See other Neocon Nuttery Articles
Title: Al-Sarafya Bridge wasn’t destroyed by a trapped lorry but it had been trapped
Source:
HAQ News Agency
URL Source: http://76news.net/eng/index.php?opt ... tent&task=view&id=182&Itemid=2
Published: Apr 14, 2007
Author: staff
Post Date: 2007-04-14 15:36:41 by Eoghan
Ping List: *Israeli Espionage*
Keywords: None
Views: 538
Comments: 7
As our agency expected during the news of destroying al-Sarafia irony Bridge one of the most Baghdad famous traditional areas were destroying the Bridge wasn’t by a trapped lorry as the governmental sources said when they announced the explosion news HAQ agency- exclusive As our agency expected during the news of destroying al-Sarafia irony Bridge one of the most Baghdad famous traditional areas were destroying the Bridge wasn’t by a trapped lorry as the governmental sources said when they announced the explosion news, in which the Internal Ministry admitted today that the body of the Bridge –450 meter length- were completely trapped with explosive riffles that indicates that this thing were organized, exact and its purpose is to destroy the Bridge. High level security sources said that destroying al-Sarafya Bridge wasn’t by a trapped lorry as it was reported in the beginning but it was by remote controlled explosive rifles, and the news about a trapped car was made to cover the accident. In another side engineering sources specialized in instructing Bridges impeached the ability of the government to rebuild the Bridge as it was before, because the dimension size that happened to the Bridge body were very big, and it is impossible to return it to its past status, and if the government thought to rebuild the Bridge, it must change it to a Concrete body not irony, because the iron body of the Bridge which was constructed in 1946 exposed to a big damage and to return it as it was will by an expensive and complicated operation that the bad security station prevent executing it in this period.
Poster Comment: Well, the Iraqis ain't buying it...
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
#1. To: Eoghan (#0)
I think I read that the bridge being blown out will actually fit into the new Bush plan to segregate and partition Baghdad. This being out will help divide the Sunni and Shia, supposedly. If so, you have to ask ... who did it? Who has the ability to set and set off such charges, without being questioned?
Yes.
who did it? Who has the ability to set and set off such charges, without being questioned? Yes. Blackwater is my choice.
A company by any other name still points to BushBakerCheneyInc.
There are no replies to Comment # 6. End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestIn another side engineering sources specialized in instructing Bridges impeached the ability of the government to rebuild the Bridge as it was before, because the dimension size that happened to the Bridge body were very big, and it is impossible to return it to its past status
#4. To: Paul Revere (#1)
who did it? Who has the ability to set and set off such charges, without being questioned?
#5. To: angle (#4)
To: Paul Revere
#6. To: Paul Revere (#5)
Blackwater is my choice.
Replies to Comment # 6.