[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11 Pentagon Explosion:9:45 AM
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ_g1buWhAA
Published: Apr 9, 2007
Author: youtube
Post Date: 2007-04-09 19:31:02 by honway
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 15578
Comments: 114

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ_g1buWhAA

Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 68.

#5. To: honway (#0)

That video appears to show an explosion some time after the initial attack, whatever it was.

There is a great video by pilots for truth which examines the flight data info, and suggests that the airplane did not hit the Pentagon. It suggests that a winged missile was dropped by the large aircraft, which never got below about 300-400 feet.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-09   19:49:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Paul Revere, ALL (#5)

It suggests that a winged missile was dropped by the large aircraft

How big were those wings, Paul? A hundred feet from tip to tip? Because something knocked down lightpoles spaced that far apart at least. And something created a plane shaped hole in the Pentagon about 90 feet across. Those missile wings must have been made of unobtainium to do that. ROTFLOL!

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-04-09   19:54:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: BeAChooser (#6)

I'm not one who troubles myself with the opinions of those who support the official story, so there's no point in your derisive remarks. They merely reveal your lack of confidence in the substance of that which you say.

According to pilots who know a lot more than you about flight data recorders, the plane never hit the Pentagon, and most of the evidence suggests their conclusion is accurate.

Each of us chooses what we will believe. You choose to believe the myth told by the Bush administration. I don't.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-09   20:35:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Paul Revere, ALL (#10)

I'm not one who troubles myself with the opinions of those who support the official story, so there's no point in your derisive remarks. They merely reveal your lack of confidence in the substance of that which you say.

So in other words, you don't have an explanation for the downed lightpoles.

Nor the rather sizable holes in the Pentagon. Like these:


Left side and center hole damage


central hole and right side damage


Right side damage.


Collage of what the damage looked like pre-collapse

I don't think I'm the one lacking confidence here, Paul.

According to pilots who know a lot more than you about flight data recorders, the plane never hit the Pentagon, and most of the evidence suggests their conclusion is accurate.

And that would be the Pilots For Truth? All 36 of them? Even though some aren't even pilots? ROTFLOL!

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-04-10   13:46:31 ET  (5 images) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: BeAChooser (#42)

You're wasting your time, sport.

There isn't anything you can post I haven't already reviewed and considered. I didn't arrive at my conclusions lightly or quickly.

I have one major advantage over you. I've actually worked at NORAD headquarters inside Cheyenne Mountain, so all your piffle as a loyal Bushie means absolutely nothing.

It was an inside job, and only the president, the vice president and the secretary of defense could have seen to it that no aerial interference by NORAD occurred.

So wake up, Little Snoozie.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-10   16:13:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 68.

#69. To: Paul Revere, ALL (#68)

You're wasting your time, sport. There isn't anything you can post I haven't already reviewed and considered. I didn't arrive at my conclusions lightly or quickly.

What you don't seem to understand, Paul, is that I'm not really posting to you.

so all your piffle as a loyal Bushie means absolutely nothing.

You also know nothing about me. Would a loyal Bushie have accused Bush and his administration of helping coverup a mass murder by someone(s) in the Clinton administration? Would a loyal Bushie be as critical as I have been about Bush's immigration policies? Would a loyal Bushie say that Bush is wrong about CFR, education spending and the senior drug plan? You don't know me, Paul.

It was an inside job, and only the president, the vice president and the secretary of defense could have seen to it that no aerial interference by NORAD occurred.

Maybe, maybe not, but you will NOT find the truth if you keep spouting what is provably nothing but disinformation about the damage at the Pentagon and the nature of the debris they found there. All you will do is discredit the rest of your allegations.

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-04-10 17:19:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: Paul Revere, robin, christine, AGAviator, bluedogtxn, Burkeman1 (#68)

Paul Revere's response to BAC: I have one major advantage over you. I've actually worked at NORAD headquarters inside Cheyenne Mountain, so all your piffle as a loyal Bushie means absolutely nothing.

It was an inside job, and only the president, the vice president and the secretary of defense could have seen to it that no aerial interference by NORAD occurred.

FYI...

scrapper2  posted on  2007-04-11 00:54:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 68.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]