[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval, China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence Happy fourth of july The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande! Lightning Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge Mister Roberts (1965) WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread] I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden... Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything. How Romans Built Domes My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today. They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029] Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean The Siege (1998) Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger Skateboarding Dog

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: NIST scientist on the hot seat (video)
Source: NIST scientist on the hot seat (video)
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 22, 2007
Author: NIST scientist on the hot seat (video)
Post Date: 2007-02-22 16:08:21 by RickyJ
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 407
Comments: 13

God has a way to make the guilty reveal themselves.

They are putty in God's hands. Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: All, BeAChooser, *9-11* (#0) (Edited)

This idiot admits that they just used the video as "proof" of their statement that the WTC towers collapse was the result of a progressive collapse after it started, which he says they "proved", but offers no proof.

"We did no calculation to show the progressive collapse, it is obvious from the video."

Yo, chooser you idiot, why don't tell your "expert" at NIST that there is a simple calculation to prove that the WTC towers were a progressive collapse. Your idiot expert doesn't seem to know about it. LOL!

He said they "proved" scientifically why the towers started to collapse. Yet from what I have heard not one scientist has proved how it started, they just guess. I guess this idiot thinks guesses from scientists amount to proof.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2007-02-22   16:38:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Why are you ignoring this Chooser? Your expert guessed at the reason the collapse started, and didn't bother to determine why it continued.

What kind of experts do you believe in? Sounds like pretty piss poor science if you ask me.

Critter  posted on  2007-02-22   17:14:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Here's my response to the Gross video (see post #12):

http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=45764&Disp=All&#C12

You are invited to respond to what I posted on that thread.

As to NIST not doing a calculation of the progressive collapse ...

Why is one necessary?

If the models they have show the impact and fires would drop the top section of building on the floor below (as observed), you won't find a competent structural engineer in the world saying the collapse would stop at that point. In fact, I don't think you can name a single one who claims that.

And if it doesn't, then the loads are even worse in the next floor that is impacted by the mass above it.

And while NIST may not have run progressive collapse models, that's not to say others haven't. Others have.

Try using your browser for a change ...

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-02-22   20:05:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And while NIST may not have run progressive collapse models, that's not to say others haven't. Others have.

Try using your browser for a change ...

You mean like the one you posted a link to, where they start off with a lie about fire temperatures? lmao!

Critter  posted on  2007-02-22   21:12:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You are invited to respond to what I posted on that thread.

"If you can't blind 'em with brilliance - baffle 'em with bullshit" we know your style, BAC!

What magnitude of distraction are you assigned to create??

SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-02-22   21:15:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

As to NIST not doing a calculation of the progressive collapse ...

Why is one necessary?

Not necessary? You are scientifically illiterate to say something like that. It's absolutely necessary, especially for the agency that was suppose to be investigating why the towers collapsed. UNFREAKINGBELIEVABLE!

Give it up Chooser, no one takes you seriously here.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2007-02-22   21:19:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Try using your browser for a change ...

You use that instead of thinking for yourself, don't you?

Well of course you do! Thinking for yourself would tax the neurons too much in your little head and give you a bad headache, wouldn't it? LOL!

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2007-02-22   21:24:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You mean like the one you posted a link to, where they start off with a lie about fire temperatures? lmao!

Chooser lies about anything that will make the government theory of 9/11 look correct. He lies consistently and constantly. I seriously doubt he stays on this forum much longer, he is seriously out of his league here. At least on LP there were some that were scientifically illiterate enough he could fool, but over here I would say he is batting about 0 for 200 or so.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2007-02-22   21:28:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I think this disproves everything you've ever said. facts are facts.

Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Red Jones  posted on  2007-02-22   21:38:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You are scientifically illiterate to say something like that.

RickyJ from a recent post - "It would take approx. 16.31 seconds for a building as twice as tall as the WTC to freefall with no resistance to its fall."

s = 1/2 a t^^2

417 meters * 2 = 1/2 9.8 t^^2 ... t = 13.05 seconds.

ROTFLOL!

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-02-22   21:51:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

At least on LP there were some that were scientifically illiterate enough he could fool, but over here I would say he is batting about 0 for 200 or so.

RickyJ from a recent post - "It would take approx. 16.31 seconds for a building as twice as tall as the WTC to freefall with no resistance to its fall."

s = 1/2 a t^^2

417 meters * 2 = 1/2 9.8 t^^2 ... t = 13.05 seconds.

ROTFLOL!

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-02-22   21:53:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

ROTFLOL!

You are a shill BAC. A total shill.

So I was a little off, but a heck of a lot closer than the NIST team with their non-existent calculation to "prove" the progressive collapse. LOL!

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2007-02-22   21:55:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't believe a word you say.

Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Red Jones  posted on  2007-02-22   22:04:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]