[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

BREAKING NEWS: Kilmar Abrego Garcia Coming Back To U.S. For Criminal Prosecution, Report Says

he BEST GEN X & Millennials Memes | Ep 79 - Nostalgia 60s 70s 80s #akornzstash

Paul Joseph Watson They Did Something Horrific

Romantic walk under Eiffel Tower in conquered Paris

srael's Attorney General orders draft for 50,000 Haredim amid Knesset turmoil

Elon Musk If America goes broke, nothing else matters

US disabilities from BLS broke out to a new high in May adding 739k.

"Discrimination in the name of 'diversity' is not only fundamental unjust, but it also violates federal law"

Target Replaces Pride Displays With Stars and Stripes, Left Melts Down [WATCH]

Look at what they are giving Covid Patients in other Countries Whole packs of holistic medicine Vitamins and Ivermectin

SHOCKING Gaza Aid Thefts Involve Netanyahu Himself!

Congress Is Functionally Illiterate

Police Adviser Cancelled for Daring to Claim Women Commit Just as Much Domestic Violence as Men

Mediaite and The Daily Beast FORCED to RETRACT False Claims

Caitlin Clark Is HATED By All The BLACK (LESBIAN) WBNA Players.

School board tells teachers 'family' is a white supremacist term

Illegal Migrant Accused of Crushing Co-Workers Head with Heavy Machinery at Florida Construction Site

DACA Recipient Sent to U.S. Prison for Buying Guns for Mexican Cartels

Israel Threatens Aid Flotilla Will Not Be Allowed to Dock in Gaza

Poll: Americans, Europeans Have Negative View of Israel

Israeli strike on al-Ahli Baptist Hospital in Gaza City kills journalists

Paul Joseph Watson: Spot The Difference

Netanyahu's Rule In Peril As Ultra-Orthodox Move To Dissolve Knesset Over Conscription Of Haredim

DOJ moves to pull federal election funding from Wisconsin for failing to comply with integrity laws

Fake news is in free fall

Will Tucker Carlson's Article on X Stop a War with Iran?

A 63-Year-Old Medical Worker Spent Three Months as a Human Shield for Israelis in Gaza

Secret Service Drops Biden Bomb On White House Visitors

Lia Thomas has officially been stripped of every medal she once held

Global Greening From Higher CO2 Hits Striking New Heights


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Terror Expert: Insurgents Have Won 'Hearts and Minds' of Iraqis
Source: RawStory / Salon
URL Source: http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/T ... ents_have_won_hearts_0302.html
Published: Mar 2, 2007
Author: Michael Roston
Post Date: 2007-03-02 11:14:35 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 1069
Comments: 18

Friday March 2, 2007

An expert on the Iraqi insurgency said Sunni forces fighting the American military have already won the "hearts and minds" of the Iraqi people.

Evan Kohlmann, who produces the "terrorist communique clearinghouse" http://GlobalTerrorAlert.com, spoke to Salon's Kevin Berger in an interview published this morning.

Kohlmann's website watches the statements, videos, and other communications issued by Iraqi insurgent groups, and he has subsequently been employed as a "consultant" by various federal entities, including the Departments of Defense and Justice, the FBI and the CIA.

Berger asked Kohlmann if Sunni insurgents, including al-Qaeda in Iraq, had won the "hearts and minds" of the Iraqi people during the course of the conflict in the country.

"Unfortunately, I do," he responded.

The failure of the US after the bombing of the Samarra mosque to try to control the rise of Shi'a militias caused them to go "on a rampage," and cemented the power of the insurgent groups among the Sunni population of the country, he argued.

Kohlmann was dismissive of the idea that Iran was the main driver of the conflict in Iraq.

"The most common nationality of foreign insurgents in Iraq has been Saudis. Where do you think all the money comes from to pay for these operations? It's from Saudi donors," he said.

He noted he wasn't blaming the Saudi government, but added, "If we're going to put pressure on Iraq's neighbors, let's put pressure on all of Iraq neighbors to stop contributing to the violence."

Regarding the emergence of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Kohlmann told Berger, "There wouldn't be an al-Qaeda in Iraq if the U.S. wasn't there."

But at the same time, he said American troops should not rapidly withdraw from the country.

"If we withdraw from Iraq right now...there's going to be a war for control of Baghdad and then once Baghdad is ripped to the ground, the battle is going to spread across Iraq. It could potentially be like Rwanda," he warned.

"If we withdraw, a widespread war is going to be entirely our responsibility," Kohlmann continued. "It's easy to say it's Iraqis killing Iraqis. But nobody else is going to see it that way. Everyone is going to affix blame to us. We will ultimately cause a situation that forces us to reinvade Iraq and create even more casualties. It's an awful Catch-22."

But Kohlmann admitted that current options to resolve the conflict were thin, and added that he didn't think the Bush administration was smart enough to figure out a way to stop Iraq's violence.

"I thought perhaps, in invading Iraq, they had some long-term view that nobody else could see," he said. "But that hope faded very quickly."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

"I thought perhaps, in invading Iraq, they had some long-term view that nobody else could see," he said. "But that hope faded very quickly."

Over at Rockwell this morning Karen Kwiatkowski makes a convincing case that we've won in Iraq already.

The objective has nothing to do with stabilizing Iraq or democracy or being loved or installing a gummint or anything.

It's about the 4 collossal permanent bases we've built there, which we will retain possession of, pretty much no matter what. The entire objective of the invasion was to build and occupy those bases, and civil war in the countryside around them is pretty much irrelevant.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-03-02   11:18:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: bluedogtxn (#1)

Perhaps but the US will need safe and secure 'supply lines' to those bases no matter what.

Will the Iraqi gov't provide them?

Brian S  posted on  2007-03-02   11:39:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Brian S (#3)

Perhaps but the US will need safe and secure 'supply lines' to those bases no matter what.

Will the Iraqi gov't provide them?

A) What can't they fly in? B) Why would we give the Iraqi govt any choice in the matter?

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-03-02   11:42:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: bluedogtxn (#5)

A) What can't they fly in? B) Why would we give the Iraqi govt any choice in the matter?

A: Ask the chopper survivors that are being picked out of the sky with SAM's.

B: We won't if we are willing to keep troop levels at the current 140k.

Brian S  posted on  2007-03-02   11:46:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Brian S (#6)

A: Ask the chopper survivors that are being picked out of the sky with SAM's.

I haven't heard of any transport planes being shot down. Only the cowboys out on low patrol. If they can land a C130, they can keep the bases fully equipped.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-03-02   11:50:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: bluedogtxn (#7)

I haven't heard of any transport planes being shot down.

You are correct...not yet, however as far as I know, all the C130's and other large fixed winged aircraft are using but one "well protected" airfield in Baghdad.

Bottomline is, these permanent bases will also become permanent targets for the resistance, using whatever means available to them to attack.

Another strategic blunder by the zionistas in thinking that the US can maintain, over the long run, permanent bases in Iraq.

Brian S  posted on  2007-03-02   11:59:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 8.

#16. To: Brian S (#8) (Edited)

Bottomline is, these permanent bases will also become permanent targets for the resistance, using whatever means available to them to attack.

I agree.

I could never understand the DC junta's idea that somehow these US bases were going to remain safe and secure in hostile anti-foreign occupier Iraq. These bases would have "hit me" target signs written all over them.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-03-06 02:04:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]