[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11 skeptics want those who disagree at Saturday event
Source: http://www.southbendtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/2
URL Source: http://www.southbendtribune.com/app ... 315/News01/703150485/-1/NEWS01
Published: Mar 16, 2007
Author: JOSHUA STOWE
Post Date: 2007-03-16 06:33:44 by Kamala
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: 911
Views: 308
Comments: 12

Article published Mar 15, 2007

Conference schedule

Saturday's "9/11 truth" conference runs 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the St. Joseph County Public Library, 304 S. Main St., South Bend. The event is free and open to the public. Here is the schedule:

10 a.m. Mike Berger, media coordinator for the site http://www.911truth.org, will show his film "Improbable Collapse" and speak about it.

Noon Lunch break, meet and greet, free raffle for books and DVDs.

1 p.m. Presentation by Kevin Ryan, former South Bend resident, on his experience of speaking out about Sept. 11 and his research on the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings.

3 p.m. Presentation by author and lecturer Webster Tarpley on the history of "false-flag" state-sponsored terrorism, and how Tarpley believes this history applies to the events of Sept. 11.

9/11 skeptics want those who disagree at Saturday event

They claim evidence will sway others to doubt 'official' story.

JOSHUA STOWE

Tribune Staff Writer

SOUTH BEND -- Andy Schmidt wants you to attend Saturday's conference -- especially if you don't agree with him that what he calls the "official story" of 9/11 is false.

Three presenters -- all part of the "9/11 truth movement" that questions the conventional explanation of the 9/11 attacks -- will speak at the event, which Schmidt sees as a learning experience.

"I would strongly encourage people who doubt the 9/11 truth movement to come to the conference," he wrote in an e-mail, "because they will learn the most (if they remain civil, that is!) We don't want to just be preaching to the choir. It's an educational event that will be of most benefit to folks who are still 'on the fence' about 9/11 truth."

The Granger man says he wants to draw people who, like he once did, don't agree with 9/11 skeptics.

Initially, Schmidt said in a telephone interview, "I was one of the strongest believers in the 9/11 story."In fact, he said, in the wake of the attacks, he reported two men of Middle Eastern descent after they walked into the Boston library where he worked at the time because he thought they seemed suspicious.

But over time, he encountered the work of skeptics -- at talks, on the Internet and in books -- who sought to poke holes in the mainstream explanation of 9/11. The questions they raised changed his perspective. Now, he hopes to change others' views, as well.

"The Web sites, the books, that's basically it," he said. "I think if you just do minimal research, you can find things that just don't add up."

Kevin Ryan, a former South Bend resident and one of the presenters, likes Schmidt's approach to the conference.

"It's very useful when we can get people who are interested in what we have to say," Ryan said.Ryan, who now lives in Bloomington, Ind., was fired in 2004 from his job at Environmental Health Laboratories Inc. in South Bend, a subsidiary of Underwriters Laboratories Inc.

The firing came after Ryan wrote a letter to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which was examining the collapse of the World Trade Center's twin towers.

In the letter, Ryan said burning jet fuel did not cause the buildings to collapse and maintained that Underwriters Laboratories had certified steel components used in the construction of the skyscrapers, a claim the company denied.

Mike Berger, another presenter, said the conference will be about raising questions, which he said is key to addressing official reports that have "white-washed" what happened on 9/11.

During the conference, he will show and discuss his film "Improbable Collapse," which critiques government reports about the collapse of the Trade Center buildings."While people want to speculate, there's no need for speculation," he said. "What we have from the government, in effect, is speculation on how these attacks may have happened. But certainly they haven't run all these leads down."

Berger says the "painful truth" is that the U.S. government had provided a "conspiracy theory" to explain the attacks. But despite that, he said, many people don't question the explanation of 9/11 offered in government reports and through countless media outlets.

Schmidt hopes the conference will help change that.

"Come to the event. Keep an open mind. Just look at the evidence," he said. "Because that's where things start to fall apart."

Staff writer Joshua Stowe: jstowe@sbtinfo.com (574) 235-6359


Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

#4. To: Kamala, ALL (#0)

The firing came after Ryan wrote a letter to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which was examining the collapse of the World Trade Center's twin towers.

Kevin forgot to mention that he put his letter on UL stationary and filled it full of misinformation. He implied he was representing UL and he was not. THAT is why he got fired. A guy who tests water for a living had no business putting himself out as some sort of expert on steel and fire.

maintained that Underwriters Laboratories had certified steel components used in the construction of the skyscrapers, a claim the company denied.

Not just UL. http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm "UL did not certify any steel as suggested. In fact, in U.S. practice, steel is not certified at all; rather structural assemblies are tested for their fire resistance rating in accordance with a standard procedure such as ASTM E 119 (see NCSTAR 1-6B). That the steel was “certified ... to 2000 degrees Fahrenheit for six hours” is simply not true."

Moreover, that claim was deceptive since only fireproofed steel can survive hours at 2000 F. The steel in the WTC had its fireproofing damaged by the plane impacts. Ryan simply ignored that aspect of the problem.

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-03-17   21:02:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: BeAChooser, Kamal (#4)

"UL did not certify any steel as suggested. In fact, in U.S. practice, steel is not certified at all; rather structural assemblies are tested for their fire resistance rating in accordance with a standard procedure such as ASTM E 119 (see NCSTAR 1-6B). That the steel was “certified ... to 2000 degrees Fahrenheit for six hours” is simply not true."

Did UL test the any WTC structural assemblies for their fire resistance rating in accordance with a standard procedure?

Critter  posted on  2007-03-17   22:26:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Critter, ALL (#5)

Did UL test the any WTC structural assemblies for their fire resistance rating in accordance with a standard procedure?

Before or after 9/11?

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-03-17   22:27:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: BeAChooser (#6)

Before or after 9/11?

Ever.

Critter  posted on  2007-03-17   22:59:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Critter, ALL (#7)

Ever.

Ask Ryan. ROTFLOL!

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-03-18   0:45:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 11.

#12. To: BeAChooser (#11)

I figured you'd say something like that as not to get caught lying.

Critter  posted on  2007-03-18 03:09:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]