[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Whitney Webb: Foreign Intelligence Affiliated CTI League Poses Major National Security Risk

Paul Joseph Watson: What Fresh Hell Is This?

Watch: 50 Kids Loot 7-Eleven In Beverly Hills For Candy & Snacks

"No Americans": Insider Of Alleged Trafficking Network Reveals How Migrants Ended Up At Charleroi, PA Factory

Ford scraps its SUV electric vehicle; the US consumer decides what should be produced, not the Government

The Doctor is In the House [Two and a half hours early?]

Trump Walks Into Gun Store & The Owner Says This... His Reaction Gets Everyone Talking!

Here’s How Explosive—and Short-Lived—Silver Spikes Have Been

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors

Rasmussen Poll Numbers: Kamala's 'Bounce' Didn't Faze Trump

Trump BREAKS Internet With Hysterical Ad TORCHING Kamala | 'She is For They/Them!'

45 Funny Cybertruck Memes So Good, Even Elon Might Crack A Smile

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means

New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have

More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico

New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Opening round of immigration reform begins
Source: NY Daily News
URL Source: http://www.nydailynews.com/boroughs ... f_immigration_reform_begi.html
Published: Mar 26, 2007
Author: Albor Ruiz
Post Date: 2007-03-26 22:43:28 by scrapper2
Keywords: STRIVE Act, DREAM Act, bipartisan chicanery
Views: 99
Comments: 7

It is the opening salvo in the new round of debate about immigration reform in Congress. Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Ill.) introduced on Thursday the STRIVE Act (Security Through Regularized Immigration and a Vibrant Economy) of 2007, a bipartisan comprehensive reform immigration bill.

In a debate that has been dominated by irrationality, harsh rhetoric and outright racism, the mere introduction of this bill is an all-important first step.

"The introduction of the STRIVE Act is a step toward passing a bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform bill that will make our immigration system more humane while addressing border security, economic security, global competitiveness, and reestablishing the rule of law," said Héctor Figueroa, Secretary-Treasurer of Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ.

"Our broken immigration system fuels an underground economy that undermines standards for all working people. Everyone who works hard in America deserves a job that supports a family, affordable health care and a secure retirement - we see comprehensive immigration reform as a way of achieving this goal."

The STRIVE Act incorporates some essential points for a workable and fair immigration reform. For example, it establishes an earned legalization program for the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. It also includes the DREAM Act, which makes it possible for immigrant students to pursue a higher education.

The act also contains enhanced enforcement on the U.S.-Mexico border, tougher enforcement measures in the workplace, a temporary worker program, and a requirement - sure to provoke a great deal of controversy - that undocumented immigrants wishing to get on a path to citizenship first leave the country and reenter legally.

But the Gutiérrez-Flake bill is just the beginning of what is sure to be a long and difficult process - a process that will demand much work, patience and bipartisan goodwill if it is going to culminate in real comprehensive reform before Congress recesses in August.

"The bipartisan bill in the House is huge progress from last year's absurd anti-immigrant bill that sought to make criminal felons out of millions of undocumented immigrants and anyone who helps them," said Chung-Wha Hong, executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition. "The demand for reform is coming from all quarters - immigrant families want a chance to fully contribute to this country, responsible businesses want a legal workforce, American workers want a level playing field, and the public wants a solution once and for all. Let's all get to work!"

After a first read, the STRIVE Act looks like a useful tool to spark a discussion that could lead to real immigration reform. But it also seems too heavy on enforcement and too harsh in the requirements it imposes on undocumented immigrants who want to come out of the shadows and become full members of society - a society to which the great majority of them have been contributing for years.

As Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said: "No bill is perfect, and after studying the language carefully, we expect we will take issue with specific provisions. But we are thrilled that the legislative starting gun has been fired."


Poster Comment:

"It also includes the DREAM Act, which makes it possible for immigrant students to pursue a higher education."

HARHARHARHARHAR.

So this is a 2-fer kick in the pants to US legal taxpayer-citizens. The Dream Act = in state college tuition to illegals = and what will be extended to illegals will not be extended to regular citizens.

HARHARHARHAR. So while we sheeple are fixated on whether or not Alberto will resign (I'll go out on a limb and say yes...chuckle)the congresscritters are cooking up a bipartisan deal to legalize 40 Million ( illegals and extended family members)Aberto clones. Nice.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: scrapper2 (#0)

"The introduction of the STRIVE Act is a step toward passing a bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform bill that will make our immigration system more humane while addressing border security, economic security, global competitiveness, and reestablishing the rule of law,"

Well I'm glad their priorities are straight.

I'm reminded of Cinderella's evil stepmom: "I said IF."

The result was a rise in revolutionary temperature throughout Mediterranean Jewry, and a second expulsion of the Jews from Rome by the emperor Claudius on the ground, we are told, that they "constantly made disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus." With this statement the name of Christ first appears in Roman history.

Tauzero  posted on  2007-03-26   23:50:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: BeAChooser (#0)

Why are our soldiers fighting and dying in Iraq with our State Dept huffing and puffing about Iran and Syria "not doing enough" to protect their borders from opportunistic crossings by evil doers while our elected officials rubber stamp lawlessness on our southern border and offer benefits/rewards to everyone on the planet who want to come here illegally? Can you explain that logic to me, BAC?

Wouldn't the first step in any "war" be to secure one's own borders?

scrapper2  posted on  2007-03-27   1:25:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: scrapper2, SKYDRIFTER, robin (#0)

I've come to the conclusion our govt wants these illegals here.

This country is rapidly coming to an end.

In it's last hours it's being looted of blood and money by the PTB before it all comes crashing down.

Diana  posted on  2007-03-27   3:34:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Diana, Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Kamala, All (#3)

I've come to the conclusion our govt wants these illegals here.

The controllers of the Bush Cabal want them - to accelerate a downward spiral of pay & benefits to the working slob.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-03-27   11:34:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: scrapper2, BeAChooser (#2)

BeAChooser (though he is awesomely intelligent and knowledgeable - the best poster ever) is pro-Republican. Therefore, he is anti-American.

Republicans support legislation that will greatly increase the combined total of legal & illegal immigrants per year to our country. They support legislation that will fill up our economy with indentured servants to undermine the free market for labor and push American wages down. This is true with Tancredo, this is true with Bush, this is true with Jeff Flake.

Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Red Jones  posted on  2007-03-27   14:38:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: scrapper2, ALL (#2)

Can you explain that logic to me, BAC?

Because illegal immigration and defending ourselves from islamofascism are two different issues that need different solutions. The government is handling one right (at times) but the other wrong (most of the time).

Wouldn't the first step in any "war" be to secure one's own borders?

Stopping a million illegal immigrants and stopping half a dozen would be, wmd carrying, terrorists are two different problems. Stopping 99% of the former will not necessarily prevent determined terrorists from entering the country.

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-03-27   17:49:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: BeAChooser (#6)

scrapper: Wouldn't the first step in any "war" be to secure one's own borders?

BAC: Stopping a million illegal immigrants and stopping half a dozen would be, wmd carrying, terrorists are two different problems. Stopping 99% of the former will not necessarily prevent determined terrorists from entering the country.

As usual, you are wrong - but nice try at covering up a major flaw in the neocons' WOT schtick that is in fact at odds with their open borders mindset...that is if the neocons were serious about their "war". The only fascists I see in evidence are the neozio ones who are trying to turn our fair republic into a police state. We citizens are being branded and counted and our whereabouts, our thoughts are being monitored by Homeland Security - HA! - that department's name sounds like an agency Hitler himself would be proud of - and all the while even though citizens are being "watched", the southern border is kept wide open to non-citizen aliens - think about that curious situation, BAC, if you will.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0322/p01s01-uspo.html

"US-Mexican border as a terror risk: Recent intelligence gives the most evidence yet of terrorist plans. Lawmakers push for tighter security"

Concern is growing at the top levels of government about the US-Mexican border becoming a back door for terrorists entering the United States. While Al Qaeda infiltration across the nation's southern border has been a constant concern since 9/11, US officials cite recent intelligence giving the most definitive evidence yet that terrorists are planning to use it as an entry point - if they haven't already.

As a result, a number of Republican and Democratic lawmakers - mainly from border states - are pushing to tighten checkpoints and other ways of monitoring the porous 1,400-mile boundary. The subject will also be central to President Bush's summit in Texas Wednesday with Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin.

"I'm worried about our border," Sen. John McCain (R) of Arizona said at a March 17 Senate hearing on threats facing the US. "We have now hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people who are crossing illegally every year. And we are now seeing a larger number of people cross our southern border who are from countries of interest as opposed to just Latin American [countries]."

The "countries of interest" that Senator McCain refers to are those so designated by the US government as known to house radical, if not terrorist, groups.

One of the biggest concerns is that terrorists may exploit the current crossing procedures to make their way into the US. One way they might do this - and members of Congress say evidence is mounting that terrorists are trying this - is by paying smuggling networks, especially organized gangs.

The other is through a loophole in the system to separate the large number of illegal Mexican migrants, who are automatically turned back at the borders, from citizens of other countries who are allowed in, pending immigration hearings. These others are referred to as "other than Mexicans," or OTMs, by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). They come from other Latin American countries as well as other parts of the world, many of them designated by the government as countries of "special interest." In 2004, some 44,000 OTMs were allowed into the US.

It's not clear how many terrorists or people having connections to terror groups may have entered the US as OTMs. But FBI Director Robert Mueller, in a House Appropriations Committee hearing March 9, said he was aware that individuals from countries with known Al Qaeda ties had entered the US under false identities.

Furthermore, in a Feb. 16 Senate hearing, Mr. Mueller cited the case of Mahmoud Youssef Kourani, who paid to be smuggled across the US-Mexico border in 2001. He pleaded guilty on March 1 to providing material support to Hizbullah and was sentenced to no more than five years in prison.

The most recent sign, though, that terrorists may be thinking of entering the US from the south came from the mastermind of many of the terror attacks in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Last week, US officials revealed that Mr. Zarqawi may be planning to broaden his campaign to include strikes in the US - and suggested it would be easy to infiltrate the US through the southern border.

Of the 44,000 OTMs who entered the US last year, it is not known how many were detained and how many remain free. Members of Congress are continuing to lean on government officials, asking for clear assessments of numbers as well as policies intended to thwart the entry of those who would harm the US.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) of California asked the DHS's Adm. James Loy at a hearing last month about the numbers of OTMs detained and those set free. He replied that he didn't have the numbers, and as of the end of last week, the senator's office said the DHS still hadn't provided her those numbers.

But in response to a request from Rep. Solomon Ortiz (D) of Texas, the DHS supplied numbers of OTMs registered, by country of origin, who had been released on their own recognizance for fiscal years 2002, 2003, and 2004. The totals were 5,775, 9,139, and 30,756 respectively.

Some countries, such as those known to export gang members, showed dramatic increases in numbers entering the US. The DHS document, for instance, shows 1,463 OTMs entering the US from El Salvador in 2002. That number increased to 7,963 in 2004. Some 2,539 OTMs entered the US from Honduras in 2002, and that number increased to 12,549 in 2004.

Representative Ortiz, though, disputes many of the DHS numbers. He says he regularly hears reports of much higher figures from border patrol officials from his district in Texas, which includes the border-crossing area of Brownsville.

"In the Brownsville sector alone, border patrol officials reported they caught 23,178 OTMs crossing through August 2004," Mr. Ortiz says. "Of those, 16,616 were released."

Ortiz also points out that another loophole is entering Mexico through Brazil, where a visa is not required to travel to Mexico.

"We believe there is an international Salafist jihadi movement with a goal to attack the near enemy and far enemy - the US," says Richard Shultz, an international security expert at Tufts University's Fletcher School in Medford, Mass. "These terrorists are smart. They study these issues and learn from one other. And one way in is right through the southern security perimeter."

scrapper2  posted on  2007-03-27   18:47:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]