[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Media Flips Over Tulsi & Matt Gaetz, Biden & Trump Take A Pic, & Famous People Leave Twitter!

4 arrested in California car insurance scam: 'Clearly a human in a bear suit'

Silk Road Founder Trusts Trump To 'Honor His Pledge' For Commutation

"You DESERVED to LOSE the Senate, the House, and the Presidency!" - Jordan Peterson

"Grand Political Theatre"; FBI Raids Home Of Polymarket CEO; Seize Phone, Electronics

Schoolhouse Limbo: How Low Will Educators Go To Better Grades?

BREAKING: U.S. Army Officers Made a Desperate Attempt To Break Out of The Encirclement in KURSK

Trumps team drawing up list of Pentagon officers to fire, sources say

Israeli Military Planning To Stay in Gaza Through 2025

Hezbollah attacks Israeli army's Tel Aviv HQ twice in one day

People Can't Stop Talking About Elon's Secret Plan For MSNBC And CNN Is Totally Panicking

Tucker Carlson UNLOADS on Diddy, Kamala, Walz, Kimmel, Rich Girls, Conspiracy Theories, and the CIA!

"We have UFO technology that enables FREE ENERGY" Govt. Whistleblowers

They arrested this woman because her son did WHAT?

Parody Ad Features Company That Offers to Cryogenically Freeze Liberals for Duration of TrumpÂ’s Presidency

Elon and Vivek BEGIN Reforming Government, Media LOSES IT

Dear Border Czar: This Nonprofit Boasts A List Of 400 Companies That Employ Migrants

US Deficit Explodes: Blowout October Deficit Means 2nd Worst Start To US Fiscal Year On Record

Gaetz Resigns 'Effective Immediately' After Trump AG Pick; DC In Full Blown Panic

MAHA MEME

noone2222 and John Bolton sitting in a tree K I S S I N G

Donald Trump To Help Construct The Third Temple?

"The Elites Want To ROB Us of Our SOVEREIGNTY!" | Robert F Kennedy

Take Your Money OUT of THESE Banks NOW! - Jim Rickards

Trump Taps Tulsi Gabbard As Director Of National Intelligence

DC In Full Blown Panic After Trump Picks Matt Gaetz For Attorney General

Cleveland Clinic Warns Wave of Mass Deaths Will Wipe Out Covid-Vaxxed Within ‘5 Years’

Judah-ism is as Judah-ism does

Danger ahead: November 2024, Boston Dynamics introduces a fully autonomous "Atlas" robot. Robot humanoids are here.

Trump names [Fox News host] Pete Hegseth as his Defense secretary


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Einstein was right: space and time bend
Source: The Observer
URL Source: http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2057529,00.html
Published: Apr 15, 2007
Author: Anushka Asthana and David Smith
Post Date: 2007-04-15 22:49:08 by BeAChooser
Keywords: None
Views: 372
Comments: 33

Einstein was right: space and time bend

Ninety years after he expounded his famous theory, a $700m Nasa probe has proved that the universe behaves as he said. Now the race is on to show that the other half of relativity also works

Anushka Asthana and David Smith

Sunday April 15, 2007

The Observer

Under his name in the Oxford English Dictionary is the simple definition: genius. Yet for decades physicists have been asking the question: did Albert Einstein get it wrong? After half a century, seven cancellations and $700m, a mission to test his theory about the universe has finally confirmed that the man was a mastermind - or at least half proved it.

The early results from Gravity Probe B, one of Nasa's most complicated satellites, confirmed yesterday 'to a precision of better than 1 per cent' the assertion Einstein made 90 years ago - that an object such as the Earth does indeed distort the fabric of space and time.

But this - what is referred to as the 'geodetic' effect - is only half of the theory. The other, 'frame-dragging', stated that as the world spins it drags the fabric of the universe behind it.

Francis Everitt, the Stanford University professor who has devoted his life to investigating Einstein's theory of relativity, told scientists at the American Physical Society it would be another eight months before he could measure the 'frame-dragging' effect precisely.

'Understanding the details is a bit like an archeological dig,' said William Bencze, programme manager for the mission. 'A scientist starts with a bulldozer, follows with a shovel, then finally uses dental picks and toothbrushes to clear the dust away. We're passing out the toothbrushes now.'

The Gravity Probe B project was conceived in the late 1950s but suffered decades of delays while other scientists ran tests corroborating Einstein's theory. It was Everitt's determination that stopped it being cancelled. The joint mission between Nasa and Stanford University uses four of the most perfect spheres - ultra precise gyroscopes - to detect minute distortions in the fabric of the universe. Everitt's aim was to prove to the highest precision yet if Einstein was correct in the way he described gravity.

According to Einstein, in the same way that a large ball placed on a elasticated cloth stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time. A marble moving along the sagging cloth will be drawn towards the ball, as the Earth is to the Sun, but not fall into it as long as it keeps moving at speed. Gravity, argued Einstein, was not an attractive force between bodies as had been previously thought.

Few scientists need the final results, which will be revealed in December, to convince them of Einstein's genius. 'From the most esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple equation, e=mc2, the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe are standing up to the test of time,' said Robert Massey, from the Royal Astronomical Society.

He said the mission was 'legitimate science' to test a theory and confirm its brilliance, but others have criticised the costs and length of the study, claiming that what was announced had already been shown. Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said the announcement would 'fork no lightning'.

The theory explained

When Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity in 1915, he found a new way to describe gravity. It was not a force, as Sir Isaac Newton had supposed, but a consequence of the distortion of space and time, conceived together in his theory as 'space-time'. Any object distorts the fabric of space-time and the bigger it is, the greater the effect.

Just as a bowling ball placed on a trampoline stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time - a phenomenon known as the 'geodetic effect'. A marble moving along the trampoline will be drawn inexorably towards the ball.

Thus the planets orbiting the Sun are not being pulled by the Sun; they are following the curved space-time deformation caused by the Sun. The reason the planets never fall into the Sun is because of the speed at which they are travelling.

According to the theory, matter and energy distort space-time, curving it around themselves. 'Frame dragging' theoretically occurs when the rotation of a large body 'twists' nearby space and time. It is this second part of Einstein's theory that the Nasa mission has yet to corroborate.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#1. To: BeAChooser (#0)

Einstein had doubts about his own theory towards the end of his life and some scientists say his equations were misinterpreted or not quite right, though others have done work on this too and found it very difficult.

I'm just curious about this whole topic and will be happy when it's solved, though I doubt any human will be able to solve it completely because I think a lot of it goes beyond our comprehension.

For instance I find it difficult to grasp the idea of space and time being twisted. How does time become twisted? How can space and time curve around themselves? Of course I am dumb though and I am sure that many of the posters who are not dumb can easily understand this subject matter.

Diana  posted on  2007-04-15   23:02:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Diana, BeAChooser (#1)

Here is an interesting thought proof of the variability of time.

An observor is on a very high speed train. A land based observor happens to be exactly in the middle of the fast moving train when lightening simultainously strikes the front and back of the train.

From this event TWO perspectives emerge.

The passenger in the train would have moved a little closer towards the front train while the light from the event passed towards her and that she will have percieved it as striking the front of the train before the lightening hit the rear of the train.

The land observor sees the same event as both lightening strikes happening at the same time.

Both are correct, time is variable. Not by much untill superhuman speeds are achieved.

Interesting that Sir Newton recognized the same, that his calculus was correct, only if time was a constant.

tom007  posted on  2007-04-15   23:17:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: tom007 (#5)

A land based observor happens to be exactly in the middle of the fast moving train

I got confused here.

Land-based observer implies to me this person is standing on the ground outside by the train, yet you say that person is exactly in the middle of the train, do you mean outside but as the lightening strikes the person on the land happens to be standing exactly by the mid-point of the train?

Diana  posted on  2007-04-15   23:46:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Diana (#18)

et you say that person is exactly in the middle of the train, do you mean outside but as the lightening strikes the person on the land happens to be standing exactly by the mid-point of the train?

Yes, the land based person is exactly at the mid point of the train when the lightening strikes the front and the back of the train at the same time.

The person in the train will travel foreward towards the front strike and will percieve the front strike before she will percieve the reart strike.

SOOO, the matter of time is altered by velocity. And it really is true, just not percieveable in our usual world.

tom007  posted on  2007-04-15   23:53:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: tom007 (#20) (Edited)

SOOO, the matter of time is altered by velocity.

I don't see it that way. Perception was altered by velocity, time wasn't.

BTW, velocity is measured in meters per second, so if traveling at high velocity were able to alter time, then it would alter the very definition of velocity.

RickyJ  posted on  2007-04-16   0:04:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: RickyJ (#22)

BTW, velocity is measured in meters per second, so if traveling at high velocity were able to alter time, then it would alter the very definition of velocity.

might velocity be defined by distance divided by time by a directional vector, such as north or south west?

"so if traveling at high velocity were able to alter time, then it would alter the very definition of velocity."

I belive so. Alter time and alter velocity.

tom007  posted on  2007-04-16   0:41:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 25.

        There are no replies to Comment # 25.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]