[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

"Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: There is no war on terrorism
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/76020-terorrism-0
Published: Apr 5, 2007
Author: Jack Duggan
Post Date: 2007-04-05 10:26:44 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 374
Comments: 38

All the stories we see in the TV news, print and Internet media today are like mice in a small room occupied by a grizzly bear. We can see the bear, hear him panting and growling as he attempts to stomp on us, but everyone pretends he's just not there, even though he's eating all the food and we mice are starving.

The bear is the U.S. government and media cover up of the 9/11 attacks. They never came close to proving that foreign "terrorists" were involved. Of all four missing planes' passenger manifests, not one Middle Easterner was on any of them. A jihadist who is bravely going to his death for the sake of his beliefs in Allah and Islam is a martyr and wants the whole world to know it. Martyr's families receive reverential praise and support in their communities for decades. Yet not one of the "terrorists" the American government insists were on the aircraft used their real names or were listed on the passenger lists. At least seven of the nineteen 'hijackers' are still alive.

The 9/11 attacks were created for justification of U.S. covert plans to grab influence over oil politics in the Middle East and as an excuse to take away the rest of Americans' liberties through a manufactured threat-scenario called, "The War On Terror."

What good are all the thousands of articles about politics, global warming, education, scandals, religion, economics and how we must always go out and vote so that we can "make a difference"? If our votes really did make a difference, they'd be illegal.

Who cares about such articles when the cover up of what really happened on 9/11 is hands-off, an untouchable leper? What good are they when in the name of a phony "terrorist attack," our way of life no longer exists except at the pleasure of corporate-driven federal socialists? We are being starved of our liberties by a ursus horribulus that stomps every mouse who dares get in his way or mention that he's there.

I see a lot of authors write all around the grizzly bear, almost approaching the truth, but none seem to have the conviction to call for an open door to run the bear out of the house. Our Founding Fathers would have made a bearskin rug.

I will tell you here and tell you now with no equivocation: THE 9/11 ATTACKS WERE NOT DONE BY TERRORISTS.

There is absolutely no need for the PATRIOT Act, the FEMA Police, Homeland Security, airline and stadium searches and warrantless monitoring of every phone call and e-mail conversation we make.

In the name of a false threat that never existed, all of our rights and freedoms have been trivialized. Every branch of federal government has been suborned, including the U.S. Supreme Court, whose judicial activists invent law and have recently canceled our rights to own property, in Kelo v. City of New London, making eminent-domain confiscations of our homes to increase politicians' tax profits 'constitutional.'

Central government today is one-hundred times worse than under George III, yet how many Americans can see this? Perhaps most don't want to see it, because it might compel them to drop their precious remote controls.

There is no war on terror

If there was, the whole nation would be told to take up arms. Everybody would be armed, even on aircraft. Inexpensive AK47's would be stored in every closet, much like arms are stored in homes all over Switzerland because the Swiss government has nothing to fear from its populace. There is only a war against our freedom in the name of a created threat that doesn't exist. We have been duped into surrendering our liberty in the false name of security by a government that sends us out into the "War On Terror" unarmed because we cannot be trusted with guns. The most basic of all rights is the right of self defense against criminal attacks. A great equalizer between the weak and the strong, guns in the hands of women could reduce assaults upon them by stronger male attackers by 80%. How can it be said that women have equal rights if they cannot carry, yet Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton and Laura Bush all hide behind guns for their protection because they're much more important than our wives, sisters and daughters? Again, the only 'war' is on our freedoms.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

#1. To: More--Excellent article! (#0)

People are so used to being indoctrinated by government that they have actually been convinced to ignore their own eyes. Everyone who saw the videos of the World Trade Center Towers saw them fall exactly like other high-rise buildings that were dropped by sequential demolition charges, at the speed of gravity because there was no structural resistance below to impede their collapse into their basement footprints. Yet almost every viewer has been convinced by the lap-dog media that measly jet-fuel fires could melt the massive steel girders of both buildings, then make everything collapse. Just like a pilot's foot pedals could make a passenger jet burst into flames, then crash in Rockaway, NY. Apparently the federal government has learned that the public will buy any lie, no matter how absurd, if it's repeated often enough.

There were dozens and dozens of reports by rescue workers on the ground at the WTC complex that heard explosions over an hour after the planes crashed into the towers. They felt explosions under their feet that were so powerful that seismographs registered them at 2.1 and 2.3 on the Richter scale. Only explosions could have caused them.

The weekend before the 9/11 WTC demolition, all power was shut down to install "computer cables." No one was allowed inside and all security cameras and alarms had no power for 30 hours. Computer cables don't connect with building electricity, so the need to turn off and close both towers to do so is indicative of another motive, like planting charges without alarms and video surveillance. Marvin Bush, brother to President George and Jeb, was a principal in Securacom, which was in charge of security for the World Trade Center. Didn't hear that on the TV news, did you?

Suckers who still buy into the monumental lie that aircraft crashes caused the collapse of both WTC Towers, cannot explain how a steel beam weighing twice as much as a Boeing 767 flew from one WTC building over 390 feet to bury itself very deeply into the neighboring American Express building. Even harder to explain is why WTC Building 7, a block away, collapsed "because of fire," when it received no damage from the Twin Towers' collapse. No other skyscraper in the world ever collapsed because of a fire of any type, including that from a B25 bomber crashing into the Empire State Building decades ago. Of all the air crashes in the USA over the past three decades, how many ground crashes resulted in not recovering their black boxes, containing pilots' voices (CVR's) and aircraft telemetries (FDR's) before and during impact? Yet not one usable black box was ever recovered from any of the four planes that reputedly were hijacked on 9/11. Not one. Flight 93 that contained the "Let's roll!" myth, where four passengers supposedly tried to overpower the hijackers, did not crash into one small area like it should have. Its debris was spread over 8 miles, indicating that it was shot down by a military fighter jet, exploding in the sky and raining down debris over eight miles, "like confetti."

The WTC was the biggest crime, mass murder, 'hijackings' and air crashes in US history. Yet all the forensic evidence was immediately removed, buried or shipped to smelters so that not one investigator from any agency could inspect it. Who has that kind of power?

President Bush and all his staff swore to God to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America , then apparently went on to violate their oaths of office by completely ignoring the Constitution. Bush maintains that he can ignore the U.S. Constitution and tap into private computers, phone lines, medical records and any other private citizens' data whenever he wants, by his self-declared doctrine of "Unitary Executive.” He claims that as Commander-In-Chief the president is the sole judge of the law, is unbound by the Geneva Conventions against torture and possesses inherent authority to subordinate the entire government to his rule - including Congress and the courts.

christine  posted on  2007-04-05   10:39:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: christine, ALL (#1)

Everyone who saw the videos of the World Trade Center Towers saw them fall exactly like other high-rise buildings that were dropped by sequential demolition charges

This is ABSOLUTELY FALSE, christine. Which is why NOT ONE demolition expert anywhere in the world is on record saying that the towers were brought down by explosives. NOT ONE. This is a much simpler explanation:

http://www.debunking911.com/collapse.htm

, at the speed of gravity because there was no structural resistance below to impede their collapse

This is ABSOLUTELY FALSE, christine. Just because I'm *evil* doesn't make your claim true. To collapse at the "speed of gravity", the towers would have to have collapsed in under 10 seconds. But videos and photos prove the collapses took about 15 seconds.

Yet almost every viewer has been convinced by the lap-dog media that measly jet-fuel fires could melt the massive steel girders of both buildings, then make everything collapse.

This is a STRAWMAN, christine. Neither the government, NIST or any structural engineers or demolitions experts are now saying that melting steel had anything to do with the collapse of the towers. Why do you persist in this nonsense, christine? I know you think I'm *evil* but that doesn't change the facts into what you claim.

They felt explosions under their feet that were so powerful that seismographs registered them at 2.1 and 2.3 on the Richter scale. Only explosions could have caused them.

That's not what the seismologists say. ALL who have spoken on the subject anywhere in the world, including those who recorded the data, are on record saying there is no indication of explosives or anything besides what is postulated in NIST's scenario in the seismic records. Lerner-Lam said "There is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers. That representation of our work is categorically incorrect and not in context." ImplosionWorld, experts in demolition stated "In all cases where seismographs detected the collapses, waveform readings indicate a single, gradually ascending and descending level of ground vibrations during the event. At no point during 9/11 were sudden or independent vibration "spikes" documented by any seismograph, and we are unaware of any entity possessing such data. This evidence makes a compelling argument against explosive demolition. The laws of physics dictate that any detonation powerful enough to defeat steel columns would have transferred excess energy through those same columns into the ground, and would certainly have been detected by at least one of the monitors that were sensitive enough to record the structural collapses. However, a detailed analysis of all available data reveals no presense of any unusual or abnormal vibration events." So why do you persist in this, christine, even though this has already been pointed out to you several times?

Suckers who still buy into the monumental lie that aircraft crashes caused the collapse of both WTC Towers,

That would be ALL the real experts in the world, I guess. The only non-suckers are you, a couple janitors, a sub-atomic particle physicist, a water treatment expert, a theologian, a couple philosophers, a dental material expert, a lawyer and sundry others with absolutely no experience in structures, impact, fire, steel, concrete, demolition, buckling, seismology or macro-world physics. ROTFLOL!

cannot explain how a steel beam weighing twice as much as a Boeing 767 flew from one WTC building over 390 feet to bury itself very deeply into the neighboring American Express building.

This is ABSOLUTELY FALSE, christine. Explanations have been presented on more than one occasion. Here is one: http://www.911myths.com/html/explosive_force.html The problem is that you simply ignore them. Which only makes you look foolish.

Even harder to explain is why WTC Building 7, a block away, collapsed "because of fire," when it received no damage from the Twin Towers' collapse.

This is ABSOLUTELY FALSE, christine. WTC7 was badly damaged by the collapse of the towers. And numerous experts, fireman statements and photos document this. Why do you insist on this nonsense ... going so far as to misrepresent the facts? Are you that obsessed?

No other skyscraper in the world ever collapsed because of a fire of any type,

Again, this is ABSOLUTELY FALSE. All portions of the Windsor Tower in Madrid that relied solely on a steel frame for support did in fact collapse due to fire ... one not even started by jet fuel and one that was fought by firemen.

Furthermore, no other skyscrapers in the world of WTC-like construction have ever been hit by commercial jets filled with fuel and traveling at maximum speed and then burned without firefighting of any kind for over an hour.

Why do you persist in this nonsense, christine? You only discredit the effort to find out what really happened on 9/11 by doing this. You will never find the truth on a foundation of misinformation and delusion.

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-04-05   19:37:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: beachooser, Destro, Minerva, Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#10)

To collapse at the "speed of gravity", the towers would have to have collapsed in under 10 seconds.

The point being that with the factual speed of the collapse, at whatever timing you care to cite, only controlled demolition could have accomplished that.

OR; BAC - you treasonous queer - are you saying that all those firemen didn't hear the charges going off? Are they qualified to identify an explosion?

Well ...... ?


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-05   21:48:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: SKYDRIFTER, Minerva, Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala (#18)

The point being that with the factual speed of the collapse

What is the speed it is supposed to fall at?

Nimords.

Destro  posted on  2007-04-06   0:19:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Destro, Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#28)

What is the speed it is supposed to fall at?

Makes no difference, inasmuch as it is somewhere under 20 secongs certifying that only controlled demolition could have achieved that.

Who cares about the sometimes-interesting nit-noy details?


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-06   0:29:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: SKYDRIFTER (#29)

Makes no difference, inasmuch as it is somewhere under 20 secongs certifying that only controlled demolition could have achieved that.

And if no explosives it would fall under what speed? Slow mo like in the movies?

Destro  posted on  2007-04-06   1:21:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Destro, Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#30)

And if no explosives it would fall under what speed? Slow mo like in the movies?

Makes no difference, inasmuch as it is somewhere under 20 secongs certifying that only controlled demolition could have achieved that.

Any kind of "structural failure" collapse would have taken minutes to hours - if not days. The abrupt collapse of the core columns in the two towers says it was demolition, add the video captures and witnesses.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-06   1:28:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: SKYDRIFTER (#31)

Any kind of "structural failure" collapse would have taken minutes to hours - if not days.

Really? Please point out the study that indicates that. Pulling a theory out of your arse ain't science.

Destro  posted on  2007-04-06   2:30:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Destro, Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#32)

Common sense doesn't require a science degree or a study.

(You and BAC, eh?)


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-06   10:05:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 33.

        There are no replies to Comment # 33.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]