[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Nigel Farage warns riots will sweep Britain due to decades-long failure to control immigration

School board trains staff that the term family is harmful, racist

Fort Wayne joins in on nationwide ‘No Kings’ protests, honoring veterans and giving back

More than a human can bear

Top Doctor Blows Whistle: Hospitals Boosted Covid Deaths by Euthanizing Patients

The U.S. will very likely fight a 3-front war against Russia, China and Iran, Palantir's Alex Karp says

Middle East War: Next Steps For Israel And Will Iran Blockade The Straits Of Hormuz

Ford forced to shutter factories amid worrying parts shortages: 'Hand-to-mouth right now'

7 Issues On The G7 Agenda: The Big Topics Albanese And Trump Could Discuss

Dark-Money Network Funneled Millions Into 'No Kings' Nationwide Color Revolution Operation

House Republicans Probe China-Based Billionaire Allegedly Bankrolling Anti-ICE Riots

Did Iranian ballistic missiles hit the Dimona nuclear reactor.

Rep. Green Letter to DoD IG Demands Answers On K2 Base Toxins

“Israel is DESTROYING itself by attacking IRAN and millions could die” Col. Douglas Macgregor

How Boeing 787 Whistleblower's Disaster Warning Was Ignored |

Israel Says Another Missile Barrage Launched From Iran Overnight, Casualties Rise

2025 Annotated Bilderberg Members List

Major Iranian Missile Impacts On Israel; IAEA Warns Radioactive Contamination Observed At Natanz

Israeli Strikes On Iran Ongoing Through Friday As Death Toll Surpasses 100

From Torah to trauma: A Satanic child abuse scandal blows up in Israel

MAGA Influencer Calls to Deploy Palantir on LA Streets

Egypt detains nearly 200 foreigners who flew in to join Gaza march

FLASHBACK - How Mayor Daley dealt with looters!

Scammers Use AI Bots to Impersonate Students, Stealing Millions in Financial Aid

Bilderberg 2025 begins. Global elites gather in Stockholm. AI, migration, and national security dominate

I Wish We All Could Leave California (Beach Boys Parody)

Exclusive: US slams UN conference on Israel-Palestinian issue, warns of consequences

Brilliant & Critical Insight!

Legal Immigrants Shift to GOP on Immigration, Shows 40-Point Swing from Democrats

American fuel tankers were spotted REFUELING ISRAELI JETS over Syria.


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Air Force Fighter Pilot and Instructor Comes Out for 9/11 Truth
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 4, 2007
Author: Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer .
Post Date: 2007-04-04 20:57:00 by tom007
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 5382
Comments: 96

Air Force Fighter Pilot and Instructor Comes Out for 9/11 Truth

9/11 Blogger | April 2, 2007

Every day, additional military and government people come out for 9/11 truth. The latest is Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer .

Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Retired U.S. Air Force fighter pilot (F-111, F-15E, F-16, B-1, F-18, Mig-29, and Suu-22). Flew combat missions over Iraq. Former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO's Tactical Leadership Program.

• Statement to this website 3/25/07: "After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back.

The "collapse" of WTC Building 7 [570 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an airplane] shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned. There is simply no way to demolish a 47-story building (on fire) over a coffee break. It is also impossible to report the building's collapse before it happened, as BBC News did, unless it was pre-planned. Further damning evidence is Larry Silverstein's video taped confession in which he states "they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we watched the building collapse."

We cannot let the pursuit of justice fail. Those of us in the military took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic". Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.

We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!" Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 55.

#16. To: tom007, ALL (#0)

The "collapse" of WTC Building 7 [570 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an airplane] shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned.

Odd. Not one demolition expert in the world seems to believe that.

Further damning evidence is Larry Silverstein's video taped confession in which he states "they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we watched the building collapse."

Is it necessary to alter quotes to fabricate a case against the US government? Apparently so ...

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-04-04   22:36:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: BeAChooser (#16)

are you an operative from DU?

you seem to be trying to convince the world that all republicans are rude bullshitters like yourself.

Morgana le Fay  posted on  2007-04-04   22:39:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Morgana le Fay, ALL (#17)

Come on, Morgana, help us out.

Provide us with a statement in the Constitution or US law that defines the form a Declaration of War must take.

Or did you just drop by to cheerlead for those who so far haven't been able to do that?

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-04-04   22:50:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: BeAChooser (#19)

Provide us with a statement in the Constitution or US law that defines the form a Declaration of War must take.

Once again, you're an idiot.

This has been explained to you many times, yet you slink off and try your parlour trick with someone you think missed the last show. Pathetic.

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-04   22:56:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Dakmar, ALL (#24)

"Provide us with a statement in the Constitution or US law that defines the form a Declaration of War must take."

Once again, you're an idiot.

This has been explained to you many times,

A few folks have expressed an OPINION. But that's about it.

NO ONE has quoted the Constitution or US law as to the form a Declaration of War must take.

And it seems that Congress had a different OPINION than you back in 2002. At least according to the LAW they passed authorizing the use of military force in Iraq to deal with a bunch of WHEREASes.

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-04-04   23:02:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: BeAChooser (#29)

NO ONE has quoted the Constitution or US law as to the form a Declaration of War must take.

Red Herring by a desperate Jewish guy shilling for Israels war.

Minerva  posted on  2007-04-04   23:09:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Minerva, ALL (#39)

Red Herring by a desperate Jewish guy shilling for Israels war.

Speaking of red herrings. ROTFLOL!

By the way, you know NOTHING about me.

You only make yourself look more and more foolish every time you assert I'm jewish .

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-04-04   23:28:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: BeAChooser (#46)

Speaking of red herrings. ROTFLOL!

By the way, you know NOTHING about me.

Fish Breath, pay attention and try to stay on subject.

I said your arguement about the form of the war resolution was a stupid red herring.

In response, you tried to change the subject and you tried to interject personal insults.

This tells me two things. Your stupid argument about the form of the war resolution was a red herring and you are caught red handed and have no good response.

Minerva  posted on  2007-04-04   23:40:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Minerva, ALL (#52)

you tried to interject personal insults.

What personal insult would that be?

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-04-04   23:45:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 55.

#56. To: BeAChooser (#55)

What personal insult would that be?

The one on the thread above.

You are still trying to change the subject. You are doing this because your stupid argument about the form the war resolution must take was pointed out to be a deliberate red herring. You have no answer for this.

Minerva  posted on  2007-04-04 23:48:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: BeAChooser (#55)

you tried to interject personal insults.

What personal insult would that be?

try to stay on point. only little kids use these sorts of tactics. your using them has made you the laughing stock on three internet sites at least.

your silly argument about he war resolution was pointed out to be a dishonest diversion.

since then, you have done nothing but try to change the subject.

Morgana le Fay  posted on  2007-04-04 23:50:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 55.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]