[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: Iowa Flag-Desecration Laws Tossed [flying a flag upside down and writing on it] DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) -- Two state laws that prohibit misuse and desecration of an American flag are unenforceable and unconstitutional, a federal judge has ruled. U.S. District Judge Robert W. Pratt said Tuesday that the Iowa laws violate a due process clause in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa brought a lawsuit on behalf of a man charged with a misdemeanor for flying a flag upside down and writing on it and another man also charged with flying a flag upside down. It declared the ruling a victory. "Today should mark the end of government misuse of these laws to intimidate and harass those who disagree with government policies," said Ben Stone, ACLU of Iowa executive director, in a statement. Kathy Nees, state program director for the American Legion of Iowa, said the ruling will upset many veterans and others who have fought for a federal constitutional amendment to ban flag desecration. "I think it's definitely going the wrong direction and sending the wrong message," she said. Scott Wayne Roe of Ottumwa displayed a U.S. flag upside down on June 4, 2006, and wrote "Corruption of Blood" across it, saying he was protesting city ordinances and how they were enforced. He was charged with a misdemeanor, but the charge was dismissed. Dale Klyn of Corydon displayed his flag upside down to protest what he called an unfair loss in a bankruptcy case and to support a campaign for mental health care services for veterans. His case was also dismissed. Pratt struck down a portion of the state's disorderly conduct code, which makes it a simple misdemeanor to "knowingly and publicly use the flag as to show disrespect for the flag as a symbol of the United States," and a state code that prohibits desecration of the flag. The judge rejected an assertion that the laws also violated the First Amendment protection of free speech.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|