See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: LP owner allows poster to plant 1-pixel gifs in order to track LP users
Source:
Libertypost
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... .cgi?ArtNum=179683&Disp=16#C16
Published: Mar 9, 2007
Author: add925
Post Date: 2007-03-09 14:17:36 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 8815
Comments: 257
FYI....very interesting indeed.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 246.
#1. To: Hayek Fan (#0)
don't need a crystal ball to see that place as a spook front. and here we were just talking about weird shit, 'they talk of days for which they sit and wait, when all will be revealed' Led Zeppelin, Kashmir. again, the old control paradigms evaporate in the face of novelty.
Wow! You maybe right, gengis, about spooky spooks operating on or perhaps even running (?) LP. I wonder if lurkers in addition to LP posters are nabbed by this sly gif ploy. Holy moley. Good thing for you, BAC, that you were thrown off LP by Goldi and you came here to 4um or you could be part of a spook operation...hmmm....or you would be part of a spook op...or you are part of ...hmmm... A. And more... 26. To: Scrivener (#23) The meat of it starts here: http://69.55.11.240/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=178235&Disp=192#C192 After I caught PA hiding a one pixel .gif in his post, one of his responses to me was, "The question is, what are you hiding? What do you think you are hiding or hiding from?" The old "if you don't have anything to hide, you shouldn't mind me snooping around in your business." Also here: http://69.55.11.240/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=178117&Disp=115#C115 s2m seen2much posted on 2007-03-08 10:56:54 ET Reply Trace B. AND more.... 19. To: add925, PatrioticAmerican, seen2much, liberator, goldi-lox, Johnny99 (#17) What gives? Why the use of these imbedded images? Whats their purpose? Mighty suspicious, indeed. How companies track surfers The most common way to track surfers is a combination of images (sometimes called beacons, 1-pixel GIFs, tracking GIFs and so forth) and cookies. Company X’s website will have an image embedded in it. The image is hosted by Tracker Inc, so every time you view a page on Company X’s site, Tracker Inc gets a request for an image. The request typically contains encoded information. As a simple example, when you request http://www.companyx.com/shoppi ngcart.html, your browser might also request an image from http://www.trackerinc.com/tracker.gif? cartitem=ipod40gb. At the same time, your browser gets a cookie set on it, such as globalid=1234. This cookie identifies you when you go to Company Y’s website. Scrivener posted on 2007-03-09 14:05:47 ET Reply Trace
hmmm... is right
I was thrown off LP as well - hmmmm
Many posters were thown off LP, but none with BAC's posting history.
In light of this information,if this was my site, I would dump BAC.
BAC's false story about being "thrown off LP" was a set-up and coordinated with "goldilicks"...whoever he or she REALLY is..to give him an excuse to come here and invade. He is a spook and agent provacteur. I would BAN him if I owned this forum as well. As it is, all should BOZO him immediately.
ROTFLOL! Here's the real story, folks: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=45230&Disp=75#C75 Isn't it amazing that so many FD4UM members are anxious to get rid of a poster who has been courteous, who hasn't labeled anyone or called anyone a name while at FD4UM, who hasn't been the least bit vulgar, who has posted hundreds of sourced facts about topics that should be of interest, and who has been willing to debate their accuracy whenever challenged? Instead of responding in kind, FD4UMers have used the bozo filter in large numbers to avoid reading any of those posts, have thrown out mountains of adhominems and directed rivers of vulgar language at that poster, have begged that poster to leave, have called for his banning, and are now suggesting without any proof whatsoever that he's part of some zionist conspiracy. ROTFLOL! Beware the dot!
THe reaction to you is not about whether you call somebody names. It's about your obnoxious, thread-spamming, and frequently irrelevant remarks which you repeat over, and over, and over, and over - combined with a shameless acceptance of any claims the Bush Administation has to make explaining its actions.
Like this one?
Your use of that chart on this thread is a perfect example of your thread- spamming. Carry on, fuckwit.
No, it's actually a perfect example of you not knowing what you are talking about and being unwilling to be corrected when you are wrong.
No, that would be these BeALooser posted on 2006-11- 07 02:13:00 ET BeALooser posted on 2006-11-07 19:39:19 ET BeALooser posted on 2006-11- 08 12:51:48 ET BeALooser posted on 2006-11- 08 12:51:48 ET BeALooser posted on 2006-11-09 10:28:44 ET So I accidently wrote billion instead of trillion a few times BeALooser posted on 2006-11-12 20:25:08 ET” “I suspect all of us at one time or another in the heat of a debate [!!] have switched billions and millions and even trillions. BeALooser posted on 2006-12-01 19:19:29 ET BeALooser posted on 2006-11-12 22:48:21 ET” BeALooser posted on 2006-11-13 00:00:34 ET BeALooser posted on 2006-11-13 00:00:34 ET BeALooser posted on 2006-11-13 00:00:34 ET BeALooser posted on 2006-11-13 00:25:26 ET BeALooser posted on 2006-11-13 00:25:26 ET Yet, intelligent people [!!] still knew what I meant. Still could see my point. They could tell I just transposed two similar words in the rush to respond to you BeALooser posted on 2006-11-30 14:39:06 ET "You tell us when that civil war happens because so far there is no sign of it." BeALooser posted on 2006-06-30 01:48:13 ET "Iraqi units made up of Shiites, Kurds and Sunnis are routinely operating together quite well" BeALooser posted on 2006-06-30 01:48:13 ET "American soldiers are going to die whether we are in Iraq or not. That's one of the facts the American public needs to face.." BeALooser posted on 2006-12-28 13:30:47 ET “I think you are a K**K if you think a country this size can't sustain 9 KIA a day in a global war."
Post #92 "Since 9/11, the GDP of the US has increased by something on the order of 2 TRILLION dollars a year." BeALooser posted on 2006-11- 07 02:13:00 ET Post #111 "You clearly made the claim that the rise in government expenditures was responsible for the tremendous increase in GDP (to the tune of 2 billion a year) by the end of the five years since 9/11." BeALooser posted on 2006-11-07 19:39:19 ET Post #122 "You made the claim that the 2 trillion dollar increase per year in GDP is mostly government spending." BeALooser posted on 2006-11- 08 12:51:48 ET Post #122 "Yet, the GDP has gone from about 10 billion to about 12 billion a year ... a 20 percent increase" BeALooser posted on 2006-11- 08 12:51:48 ET Post #137 “Obviously I meant $2 trillion" BeALooser posted on 2006-11-09 10:28:44 ET Post #147 So I accidently wrote billion instead of trillion a few times BeALooser posted on 2006-11-12 20:25:08 ET” Post #83 “I suspect all of us at one time or another in the heat of a debate [!!] have switched billions and millions and even trillions. BeALooser posted on 2006-12-01 19:19:29 ET Post #151 “Total government spending… was roughly 2.75 trillion dollars. A 33 percent increase would amount to 900 million BeALooser posted on 2006-11-12 22:48:21 ET” Post #154 "OK. So I was wrong...Big deal. " BeALooser posted on 2006-11-13 00:00:34 ET Post #154 “But it is clearly what I meant" [!!] BeALooser posted on 2006-11-13 00:00:34 ET Post #154 “So my language was sloppy. Sue me." BeALooser posted on 2006-11-13 00:00:34 ET Post #158 “I meant billion. Sue me." BeALooser posted on 2006-11-13 00:25:26 ET Post #158 “I'm just tired" BeALooser posted on 2006-11-13 00:25:26 ET Post #231 You were off by a factor of a thousand. Yet, intelligent people [!!] still knew what I meant. Still could see my point. They could tell I just transposed two similar words in the rush to respond to you BeALooser posted on 2006-11-30 14:39:06 ET "You tell us when that civil war happens because so far there is no sign of it." BeALooser posted on 2006-06-30 01:48:13 ET "Iraqi units made up of Shiites, Kurds and Sunnis are routinely operating together quite well" BeALooser posted on 2006-06-30 01:48:13 ET "American soldiers are going to die whether we are in Iraq or not. That's one of the facts the American public needs to face.." BeALooser posted on 2006-12-28 13:30:47 ET "No one is being fooled by your claiming 9 KIA a day (which isn't close to the actual situation on average, btw) is unsustainable for a country the size of the United States." BeALooser posted on 2006-06-29 19:16:07 ET “I think you are a K**K if you think a country this size can't sustain 9 KIA a day in a global war." BeALooser posted on 2007-01-21 17:27:20 ET AGAviator posted on 2007-03-11 4:48:43 ET Reply Trace Private Reply -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I break my self-imposed silence for this brief message: ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! And this is the 'serious poster, who doesn't call names, who only tries to put forth facts and correct 'misinformation', and use reason and/or logic, blah blah blah? Really......... Sure is funny how this person brushes off his faux paux as just a teeny weeny error made in the excitement of the heat of 'debate'.........while it was within the past couple of months this person was excoriating and questioning the credibility of LT. ? Karen Kwatewski's (sp ????) heat of the scared shitless moment in the immediate aftermath of the Pentagon's 9/11 estimated hole size as so horrible/evil/wrong that it should be placed in the category of something akin to having signed and carried out the death warrants of millions of people like Stalin or whomever!! Sheesh......how much more obvious can it get, folks........? He attempts to make a joke out of this forum, and way too many buy into the bullcrappy. There's a dilemma.....let him post and someone has to be on guard 24/7 to try to keep the bullcrappy honest and yet at the same time, a post to this person is what he eats, sleeps, and breathes for--ignore it and you have false bullcrappy [govt. sponsored no doubt] 'facts' spread thru the internet world being paid for by a couple of patriotic ladies. Makes no sense to me. BTW, AGAviator, you've provided information that should be mandatorily posted on every single thing this person posts on this forum. Kudos to you.
I think it's past time for BAC to go. The lies, distortion and thread spamming do NOT add to this 4um in any way. They do expose how the BushBots and the Bush crime family think, but if we want that we can go read Goldi's comments or anyone on FR.
I agree.
There are no replies to Comment # 246. End Trace Mode for Comment # 246.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: gengis gandhi, Hayek Fan, robin, christine, Brian S, Neil McIver, aristeides, AGAviator, BeAChooser, bluedogtxn, leveller, Burkeman1 (#1)
don't need a crystal ball to see that place as a spook front.
#5. To: scrapper2 (#3)
Good thing for you, BAC, that you were thrown off LP by Goldi and you came here to 4um or you could be part of a spook operation...hmmm....or you would be part of a spook op...or you are part of ...hmmm...
#6. To: robin, scrapper2 (#5)
Good thing for you, BAC, that you were thrown off LP by Goldi and you came here to 4um or you could be part of a spook operation...hmmm....or you would be part of a spook op...or you are part of ...hmmm...
#8. To: Destro (#6)
#9. To: robin (#8)
Many posters were thown off LP, but none with BAC's posting history.
#14. To: honway, christine, skydrifter (#9)
(Edited)
#23. To: IndieTX, honway, christine, SKYDRIFTER, ALL (#14)
BAC's false story about being "thrown off LP" was a set-up and coordinated with "goldilicks"...whoever he or she REALLY is..to give him an excuse to come here and invade. He is a spook and agent provacteur. I would BAN him if I owned this forum as well. As it is, all should BOZO him immediately.
#59. To: BeAChooser (#23)
Isn't it amazing that so many FD4UM members are anxious to get rid of a poster who has been courteous, who hasn't labeled anyone or called anyone a name while at FD4UM, who hasn't been the least bit vulgar, who has posted hundreds of sourced facts about topics that should be of interest, and who has been willing to debate their accuracy whenever challenged?
#62. To: AGAviator, ALL (#59)
It's about your obnoxious, thread-spamming, and frequently irrelevant remarks which you repeat over, and over, and over, and over - combined with a shameless acceptance of any claims the Bush Administation has to make explaining its actions.
#63. To: BeAChooser (#62)
#64. To: AGAviator, ALL (#63)
Your use of that chart on this thread is a perfect example of your thread- spamming.
#65. To: BeAChooser (#64)
Post #92
"Since 9/11, the GDP of the US has increased by something on the order of 2 TRILLION dollars a year."
"You clearly made the claim that the rise in government expenditures was responsible for the tremendous increase in GDP (to the tune of 2 billion a year) by the end of the five years since 9/11."
"You made the claim that the 2 trillion dollar increase per year in GDP is mostly government spending."
"Yet, the GDP has gone from about 10 billion to about 12 billion a year ... a 20 percent increase"
“Obviously I meant $2 trillion"
“Total government spending… was roughly 2.75 trillion dollars. A 33 percent increase would amount to 900 million
"OK. So I was wrong...Big deal. "
“But it is clearly what I meant" [!!]
“So my language was sloppy. Sue me."
“I meant billion. Sue me."
“I'm just tired"
You were off by a factor of a thousand.
BeALooser posted on 2006-06-29 19:16:07 ET
BeALooser posted on 2007-01-21 17:27:20 ET
#244. To: AGAviator, robin, Christine, SKYDRIFTER, Diana, HOUNDDAWG, Zipporah, All (#65)
#65. To: BeAChooser (#64) No, that would be these
ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!!
ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!!
ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!! ROTFLMAOATPIMY!!!
LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL!
LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL!
LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL!
#245. To: rowdee, christine (#244)
#246. To: robin (#245)
Replies to Comment # 246.
