Joe Scarborough Attacks Rosie O'Donnell, Barbara Walters & ABC For debating a serious issue. Scarborough brings in the political expert Danny Bonaduce, who says that O'Donnell should be 'strung up for treason' and 'aiding and abetting the enemy'. He then goes on to seriously defend that point.
I told everyone, and I mean EVERYONE when Rosie jumped on the 9-11 Truth Bandwagon, that it was a BAD THING.
I KNEW that she would be not only polarizing, but a means to discredit, and marginalize EVERYONE INVOLVED. I saw the little blurb she did when on the View about how Building 7 fell, and all that other shit, and I have to say without a doubt, to all those morons who thought she'd be a great asset to the so called Truth Movement, I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO.
She is a fucking moron, PERIOD. Having a MORON at the forefront of your movement, means YOU'RE ALL FUCKING MORONS in the eyes of the people.
i disagree, Tommy. The View has a very large audience and what Rosie said, not just about 911, but about MSM and government corruption, has people thinking and talking. that's a good thing. bonaduce, o'reilly, et al are immensely threatened by this publicity and are demonizing Rosie the same way they did Charlie Sheen. well, guess what? most of America agreed with Charlie Sheen and, contrary to what o'reilly et al claim, he's more popular than ever and has just renewed his TV show because of increased ratings. i'm hoping Rosie's courage will embolden many many other "celebrities" to speak out.
I saw her on the view, and I maintain she is a moron, an absolute moron.
She cannot argue, nor can she state the facts about Larry Silverstein, nor can she accurately describe what happened to the twin towers. She was going on a tear about building 7, but using the arguments for the twin towers, and totally blew off the truth about Larry Silverstein saying "We pulled it".
When you have someone like that running her mouth, speaking as an authority, who cannot keep the story straight, you have instant marginalization.
All the neocons have to do, is point at Rosie and you have instantly discredited anyone who speaks about the topic in the eyes of the morons in this country.
#58. To: TommyTheMadArtist, boonie rat, Zipporah, christine, Jethro Tull, lodwick, Diana, Minerva (#52)
All the neocons have to do, is point at Rosie and you have instantly discredited anyone who speaks about the topic in the eyes of the morons in this country.
Not hardly.
In fact, the neos don't want to point to anything lest they raise the subject for discussion, and then their problems are just beginning.
No matter what a govt shill says the answer is, "The reason for any speculation is because of the vacuum left by the lack of any serious forensic investigation, and it was you people who made sure that didn't happen!"
Is it your belief that the neos can confidently respond to any critics now? That could only be true if they had any facts on their side, and they don't. In order to accept the official fairie tale we have to believe that the laws of physics suddenly went on holiday, to say nothing of several other mathematically impossible feats that took place that terrible day.
I think the Neo-Sheviks are in the ignoring stage...before a new front opens up...
ICANN Recommends .911 Domain Suffix
(BNN - March 30, 2007 - Marina del Rey, California) - The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers today recommended the creation of the .911 Top Level domain suffix (sTLD) by a vote of 13-1.
"We believe the explosive growth in 911 conspiracy sites justifies this action," a press release said.
Nicholas Hauptmann, the lone dissenter, suspected government pressure to isolate 9/11 Truth groups. "The government wants to herd us all under the .911 domain. Then one day agents will just delete the .911 domain. We'll be finished."
A survey of national 9/11 Truth groups echoed Hauptmann's fears.
Comments on the JREF forum indicated True Skeptics' universal support for the ICANN recommendation.
"We're applying for our own domain," one commenter wrote. "We believe the most appropriate domain suffix for rational people against loony 9/11 conspiracy theories is '.NOT.'"
If I have a debate with you, I don't give you a dozen different versions of the story. I will give you ONE, and that will be all.
Rosie mixes everything up. I saw the whole thing, and the FACT that she is incoherent in her rants, tells me that she will do nothing but marginalize people who discuss this.
I already had a talk with a friend about it, and their impression of Rosie, AND HER FANS, is that she's a moron, and so are they.
When I debated this friend, the first thing he did was point at Rosie, and asked if I was one of her fans. I stated no, and proceeded to keep the debate up. His rebuttal was simply, I'm not going to listen to talking points from Rosie O'Donnell. Actually it was a little more candid than that, but you get the idea.
People will look at Rosie and realize that she's not coherent in her arguments, and gets way too shrill to even want to have a dialogue with her.
She is doing EXACTLY what she's supposed to. This is why you and I are in disagreement. You think she's a great asset to the truth movement. I see her as a device to marginalize it, and most importantly, demoralize it.
She can't debate facts, because she can't stay on track, or remain coherent. I can, you can, and just about anyone else can. When you take a look at posters like BAC, you have a pretty good idea of what kind of morons you're going to be up against, and would you really want someone like Rosie leading that debate? Not me, Not ever.