See other Editorial Articles
Title: What I like about Freedom4um
Source:
my head
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 19, 2007
Author: Paul Revere
Post Date: 2007-04-19 15:19:48 by Paul Revere
Keywords: freedom4um, all
Views: 5135
Comments: 131
The purpose of this thread is to applaud our hosts for this place, and what we like about it. One of the things I do not like about modern USA culture is that people do not properly thank others. It's as if they believe they're giving up something to acknowledge that someone else did something nice. Running a site is a royal pain in the ass, and time consuming. It costs something to run, and someone has to pay that. So thank you to the owners, and here's what I like about Freedom4um: 1. No smilies!! I hate those things. I can barely stand to read DU because there are so many people who use them. Why not crayons? 2. No threads calling for government to FIX whatever today's most visible problem is. What are your favorite things about Freedom4um and how it is run?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 102.
#36. To: Paul Revere, Mekons4, scrapper2, SKYDRIFTER, bluedogtxn, Kamala, nolu_chan, roughrider (#0)
Just for the record, I'm perfectly content with my 15 post limit (keeps me from wasting too much time) and there has been no censorship of my posts other than my VOLUNTEERING not to call folks KOOKS and the censorship imposed by folks who bozo'd themselves to avoid facing the facts contained in my posts. ROTFLOL! No, SKYDRIFTER, I'm still around. In fact, I just got done thoroughly demolishing a claim by Kamala about FDS and did you notice that no one has even attempted a rational response to my destruction of nolu_chan's and roughrider's posts yesterday regarding the WTC? Well that depends on which side of the issue you are on. There's been many a thread where it was me against THEM. But who's complaining. (wink) I like that aspect of 4um too! ROTFLOL! Except in my case? ROTFLOL!
BAC, you're a legend in your own mind.
BAC doesn't understand that posting here isn't a job for the rest of us.
Hey critter ... do you think this is a picture of slag from a pool of molten steel? I find the paranoid delusion that I'm paid to post here quite fascinating.
So BAC, why are the people who make http://debunking911.com where you got the picture faceless? Who does the site? They don't ID themselves on that site of sketchy double talk. A site like that and apologists for the administration and the shadow government people who control it were all expectable in light of how successful people have e been in bringing the truth of the false flag operation to light. If they had been innocent, hey would not have destroyed so much of the evidence, now would they? For this pedestrian taunt of yours' to have teeth to it, there would have had to be preservation and analysis of he evidence that was melted don and destroyed. But that would have been dangerous, yes? The powers that b just couldn't allow that to happen for obvious reasons.
ROTFLOL! That photo actually came from Steven Jones who presented it as proof of pools of molten steel at the WTC site. Here, this is a graphic from Steven Jones paper on the subject of what collapsed the towers: Notice the similarity between the two images? And if you want the original source of the image go here: http://www.amny.com/news/local/am-wtcrelics-pg2006,0,4734727.photogallery?index=35 And look around and you'll find lots of additional images of that piece of rubble: Funny, none of them look like slag from a molten pool of steel. Steven Jones is a LIAR.
What I get when I click on source for that image: http://debunking911.com/moltenn othing.jpg Do a better job of presenting your crap. If it is a debunking911. com image FROM another source, make that plain, or actually get the graphic from the site you say it is from. And WHO DOES THAT SITE? WHY ARE THEY FACELESS? ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTION.
So you think the evil folks at that website created that graphic and just attributed it to Steven Jones? Well your suspicions are unfounded. Here is a URL to a Steven Jones' distortion and lie filled presentation (from his own website) containing that misleading presentation slide: http://www.journalof911studies.com/Fvolume/200609/DrJonesTalksatISUPhysicsDepartment.pdf Take a look at page 26. And lest you think Jones just didn't have a good enough quality image of that debris to know better, I direct your attention to another of his reports "Why Indeed Did the WTC Building Collapse?" ... FROM HIS OWN WEBSITE. And it does indeed contain a good quality image of that debris he implies is slag. See page 9.
There are no replies to Comment # 102. End Trace Mode for Comment # 102.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest bluedogtxn - No posting limits (unless you are a known trash talking shill).
bluedogtxn - No censorship (unless you go completely insane like Leveller did, or start out completely insane like BAC).
SKYDRIFTER - [Speaking of turkeys, BAC is conspicuous by his absence, today. More disinformation school, I suspect. If Bush attacks Iran, we can be certain.]
Paul Revere - This is the only forum I've seen that allows 9-11 discussion without a beatdown as part of it.
scrapper2 - And 4um offers "characters" a place to post their opinions - 4um as the last refuge for characters?
Mekons4 - The main thing is that people with very different political views can talk rationally without being called commie or nazi. When someone goes beyond the pale, the posters tend to quash it, rather than calling for banning.
#50. To: BeAChooser, ROTFLOL, christine, ALL, skydrifter, critter, randge (#36)
(Edited)
"ROTFLOL! I just got done thoroughly demolishing a claim by Kamala about FDS and did you notice that no one has even attempted a rational response to my destruction of nolu_chan's and roughrider's posts yesterday regarding the WTC?
#61. To: IndieTX, BeAChooser (#50)
BAC, you're a legend in your own mind.
#78. To: critter, Dakmar (#61)
critter - There comes a point when we realize that trying to talk sense to you is fruitless.
Dakmar - BAC doesn't understand that posting here isn't a job for the rest of us.
#82. To: BeAChooser (#78)
#85. To: Ferret Mike, critter, nolu_chan, ALL (#82)
So BAC, why are the people who make http://debunking911.com where you got the picture faceless?
#91. To: BeAChooser (#85)
"ROTFLOL! That photo actually came from Steven Jones who presented it as proof of pools of molten steel at the WTC site. Here, this is a graphic from Steven Jones paper on the subject of what collapsed the towers: "
#101. To: Ferret Mike, ALL (#91)
What I get when I click on source for that image:
http://debunking911.com/moltennothing.jpg
#102. To: BeAChooser (#101)
Replies to Comment # 102.