[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)


National News
See other National News Articles

Title: United States to develop new hydrogen bomb
Source: UPI
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 3, 2007
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2007-03-03 11:20:23 by innieway
Keywords: None
Views: 285
Comments: 7

LIVERMORE, Calif., March 3 (UPI) -- California's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has been chosen to design the United States' first nuclear warhead in two decades.

The Bush administration claims the program will improve the nation's security and allow the United States to reduce its weapons reserve, the Los Angeles Times said.

But critics say the government's haste to come up with a new hydrogen bomb contradicts its efforts to stop the spread of nuclear weapons elsewhere, the Times reported.

"I have serious concerns with the process leading up to today's announcement, and with the priorities of the Department of Energy," Rep. Peter J. Visclosky, D-Ind., chairman of the appropriations subcommittee that would fund the project, said Friday.

Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico was also in the running for the warhead design contract. Sandia National Laboratories' California branch was part of both teams, the Times reported.

The Times reported that Livermore won the competition because its design assured it didn't need any underground testing.


Poster Comment:

More double standards.

We start a "war on terror", illegally invade another nation with no proof of them having done anything to us or anyone else, and in the process CREATE MORE "terror" than ever existed BEFORE the "war on terror" - AND THEN rationalize that we are justified in creating a NEW weapon which is arguably the ultimate weapon of terror and mass destruction... BUT if ANYBODY else wants to develop such a weapon we're coming after you...

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: innieway (#0)

We start a "war on terror", illegally invade another nation with no proof of them having done anything to us or anyone else, and in the process CREATE MORE "terror" than ever existed BEFORE the "war on terror" - AND THEN rationalize that we are justified in creating a NEW weapon which is arguably the ultimate weapon of terror and mass destruction... BUT if ANYBODY else wants to develop such a weapon we're coming after you...

What's your point?

leveller  posted on  2007-03-03   12:31:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: innieway (#0)

A country that has used nukes on civilians (and gleefully delights in it every year as we comemorate that great crime with the usual long exposed comfortable lies) and that now not only threatens other countries with nuke strikes- but threatens NON nuclear states with "pre-emptive" nuke stikes- developing new nukes whose express purpose is the extermination of human populations should greatly concern the world. We have seen how the US can rationalize ANY crime up to and including genocide while still maintaining an extraordinary belief in our inherent goodness. The US is a very sick society that is quite capable of using these weapons without the slightest of real cause against the weakest of countries.

Burkeman1  posted on  2007-03-03   12:34:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: innieway (#0)

The Bush administration claims the program will improve the nation's security and allow the United States to reduce its weapons reserve, the Los Angeles Times said.

But critics say the government's haste to come up with a new hydrogen bomb contradicts its efforts to stop the spread of nuclear weapons elsewhere,

Article VI, NPT:

"Each of the Parties to the Treaty undertakes to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a Treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control."

leveller  posted on  2007-03-03   12:39:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Burkeman1 (#2)

The US is a very sick society that is quite capable of using these weapons without the slightest of real cause against the weakest of countries.

Several times it has been reported that the "no first use" policy has been revised, so that tacical nukes may be used, in Iran, for instance, to promote peace.

leveller  posted on  2007-03-03   12:51:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Burkeman1 (#2)

The US is a very sick society

Excellent summation - and we have a raving lunatic at the helm. God help us...

No matter how noble the objectives of a government; if it blurs decency and kindness, cheapens human life, and breeds ill will and suspicion - it is an EVIL government. Eric Hoffer

innieway  posted on  2007-03-03   13:11:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: leveller (#3) (Edited)

Article VI, NPT:

"Each of the Parties to the Treaty undertakes to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a Treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control."

Good. I feel much better now. I'm sure this administration wouldn't consider circumventing any treaties or international laws.

No matter how noble the objectives of a government; if it blurs decency and kindness, cheapens human life, and breeds ill will and suspicion - it is an EVIL government. Eric Hoffer

innieway  posted on  2007-03-03   13:13:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: innieway (#6)

Good. I feel much better now. I'm sure this administration wouldn't consider circumventing any treaties or international laws.

Building better bombs so we can get by with fewer.

Only somehow we still have 10G nuclear warheads. No overkill there.

leveller  posted on  2007-03-03   13:55:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]