[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Zionist Experiment Is Over

Sen. Tim Kaine: ‘Extremely Troubling’ to Say Natural Rights Are from God

Israel & The Assassination Of The Kennedy Brothers

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER (Documentary)

The Pakistani mayor of Rotherham claims she proud to be British and proud to be Pakistani.

Khe Sanh 1968 How U.S. Marines Faced the Siege in Vietnam

Did Xi's Parade Flip The Script On US Defense Of Taiwan?

Cascade Volcanoes Show Weird Pulse Without Warning – Mount Rainier Showing Signs of Trouble!

Cash Jordan: Chicago Apartments RAIDED... ICE 'Forcibly Evicts' Illegal Squatters at 3AM

We are FINALLY turning the tide on 9/11 - The TRUTH is coming out | Redacted w Clayton Morris

Netanyahu SHAKEN as New Hostage Video DESTROYS IDF Lies!

We are FINALLY turning the tide on 9/11 VIDEO

Shocking Video Shows Ukrainian Refugee Fatally Stabbed On Charlotte Train By Career Criminal

Man Identifies as Cat to Cop

his video made her stop consuming sugar.

Shot And Bothered - Restored Classic Coyote & Road Runner Looney Tunes Cartoon 1966

How to Prove the Holocaust is a Hoax in Under 2 Minutes

..And The Legacy Media Wonders Why Nobody Trusts Them

"The Time For Real Change Is Now!" - Conor McGregor Urges Irish To Lobby Councillors For Presidential Bid

Daniela Cambone: Danger Not Seen in 40+ Years

Tucker Carlson: Whistleblower Exposes the Real Puppet Masters Controlling the State Department

Democrat nominee for NJ Governor, says that she will push an LGBTQ agenda in schools and WILL NOT allow parents to opt out.

Holy SH*T, America's blood supply is tainted with mRNA

Thomas Massie's America First : A Documentary by Tom Woods & Dan Smotz

Kenvue Craters On Report RFK Jr To Link Autism To Tylenol Use In Pregnancy

All 76 weapons at China 2025 military parade explained. 47 are brand new.

Chef: Strategy for Salting Steaks

'Dangerous' Chagas disease confirmed in California, raising concerns for Bay Area

MICROPLASTICS ARE LINKED TO HEART DISEASE; HERE'S HOW TO LOWER YOUR RISK

This Scholar PREDICTED the COLLAPSE of America 700 years ago


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Don't Mention The Polar Bears, Bush Tells US Scientists
Source: Independent UK
URL Source: http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2344771.ece
Published: Mar 10, 2007
Author: Steve Connor, Science Editor
Post Date: 2007-03-10 00:39:35 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 150
Comments: 5

Published: 10 March 2007

The Bush Administration has been accused once again of gagging US government scientists by getting them to agree not to talk about polar bears, sea ice and climate change during official overseas trips.

A leaked memorandum issued by a regional director of the US Department of the Interior states that officials within the US Fish and Wildlife Service will limit their discussions when travelling in countries bordering the Arctic region because of sensitivities about climate change.

"This traveller understands the administration's position on climate change, polar bears and sea ice and will not be speaking on or responding to these issues," says the memo from the regional director Richard Hannon to his boss, the director of the Fish and Wildlife Service.

It is not the first time that US government officials have been accused to trying to gag scientists on climate change. James Hansen, the director of Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies and a world authority on the climate, complained last year that public relations officials appointed by the Bush Administration had tried to limit his access to the media.

The memorandum from Mr Hannon was criticised by the Natural Resources Defence Council in Washington, which wants the US Department of Interior to list the polar bear as an endangered species because of the projected loss of sea ice in the Arctic over the coming century.

"This memo has got to be put into the wider context of what President Bush has done to stifle debate on global warming over the last six years," said a council spokesman, Eben Burnham-Snyder. "The Bush Administration has a long history of restricting scientific discourse on global warming's impacts and solutions. This continued restriction hampers our experts' ability to do their job effectively and aggressively deal with our global warming challenge."

A leaked e-mail from Mr Hannon to his staff warned that any future overseas trips involving or potentially involving climate change, sea ice or polar bears will require an official statement on who in the delegation will be the official spokesman.

Any requests concerning foreign trips to Arctic countries such as Canada, Norway or Russia should also include "a statement of assurance that these individuals understand the Administration's position on these issues", particularly the topic of polar bears.

Hugh Vickery, a spokes-man for the US Department of the Interior, said that the memorandum was "badly worded" and there was no intention of limiting informal discussions. The memo was intended to cover official bilateral talks where there is an agreed agenda and was an attempt to ensure that scientists stick to the areas within their remit, Mr Vickery said.

"It's very important to know what the position of the United States government is on these issues. If two scientists want to talk over a coffee, that's fine. We want them to do that," he said. "But in an official capacity you need to know what your role is. This is not about gagging scientists. We don't want to do that."

Mr Vickery added that polar bears and sea ice were mentioned in the memo because it was addressed to scientists within the Alaska region of the Fish and Wildlife Service.

Arctic sea ice and the polar bear are especially sensitive issues at present because American scientists have pointed out that the world's biggest land carnivore is unlikely to survive if the Arctic sea ice disappears in summer, which it is predicted to do by the end of the century.

The Department of Interior is currently engaged in a consultation over whether to list the species as endangered and a decision is expected by January 2008.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

It must suck having your entire set of core beliefs so vulnerable to facts and reality. What makes me nervous is agencies such as FDA and USDA where the SCIENTISTS even seem to be neocons. I wouldn't trust anything you've heard about drug trials and mad cow disease. Anything that involves money for big business is being fudged bigtime at both agencies.

Mekons4  posted on  2007-03-10   0:52:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Mekons4 (#1)

I wouldn't trust anything you've heard about drug trials and mad cow disease.

It is not without cause that most sensible countries prohibit the importation of US beef.

Brian S  posted on  2007-03-10   0:57:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Brian S (#2)

USDA is in the process of approving imports of Chinese chicken in return for China importing U.S. beef. First, we're swimming in chicken; to keep the price above 15 cents a pound, the industry has millions of pounds in freezers (they lost a bunch due to Katrina, something like 10 million pounds rotted in Mississipi). So now we're going to let Chinese chicken, shot full of who knows what noxious chemicals into the country at ultra-low prices?

There's only one reason they're doing this: votes in Western states. Period.

Oh, and they're opposing any labeling that would tell you it's chicken from China. Seriously, China is planning to import meat for the Olympics because otherwise, half the athletes would flunk their drug tests. It's that bad there.

Mekons4  posted on  2007-03-10   1:04:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Mekons4 (#3)

So now we're going to let Chinese chicken, shot full of who knows what noxious chemicals into the country at ultra-low prices?

So bring me up to date.

Did the congress pass the labeling law that prohibited the "country of origin" designation on imported meats?

Brian S  posted on  2007-03-10   1:58:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Brian S (#4)

No, it theoretically goes into effect in September, but there's almost no chance it will actually become law. The large processors want imported products, and they don't want to acknowledge it. Financially, if you make hamburger from beef from Argentina, Canada, Australia, and the U.S., it gets pretty tough to say where one package is really from.

COOL (country of origin labeling) looked like a no-brainer at first. Now it's pretty much dead.

Mekons4  posted on  2007-03-10   2:13:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]