See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Totovader ignores evidence of exotic weaponry used on 911
Source:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaFHNcIBzcQ
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaFHNcIBzcQ
Published: Mar 30, 2007
Author: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaFHNcIBz
Post Date: 2007-03-30 01:07:10 by robin
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 141
Comments: 8
Totovader ignores evidence of exotic weaponry used on 911 Exotic weapons caused the damage we can see. Poster Comment:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
Including "the meteor, 4 storeys compressed together, subjected he says to "temperatures as hot as the center of the Earth", instantly carbonised paper and vehicles with anomalous damage. WTC remains
"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Not without a lot of help. It is often quoted by the official StateInc version that the towers became chimneys which stoked the fire as a refiner's forge does, and this is responsible for the high temperature. [And yet why did all of the glass not explode outward prior to the collapse? Must've been heat-proof glass.] I wonder if we have any blacksmiths here? As hot as the center of the Earth? The inner core is 7000 degrees Celsius [7300 K] according to physics. Is the StateInc telling me that the WTC at collapse was 7000 degrees Celsius and That is what melted cars 7 blocks away and the building itself, the result of a pyroclastic flow usually associated with volcanic eruptions? The higher the chimney, in this case 100 plus stories, the hotter the fire..when it has never happened before in the history of other famous high rise fires? Why would the very chimney itself not melt before such heat were attained? Does physics allow for the unrestricted exponential heating of steel and office materials to 7000 degrees Celsius [the outer region of the sun] without some mitigating limit..or without a nuclear reaction? Why would such heat not melt the outer and weaker portion of the steel first causing the face to melt off before the much thicker core goes? If the above is true, I need to go knock around my SMU geology and physics professors for lying to me for four years. If such a temperature were attained, it was instantaneous and man-made, not the result of time, oxygen and fuel. All in my honest opinion of course. P.S. Even if I believed this were the case...a refiner's forge causing high temps at the impact point and above...this would not explain FREEFALL. Heat goes up, not down...what melted the base of the core? Again, we have a strong case for manmade intervention.
"If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may know peace." -Thomas Paine In a CorporoFascist capitalist society, there is no money in peace, freedom, or a healthy population, and therefore, no incentive to achieve these. I normally don't watch 911 videos because I have dialup and they take a long time to download, but I watched this one as I was curious. Around 1989 I had a friend who was getting a PhD, and he snuck me in the lab at his university one night to show me his project he was working on which was a high-energy laser beam which he demonstrated for me. It had incredible heat and a very high frequency, before he turned that thing on he had to set up some safety stuff. It would have instantly destroyed anything in it's path, and this was almost 20 years ago. What I find odd is how the steel beam in that video turns to dust after the building collapses, and the way it does so suggests such a weapon was used as it would penetrate all the matter instantly and then instantly vaporize it as shown in that video. But what do I know, I'm sure a certain someone will come on here to somehow prove otherwise. I don't know of any other way though to vaporize something in such a way, that was weird.
That's what the top video shows and talks about.
"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
The steel simply falls straight down and the dust that had settled on it is left hanging in the air. This is a misdirection. The important question is why did the steel fall like that after surviving the initial collapse?
#2. To: robin, 9-11, skydrifter, diana, former lurker, lodwick (#1)
(Edited)
subjected he says to "temperatures as hot as the center of the Earth
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
- - IndieTX
#3. To: IndieTX (#2)
#4. To: Diana (#3)
#5. To: Diana (#3)
A new truth movement friendly digg type site: Zlonk it!
#6. To: robin (#1)
That is an interesting video. I am going to have to download the raw video file and save it for posterity. I think it is proof that supports Steven Jones' hypothesis and debunks everyone that says "What molten steel?".
A new truth movement friendly digg type site: Zlonk it!
#7. To: Critter (#5)
The important question is why did the steel fall like that after surviving the initial collapse? That may be true, but it's honest speculation, IMO. And your question is also important.
The steel simply falls straight down and the dust that had settled on it is left hanging in the air. This is a misdirection.
"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
#8. To: Critter, robin, Kamala (#5)
The important question is why did the steel fall like that after surviving the initial collapse? If that steel beam was vaporized instantly into dust, it would hang in the air for a few moments before dispersing. I do wonder though why the steel beam fell after the initial collapse, unless the "exotic weaponry" blasted away more that a few times. I'm still thinking about that video today, and how things were instantly turned into dust because jet fuel certainly would not do that, very hot fires would not, even force from a bomb would have broken the steel beam and it would have gone flying away instead of just disintigrating on the spot. I'm not familiar with the source of that video, but I'd be curious to know if for instance that steel beam disintigrating has been shown in other videos.
The steel simply falls straight down and the dust that had settled on it is left hanging in the air. This is a misdirection.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest