Title: 2nd Debris Field Found 6 miles from United 93 Crash Site Source:
[None] URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeWi0JpI__M Published:Mar 27, 2007 Author:CNN Post Date:2007-03-27 18:54:41 by honway Ping List:*9-11*Subscribe to *9-11* Keywords:None Views:2463 Comments:73
Another one of those reports that the media and the gov desperately try to ignore now, eh?
There are only two possibilities here.
1.The 9/11 Commission lied in their report concerning the crash of United 93.
2. There was a second debris field 6 or more miles away from the primary crash site.
It really is that simple. If it can be confirmed there was a 2nd debris field, the 9/11 Commission deliberately lied to the American people and participated in a cover-up of mass murder.
The FBI is saying debris was found 8 miles away. They say that it was found to the southeast, and that there was a 9 knot wind blowing to the southeast. They said that the NTSB said not only is it feasible for lightweight debris to be carried 8 miles in that wind, but probable.
9 knots is 10.3 mph. In order for debris to be blown 8 miles, it would have had to remain airborn for about 50 minutes. 50 minutes!
Is that about as ludicrous a contention as you ever heard?
For the next few hours, Hankinson gathered charred pages of in-flight magazines, papers from a pilot's manual -- she remembers a map showing the Guadalajara, Mexico, airport -- and copies of stock portfolio monthly earnings reports.
"And there was some black webbing -- a lot of people found that," she said. The webbing, flexible where it hadn't burned, crisp where it had, was from insulation lining the belly of the jetliner.
Are you saying that paper and other light debris (that was mostly what was found 8 miles away) can't travel that distance on a windy day? Come on guys stop shooting yourselves in the foot.
Are you saying that paper and other light debris (that was mostly what was found 8 miles away) can't travel that distance on a windy day? Come on guys stop shooting yourselves in the foot.
Extremely UNlikely given the angle of the crash--almost straight in.
shows papers laying about but NO identifiable plane parts: how can paper survive but identifiable plane parts not?? Perhaps, this is the same type of indestrucable paper product from which a highjackers passport was made from-- the one found on the New York City sidewalk after the WTC conflagration.
Light debris would get caught up in terrain features prior to traveling 8 miles.
Further, an engine core was reported to have been found 2000 feet from the impact crater.
Another point: the burned trees adjacent to the impact crater indicate the jet was traveling west.
shows papers laying about but NO identifiable plane parts: how can paper survive but identifiable plane parts not?? Perhaps, this is the same type of indestrucable paper product from which a highjackers passport was made from-- the one found on the New York City sidewalk after the WTC conflagration.
Paper was reported in various stages of intactness from partially burned to intact.
If it was blown up in the air the momentum would have carried parts over but it did not.
I see plane parts everywhere around the impact zone- the plane broke up into small pieces - there are no substantial plane debris outside the impact area.
Thus using fabric and paper bits found some miles away downwind as proof it was shot down is weak at best - deceptive at worst. When things explode in the air traveling at speed they don't fall straight down - they fall towards their previous momentum. Newtonian physics.
PS: I hold an airframe and power plant license since High School.