad, 2009 in Mosul, and so on. However, on August 21, 2003 the very same detailed town-by-town figures, as well as a total of 37,000 civilians killed, originating from the same political party and spokesperson, were published on the website of Jude Wanniski, a retired Wall Street Journal reporter. Wanniski reproduced in full an emailed communiqué from the party spokesperson which stated: If we give preference to the unedited words of the spokesperson, then this survey covered the period from 20 March to mid-June 2003, not to October 2003. In any case, it is impossible for data published in August 2003 to have been collected in September and October 2003. It is clear that neither Roberts nor the champions of his analysis are aware of the provenance of this report, which — if correctly cited — provides a rate of 422 (civilians-only) killed per day, not 152 as given in the HPN table. It is surprising that this survey should have been given such cursory treatment before being added to the table, particularly considering that it provides the table's highest entry. Even if this date discrepancy is overlooked, full details of the survey's methodology (including reliability of data-gathering methods, checks for double and triple-counting etc.) have never been described. It is therefore not possible to give this survey the same weight as studies whose methodologies are clear and auditable. ************** You folks have been fooled AGAIN. ROTFLOL!
BeASpammer is trying to be the last one standing on the thread...
"it is impossible for data published in August 2003 to have been collected in September and October 2003." ROTFLOL!
Link The World, and particularly the peace-loving World is far from knowing the truth of the real number of civilian casualties during the American led aggression on Iraq. Although we know that there were groups of organizations (see http://www.iraqbodycount.net) who tried their utmost best to come up with an accurate figure of the total civilian death, but reaching the sites where these deaths occurred was one major obstacle in their effort. Besides, the language barrier and hesitation of the people in Iraq to talk to foreigners were also part of the lack of accurate information regarding this issue. As the general coordinator of the Iraqi Freedom Party, I made a request to our Party Headquarters in Iraq to fully investigate this matter and to come up with accurate and up to date information of the total civilians killed during the invasion of Iraq. After more than five weeks of intensive and thorough investigations carried out by hundreds of our party’s cadre, which included all villages, towns, cities and some of the desert areas etc. affected by the aggression (with exception of the Kurdish area), and also by interviewing hundreds of undertakers, hospitals officials and ordinary people in these places, the figure of civilians killed since the beginning of the invasion came to 37,137. This figure does not include militia, para-military or Saddam’s Fiday’een. The breakdown of the total number of civilians killed during the invasion of Iraq is as follows (Please note that the names underneath represent that of 14 Governorates, excluding Iraqi Kurdistan): Due to the absence in Iraq (with the exception of the Kurdish area) of functional communication systems with the outside World, our party headquarter in Baghdad tried to send me a fully comprehensive and detailed report by fax from Al-Sulaymaniyah (a Kurdish area). However, by crossing to the Kurdish area, the Kurdish “Peshmarga” searched the person carrying that report which was found with him and confiscated. According, he was handed over to the American troops where he was arrested and no one knows yet of his whereabouts. This incident clearly indicates that the US Army does not want the truth of the civilian casualties made public. They're some "success story" all right.
Spammer, you have had your a$$ handed to you on this thread repeatedly. I know you're a troll, and like a troll you think that as long as you can still post on the thread, you haven't had your a$$ kicked. But the fact is, all you have are your bogus numbers which ignore the fact that thousands of Iraqi doctors can issue death certificates, ignore the fact that for a year the only numbers the ministry of health reported were from one sixth of Iraq's population, and ignore the fact that 80% of the survey and not 92% of the survey stated they had death certificates. Once your obfuscation on that issue is dismissed, all you're left with is "Nobody is being killed in Iraq because the media hates Bush. Nobody is being killed in Iraq because the media hates America." But you've never have answered the question of why the Iraqis would hate America in the first place, if America liberated them and is giving them democracy. There are only 2 reasons you continue to blather on this thread.
It is impossible for something to begin in March, take 5 weeks, and end in August, or September, or October. ROTFLOL! And flock you, troll.
The Kurds sold themselves out to the neozios. With their lies about Saddam having a working relationship with AQ, the Kurds have blood on their hands - they are war criminals like the neozios - the Kurds were a significant piece of Dubya's faux rationale for the Iraq invasion. The Kurds will eventually be betrayed by the neozios - like Uncle Saddam himself was - there can only be one Precious to which DC is loyal above all else. The Kurds should have stayed with their loyalty to Iran - Israelis look down on the Kurds because they are not Jews - the Kurds are most ethnically similar to the Iranians. That was a more natural match for alliances. It's too late now - the Kurds are screwed and rightfully so. They have Iraqis' blood on their hands. When the Hewey evac helicopters are poised on the roof tops of the Green Zone, there will be no seats available for the Kurds. The neozios would never want to burn bridges with the Turks when all is said and done.
And then we'll have some of the more fortunate ones trying to eke out a living in this country as refugees.
ROTFLOL! Did you notice the date on what you just posted, AGAviator? August 21, 2003, just as IraqBodyCount indicated in the URL I posted and linked in post #260. Now do you see the problem with that date? It's BEFORE the date your first source and al-Jazerra claimed the study was conducted. Shall I repeat what you first posted? The People's Kifah, or Struggle Against Hegemony, movement said in a statement that it carried out a detailed survey of Iraqi civilian fatalities during September and October 2003. Now tell us, how can one report the results of a study in August that you don't carry out till September and October? Look at a calendar. ROTFLOL! By the way, the number of dead in each place you listed is IDENTICAL in the Al Jazeera source from which all this came. And it says "Al-Ubaidi, a UK-based physiology professor, provided a detailed breakdown of the 37,000 civilian deaths for each governorate (excluding the Kurdish areas) relating to the period between March and October 2003". Again, how can those numbers relate to a period October 2003 when they were already published in August 2003? You just don't know when to quit, do you. By the way, I don't really have a big problem with that number anyway? It's only about 50-75 percent higher than IraqBodyCounts estimate over the same period. The bottom line is that it has to have been included in John Hopkins 100,000 estimate so it doesn't begin to explain the missing 500,000 death certificates. Oh, by the way, be sure to tell folks a little about Jude Wanniski. For one, he denies Saddam committed genocide against the Kurds. What irony ...
How many Iraqi civilians would you "authorize" to be killed, BAC - got a number, asshole? They stand as American War Crimes, whether you like reality, or not; whatever the number.
Ignore the fact that you've offered no proof of that. A quote by ONE Iraqi doctor to that effect. ONE Iraqi doctor saying he did what you claim they all did. And if you don't claim that 5000 did it, then the number that each did that has to increase proportionally. But we're still waiting to hear the FIRST Iraqi doctors' name. And you clearly don't have one or a quote by him/her. Ignore the fact that even if that is true, it doesn't explain the missing 500,000 death certificates. The missing bodies. The missing graves. The missing news reports. The missing eyewitnesses. The lack of depopulation in the areas where this violence had to have mostly occurred. Ignore all that ... Ignore the fact you don't understand statistics. They reportedly asked 87 percent of the households where a death was claimed to provide a death certificate and 92 percent of that 87 percent was supposedly able to do so. But there shouldn't be anything special about the other 13 percent, if the surveyers simply forgot (as they claimed) to ask them for the proof. Statistically, one would expect such a random group to also have been able to supply a death certificate about 92 percent of the time. Hence, it is accurate to say that the John Hopkins study suggests that 92 percent of those claiming dead should have a death certificate ... if their study is valid. Which means that about 500,000 death certificates are missing. Of course I've never said or implied any such thing which makes your use of quotes all the more inappropriate and suggestive of desperation on your part.
Hey, BAC, answer the question, Fuck-Head!
You appear to be suggesting that if we abandon Iraq (as you hope), there will be a bloodbath. How many do you expect will die in that bloodbath? Say just among the Kurds. Just curious whether your estimates are as good as say ... John Kerry's estimates were about what would happen in Vietnam after we left.
How many Iraqi civilians would you "authorize" to be killed, BAC - got a number, asshole? They stand as American War Crimes, whether you like reality, or not; whatever the number. Hey, BAC, answer the question, Fuck-Head!
Let's take a look at him ... http://www.counterpunch.org/saud07122005.html "First of all the resistance, which represents the will of the majority of Iraqis is certain that the election was a violation of international law." If you read that you'll see he's a real friend of the "resistance" (you know, the folks using bombs to kill thousands of innocent Iraqis). He spouts all their slogans. Not exactly an unbiased party if you ask me. ROTFLOL! And remember when he delighted in telling Wanniski that they were going to drop the genocide charge against Saddam? http://www.orbstandard.com/News/wanniskisaddamlawyers.html Too bad that turned out false... But no wonder he and Wanniski were so friendly. Al-Obaidi denies the Kurds were murdered by Saddam, too: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=AL-20041220&articleId=330 ROTFLOL!
BeAChooser: You appear to be suggesting that if we abandon Iraq (as you hope), there will be a bloodbath. How many do you expect will die in that bloodbath? Say just among the Kurds. Just curious whether your estimates are as good as say ... John Kerry's estimates were about what would happen in Vietnam after we left. I believe that we will abandon Iraq. We are foreign occupiers. We should not be there. That culture is hundreds of years older than America - they don't need "tips" from us on how to run a country or how to be businesslike with the sale of their natural resources. We should not have invaded another sovereign nation that was no threat to us. The Iraqi nationals - ie. the insurgents - or as you and other reichwingers like to call them, the enemy - will grow in number. They want us out as well they should. They want their nation back. If we don't go gracefully, they'll drive us out with a million razor cuts. I want our nation to normalize diplomatic relations with Iraq eventually. I believe a Shiite dominated Iraq along with its sister, a Shiite dominated Iran, could be valuable allies to America in a sea of hostile Sunni Muslims, who are the vast majority of Muslims in the ME as well as the world. That cannot will not happen while we occupy and cause violence ourselves or act as magnets to violence caused by others. As for the Kurds, they would be wise to ally themselves again with Iran as they did during the Iran-Iraq War. They are more closely related ethnically to the Iranians anyways. I can't say I adore the Kurds - they helped build the lie that Uncle Saddam was a consort with AQ, which he wasn't - and please spare me the BAC spam reply with articles from the Weekly Standard etc - but I don't wish them harm - I just think they are disposable allies - the only ally DC would not purposely betray is Precious aka Israel - so the Kurds one way or the other are 2nd class allies to DC - and if the going gets rough which it will, DC would throw them under the bus, no problem. That's why if I were a Kurdish leader, I'd be re-building those ties with Shiite Iran pronto. As for Israel, it can certainly defend itself - we've paid Israelis a handsome sum over the years to buy and design every high tech weapon known to modern mankind. Israel looks out for itself. That's what we must do as well so we should diversify our allies in the ME - I think it should be Shiites - I think we should stop interfering and being bullyboy in the ME. We should buy oil at the market price and be done with all the other game playing. We should not be sending our troops to fight wars for the benefit of Israel, the oil industry, or the defense industry. If the afore-mentioned want to "control" affairs in the ME, they can pay for mercenaries, and not have the US spend American blood and treasure to give them a positive outcome for their self-serving goals. Btw, fyi I voted for GWB in 2000 because he promised he would never abuse our troops for nation building projects in foreign lands. I thought he was a conservative - what a joke on me. I believe we should give isolationaism a chance and devote our attention to the problems that exist stateside. I don't mind paying $5 per gallon for gas if it means our troops aren't sent to foreign lands to act like uncivilized Huns.
The crisis now is in admitting that the USA destroyed a country and replaced a built up nation with flattened towns and a bloody civil war. Somehow it seems more honorable to kill more for less. 3,000 plus GIs have already died for halliburton profits; will another six thousand somehow rescue those lives? It's time to bite the proverbial bullet & cut our losses. This isn't about protecting an investment, it's a matter of minimizing the obvious disaster.
So how many Iraqis (Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds, whatever) do you expect will die in the bloodbath that follows our departure?
I have no idea. Probably much less than if we parked our butts there for the next 10 years. Do you care either way? It doesn't strike me that you care how many Muslims or Americans die or are injured as long as it not Israelis. We should not have invaded Iraq. It follows that we should not continue to be there.
I have no idea. Probably much less than if we parked our butts there for the next 10 years. Do you care either way? It doesn't strike me that you care how many Muslims or Americans die or are injured as long as it not Israelis. We should not have invaded Iraq. It follows that we should not continue to be there. You for got to end your post with "LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOL! so everyone knows how self confident you are!
Hey airhead. I don't give two $hits about what Iraq Body Count posted in their URL, because Iraq Body Count didn't make the original statement and are repeating second- hand information. You can't impeach the source, so instead you go to Iraq Body Count said that Al Jazeera said that Jude Wanniski said that The People's Kiffa said. Typical of your intellectual dishonesty. So flock you, troll. You mean the date that's being given by somebody that is not a party to the original statement? You have any problem quoting from sources directly, Bozo bait, instead of from third-hand comments about the sources? Irony for you, numbnuts. By your bizarre mental process, if you don't have half a million death certificates of Kurds killed by Saddam, he couldn't have possibly committed genocide against them! ROTLOL! ROTLOL! ROTLOL! ROTLOL! ROTLOL! Where are the missing death certificates? Half a million of them! ROTFLOL! Up yours, twerp.
Do you know how many morgues the LA Times included in its total of your 50,000 death certificates you illiterate ass-wipe? Exactly one The Health Ministry gathers numbers from hospitals in the capital and the outlying provinces. If a victim of violence dies at a hospital or arrives dead,medical officials issue a death certificate.... If the morgue receives a body — usually those deemed suspicious deaths — officials there issue the death certificate. (2) The Health Ministry said it had documented 18,933 deaths from "military clashes" and "terrorist attacks" from April 5, 2004, to June 1, 2006. (3) Together, the toll reaches 49,137" A single morgue - Baghdad - produced over 30,000 violent deaths, in three years - all by itself. And Baghdad is only 1/6 of Iraq's population and not even the most violent area of that country. And then that Health Ministry stated to the LA Times that its numbers from hospitals were far below the actual totals. So tell me about the *statistics* of
Bears repeating. You do have a way with words. I may want to borrow it for my sig line.
ROTLOL! ROTLOL! ROTLOL! ROTLOL! ROTLOL! Where are the missing death certificates? Half a million of them! ROTFLOL! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! And, BeAFluffer, now that AGAviator has nailed your ass to the outhouse door I think I'll just walk away with my nose in the air, and ROTFLMAO!
excellent post
Victory means exit strategy, and it’s important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is. ~George W. Bush Hi Dawgie, where's Askel?
She doesn't post here, and last I saw her she was still over at ewe gno ware.
I've decided BAC is into S&M......cause he sure likes having his ass whupped hither and yon! LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
ROTFLMAO!
BAC, that's a great picture in 283; it's better than the other one because you're smiling in 283. LOL Don't worry about these naysayers BAC. I'm still your fan. I read every word you write. and I believe everything you say too. You are a genius.
Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
You sure? Because I quoted one of the authors of the LATimes story, Borzou Daragahi saying "We went to morgues, cemeteries, hospitals, health officials, and we gathered as many statistics as we could on the actual dead bodies, and the number we came up with around June was about at least 50,000." MorgueS. With an S.
Here's what bears repeating: *********** http://www.iraqbodycount.org/press/pr14.php Iraq Body Count Press Release 16 October 2006 Reality checks: some responses to the latest Lancet estimates Hamit Dardagan, John Sloboda, and Josh Dougherty Summary A new study has been released by the Lancet medical journal estimating over 650,000 excess deaths in Iraq. The Iraqi mortality estimates published in the Lancet in October 2006 imply, among other things, that: 1. On average, a thousand Iraqis have been violently killed every single day in the first half of 2006, with less than a tenth of them being noticed by any public surveillance mechanisms; 2. Some 800,000 or more Iraqis suffered blast wounds and other serious conflict-related injuries in the past two years, but less than a tenth of them received any kind of hospital treatment; 3. Over 7% of the entire adult male population of Iraq has already been killed in violence, with no less than 10% in the worst affected areas covering most of central Iraq; 4. Half a million death certificates were received by families which were never officially recorded as having been issued; 5. The Coalition has killed far more Iraqis in the last year than in earlier years containing the initial massive "Shock and Awe" invasion and the major assaults on Falluja. And this: If these assertions are true, they further imply: * incompetence and/or fraud on a truly massive scale by Iraqi officials in hospitals and ministries, on a local, regional and national level, perfectly coordinated from the moment the occupation began; * bizarre and self-destructive behaviour on the part of all but a small minority of 800,000 injured, mostly non-combatant, Iraqis; * the utter failure of local or external agencies to notice and respond to a decimation of the adult male population in key urban areas; * an abject failure of the media, Iraqi as well as international, to observe that Coalition-caused events of the scale they reported during the three-week invasion in 2003 have been occurring every month for over a year. In the light of such extreme and improbable implications, a rational alternative conclusion to be considered is that the authors have drawn conclusions from unrepresentative data. In addition, totals of the magnitude generated by this study are unnecessary to brand the invasion and occupation of Iraq a human and strategic tragedy. ************** Good reasons why the John Hopkins studies are BOGUS.
perfect.
Christine, I hope you realize that this level of response is exactly what I expected when I began posting here at FD4UM. And you may not realize this, but it doesn't paint a very pretty picture to folks who might *stumble* upon this site. And by the way, did you see the quote I offered from one of the authors of the LATimes article stating that they visited morgueS, with an S? Wonder what AGAviator will say to that?
maybe if you'd give us some more pictures of yourself besides the 2 you already gave us, then we could put them up and attract some new people.
Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Fuck you, BAC! Christine is light-years ahead of your "Goldi," why insult her with "Goldi" appeals? Go away. No other person has ever incited such appropriate vitriol with their presence, as you have. Take a hint, asshole!
Take a hint, asshole Hear Hear! All together now brothers and sisters! "Buh Bye BeAFluffer!"
I remember whole threads devoted to the topic of my not daring to come over here and debate FD4UMers. So here I am. And as any reader of this forum can see, I've been very courteous. No labels, no name calling. Just sourced facts and logic that don't seem to jibe with what FD4UMers have been posting. Now FD4UMers could challenge those facts and logic with credible sourced articles and logic of their own. But for the most part they haven't done that. Instead, the general response has been to use the bozo filter in large numbers and call for my banning. Along with throwing out mountains of adhominems. And now they've begun begging me to leave.
Comments (298 - 375) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest This is a quote by Les Roberts in UK's Socialist Worker newspaper:
"Most of them [workers from non-governmental organizations, my colleagues and my driver] hate the Americans, most want the coalition troops gone."
How do we know quotation in the "Socialist Worker" paper is accurate?
I don't see anything that specifically names the 8 medical doctors who particpated in the data collection.
Because you are not a medical professional - you don't have a clue about the higher values and truths that all MD's pledge themselves to uphold and abide by ie. a commitment to integrity, mercy, justice, sensitivity and trust.
That's why you'd put Iraqi medical doctors on the same level as an Iraqi vendor or cab driver or police officer.
Btw, was that inherent animosity of Iraqis to Americans documented in the research study? If it wasn't then it did not influence the study's methodology
scientific studies document known biases or negatives that might have an influence on outcomes.
and if as you say the numbers of deaths are insignificent
#259. To: AGAviator, scrapper2, ALL (#250)
There are not 500,000 missing death certificates
And no one said anything about Anbar needing to explain all the excess deaths.
The LA Times itself said that for a year after the invasion, the only deaths the Health Ministry counted were inside Baghdad.
This only proves your DESPERATION. Kurdistan is the clear success story in Iraq. It is not by any stretch of the imagination as violent as you (and Les Roberts) would have to have people believe to even begin to explain the missing death certificates.
In your dreams.
Kurdistan includes the cities of Kirkuk and Mosul.
First, the most violent governorates are relatively oversampled.
The LA Times specifically said the Health Ministry's count did not include the most violent governates.
So your source "guesses" that ~only~ 300,000 have died unnecessarily, and you consider this a victory...
But deaths the first year will NOT explain the missing 500,000 death certificates
There are no missing death certificates, so there is no need to explain them.
The fact is, Iraqi doctors also can give out death certificates.
Because John Hopkins' study only claims that about 100,000 (of the 655,000) died in the first 18 months after the invasion.
That's a lie.
And as has been pointed out to you repeatedly, most deaths don't make it into the news media,
Dahr Jamail's Mideast Dispatches
So that leaves 5000 doctors who on average have to issue 100 death certificates each and not report them (to explain 500,000 missing death certificates). That your claim?
"Well why don't you find ONE of them to come forward and support your assertion. That shouldn't seem to difficult a request. There are 5000 of them to draw from."
Because I don't prove things to trolls
He didn't hire them because they "hated Americans."
#260. To: scrapper2, AGAviator, christine, lodwick, ALL (#256)
Another group, the People's Kifah, organized hundreds of Iraqi academics and volunteers who conducted a survey in coordination "with grave-diggers across Iraq," and who also "obtained information from hospitals and spoke to thousands of witnesses who saw incidents in which Iraqi civilians were killed by U.S. fire." The project was abandoned when one of their researchers was captured by Kurdish militiamen, handed over to US forces and never seen again. Nevertheless, after less than two months' work, the group documented a minimum of 37,000 violent civilian deaths prior to October 2003.
The above figures were the actual civilian deaths killed violently since the beginning of the invasion of Iraq in March this year and until the middle of June (including those killed after the fall of Saddam's regime and who in a way of another caught between gunfire of the US troops and the Iraqi resistance).
#261. To: scrapper2 (#256)
#262. To: AGAviator, ALL (#261)
#263. To: scrapper2 (#256)
To: Mr. Jude Wanniski From: Dr. Mohammed Al-Obaidi General coordinator of the Iraqi Freedom Party
Note how BeASpammer's Kurdish darlings both refuse to give casualty figures to independent media, and also arrest and turn over people trying to get these numbers to the US Army, who "disappears" them. Baghdad 6103
The above figures were the actual civilian deaths killed violently since the beginning of the invasion of Iraq in March this year and until the middle of June (including those killed after the fall of Saddam’s regime and who in a way of another caught between gunfire of the US troops and the Iraqi resistance).
Mosul 2009
Basrah 6734
Nasiriyah 3581
Diwaniyah 1567
Kut 2494
Hillah 3552
Karbala (including Najaf) 2263
Samawah 659
Amarah 2741
Ramadi 2172
Kerkuk 861
Diyalah 604
Tikrit 1797
#264. To: BeASpammer (#259)
(Edited)
(1) You have no conscience, and
Flock you, troll.
(2) You have no shame.
#265. To: (#262)
(Edited)
#266. To: AGAviator (#263)
(Edited)
Note how BeASpammer's Kurdish darlings both refuse to give casualty figures to independent media, and also arrest and turn over people trying to get these numbers to the US Army, who "disappears" them. They're some "success story" all right.
#267. To: scrapper2 (#266)
The Kurds will eventually be betrayed by the neozios - like Uncle Saddam himself was - there can only be one Precious to which DC is loyal above all else.
#268. To: AGAviator, scrapper2, ALL (#263)
To: Mr. Jude Wanniski From: Dr. Mohammed Al-Obaidi General coordinator of the Iraqi Freedom Party
#269. To: beachooser, Critter, Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#268)
#270. To: AGAviator, scrapper2, ALL (#264)
the fact that thousands of Iraqi doctors can issue death certificates,
ignore the fact that for a year the only numbers the ministry of health reported were from one sixth of Iraq's population,
and ignore the fact that 80% of the survey and not 92% of the survey stated they had death certificates.
all you're left with is "Nobody is being killed in Iraq because the media hates Bush. Nobody is being killed in Iraq because the media hates America."
#271. To: beachooser, Critter, Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#270)
How many Iraqi civilians would you "authorize" to be killed, BAC - got a number, asshole? They stand as American War Crimes, whether you like reality, or not; whatever the number.
#272. To: scrapper2, ALL (#266)
When the Hewey evac helicopters are poised on the roof tops of the Green Zone, there will be no seats available for the Kurds.
#273. To: beachooser (#272)
#274. To: AGAviator, scrapper2, ALL (#263)
Mohammed Al-Obaidi
#275. To: BeAChooser, AGAviator, christine, SKYDRIFTER (#272)
(Edited)
scrapper: When the Hewey evac helicopters are poised on the roof tops of the Green Zone, there will be no seats available for the Kurds.
#276. To: scrapper2, Critter, Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#275)
#277. To: scrapper2, ALL (#275)
#278. To: BeAChooser (#277)
So how many Iraqis (Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds, whatever) do you expect will die in the bloodbath that follows our departure?
#279. To: scrapper2 (#278)
So how many Iraqis (Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds, whatever) do you expect will die in the bloodbath that follows our departure?
#280. To: BeABozo, scrapper2 (#268)
(Edited)
ROTFLOL! Did you notice the date on what you just posted, AGAviator? August 21, 2003,just as IraqBodyCount indicated in the URL I posted and linked in post #260.
Now do you see the problem with that date? It's BEFORE the date your first source and al-Jazerra claimed the study was conducted.
Oh, by the way, be sure to tell folks a little about Jude Wanniski.
For one, he denies Saddam committed genocide against the Kurds. What irony ...
#281. To: BeABozo, scrapper2, skydrifter (#270)
(Edited)
Ignore the fact you don't understand statistics. They reportedly asked 87 percent of the households where a death was claimed to provide a death certificate and 92 percent of that 87 percent was supposedly blah blah blah
"The Times attempted to reach a comprehensive figure by obtaining statistics from the Baghdad morgue and the Health Ministry and checking those numbers against a sampling of local health departments for possible undercounts.
. The 50,000 death certificates you keep blathering about consist of data from only two sources(1) The Baghdad morgue received 30,204 bodies from 2003 through mid-2006, while
(1) The Baghdad morgue by itself from 2003 through mid- 2006, and
(2) The Health Ministry looking at its available records between 2004 and 2006 for hospitals around the country, while omitting the entire year from March 20 2003 through April 4, 2004 as well as the regions the Times specifically cited as being omitted.(1) Counting only one morgue in an entire country,
You pathetic turd.
(2) Omitting the entire country's hospitals for more than an entire year,
(3) Omitting the most violent provinces for all years,
(4) Omitting 3 Kurdish provinces whose officials refuse to give out any numbers, and
(5) "Grossly under counting" those numbers they finally did come up with.
#282. To: scrapper2 (#202)
And just because she exercises this type of tolerance for the absurd ( ie. you), it doesn't mean she has to smell your droppings up close.
#283. To: AGAviator, BeAFluffer, christine, Zipporah, Rowdee, Robin, Minerva, Diana, kiki (#280)
By your bizarre mental process, if you don't have half a million death certificates of Kurds killed by Saddam, he couldn't have possibly committed genocide against them!
#284. To: AGAviator (#281)
(About the quote: Speaking on the war in Kosovo.)
#285. To: HOUNDDAWG (#283)
#286. To: AGAviator (#285)
#287. To: HOUNDDAWG (#283)
#288. To: rowdee (#287)
#289. To: HOUNDDAWG, BeAChooser (#283)
#290. To: AGAviator, ALL (#281)
Do you know how many morgues the LA Times included in its total of your 50,000 death certificates you illiterate ass-wipe?
Exactly one
#291. To: AGAviator, ALL (#282)
#292. To: AGAviator, scrapper2, HOUNDDAWG, rowdee, Red Jones (#281)
You pathetic turd.
#293. To: christine, AGAviator, ALL (#292)
You pathetic turd.
perfect.
#294. To: BeAChooser (#293)
#295. To: beachooser, Critter, Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#293)
Christine, I hope you realize that this level of response is exactly what I expected when I began posting here at FD4UM. And you may not realize this, but it doesn't paint a very pretty picture to folks who might *stumble* upon this site.
#296. To: SKYDRIFTER, All (#295)
Go away. No other person has ever incited such appropriate vitriol with their presence, as you have.
#297. To: HOUNDDAWG, SKYDRIFTER, ALL (#296)
Go away. No other person has ever incited such appropriate vitriol with their presence, as you have.
Take a hint, asshole
Hear Hear!
.
.
.