[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Steven Seagal : Fight scene Above the Law (Baseball bat scene)

Really Funny Inappropriate, Sexist, Chauvinistic, Misogynistic Memes Jokes Cartoons

ALERT: GDP Only Half the Story (why trouble is ahead)

Panic In Israel As Hezbollah Expands Attack Strategy, Changes Targets: '2 Million Israelis At Risk'

Why Does Kamala Harris Keep Repeating This Quote? - (Karl Marx Origins)

Re-Visiting Deagel 2025 Population Forecast: An Accidental Warning?

NHS Whistleblower: We Were Instructed to Euthanize Patients to Inflate COVID Death Toll While Hospitals Sat Empty!

America Obliterates Half North Vietnam's MiG-21 Fleet In 13 Minutes - Operation Bolo

Fully Autistic at 3 but by age 6 he was symptom-free and back to being a normal kid

We Are at War, You Got An Enemy, Stop Depending on Your Enemy (Money Laundering)

A mass shooting in Birmingham, Alabama’s Five Points South left 4 dead, 25 injured,

Brilliant takedown of how lost the Democratic Party is from a former Democrat

KY Sheriff Shot Judge because Judge was R*ping his Daughter

Arrested by Kamala: A Black Mother's Story

Israeli Media Fear Houthis Have Arrived on Israel's Border as Militia Touts Readiness for 'Long War'

KAMALA’S AMERICA: Violent Squatters Take Over Massive Mansion in Wealthy Los Angeles Neighborhood

Walk/Don't-Walk - In Which States Do Citizens Stroll The Most?

U.S. Poverty Myth EXPOSED! New Census Report Is Shocking Capitol Hill

August layoffs soared to 15-year high, marking a 193% increase from July.

NYPD Faces Uncertain Future Amid New York's Growing Political Crisis

Whitney Webb: Foreign Intelligence Affiliated CTI League Poses Major National Security Risk

Paul Joseph Watson: What Fresh Hell Is This?

Watch: 50 Kids Loot 7-Eleven In Beverly Hills For Candy & Snacks

"No Americans": Insider Of Alleged Trafficking Network Reveals How Migrants Ended Up At Charleroi, PA Factory

Ford scraps its SUV electric vehicle; the US consumer decides what should be produced, not the Government

The Doctor is In the House [Two and a half hours early?]

Trump Walks Into Gun Store & The Owner Says This... His Reaction Gets Everyone Talking!

Here’s How Explosive—and Short-Lived—Silver Spikes Have Been

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses


Sports
See other Sports Articles

Title: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
Source: ABC News
URL Source: http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/LegalCenter/story?id=3028515&page=1
Published: Apr 10, 2007
Author: LARA SETRAKIAN
Post Date: 2007-04-11 09:21:29 by JohnGalt
Keywords: None
Views: 484
Comments: 10

April 10, 2007 — The office of North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper will announce that he is dismissing all charges against three Duke Lacrosse players, ABC News has learned from sources close to the case.

The three players, Reade Seligmann, David Evans and Collin Finnerty, were facing charges of first degree kidnapping and first degree forcible sexual offense. The charges stem from an off-campus party on the night of March 13, 2006.

* Duke Lacrosse Case: Complete Coverage

In the hours after the party, one of two dancers hired to perform for the players claimed she had been violently raped in a bathroom by members of the lacrosse team. The players had also been indicted for first degree rape, but that charge was dismissed on Dec. 22, 2006.

Special prosecutors from the Attorney General's office took over the case after Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong recused himself in January, citing charges of unethical conduct filed against him by the North Carolina Bar. Since then, Jim Coman and Mary Winstead have examined the case from scratch, interviewing key witnesses and working through reams of evidence.

The reasons that will be cited for the dismissal are not yet known, though the case has been riddled with criticism and colored by controversy since its early months. Defense attorneys released documents showing the accuser changed key details of her story in the weeks and months after the alleged assault.

Legal analysts and forensic experts have criticized what they call a critically flawed photo identification lineup — a lineup that led to the identification and indictment of Evans, Finnerty, Seligmann. No DNA evidence was found matching any lacrosse players with samples from the rape kit, while DNA from unidentified men was found on the accuser's body and clothing.

On Tuesday, a spokeswoman for the Attorney General confirmed to ABC News that his office had completed its investigation into the Duke lacrosse case. A press conference on the outcome of their inquiry is widely expected sometime this week, though members of that office have not yet revealed a date and time.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: JohnGalt (#0)

No DNA evidence was found matching any lacrosse players with samples from the rape kit, while DNA from unidentified men was found on the accuser's body and clothing.

She had semen from 3 different (unidentified) men in her cooter--what a playa!

This lying coont needs to be locked up for dragging these boys through a public hell.

The "Department of Defense" has never won a war. The "War Department" was undefeated.

Indrid Cold  posted on  2007-04-11   11:20:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Indrid Cold (#1)

This lying coont needs to be locked up for dragging these boys through a public hell.

Indict the nappy-headed ho.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2007-04-11   17:01:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: MUDDOG (#2)

Waiting on word from Shakedown Al and Jesse...

“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"

Eoghan  posted on  2007-04-11   18:00:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: JohnGalt (#0)

Special prosecutors from the Attorney General's office took over the case after Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong recused himself in January, citing charges of unethical conduct filed against him by the North Carolina Bar.

I wonder if Nifong will be dis-barred or sued for malicious prosecution or both.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-04-11   18:02:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: JohnGalt (#0)

This case smelled like the accuser's day old juices from day one.

Nifong ruined three lives for political gain.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-11   18:18:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: scrapper2 (#4)

Arrest record...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0411071duke3.html

“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"

Eoghan  posted on  2007-04-11   18:19:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: JohnGalt (#0)

Actually- this report is a bit tame. The new prosecutor didn't just merely "drop the charges" but said- the boys were innocent. Now that- is a rarity from a prosecutor's office. Nifong's actions must have been truly evil and wrong beyond question for a proscecutor (most of whom are filth scumbags) to concede that not only were the charges improperly applied but that they were innocent.

Burkeman1  posted on  2007-04-11   18:24:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Burkeman1 (#7)

I watched the press conference and was surprised to the degree the AGs went to stress the innocent point--if backing off charging the liar in this case.

I was really impressed with the speaking ability of the Duke Lacrosse boys, not that I was that surprised, but nevertheless, I was impressed. At least I can understand the context of why Big Media and the Race Hustlers would rather have us talking about Imus.

Ron Paul 2008

JohnGalt  posted on  2007-04-11   19:33:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: JohnGalt (#0)

one of two dancers hired to perform for the players claimed

The very first clue was that the other dancer was not a complainant or complaining witness.

leveller  posted on  2007-04-11   20:50:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: scrapper2 (#4)

I wonder if Nifong will be dis-barred or sued for malicious prosecution or both.

The correct answer is "both".

Withholding exculpatory evidence will anger juries and judges alike.

leveller  posted on  2007-04-11   21:06:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]