[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: The art of distraction, Gangsta rappers pose a bigger threat to black community
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.statesman.com/sports/con ... UTUWUcUbUZUcUaUcTYWYWZV&urcm=y
Published: Apr 13, 2007
Author: Jason Whitlock
Post Date: 2007-04-13 19:00:35 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 339
Comments: 42

Thank you, Don Imus. You've given us (black people) an excuse to avoid our real problem.

You've given Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson another opportunity to pretend that the old fight, which is now the safe and lucrative fight, is still the most important fight in our push for true economic and social equality.

Jeremy M. Lange THE NEW YORK TIMES

(enlarge photo) While anger is fixated on Don Imus, seen here talking to the Rev. Al Sharpton on Monday, what of rappers who use the same language?

MOST POPULAR STORIES Storms could bring hail, isolated tornadoes tonight Former Hutto High police officer charged with photographing girl Acid spread in Leander city park Go ahead and filet Imus, but skin his bosses, too Bible elective class bill stirs religious debate Share This Story del.icio.usdigg Newsvinereddit Yahoo!Facebook What's this? You've given Vivian Stringer and Rutgers the chance to hold a nationally televised recruiting celebration expertly disguised as a news conference to respond to your poor attempt at humor.

Thank you, Don Imus. You extended Black History Month to April, and we can once again wallow in victimhood, protest like it's 1965 and delude ourselves into believing that fixing your hatred is more necessary than eradicating our self-hatred.

The bigots win again.

While we're fixated on a bad joke cracked by an irrelevant, bad shock jock, I'm sure at least one of the marvelous young women on the Rutgers basketball team is somewhere snapping her fingers to the beat of 50 Cent's or Snoop Dogg's or Young Jeezy's latest ode glorifying nappy-headed pimps and hos.

I ain't saying Jesse, Al and Vivian are gold-diggas, but they don't have the heart to mount a legitimate campaign against the real black-folk killas.

It is us. At this time, we are our own worst enemies. We have allowed our youths to buy into a culture (hip hop) that has been perverted, corrupted and overtaken by prison culture. The music, attitude and behavior expressed in this culture is anti-black, anti-education, demeaning, self-destructive, pro-drug dealing and violent.

Rather than confront this heinous enemy from within, we sit back and wait for someone like Imus to have a slip of the tongue and make the mistake of repeating the things we say about ourselves.

It's embarrassing. Dave Chappelle was offered $50 million to make racially insensitive jokes about black and white people on TV. He was hailed as a genius. Black comedians routinely crack jokes about white and black people, and we all laugh out loud.

I'm no Don Imus apologist. He blasted me after I fell out with ESPN. Imus is a hack.

But he didn't do anything outside the norm for shock jocks and comedians. He also offered an apology. That should've been the end of this whole affair. Instead, it's only the beginning. It's an opportunity for Stringer, Jackson and Sharpton to step on victim platforms and elevate themselves and their agenda$.

I watched the Rutgers news conference and was ashamed.

Martin Luther King Jr. spoke for eight minutes in 1963 at the March on Washington. At the time, black people could be lynched and denied fundamental rights with little thought. With the comments of a talk-show host most of her players had never heard of before last week serving as her excuse, Vivian Stringer rambled on for 30 minutes about the amazing season her team had.

Somehow, we're supposed to believe that the comments of a man with virtually no connection to the sports world ruined Rutgers' wonderful season. Had a broadcaster with credibility and a platform in the sports world uttered the words Imus did, I could understand a level of outrage.

But an hourlong press conference over a man who has already apologized, already been suspended (and now fired) and is already insignificant is just plain intellectually dishonest. This is opportunism. This is a distraction.

In the grand scheme, Don Imus is no threat to us in general and no threat to black women in particular. If his words are so powerful and so destructive and must be rebuked so forcefully, then what should we do about the idiot rappers on BET, MTV and every black-owned radio station in the country who use words much more powerful and much more destructive?

I didn't listen or watch Imus' show regularly. Has he at any point glorified selling crack cocaine to black women? Has he celebrated black men shooting each other randomly? Has he suggested in any way that it's cool to be a baby-daddy rather than a husband and a parent? Does he tell his listeners that they're suckers for pursuing education and that they're selling out their race if they do?

When Imus does any of that, call me and I'll get upset. Until then, he is what he is — a washed-up shock jock who is very easy to ignore when you're not looking to be made a victim.

No. We all know where the real battleground is. We know that the gangsta rappers and their followers in the athletic world have far bigger platforms to negatively define us than some old white man with a bad radio show. There's no money and lots of danger in that battle, so Jesse and Al are going to sit it out.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: christine (#0)

We all know where the real battleground is. We know that the gangsta rappers and their followers in the athletic world have far bigger platforms to negatively define us than some old white man with a bad radio show. There's no money and lots of danger in that battle, so Jesse and Al are going to sit it out.

Actually, Sharpton has repeatedly criticized Gangsta Rappers.

The downfall of Imus was significant as a Triumph of Capitalism. He Lost his job because sponsors were afraid of boycotts. The free market worked. A bitter old drug addict made fun of too many people, and eventually paid the price. He was too offensive to too many people.

Better to let the free market vanquish bigots than to let the government control speech.

leveller  posted on  2007-04-13   20:31:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: leveller (#1)

The free market worked.

Not in this case. A pair of black hucksters did indeed scare some global capitalists and feckless whites, but what's new? This pair of rejects from Amos and Andy have been thugs and criminals all their lives. Only intimidation of the white race keeps their scam rolling along. The triumph belongs to the proponents of political correctness and those who support pending hate speech law.

PS: The free market ceased to exist once capitalism crossed our borders and morphed into transnational corporations.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-04-13   20:51:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

A pair of black hucksters did indeed scare some global capitalists and feckless whites, but what's new?

No doubt Sharpton and Jesse are hucksters. No argument there. The beauty of capitalism is that it does not depend upon the virtues of mankind to work. The baser motives will do just fine. The computer that you are using now was assembled not out of love for you, but out of desire for your money.

Would you rather have the government decide what you hear and say, or let hucksters exploit the vulnerabilities of radio sponsors and threaten boycotts to discourage hate-speech? Under which regime is free speech more likely to thrive?

leveller  posted on  2007-04-13   20:57:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: leveller (#3)

One problem here. The capitalism you describe is that of Tony Soprano and the broken legs of competition. IMHO, the threat of intimidation negates free markets, which as I said no longer exists except as a nostalgic view.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-04-13   21:17:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

PS: The free market ceased to exist once capitalism crossed our borders and morphed into transnational corporations.

Let the same band of theives tax me again? No thanks.

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-13   21:20:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Jethro Tull (#4)

How many snow-blowers were you allowed to export to Mexico last year?

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-13   21:24:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Dakmar (#5)

Don't fret. The Neil Boortz "Fair Tax" is a cure all.

About those Mexican snow blowers? The bastards cannibalized them for their Chevy’s. I’m sick over it.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-04-13   21:29:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: christine (#0)

I'm no Don Imus apologist. He blasted me after I fell out with ESPN. Imus is a hack.

Remember when Limbaugh was fired from ESPN? Neither did I to be honest until someone's post reminded me.

My position was same then as now, Imus was an employee of a business, it has nothing to do with free speech. What we need to do, as good Americans, is boycott these weakling sponsors crumbling under incessant hectoring.

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-13   21:37:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Christine, Brian S, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#0)

Al Sharpton and the race gang have illuminated a major issue which has plagued the USA for a long time - "selective outrage."

So, shut down the record companies which sell the rap/gangsta rap & watch the 'artists' go broke. Then, Al can discuss "justice" on a more local level.

Cool!

I suspect the Spanish artists are as bad as the 'gangsta rappers.'


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-13   21:40:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Dakmar (#8)

I agree and I LOVE your use of the word hector.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-04-13   21:42:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Jethro Tull (#10)

Sure, but only kooks use the word "incessant" or its derivatives.

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-13   21:44:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: christine (#0) (Edited)

This entire week of lynch mobbing is a great example of the finest racial huckstering we've ever seen. Not since George Wallace vowed to never be "outniggered" in a political race again, have we seen such an audacious display of racial gamesmanship from a virilent racist.

I'm not talking about Imus. I'm talking about Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton, and all the phonies who trotted onto the TV and did what blacks have been doing for the past 30 years: blaming some white man for what they've done to their community.

It's blacks killing blacks. It's blacks saying "be a nappy headed ho" instead of "be a Rhodes Scholar." It's blacks making excuses for boys who won't go to school, won't get a job, won't work hard if they do, won't lose the attitude, won't pay their way, won't be a father, and won't contribute in our society.

The black community is all about acting one thing and living another. "We take care of our own" is the fiction they speak, but the reality is that everyone else in our culture takes care of the all the screw-ups in the black community. The reason more black kids go to bed in foster homes every night than all the other races combined is simple: Blacks don't take care of their own. These are the kids who have no relative - not one - who will take them in and care for them. So some white couple is paid some small sum from CPS to care for those kids. But if one of those foster families decides they want to adopt the black child living with them, guess what happens?

CPS and the National Association of Black Social Workers rears its ugly, racist head. They would rather see some poor, beatdown black kid denied a family of his own, if that family is white. They would rather keep this kid in foster care, and CPS will fight the white couple who tried to adopt such a child.

I've given one small example, but the black community is full of such failures.

If blacks want to address black problems, the place to start is in front of a mirror. By always supporting the race card, by undermining education with poor attitudes among black parents and students towards scholarship, by making excuses for the hip hop values, by making allowances for black men who won't meet their obligations as a father or husband, the black community dooms itself.

There's a reason Vietnamese and Indians have succeeded in America the past 30 years. They don't lay in bed until noon, play video games until dark, and buy all their food at fast food restaurants. They work hard. They save. They learn to adapt to this culture.

Yes, there are many very hard working and admirable blacks. Unfortunately, they are the minority of that minority, and they aid and abet all the slackers and criminals, by NOT contradicting the race card.

Only the black community can save the black community, and they're not doing it. Every year, they fall further back. Lack of personal responsibility is the reason.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   21:46:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Jethro Tull (#4)

The capitalism you describe is that of Tony Soprano and the broken legs of competition. IMHO, the threat of intimidation negates free markets,

Jesse didn't threaten to break anyone's legs. What the radio sponsors saw coming was a boycott.

leveller  posted on  2007-04-13   21:47:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: leveller (#1)

The downfall of Imus was significant as a Triumph of Capitalism. He Lost his job because sponsors were afraid of boycotts. The free market worked. A bitter old drug addict made fun of too many people, and eventually paid the price. He was too offensive to too many people.

Better to let the free market vanquish bigots than to let the government control speech.

You couldn't be more wrong. You are lost in Neverland, MJ. Come back.

If there were no government regulation of television and radio, if government didn't control the entire process for licensure and renewal of licensure, if government didn't control the entire basis of value for a radio or tv station (it's ticket to operate), Imus would still be on the air.

If the Amos and Andy of racial shilling hadn't been getting blacks nationwide to file FCC complaints all week, and if those complaints carried no weight, Imus would still be on the air.

Imus has listeners, and he'll have listeners again when this overblown excuse for a scandal fades and sanity returns.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   21:55:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

Not in this case. A pair of black hucksters did indeed scare some global capitalists and feckless whites, but what's new? This pair of rejects from Amos and Andy have been thugs and criminals all their lives. Only intimidation of the white race keeps their scam rolling along. The triumph belongs to the proponents of political correctness and those who support pending hate speech law.

PS: The free market ceased to exist once capitalism crossed our borders and morphed into transnational corporations.

Indeed, JT, indeed.

It's really disingenuous to hear some phoney "free market" explanation to why the IMUS World Trade Center collapsed into its footprint.

Mega corps that sleep with government in every hidey hole found in the economy are hardly agents of a free market. They are part of the oligarchy that keeps real news off the news, that trivializes life with these dust ups over language, while real humans die horrible deaths from real wars.

Licenses from the government create the value of the stations which operate thanks to those auspices. It's not just the half million dollar fine. It's the hit on stock value and resulting loss of capital value as perceived.

In the world of sleazy business and government, Imus gets tossed overboard for short term gain and benefit, by some assholes who have never done anything for blacks except let them park their cars at the country club.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   22:01:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Paul Revere (#15)

In the world of sleazy business and government, Imus gets tossed overboard for short term gain and benefit, by some assholes who have never done anything for blacks except let them park their cars at the country club.

Well said, PR. And the real irony? My guess is that these self appointed leaders aren't supported by anyone but the most extreme element of their race. But the symbiotic relationship bet. them, and the corporate/media complex is what AmeriKans know and accept. We have become a land of full blown dopes.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-04-13   22:08:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: leveller (#3)

Would you rather have the government decide what you hear and say, or let hucksters exploit the vulnerabilities of radio sponsors and threaten boycotts to discourage hate-speech?

Do you realize how silly that is - what you just said?

The government DOES decide what you hear and say on radio and TV.

You live in a fantasy world where there's this fictional "free market" that decides everything. That was the 1800s, sport. We have this thing called government regulation that has superceded it, and nowhere is it more evident than in the lynching of Imus.

Take a course in economics, and when you get out of that, take some courses in the regulatory process, how it controls entry into businesses, how it controls those businesses, and how they respond to political, not economic, pressures.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   22:08:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Paul Revere (#17)

The government DOES decide what you hear and say on radio and TV.

Of course the FCC should be abolished. You and I are in agreement there. My point is that boycotts and threats to boycott are much preferable to government regulation.

leveller  posted on  2007-04-13   22:15:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Jethro Tull, Paul Revere (#16)

My guess is that these self appointed leaders aren't supported by anyone but the most extreme element of their race.

And the Ford Foundation, don't forget them.

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-13   22:16:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Paul Revere (#17)

We have this thing called government regulation that has superceded it, and nowhere is it more evident than in the lynching of Imus.

Excuse me? What, CBS was going to lose their license unless they fired Imus? Is that what you're expecting us to believe?

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-13   22:18:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: leveller (#18)

I don't disagree that boycotts and economic threats by individuals are better than government regulation, but you can't carve the existing government regulation out of the mix when addressing a regulated industry.

Besides, the Evil Queen and her evil following were in on this.

Hillary needs to split the community to beat Obama. She is exploiting the need Jesse and Al have for ego gratification, money, and TV time. By doing so, she undermines Obama as the true "black" leader.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   22:19:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Paul Revere (#17)

You live in a fantasy world where there's this fictional "free market" that decides everything. That was the 1800s, sport. We have this thing called government regulation that has superceded it, and nowhere is it more evident than in the lynching of Imus.

Take a course in economics, and when you get out of that, take some courses in the regulatory process, how it controls entry into businesses, how it controls those businesses, and how they respond to political, not economic, pressures.

The market in the 1800's wasn't free. Mercantilism reasserted itself in the form of protectionism, central banking, and federal internal improvements, as the party of Hamilton-Webster-Clay-Lincoln morphed from Federalists to Whigs to Republicans.

A course on economics? Will the works of Smith, Hume, Bohm-Bawerk, Mises, Rothbard, and Hayek do, or is there somthing else I am missing?

leveller  posted on  2007-04-13   22:22:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Dakmar (#20)

Excuse me? What, CBS was going to lose their license unless they fired Imus? Is that what you're expecting us to believe?

Apparently, you can't understand what you read, because you sure took a leap with that bad logic.

Apparently you are a newbie to the concept of a regulated industry.

Do you have any idea how many licenses CBS holds for radio and tv stations?

Do you have any idea how many regulations they must meet?

Do you know what the licensure renewal process entails?

Do you know the kind of fines the FCC can impose?

Do you know how many ways a government regulator can screw you without cancelling your license.

Grow up and join the world of adult economics.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   22:23:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Paul Revere (#23) (Edited)

Michael Savage called for the genocide of all Muslims. Why is he still on the air?

http://mediamatters.org/items/200604190001

This is about politics, not economics.

On April 17, nationally syndicated radio host Michael Savage called for "kill[ing] 100 million" Muslims and referred to the woman who alleged she was raped by members of Duke University's lacrosse team as a "drunken slut stripping whore."

"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

robin  posted on  2007-04-13   22:26:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: leveller (#22)

The market in the 1800's wasn't free. Mercantilism reasserted itself in the form of protectionism, central banking, and federal internal improvements, as the party of Hamilton-Webster-Clay-Lincoln morphed from Federalists to Whigs to Republicans.

A course on economics? Will the works of Smith, Hume, Bohm-Bawerk, Mises, Rothbard, and Hayek do, or is there somthing else I am missing?

What you read and what you understand are not the same thing, as your posts prove.

You don't understand a regulated industry. If you did, we wouldn't have to have this conversation. Oh, and I'm glad you were paying attention the day Merchantilism was covered in American History 101. Good boy.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   22:29:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Paul Revere (#23)

And you don't think anyone in fortune400 would be a little miffed about Price Is Right getting ganked?

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-13   22:35:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: robin (#24)

This is about politics, not economics.

It's about politics and economics. Reject either/or paradigms. They're almost always wrong.

Politics is what puts pressure on the government agency that regulates an industry. Politics creates an impact on the economics. You can't segregate them and say it's one or the other.

As for Michael Savage, he's not important. He's not on a TV news channel, and he doesn't interview the top politicos in the country on his show. He's not on the radar screen for Americans.

It's politics that makes the regulated industry vulnerable to political pressure, but the threat of fines and other sanctions is a very real economic pressure.

Ask those who paid fines for Howard Stern and CBS.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   22:35:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Dakmar (#26) (Edited)

And you don't think anyone in fortune400 would be a little miffed about Price Is Right getting ganked?

In other words, you don't have anything appropriate to say to my last post, so instead you suggest that the FCC can make CBS cancel a game show. Apparently you can't understand the concept of licensure of STATIONS.

And it's the Fortune 500 and the Forbes 400.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   22:40:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Paul Revere (#27)

He shouldn't be on the air if Imus isn't:

http://www.nndb.com/people/588/000044456/

And same for Limbaugh:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200405130001

"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

robin  posted on  2007-04-13   22:43:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Paul Revere (#27)

Politics is what puts pressure on the government agency that regulates an industry. Politics creates an impact on the economics. You can't segregate them and say it's one or the other.

You make a very eloquent case for free speech, but commercial broadcasting...there's so many loopholes. The firing of Imus by CBS was a financial decision, first and foremost, not because of any impending threat of fines, but due to sponsors pulling out. It's the work of your usual rent-an-outrage mob, to be sure, but I can't find any laws against hectoring.

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-13   22:47:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Paul Revere (#28) (Edited)

so instead you suggest that the FCC can make CBS cancel a game show

If CBS lost their license the game show would be cancelled by default, genius. Don't you realise it's not the idiots watching at home that are paying for those shows? Well, not directly anyway.

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-13   22:50:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Dakmar (#30)

We may never know why CBS did what it did. Certainly, getting grief from advertisers would play a role, but that is the reason you suspend the show, not cancel it.

You prefer to believe CBS had some bean counters who said "holy shit, we're never going to make money on this guy again!" I don't buy that. The rational business move is to suspend the show, see what can be done to salvage the thing, and reinvent it a few weeks later.

You don't kill the goose that has laid and can lay again the golden egg. You get him to a vet, and get those eggs rolling again.

This was a political hit job, and the perps may never be known. Certainly current economics played a role. But you don't put down a long standing money maker for a short term problem.

The economics of the Imus show may have been impinged for the short term because advertisers do run for the life boats early, but it wasn't economics that drove Imus' head back and to the left. It was the politicos behind the grassy knoll.

Imus is a thorn in the side of AIPAC, the Israel lobby, Bush, Cheney, and Hillary. Al and Jesse? They're paid errand boys in this.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   22:57:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Dakmar (#31)

If CBS lost their license the game show would be cancelled by default, genius.

CBS is a COMPANY.

The Price is Right is a SHOW.

The FCC licenses STATIONS.

Are you lost yet? Am I going too fast?

If you can find anywhere I said the FCC could or would cause CBS to fail as a network and stop broadcasting any show, please provide that quote.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   23:02:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Paul Revere (#32)

I'm surprised that all this coming out just now. Why wasn't he on the SPLC's "Infamous Nazi War Criminals" List?

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-13   23:09:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Paul Revere (#33)

If you can find anywhere I said the FCC could or would cause CBS to fail as a network and stop broadcasting any show, please provide that quote.

" If there were no government regulation of television and radio, if government didn't control the entire process for licensure and renewal of licensure, if government didn't control the entire basis of value for a radio or tv station (it's ticket to operate), Imus would still be on the air." - Paul Revere, post #14 on this thread

I'd say you implied so, in a broader sense.

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-13   23:14:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Dakmar (#35)

I'd say you implied so, in a broader sense.

No, you inferred it, or claimed to, so you could support your straw man argument.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   23:45:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: christine (#0)

Pat Buchanan gets it.

http://www. worldnetdaily.com/staticarticles/article55179.html

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-13   23:47:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Dakmar (#26)

we the only negroes here?

Nappy Headed Ho  posted on  2007-04-14   0:53:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Paul Revere (#21)

you can't carve the existing government regulation out of the mix when addressing a regulated industry.

Sure you can. What persuaded the networks to drop him? Was it FCC complaints or was it the flight of the sponsors? How long would FCC complaints have taken to wend their way through administrative hearings and court challenges, and what would have been the worst case scenario for the networks? Fines? Now consider the immediate effect upon the networks' bottom line that the absence of the sponsors would have had. The most likely cause and effect relationship seems clear.

leveller  posted on  2007-04-14   7:45:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Paul Revere (#32)

The economics of the Imus show may have been impinged for the short term because advertisers do run for the life boats early, but it wasn't economics that drove Imus' head back and to the left. It was the politicos behind the grassy knoll.

And your proof of this conspiracy theory is . . . .?

leveller  posted on  2007-04-14   7:47:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 42) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]