[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Ethereum ETFs In 'Window-Dressing' Stage, Approval Within Weeks; Galaxy

Americans Are More Likely To Go To War With The Government Than Submit To The Draft

Rudy Giuliani has just been disbarred in New York

Israeli Generals Want Truce in Gaza,

Joe Biden's felon son Hunter is joining White House meetings

The only Democrat who could beat Trump

Ukraine is too CORRUPT to join NATO, US says, in major blow to Zelensky and boost for Putin

CNN Erin Burnett Admits Joe Biden knew the Debate questions..

Affirmative Action Suit Details How Law School Blackballed Accomplished White Men, Opted For Unqualified Black Women

Russia warns Israel over Ukraine missiles

Yemeni Houthis Vow USS Theodore Roosevelt 'Primary Target' Once it Enters Red Sea

3 Minutes Ago: Jim Rickards Shared Horrible WARNING

Horse is back at library

Crossdressing Luggage Snatcher and Ex-Biden Official Sam Brinton Gets Sweetheart Plea Deal

Music

The Ones That Didn't Make It Back Home [featuring Pacman @ 0:49 - 0:57 in his natural habitat]

Let’s Talk About Grief | Death Anniversary

Democrats Suddenly Change Slogan To 'Orange Man Good'

America in SHOCK as New Footage of Jill Biden's 'ELDER ABUSE' Emerges | Dems FURIOUS: 'Jill is EVIL'

Executions, reprisals and counter-executions - SS Polizei Regiment 19 versus the French Resistance

Paratrooper kills german soldier and returns wedding photos to his family after 68 years

AMeRiKaN GULaG...

'Christian Warrior Training' explodes as churches put faith in guns

Major insurer gives brutal ultimatum to entire state: Let us put up prices by 50 percent or we will leave

Biden Admin Issues Order Blocking Haitian Illegal Immigrants From Deportation

Murder Rate in Socialist Venezuela Falls to 22-Year Low

ISRAEL IS DESTROYING GAZA TO CONTROL THE WORLD'S MOST IMPORTANT SHIPPING LANE

Denmark to tax livestock farts and burps starting in 2030

Woman to serve longer prison time for offending migrant men who gang-raped a minor

IDF says murder is okay after statistics show that Israel killed 75% of all journalists who died in 2023


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11 Truth Movement: Only Growing Stronger – And the Media are Frightened to Death!
Source: http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=593
URL Source: http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=593
Published: Apr 7, 2007
Author: Jessie
Post Date: 2007-04-07 07:32:37 by Kamala
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: 911
Views: 260
Comments: 19

9/11 Truth Movement: Only Growing Stronger – And the Media are Frightened to Death!

The corporate media have launched a desperate attempt to eliminate all discussions about the official body of evidence related to the events of 9/11. Just watch how they are trying frantically to get Rosie O’Donnell fired from ABC’s The View. Also think back to when the media launched a broad based attack against the character of Charlie Sheen for daring to publicly question the official story of 9/11. Rosie, however, is a much greater problem for the criminals in the media. She is on a daily network TV program with a large audience that doesn’t even know that questions and disturbing facts about 9/11 exist.

Let’s understand one thing: the 9/11 truth movement is doing nothing but growing. People who have been exposed to the actual evidence and understand the ramifications of what it reveals are not waking up one morning and suddenly deciding that they believe the official story. The dynamic works like this: those who are not aware of the evidence believe the official story. Once they start poking around they realize that the official story about the attacks could not possibly be true, and they discover the plethora of evidence that was hidden and misrepresented by the Bush administration, the 9/11 Commission and the corporate media. 9/11 truthers are not suddenly coming across new information that causes them to suddenly believe the official story. It’s a one way flow. The evidence speaks for itself.

Could that last statement possibly explain why the media are trying so desperately to quash any discussion about 9/11 or destroy the credibility of anyone who dares to try to raise the topic? You can bet that it is! But there is another angle here as well. The media are no longer trying to protect the insiders of the Bush administration whose involvement in the events and cover up of the evidence is implicated by so much that has been uncovered. This time around they are protecting themselves. Let’s be real here. With every day a liar continues to lie it becomes more difficult to undo, explain, correct or justify that lie. This is the position in which the corporate media find themselves right now.

The events of 9/11 pose a unique problem for the criminal corporate media. For generations, the media have kept Americans in the dark about topics like war, taxation, the monetary system, America’s involvement in atrocities in the world, domestic assassinations, science, health, and our environment. Yet, 9/11 is a topic that hits home like no other. Understand that this is not theory, this is provable.

We have to understand that the media have “protected the people” from the truth about many events over the years. I demonstrate this very clearly in a presentation that I give to live audiences. You can get some insight into media deception by perusing http://TvNewsLIES.org, but my lecture leaves no doubt in people’s minds that the media lie to them via distortions, distractions delusions and omissions. But even more important, they discover that the media are controlled by a single source. I don’t just tell people this, I show them the proof so they see it if for themselves. It’s right there, all the time and once you know what to look for you see it.

If anyone cares to call me out on this, all they have to do is invite me to give my presentation and provide an unrestricted question and answer session. Those who hear me will see the world in a different light; I promise you. That aside, my point here is that exposing the deceptions surrounding an issue such as the Federal Reserve to the American public would probably not provoke a huge amount of anger and outrage. I say that despite the fact that this topic involves perhaps the biggest conspiracy in the history of this country, and one that affects us all.

On the contrary, I can just imagine the horror and rage if the general public were to learn that the events of 9/11 had been actually carried out by rogue elements operating within our government, with outside cooperation (can you say Larry Silverstein?).The tragedy of 9/11 was personal. It was a vivid, calculated, murderous assault on Americans. It is easy to understand that. We all felt the pain and horror of that day, and many of us have lived ever since with 9/11 hanging over our heads and in our hearts, and we have seen those events eclipse our Constitution and democracy. Because of this, we have been easily emotionally manipulated and motivated ever since the attacks by the criminal corporate media. That is probably one of the most difficult realities to confront in all of this. Just think about the reactions of the newly awakened 9/11 truthers when they start to absorb the voluminous evidence that the criminal corporate media has hidden from them for all these years!

Have you ever seen the movie Cape Fear? In the film, Max Cady is a criminal who is released after a long prison term. While Cady was in prison he teaches himself law, using the prison library. While in prison Max discovers that his lawyer had been in possession of evidence that might have affected the outcome of the trial. However, the lawyer had not disclosed any of it to either Cady or the jury. He did not allow the jury to see evidence that might have led them to conclude that Cady did not commit the crime of which he was accused. For those of you who saw the movie, you know how angry Cady was when he got out of jail. And you also know that Cady’s vengeance is taken out on his lawyer, not on the jury that actually put him in jail.

Let me suggest that in the theoretical Case of 9/11, you, the American people, are very much like the members of the jury, just as and the criminal corporate media parallel the lawyer in the film. In a sense, as you will see a bit later, you also become one of the condemned defendants in the case of 9/11. In attempting to influence the jury as they try to determine what happened on 9/11, the criminal corporate media, like Cady’s lawyer, withheld evidence from you, the jury. Based on the cherry-picked evidence selected and presented to you, you were intentionally misled to draw prescribed conclusions related to the case. As a result, you easily found the defendant guilty. As a matter of fact the media in this case made sure that you pre-convicted the prescribed accused before they even presented any evidence to you.

But what you did not know when you reached your verdict was that you had not been allowed to see a massive amount of available evidence. The intent of the lawyer was to ensure a conviction, not to expose the truth. For example, in this predetermined trial, among so much more, you were never told about:

* A large organized group of highly placed people with known motives to commit the crime in question had far better opportunity to do so.

* Aspects of the crime that the accused could not possibly have carried out, such ordering NORAD not to follow procedures, preventing the US Secret Service from doing its job by immediately moving the president to a safe location once they knew the nation was under attack.

* Eyewitness testimony directly relating to the events of that day.

* Evidence of foreknowledge by people other than the accused.

* Scientific evidence that contradicts the official story by stating that pools of molten metal (much hotter than burning jet fuel ) burned below the collapsed building for weeks.

And here is the more tragic irony. At the same time that you convicted a defendant on largely unsupported and highly unbelievable evidence, you actually sentenced YOURSELF as well. In this farce of a trial, you condemned yourself to an eternal post 9/11 nightmare world you could never have otherwise imagined!

You sentenced yourself to accepting the elimination of your own Constitutional rights. You sentenced yourself to supporting the use of your tax dollars for egregious and illegal assaults on other nations. You sentenced yourself to allowing the reduction of funding for vital domestic programs. In a nutshell, you sentenced yourself to supporting a foreign and domestic policy that has weakened almost every imaginable aspect of our nation.

All this has happened because evidence was withheld from you, making it impossible for you to seek the truth with any credible tools at your disposal. But, fortunately, that does not have to be the end of the story.

I submit to you that the Internet has served the American people in the same way that prison library served Max Cady. As we read and access legitimate public records on the Internet, we see more and more of the evidence that the lawyer (the criminal corporate media) withheld from us. And with each piece of evidence we find, we understandably become more and more angry with the lawyer – in fact, the corrupt corporate media - who was supposed to work on our behalf!

As a result, the criminal corporate media have a lot to fear. They have to fear the response of the American people who may one day discover that they not only withheld evidence from the public, but duped the people of this country into supporting the actual criminals who committed atrocities against them on 9/11.

I learned this lesson before 9/11. I started http://TvNewsLIES.org while I still believed the official explanation of 9.11 but still had the US corporate media tagged as America’s #1 Enemy! I use 9/11 often in my writing because it is an issue that hits home with the American people. It is something they can understand. It is something that they experienced. The media have acted against the interest of the American people for generations, allowing a small group of powerful people to pretty much have their way with us and the planet in general..

Maybe 9/11 can serve as an eye opener and jolt the people into recognizing the US corporate media as the enemy. We don’t need media reform in this nation, we need media replacement. We need a real news industry, one that understands why its vocation is the only one protected by thy US Constitution. We don’t need a media with incestuous connections to the CIA or nefarious secret organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group). We don’t need journalists who report American Idol scandals; we need journalists to keep an eye on our government and show us every last piece of evidence they uncover about their misdeeds.

I often wonder what would happen if enough establishment institutions were to become really informed about 9/11. I have to believe that many Americans would probably accept the idea that 9/11 was an inside job and somehow justify it in their mind and heart. But I also wonder what would happen if a great many other people were like me and would not be OK with it. I often wonder how these people would react and who would be the target of their rage. But wondering aside, I know how I am reacting right now, and whom I want to punish. I am sure I am not alone when it comes to being angry with those who lie to protect the real criminals…and that’s why the media are becoming more and more terrified of any discussion about 9/11. Exposing the evidence can serve to wake up the millions of falsely imprisoned victims of their deception. And that can be fatal for the criminal corporate media.

The 9/11 truth movement can only grow. It’s not about theories. It’s not about accusations. It’s not about speculation. It’s about the official public body of evidence and how much of it has been kept from us, misrepresented and in some cases totally fabricated. You don’t have to convince people of a theory; all you have to do is show them the evidence. And the longer the criminal corporate media continue to withhold evidence, the harder it will be to explain to the growing body of very angry Max Cadys out there, why they have done so. Think about it Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Kamala, Brian S, Christine, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Diana, All (#0)

Hopefully the media and their NWO/CIA controllers are panic stricken.

I have little use for Rosie, but still, hell hath no fury as a fucking pissed off broad.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-07   10:48:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Kamala (#0)

It's reasonable to think that FDR, in provoking Pearl Harbor, allowing it to happen, and not letting the American people in on the secret, was serving a greater good by bringing the U.S. into the war and defeating fascism. I don't believe it, but it's not an unreasonable, indefensible view.

It's reasonable to think that the U.S. government and the corporate media, by bringing about the assassination of JFK and hiding what happened from the American people, were serving a greater good by removing an unreliable loose cannon from the most powerful office in the world. I don't believe it, but it's not an unreasonable, indefensible view.

If, as seems likely, the U.S. government somehow brought about 9/11 and the corporate media have been hiding that fact from the American people, it is not reasonable to believe that those indefensible means were used to serve some higher good. In this case, there is no higher good that would justify the evils that resulted from 9/11.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-04-07   11:04:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: aristeides (#2)

If, as seems likely, the U.S. government somehow brought about 9/11 and the corporate media have been hiding that fact from the American people, it is not reasonable to believe that those indefensible means were used to serve some higher good. In this case, there is no higher good that would justify the evils that resulted from 9/11.

But you haven't seen Cheney's financial portfolio!

"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

robin  posted on  2007-04-07   11:19:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: aristeides (#2)

It's reasonable to think that FDR, in provoking Pearl Harbor, allowing it to happen, and not letting the American people in on the secret, was serving a greater good by bringing the U.S. into the war and defeating fascism. I don't believe it, but it's not an unreasonable, indefensible view.

Let's see. Isn't allowing the death of thousands of American sailor, soldiers and civilians tantamount to aiding an enemy? That is not defensible by any yardstick.

It's reasonable to think that the U.S. government and the corporate media, by bringing about the assassination of JFK and hiding what happened from the American people, were serving a greater good by removing an unreliable loose cannon from the most powerful office in the world. I don't believe it, but it's not an unreasonable, indefensible view.

I won't even comment on that except to say that there is nothing remotely defensible in the assassination of a chief executive and providing cover for all the perps and plots behind the killing. The only "good" in this is that it is the one event that, through the army of lies martialed to obsure the facts, awakened millions to the nature of the beast that governs us.

In this case, there is no higher good that would justify the evils that resulted from 9/11.

That is stating the obvious in the the negative. I'd say that a higher good demands that those responsible for the crimes of omission and commission in this horror belong in the dock - not in the figurative dock of history, but in a court of law to answer for a treason.

Aristeides, you are an intelligent man. Why is it that you choose to mince words? Perhaps, like most of us, you'd very much like to withdraw into denial consoling yourself with the thought that the crimes of, say, the last seventy five years somehow "served a higher good." Well, they did not, and as much as I would like to retreat into the cozy world of moral and historical certitudes as taught to us by our high school history teachers, those days are over. And it's going to come to a fight before these days are over.

Alles Scheisse. - Geo. W. Bush

randge  posted on  2007-04-07   11:42:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: randge (#4)

My point is that, 9/11-as-an-inside-job, unlike previous outrages, automatically discredits itself. It has the potential to bring the whole system down, because, granted that it's true, it's virtually impossible psychologically to excuse or dismiss it.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-04-07   11:47:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Kamala (#0)

Once they start poking around they realize that the official story about the attacks could not possibly be true, and they discover the plethora of evidence that was hidden and misrepresented by the Bush administration, the 9/11 Commission and the corporate media. 9/11 truthers are not suddenly coming across new information that causes them to suddenly believe the official story. It’s a one way flow. The evidence speaks for itself.

right on!

christine  posted on  2007-04-07   12:01:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: aristeides (#2)

It's reasonable to think that FDR, in provoking Pearl Harbor, allowing it to happen, and not letting the American people in on the secret, was serving a greater good by bringing the U.S. into the war and defeating fascism. I don't believe it, but it's not an unreasonable, indefensible view.

It's reasonable to think that the U.S. government and the corporate media, by bringing about the assassination of JFK and hiding what happened from the American people, were serving a greater good by removing an unreliable loose cannon from the most powerful office in the world. I don't believe it, but it's not an unreasonable, indefensible view.

JFK was a public figure, a President and purportedly protected by secret service and military personel. The men at Pearl Harbor were G.I.'s (Government Issue or Govt. property) had defensive weapons, and knew that by being in the military they were at risk.

Those murdered in lower Manhattan on 9-11 were completely innocent, unarmed civilians. This was mass murder in the 1st degree. Indefensible.

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

noone222  posted on  2007-04-07   12:13:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: All (#7)

Excellent article & thread.

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-04-07   12:32:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: aristeides (#2)

In order for a government to committ a false flag op on its "own people" like 9/11- there has to be in place an already pre-existing political culture among the elite that "they know what is best" and that "tough choices" are what mark "great rulers." Believe me- it isn't hard for a cabal government to convince itself that its greatest evil is actually in service of a higher good. The men who actually carried out mass murders of Jews among the Nazis did so believing they were serving a higher good- that elminiting Jews would bring "peace" to the world.

Operation Northwoods- was suggested because a general thought the "higher good" of eliminting the seat of communism in the western hemisphere- Cuba- justified staging terrorist attacks on Americans and murdering them.

Is there a similiar cabal in our government that thinks staging 9/11 was justified in the long run in order to secure rapidly depleting oil reserves and to check the "rise of Islam"?

People rarely carry out evil acts thinking themselves evil. They always justify their evil with "good intentions" and "higher goods". And the more secretive a government, the more unaccountable, the more expereince they have in these matters (and ours has a lot of black op experience in foreign lands over the last 50 years)- the more likely that a bureaucratic and elite culture exists in such a government in which the suggestion of carrying out such evil acts isn't thought crazy or out of the ordinary. It may be thought "daring" or impractical- but the objections by officials and elites in the Beltway raised to carrying out a 9/11 attack on Americans woulnd't be moral.

Burkeman1  posted on  2007-04-07   13:31:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: noone222, aristeides (#7) (Edited)

There is a moral shading here that those of us without an advanced education in ethics fail to see.

But this is all quibbling. WWII is long over as are the 60s. Our table is set. It's up to us to attempt to set things straight in our time. If we fail, it won't be for lack of trying.

Amid all the rhetoric woven around the myriad aspect of these crimes, you rarely hear talk of the victims. We should never forget the sacrifice of 3000 for gross private political ends.

Write it on your hearts. Never forget.

Alles Scheisse.

randge  posted on  2007-04-07   15:37:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: randge (#10)

Write it on your hearts. Never forget.

Amen, brother!

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2007-04-07   15:46:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: randge, ALL (#10) (Edited)

But this is all quibbling. WWII is long over as are the 60s. Our table is set. It's up to us to attempt to set things straight in our time. If we fail, it won't be for lack of trying.

I'd regard it as necessary quibbling for a couple of reasons, and I agree with your comments.

We're a civilized society that is approaching the need to revolt against a class of trolls that intend to monitor and regulate our every moment. As a civilized society we need to know that our actions in opposition to this are justified and that we've exhausted every other means of addressing these encroachments before violence is an acceptable alternative to the slick form of slavery that is planned for all of us.

Within this quibbling is the opportunity for less informed persons to witness and rationalize for themselves the validity of what other more experienced people have to say about our situation and prospects for the future.

There are many on this forum with a more lengthy historic understanding of the incremental reduction of liberty and increase in surveillance, regulation and incarceration than some of those other younger persons that will actually be fighting or at a minimum resisting the globalist controllers in the future. The quibbling process affords an opportunity for everyone to get a more complete understanding of the issues and of each other before deciding which actions may be taken without hesitation in the not so distant future.

WW II never ended they just told us it did. Much evidence exists to demonstrate the fact that most of the nazi and communist leadership have continued a more silent war since 1945. The hegelian dialectic is intended to bring about certain changes or resolutions through conflicts such as WW II. Today, the U.S. Government is run by ex-nazis / ex-communists and their offspring. The U.N. is a perfect example of "problem", "reaction", "solution", as is the fake State of Israel, both outgrowths of WW II.

All of this quibbling, which I too find tedious, is in my opinion necessary in order for all of us to realize the value of our liberty, our obligations to the past and the future, but most importantly to fortify our committment to freedom against all takers.

You're spot on concerning the table being set. The global elites have been gorging themselves upon the backs of the decent common folks for centuries (millenium). They are like heroin addicts in this respect, never satisfied.

In the end it may be necessary for many of us to do things we would never have ordinarily imagined ourselves doing. Our conscience must be clear and our hearts pure in order to obtain the committment within ourselves that will be necessary to bring down the leviathon, and implement a new and improved system that denies monopolist murdering scumbags an existence.

You're correct, it is up to us to set it straight. Today, we're fragmented and divided for a million non-reasons because we haven't prioritized our needs. We continue to allow the MSM and other information disseminators the ability to divide us. These divisive issues such as tree hugger vs. the industrialists, abortion vs. choice etc., are stumbling blocks of our own making, when we know deep down inside that we first need to have a voice in determining our own future, and the liberty to speak the truth. And, once we're convinced and united as a general population knowing full well that ours is a righteous cause ... I'm certain we will set things straight.

Truth be told, George Bush has done more to bring us all together through his constant attacks on every segment of society and the world at large than any other force. Rosie O'Donnell is a perfect example. I would never have considered that I would find myself in agreement with her on most issues. However, her stand on the WTC demolition is with great risk to her personal wealth and well-being, it's an unselfish act of bravery for the common good, and I have to respect her for denying her self. I might never agree with her on the other issues but I might have to tone down my rhetoric in opposition since I know her agenda isn't personal against society and she has shown that she's willing to sacrifice her personal well-being for a higher cause that includes everyone.

In order for us to make things right, we first need to have respect for each others views and opinions. Then we can form the necessary army of millions to shut down the oppressors. And, I believe we're headed in that direction.

If we fail, it won't be for lack of trying. If we fail, the opportunity to throw off the chains may never present itself again.

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

noone222  posted on  2007-04-09   6:47:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: robin, Itisalmosttoolate (#3)

The Third Stage - A collection of short mainstream media and independent film clips on the evolution of 9/11 skepticism.

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5224963246223576086&q=%22third+stage%22

“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"

Eoghan  posted on  2007-04-09   8:47:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Eoghan, *9-11* (#13) (Edited)

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5224963246223576086&q=%22third+stage%22

bump to above link The Third Stage, 21 minutes long.

This really should have a thread of its own.

"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

robin  posted on  2007-04-09   10:30:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Eoghan, robin, all (#13)

Well done video - thanks.

Third stage bump

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-04-09   10:54:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: lodwick, Eoghan (#15)

http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=49764&Disp=0

I just created a separate thread for this excellent 21 minute video.

"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

robin  posted on  2007-04-09   10:56:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: robin (#16)

It's worthy.

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-04-09   11:09:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: noone222 (#12)

Thank you for your perspectives. You've admirably sketched in the outlines of the big picture.

The problem is, when you begin unraveling the big ball, you'll never run out of twine. Even if you go back JFK as part of this web of evils, (my God, that's 45 years ago!) you're into the annals of ancient history as far as most Americans are concerned. The question is, at his critical juncture, where do you stop unrolling the ball?

Most of your fellow citizens can barely remember life before 2001. Let alone what happened nearly half a century ago.

Those murdered in lower Manhattan on 9-11 were completely innocent, unarmed civilians. This was mass murder in the 1st degree. Indefensible.

Yes. Here's an outrage that the folks can grasp, and I believe they are just beginning to come to grips with the meaning and significance of those events.

If you can get them to wrap their minds around that, the rest will inevitably come in the fullness of time. I may be wrong, but I think we need to focus on the here and now as much as possible.

But anything you have to say that wakes up the people is a good thing, I suppose, even if you have to go back to the Crusades or the burning of Temple. Knock youself out.

Quibble on.

Gloria est pro petroleo mori.

randge  posted on  2007-04-09   11:36:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: randge (#18)

Those murdered in lower Manhattan on 9-11 were completely innocent, unarmed civilians. This was mass murder in the 1st degree. Indefensible.

EXACTLY how I view this; an epic murder mystery. Who killed all those people, and why? We have not yet received a satisfactory response to that question.

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil  posted on  2007-04-09   11:45:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]