Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: Bushzarro Google: the Quality of Omission and Lies
Source: kurtnimmo
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 1, 2005
Author: http://kurtnimmo.com/blog/index.php?p=64
Post Date: 2005-05-03 17:44:24 by Eoghan
Keywords: Bushzarro, Omission, Google:
Views: 84
Comments: 13

Considering Google’s plan “to build a database that will compare the track record and credibility of all news sources around the world, and adjust the ranking of any search results accordingly” (see Google To Implement Bias Towards Mainstream News), I am reminded of George Creel.

Creel ran the Committee on Public Information (CPI), a warmongering propaganda outfit set up by president Wilson on April 13, 1917. “CPI recruited heavily from business, media, academia, and the art world,” writes Propaganda Critic. “Like modern reporters who participate in Pentagon press pools, journalists grudgingly complied with the [CPI’s]official guidelines in order to stay connected to the information loop. Radical newspapers, such as the socialist Appeal to Reason, were almost completely extinguished by wartime limitations on dissent.”

Of course, nowadays, there is no CPI telling newspapers and web sites what they will publish or post—and there does not need to be because censorship (or propaganda by omission) is a built-in feature of the corporate media and information services, as Google demonstrates. Note Google’s assertion that it is simply adjusting the “credibility” of news sources, as if the New York Times and the Washington Post, two “mainstream” corporate newspapers guilty of telling lies about Saddam Hussein’s illusory weapons of mass destruction and thus cheerleading Bush’s illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq, are more “credible” than other news sources that told the truth about what Bush and his clique of warmongering Strausscons were up to, indisputable facts borne out after the fact (and generally ignored by the corporate media).

In short, after Google installs its “quality” control algorithm, a search of the words “Fallujah” and “war crimes” will return stories by the corporate media (who have basically ignored the war crimes in Fallujah) and sort those stories at the top of the list while stories by Francis A. Boyle posted in Counterpunch or Christopher Bollyn of the American Free Press will sorted at the distant end of a list of 400,000 results.

In order to use Google effectively in the future, it may be necessary to click on the page numbers at the bottom of the page until you reach the end of the list. Remember, in Bushzarro world, everything is backwards, up is down, night is day, mass murder is democracy, etc. Bushzarro Google, as a large corporate leviathan with a strangle hold on the “search market,” will naturally follow these dynamics. In order to find the truth, more work will be required.

Nobody said it would be a rose garden.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut, christine, robin, All (#0)

joogle babysteps...use A9 search engine for now on?

Eoghan  posted on  2005-05-03   17:45:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Eoghan (#0)

I've been using Yahoo ever since I heard even a hint that google might favor The Chimperor.

(I hope Yahoo doesn't turn out to be in the repukes' pocket, too.)

h-a-l-f-w-i-t-t  posted on  2005-05-03   17:49:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Eoghan (#0)

This could have some rather bad consequences for the mass corporate media. Having their stories pop up front on every issue will ultimatley show how friggin wrong they were. Do a search for a story on "rebuilding" in Fallujah and have the Boston Globe story the day after they announced the "back broken" of the insurgency pop up? That won't be too flattering as it announced all sorts of things that have yet to take place and had to be either knowing lies or just made up out of thin air.

Burkeman1  posted on  2005-05-03   17:49:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Eoghan (#1)

In short, after Google installs its “quality” control algorithm, a search of the words “Fallujah” and “war crimes” will return stories by the corporate media (who have basically ignored the war crimes in Fallujah) and sort those stories at the top of the list while stories by Francis A. Boyle posted in Counterpunch or Christopher Bollyn of the American Free Press will sorted at the distant end of a list of 400,000 results.

well, f*ck google. i won't be using it anymore.

christine  posted on  2005-05-03   19:34:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: christine (#4)

If you like google's cache and ad-free features you should look at gigablast.com. It's more or less a clone of google except that it indexes 1.5 billion pages instead of 8 billion. The results aren't as good, but in many cases they are good enough.

purpleman  posted on  2005-05-04   8:51:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: purpleman (#5)

Any word on whether gigablast.com is planning to intall a pro- establishment/pro-Zionist filter?

wbales  posted on  2005-05-04   9:10:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: wbales, All (#6)

www.gigablast.com

That's new to me. Thanks. There is room for competition. We should all take gigablast.com for a test drive and see how it scores. It has links to other search engines, which is very friendly.

robin  posted on  2005-05-04   9:42:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: wbales (#6)

My search for "zionist" shows pretty much the same pages as Google, all positive. The "USS Liberty" results similar mild critiques as Google. Rather than filtering, they may not bother indexing certain parts of the WWW.

purpleman  posted on  2005-05-04   9:44:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: robin (#7)

Gigablast passed my tests so far...

Good results for 'Jew Chertoff'

Eoghan  posted on  2005-05-04   9:50:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: all (#8)

Hmmmmmmm..

This makes me wonder if the MSM has 'helped' to create this new feature on Google.

After all, the MSM would know their sources would come up first and the alternative news sources which are becoming a huge competitor would be buried.

Grumble Jones  posted on  2005-05-04   9:56:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: purpleman (#8)

i like altavista.com, at least for images and MP3s.

christine  posted on  2005-05-04   10:07:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: purpleman (#5)

gigablast.com

Thanks..

Zipporah  posted on  2005-05-04   10:28:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: christine (#11)

altavista.com

I used that about 10 years ago (I think it was just ftp), but I mostly search for text like "0x81"

purpleman  posted on  2005-05-04   12:18:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest