See other Editorial Articles
Title: Air Force Fighter Pilot and Instructor Comes Out for 9/11 Truth
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 4, 2007
Author: Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer .
Post Date: 2007-04-04 20:57:00 by tom007
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 2028
Comments: 96
Air Force Fighter Pilot and Instructor Comes Out for 9/11 Truth 9/11 Blogger | April 2, 2007 Every day, additional military and government people come out for 9/11 truth. The latest is Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer . Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Retired U.S. Air Force fighter pilot (F-111, F-15E, F-16, B-1, F-18, Mig-29, and Suu-22). Flew combat missions over Iraq. Former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO's Tactical Leadership Program. • Statement to this website 3/25/07: "After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back. The "collapse" of WTC Building 7 [570 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an airplane] shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned. There is simply no way to demolish a 47-story building (on fire) over a coffee break. It is also impossible to report the building's collapse before it happened, as BBC News did, unless it was pre-planned. Further damning evidence is Larry Silverstein's video taped confession in which he states "they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we watched the building collapse." We cannot let the pursuit of justice fail. Those of us in the military took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic". Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it. We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!"
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
Kooks are everywhere it seems.
More and more everyday.
Supporters of Bush and the Iraq war for Israel and oil are traitors to America and they hate American troops.
Don't miss this one.
"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Oh, he's just a BIG LOSER! What kind of a LOSER would believe anything said by a LOSER like this? LOL! ROFL! LOL PMP ROFLOL ROFL ROFLOL ROFL! Sorry, just had to play "government apologist" for a moment... Ick, ick... man, I feel like I need a shower now...
#2. To: tom007 (#1)
Kooks are everywhere it seems.
#3. To: tom007, SKYDRIFTER, Kamala (#0)
Every day, additional military and government people come out for 9/11 truth. The latest is Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer .
#4. To: tom007 (#1)
 | Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#5. To: robin (#3)
Tonight on Countdown, Olberman commented on the "stone silence treatment" Bush got from his captive military audience at Fort Erwin, CA today. The military knows he's a lunatic dancing on Isreal's puppet strings.
Supporters of Bush and the Iraq war for Israel and oil are traitors to America and they hate American troops.
#6. To: tom007 (#0)
Short and sweet. Welcome, Colonel.
The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!
#7. To: wbales (#5)
President Says "I Saw A Threat In Saddam Hussein" That's a lot of material for the likes of Olbermann.
America's Commander in Chief says, "And I had a choice to make, and that is whether or not to pull back and hope that chaos wouldn't spread, or to do something about the sectarian violence that was taking place and to help the Iraqis bring order to their capital in order to give them breathing space, time to reconcile their differences after having lived under the thumb of a tyrant for years."
"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
#8. To: wbales (#5)
The military knows he's a lunatic dancing on Isreal's puppet strings. More good news - thanks.
Tonight on Countdown, Olberman commented on the "stone silence treatment" Bush got from his captive military audience at Fort Erwin, CA today.
#9. To: lodwick (#6)
Oh yeah? Well you just want to have sex with Rosie O'Donnell. Face up to it, man! Eww, sorry, I played it much too real.
"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar
#10. To: tom007 (#0)
congrats to Col. Razer.
Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
#11. To: BeAChooser, SkyDrifter, Diana (#0)
Please note BAC. Lt. Col. Razer is NOT a TREASONOUS QUEER. But you are.
Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
#12. To: Dakmar (#9)
Considering all the mullets that she is awakening to the truth, a mercy-hump might not be remiss...but, doesn't her clock swing the other way?
#13. To: lodwick (#12)
You deserve every bit of ugliness I fishtailed into your yard!
"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar
#14. To: tom007 (#0)
Because of the "911 INSIDE JOB" painted on the back glass of my van, I get folks who ask about the DVD's I give away. I like to show them articles of credible folks who believe the same. This guy goes on my short list.
............
Just a reminder... giving away FREEDOM TO FASCISM dvd's is a wonderful way to help Ron Paul.
Note: All my DVD's now contain two videos. And, I have nicer labels now.
#15. To: wakeup. all (#14)
WU is right on - the DVD's and the labels are top-notch. Please do whatever you can to support his efforts, and his unique project.
And, I have nicer labels now.
#16. To: tom007, ALL (#0)
Odd. Not one demolition expert in the world seems to believe that. Is it necessary to alter quotes to fabricate a case against the US government? Apparently so ...
The "collapse" of WTC Building 7 [570 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an airplane] shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned.
Further damning evidence is Larry Silverstein's video taped confession in which he states "they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we watched the building collapse."
#17. To: BeAChooser (#16)
are you an operative from DU? you seem to be trying to convince the world that all republicans are rude bullshitters like yourself.
"And this is the end of my brilliant career on the 4um..." -- ponchy 12/20/2006
#18. To: Morgana le Fay (#17)
BAC's an agent equivocateur.
ss . . ssanibsurdansinuoashin - Geo. W. Bush
#19. To: Morgana le Fay, ALL (#17)
Come on, Morgana, help us out. Provide us with a statement in the Constitution or US law that defines the form a Declaration of War must take. Or did you just drop by to cheerlead for those who so far haven't been able to do that?
#20. To: randge, ALL (#18)
Lend Morgana a hand in that, randge. I'm sure she(?) will need it.
#21. To: BeAChooser (#19)
provide us with a statement in the Constitution or US law that defines the form any bill must take. It's silly that you havfe to resort to this over the top spin becuase you know that 114 doesn't say what you need it to say. lol!!
Provide us with a statement in the Constitution or US law that defines the form a Declaration of War must take.
"And this is the end of my brilliant career on the 4um..." -- ponchy 12/20/2006
#22. To: BeAChooser (#19)
your obvious shiftiness is the reason you are a laughing stock on the last three forums you have been on. how was passover?
"And this is the end of my brilliant career on the 4um..." -- ponchy 12/20/2006
#23. To: Morgana le Fay (#22)
You said Fish Breath was on a rampage?
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
#24. To: BeAChooser (#19)
Once again, you're an idiot. This has been explained to you many times, yet you slink off and try your parlour trick with someone you think missed the last show. Pathetic.
Provide us with a statement in the Constitution or US law that defines the form a Declaration of War must take.
"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar
#25. To: Minerva (#23)
read the threads. there are at least two. i think he has a lot of pent up bs from sitting out over passover.
"And this is the end of my brilliant career on the 4um..." -- ponchy 12/20/2006
#26. To: Fish Breath (#20)
Shalom Fish Breath. Are you on a rampage?
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
#27. To: Morgana le Fay, ALL (#21)
You mean Public law 107-243, 116 Stat. 1497-1502? You know, the one titled "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002"? I think it says all it needs to say. And, of course, you can't show us anything in the Constitution or US law defining what it should say.
It's silly that you havfe to resort to this over the top spin becuase you know that 114 doesn't say what you need it to say.
#28. To: BeAChooser (#27)
The one you wouldn't quote? The one where you only quoted the recitals as these served you better than the actual bill? LOL!!
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
#29. To: Dakmar, ALL (#24)
A few folks have expressed an OPINION. But that's about it. NO ONE has quoted the Constitution or US law as to the form a Declaration of War must take. And it seems that Congress had a different OPINION than you back in 2002. At least according to the LAW they passed authorizing the use of military force in Iraq to deal with a bunch of WHEREASes.
"Provide us with a statement in the Constitution or US law that defines the form a Declaration of War must take."
Once again, you're an idiot.
This has been explained to you many times,
#30. To: BeAChooser (#27)
you asked me what form a bill should take. i answered you and called you on your silly bullshit. you are now trying to change the subject. 12 year olds do this a lot.
You mean Public law 107-243, 116 Stat. 1497-1502? You know, the one titled "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002"? I think it says all it needs to say. And, of course, you can't show us anything in the Constitution or US law defining what it should say.
"And this is the end of my brilliant career on the 4um..." -- ponchy 12/20/2006
#31. To: Morgana le Fay (#30)
That is true. and TREASONOUS QUEERS do also.
12 year olds do this a lot.
Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
#32. To: BeAChooser (#29)
because ..... as you know .... it is a silly red herring to get the discussion away from the fact that the war resolution doesn't say what you need it to say. lol!!!!!
NO ONE has quoted the Constitution or US law as to the form a Declaration of War must take.
"And this is the end of my brilliant career on the 4um..." -- ponchy 12/20/2006
#33. To: Minerva, ALL (#28)
I did better than that. I provided a link to it. So folks could read all the WHEREASes that you folks just ignored. And see that Congress gave it's APPROVAL of the use of force against Iraq for all those WHEREAS reasons.
The one you wouldn't quote?
#34. To: BeAChooser (#29)
So Bush's Declaration of War is not valid because you and Jeff Gannon smeared the paper it was written on with your AIDS infected semen?
NO ONE has quoted the Constitution or US law as to the form a Declaration of War must take.
"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar
#35. To: Morgana le Fay, ALL (#30)
I notice you never provided a link to this 114 you speak of. Why is that?
12 year olds do this a lot.
#36. To: Dakmar, ALL (#34)
Yes, you definitely are a typical 4um poster.
So Bush's Declaration of War is not valid because you and Jeff Gannon smeared the paper it was written on with your AIDS infected semen?
#37. To: BeAChooser (#33)
No you didn't liar. You know where it is, post the link yourself if you think it says something different. Do you know how desperate you look pushing this goofy red herring? Duhhhhh guess I got nuttin else, so where in the contstitution does it say what form a war resolution should take huh?
I did better than that.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
#38. To: BeAChooser (#36)
Are you still a Jew?
"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar
#39. To: BeAChooser (#29)
Red Herring by a desperate Jewish guy shilling for Israels war.
NO ONE has quoted the Constitution or US law as to the form a Declaration of War must take.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
#40. To: Morgana le Fay, BeAChooser (#32)
Regarding your assertion that Jefferson sent the marines to fight the pirates without a formal 'declaration of war'. this is technically true. But the pirates that were targeted were not a nation. and the US Marines were established by an act of Congress & funded in 1790's with the specific understanding that they would be used to fight these pirates. So I think you're a little bit ridiculous. The constitution says we don't go to war unless Congress declares war. and for you to suggest that Jefferson was a TREASONOUS QUEER! like you is obnoxious. Washington wasn't a TREASONOUS QUEER! either. and the fighting against the pirates began in 1790's when Washington was president. It only continued under next 2 presidents which included Jefferson (3'rd president).
Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
.
.
.
Comments (41 - 96) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest