[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything. How Romans Built Domes My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today. They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029] Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean The Siege (1998) Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger Skateboarding Dog Israel's Plans for Jordan Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging: Hepatitis E Virus in Pork Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7, 2023 100m Americans live in areas with cancer-causing 'forever chemicals' in their water Scientists discover cancer-fighting bacteria that "soak up" forever chemicals in the body Israel limits entry of baby formula in Gaza as infants die of hunger 17 Ways mRNA Shots May CAUSE CANCER, According to Over 100 STUDIES Report: Pentagon Halts Some Munitions Shipments To Ukraine Over Concerns That US Stockpiles Are Too Low Locals Fear Demolitions as Israeli Troops Set Up New Base in Syrias Quneitra Russian forces discover cache of Ukrainian chemical drone munitions FSB Clarissa Ward: Gaza is what is turning people overseas against the US What Parents Wish Their Children Could Grow Up Without WHY SO MANY FOREIGN BASES IN AFRICA? Trump called Candace Owens about Brigitte Macron's P*NIS? New Mexico Is The Most-Dependent State On The Federal Govt, New Jersey The Least

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: NIST scientist on the hot seat (video)
Source: NIST scientist on the hot seat (video)
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 22, 2007
Author: NIST scientist on the hot seat (video)
Post Date: 2007-02-22 16:08:21 by RickyJ
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 391
Comments: 13

God has a way to make the guilty reveal themselves.

They are putty in God's hands. Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: All, BeAChooser, *9-11* (#0) (Edited)

This idiot admits that they just used the video as "proof" of their statement that the WTC towers collapse was the result of a progressive collapse after it started, which he says they "proved", but offers no proof.

"We did no calculation to show the progressive collapse, it is obvious from the video."

Yo, chooser you idiot, why don't tell your "expert" at NIST that there is a simple calculation to prove that the WTC towers were a progressive collapse. Your idiot expert doesn't seem to know about it. LOL!

He said they "proved" scientifically why the towers started to collapse. Yet from what I have heard not one scientist has proved how it started, they just guess. I guess this idiot thinks guesses from scientists amount to proof.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2007-02-22   16:38:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Why are you ignoring this Chooser? Your expert guessed at the reason the collapse started, and didn't bother to determine why it continued.

What kind of experts do you believe in? Sounds like pretty piss poor science if you ask me.

Critter  posted on  2007-02-22   17:14:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Here's my response to the Gross video (see post #12):

http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=45764&Disp=All&#C12

You are invited to respond to what I posted on that thread.

As to NIST not doing a calculation of the progressive collapse ...

Why is one necessary?

If the models they have show the impact and fires would drop the top section of building on the floor below (as observed), you won't find a competent structural engineer in the world saying the collapse would stop at that point. In fact, I don't think you can name a single one who claims that.

And if it doesn't, then the loads are even worse in the next floor that is impacted by the mass above it.

And while NIST may not have run progressive collapse models, that's not to say others haven't. Others have.

Try using your browser for a change ...

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-02-22   20:05:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And while NIST may not have run progressive collapse models, that's not to say others haven't. Others have.

Try using your browser for a change ...

You mean like the one you posted a link to, where they start off with a lie about fire temperatures? lmao!

Critter  posted on  2007-02-22   21:12:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You are invited to respond to what I posted on that thread.

"If you can't blind 'em with brilliance - baffle 'em with bullshit" we know your style, BAC!

What magnitude of distraction are you assigned to create??

SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-02-22   21:15:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

As to NIST not doing a calculation of the progressive collapse ...

Why is one necessary?

Not necessary? You are scientifically illiterate to say something like that. It's absolutely necessary, especially for the agency that was suppose to be investigating why the towers collapsed. UNFREAKINGBELIEVABLE!

Give it up Chooser, no one takes you seriously here.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2007-02-22   21:19:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Try using your browser for a change ...

You use that instead of thinking for yourself, don't you?

Well of course you do! Thinking for yourself would tax the neurons too much in your little head and give you a bad headache, wouldn't it? LOL!

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2007-02-22   21:24:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You mean like the one you posted a link to, where they start off with a lie about fire temperatures? lmao!

Chooser lies about anything that will make the government theory of 9/11 look correct. He lies consistently and constantly. I seriously doubt he stays on this forum much longer, he is seriously out of his league here. At least on LP there were some that were scientifically illiterate enough he could fool, but over here I would say he is batting about 0 for 200 or so.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2007-02-22   21:28:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I think this disproves everything you've ever said. facts are facts.

Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Red Jones  posted on  2007-02-22   21:38:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You are scientifically illiterate to say something like that.

RickyJ from a recent post - "It would take approx. 16.31 seconds for a building as twice as tall as the WTC to freefall with no resistance to its fall."

s = 1/2 a t^^2

417 meters * 2 = 1/2 9.8 t^^2 ... t = 13.05 seconds.

ROTFLOL!

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-02-22   21:51:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

At least on LP there were some that were scientifically illiterate enough he could fool, but over here I would say he is batting about 0 for 200 or so.

RickyJ from a recent post - "It would take approx. 16.31 seconds for a building as twice as tall as the WTC to freefall with no resistance to its fall."

s = 1/2 a t^^2

417 meters * 2 = 1/2 9.8 t^^2 ... t = 13.05 seconds.

ROTFLOL!

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-02-22   21:53:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

ROTFLOL!

You are a shill BAC. A total shill.

So I was a little off, but a heck of a lot closer than the NIST team with their non-existent calculation to "prove" the progressive collapse. LOL!

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2007-02-22   21:55:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't believe a word you say.

Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Red Jones  posted on  2007-02-22   22:04:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]