[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Hamas Still Killing IDF Soldiers After 642 Days

Copper underpins every part of the economy. If you want to destroy the U.S. economy this is how you would do it.

Egyptian Pres. Gamal Abdel Nassers Chilling Decades-Old Prediction About Israel-Palstine Conflict.

Debt jumps $366B in one day.

Proof that Israel Has Lost the War: Sizable Portion of Military, Intelligence, Energy, and R&D facilities Destroyed

French police raid offices of Marine Le Pens far-right Rassemblement National


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Buchanan: The AIPAC Girl
Source: Worldnetdaily
URL Source: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54779
Published: Mar 20, 2007
Author: Pat Buchanan
Post Date: 2007-03-20 11:13:46 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 179
Comments: 9

Posted: March 20, 2007

If George W. Bush launches a pre-emptive war on Iran, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will bear full moral responsibility for that war.

For it was Pelosi who quietly agreed to strip out of the $100 billion funding bill for Iraq a provision that would have required President Bush to seek congressional approval before launching any new war on Iran.

Pelosi's capitulation came in the Appropriations Committee.

What went down, and why?

"Conservative Democrats as well as lawmakers concerned about the possible impact on Israel had argued for the change in strategy," wrote ghe Associated Press' David Espo and Matthew Lead.

"Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., said in an interview there is a widespread fear in Israel about Iran, which ... has expressed unremitting hostility to the Jewish state.

"'It would take away perhaps the most important tool the U.S. has when it comes to Iran,' she said of the now-abandoned provision.

"'I don't think it was a very wise idea to take things off the table if you're trying to get people to modify their behavior and normalize in a civilized way,' said Gary Ackerman of New York."

According to John Nichols of The Nation, Pelosi's decision to strip the provision barring Bush from attacking Iran without Congress' approval "sends the worst possible signal to the White House."

"The speaker has erred dangerously and dramatically," writes Nichols. Her "disastrous misstep could haunt her and the Congress for years to come."

Nichols does not exaggerate.

If Bush now launches war on Iran, he can credibly say Congress and the Democrats gave him a green light. For Pelosi, by removing a provision saying Bush does not have the authority, de facto concedes he does have the authority.

Bush and Cheney need now not worry about Congress.

They have been flashed the go sign for war on Iran.

Pelosi & Co. thus aborted a bipartisan effort to ensure that if we do go to war again, we do it the constitutional way, and we do it together.

Nothing in the provision would have prevented Bush, as commander in chief, from responding to an Iranian attack or engaging in hot pursuit of an enemy found in Iraq. Nor would the provision have prevented Bush from threatening Iran. It would simply have required him to come to Congress – before launching all-out war.

Now Pelosi has, in effect, ceded Bush carte blanche to take out Iran's nuclear facilities. It's all up to him and Cheney.

For this the nation elected a Democratic Congress?

Why did Pelosi capitulate? Answer: She was "under pressure from some conservative members of her caucus, and from lobbyists associated with neoconservative groups that want war with Iran and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)," writes Nichols.

The Washington Times agrees as to who bully-ragged Nancy into scuttling any requirement that Bush come to the Hill before unleashing the B-2s on Arak, Natanz and Bushehr:

"Last week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi received a smattering of boos when she bad-mouthed the war effort during a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and the Democratic leadership, responding to concerns from pro-Israel lawmakers, was forced to strip from a military appropriations measure a provision meant to weaken President Bush's ability to respond to threats from Iran."

This episode, wherein liberal Democrats scuttled a bipartisan effort to require Bush to abide by the Constitution before taking us into a third war in the Middle East, speaks volumes about who has the whip hand on Capitol Hill when it comes to the Middle East.

Pelosi gets booed by the Israeli lobby, then runs back to the Hill and gives Bush a blank check for war on Iran, because that is what the lobby demands. A real candidate for Profiles in Courage.

As for the presidential candidates, it is hard to find a single one willing to stand up and say: If Bush plans to take us into another war in the Mideast, he must first come to Congress for authorization. And if he goes to war without authorization, that will be impeachable.

All retreat into the "all-options-are-on-the-table" mantra, which is another way of saying, "It's Bush's call."

The corruption of both parties is astonishing. Republicans used to be the party of the Constitution: "No more undeclared wars! No more presidential wars!"

Democrats used to be the party of the people. The people don't want this war. They don't want another. The Jewish community voted 88 percent for Democrats in November, and 77 percent oppose Iraq.

So says Gallup. Yet, just because the Israeli lobby jerked her chain, the leader of the Peoples' House has decided she and her party will leave the next war up to Bush.

Sam Rayburn must be turning over in his grave.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

Pelosi gets booed by the Israeli lobby, then runs back to the Hill and gives Bush a blank check for war on Iran, because that is what the lobby demands.

This shows again that what we need is not 'leaders' but a nation of educated and self-reliant citizens who send their representatives, not their leaders, to act on their behalf, not to perform some stupid or imaginary leadership tasks.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2007-03-20   11:20:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Brian S, Indie TX, christine, Zipporah, robin, rowdee, Diana, Jethro Tull, lodwick (#0)

Pat Buchanan knows better than anyone the perils associated with crossing The Lobby.

After his surprise win in New Hampshire a childhood acquaintance surfaced and explained tearfully that when he and Buchanan were 8 years old "He called me a KIKE!" the man said. Buchanan was then "the Nazi who slipped into the program" and Americans dutifully distanced themselves from him.

Any candidate who bypasses the vetting process by American Jewish interests just picks up a newspaper or tunes in a TV news network and learns that he or she mysteriously woke up dead.

There are two types of candidates for president-Jewish approved and therefore viable and....oh, wait, there is ONE TYPE of candidate for president....

And, just how are Americans supposed to know who is or isn't? One very good indicator is if the candidate was invited to debate by The League Of Women Voters.

If a candidate shows up only to be arrested (like Alan Keyes) I know that he foolishly believes that the people decide....

And, do we really want a president who is that tuned out? (Well, yes, we might but that doesn't matter because we can't have her or him!)

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2007-03-20   11:49:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Brian S (#0)

According to John Nichols of The Nation, Pelosi's decision to strip the provision barring Bush from attacking Iran without Congress' approval "sends the worst possible signal to the White House."

"The speaker has erred dangerously and dramatically," writes Nichols. Her "disastrous misstep could haunt her and the Congress for years to come."

No sh*t. This is why I am an anti-Republican, not a Democrat. If we attack Iran, it will make Iraq look like tiddley-winks. We do not have the manpower, for one thing, and we SURE don't have the logistics for a land war with these guys.

Bellicose screeching and monkey fits are not foreign policy, and it is Congress' duty to put handcuffs on that moron Chimperor. Pelosi et al failed in that duty. If we end up at war with Iran, Pelosi is as guilty as the Punk.

Mekons4  posted on  2007-03-20   11:54:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: HOUNDDAWG (#2) (Edited)

When Pat defended Demjanjuk, Alan Dershowitz and Foxman went ape shit. Nevermind that the Israeli Supreme court eventually found him innocent, thus agreeing w/Pat. Add to that Buchanan's comment that our congress was an "Amen Corner" for Israel, and he forever branded himself an anti-Semite.

Jews and their pets - click me

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-03-20   12:29:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: HOUNDDAWG (#2)

After his surprise win in New Hampshire a childhood acquaintance surfaced and explained tearfully that when he and Buchanan were 8 years old "He called me a KIKE!" the man said. Buchanan was then "the Nazi who slipped into the program" and Americans dutifully distanced themselves from him.

I remember that! That was when I was living in Holland, and I had a subscription to Newsweek (International, that's all you could get at the time, though it was similar to regular Newsweek) and they did a major hit-piece on him when he won that NH primary. It was their cover story, and they made him out to be an evil nazi. I knew at the time the PTB were making sure to put a halt to any further success in his campaign.

Diana  posted on  2007-03-21   6:23:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: HOUNDDAWG (#2)

"He called me a KIKE!"

Pretty much includes all goyim growing up around Jewish confines...All's I remember is the Jewish kids starting in on the religious background taunts.

It's synagogue 101.

“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"

Eoghan  posted on  2007-03-21   8:26:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Diana, SKYDRIFTER, christine, Zipporah, rowdee, robin, Eoghan (#5)

After his surprise win in New Hampshire a childhood acquaintance surfaced and explained tearfully that when he and Buchanan were 8 years old "He called me a KIKE!" the man said. Buchanan was then "the Nazi who slipped into the program" and Americans dutifully distanced themselves from him.

I remember that! That was when I was living in Holland, and I had a subscription to Newsweek (International, that's all you could get at the time, though it was similar to regular Newsweek) and they did a major hit-piece on him when he won that NH primary. It was their cover story, and they made him out to be an evil nazi. I knew at the time the PTB were making sure to put a halt to any further success in his campaign.

And, do you know why?

Buchanan wants to cut all foreign aid.

Now, what's the diff between former Klansman and senior US Senator Robert Byrd (D-WVA) and former Klansman David Duke?

Byrd supports aid to Israel and is therefore "rehabilitated" but Duke and Buchanan want to cut foreign aid and for them it's "Once a Nazi/Klansman always a Nazi/Klansman!"

It really is that simple.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2007-03-21   8:55:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: HOUNDDAWG. all (#2)

Pat Buchanan knows better than anyone the perils associated with crossing The Lobby.

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-03-21   9:02:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Diana (#5)

I remember that! That was when I was living in Holland, and I had a subscription to Newsweek (International, that's all you could get at the time, though it was similar to regular Newsweek) and they did a major hit-piece on him when he won that NH primary. It was their cover story, and they made him out to be an evil nazi. I knew at the time the PTB were making sure to put a halt to any further success in his campaign.

Interesting.

My belief is this.

Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WVA) is a reformed former Klux, but with David Duke it's "Once a Klansman always a Klansman".

Byrd supports generous aid to Israel, and Duke and Buchanan want to cut all foreign aid.

So, anyone seeking higher office who threatens to even raise the issue for legit discussion must be slapped down hard and fast.

The American people would pounce on the idea of cutting foreign aid (can you blame us? Why give money to darkies, Jews and Jewish darkies when our infrastructure is crumbling) and it only continues because we're never permitted to bring the issue to the table. It's never a campaign issue except for "the kooky fringe candidates".

And what is it that makes them "kooky fringe candidates"?

Why, they want to cut foreign of course.

Years ago I received a questionnaire from Delaware's senior senator, Bill Roth. (of ROTH IRA infamy) it asked if I believed that

A) Taxes should be raised or, B) Taxes should stay the same.

Now, I looked all over that mailer for "option C" and guess what? It wasn't there.

Roth and other arrogant incumbents for life have decreed that cutting taxes (on the working classes that is) is so absurd that it deserves no consideration.

Of course when it comes to attaching riders to bills to give generous tax breaks to their corporate benefactors, or even discussing the possibility of abolishing corporate taxes completely and leaving the god-cursed "income tax" as a unconstitutional middle class wage tax on us, well, the Roths and Bushes tell use tearfully how corporations make jobs for Americans and how they pay too much in taxes! The reason why we have millions of pages of tax laws is, everyone except middle class wage earners has a special exemption somewhere in the codes.

Now that the people are waking up to the swindle the WTP foundation has reported that critical documents are disappearing from The National Archives.

What's in those documents? Proof that wage earners were never supposed to pay the corporate income tax. And now they want us to be the only ones who pay it so they can give it to Israel!

Those goddam evil bastards!

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2007-03-21   10:52:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]