[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Soros-Funded Dark Money Group Secretly Paying Democrat Influencers To Shape Gen Z Politics

Minnesota Shooter's Family Has CIA and DOD ties

42 GANGSTERS DRAGGED From Homes In Midnight FBI & ICE Raids | MS-13 & Trinitarios BUSTED

Bill Gates EXPOSED: Secret Operatives Inside the CDC, HHS, and NIH REMOVED by RFK, Jr.

Gabriel Ruiz, a man who dresses up as a woman was just arrested for battery (dating violence)

"I'm Tired Of Being Trans" - Minneapolis Shooter Confesses "I Wish I Never Brain-Washed Myself"

The Chart Baltimore Democrats Hope You Never See

Woman with walker, 69, fatally shot in face on New York City street:

Paul Joseph Watson: Bournemouth 1980 Vs 2025

FDA Revokes Emergency Authorization For COVID-19 Vaccines

NATO’s Worst Nightmare Is Happening Right Now in Ukraine - Odessa is Next To Fall?

Why do men lose it when their chicky-poo dies?

Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class

SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video

Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is...

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: "Mind Control" Doesn't Exist. Propaganda Does
Source: The Price of Liberty
URL Source: http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/05/08/03/wallace.htm
Published: Apr 19, 2007
Author: Bob Wallace
Post Date: 2007-04-19 20:34:00 by YertleTurtle
Keywords: None
Views: 342
Comments: 27

Here is the way my brain is organized (and yours, and everyone else's on the planet since people first appeared): perception--emotion--reason. Know what that means? Perception goes through the more primitive emotional part of the brain first, to the more advanced rational part of the brain last. People always respond emotionally first, even the most egghead of "rational" intellectuals.

Those who control perception, control people. Perception is everything. I should really say they control "the masses" or the "herd," because people individually can't really be controlled all that well, although they can be pressured by the herd. But when you use propaganda techniques against the masses, baby, you've got a propagandist's dream come true.

People should always understand how propaganda techniques work. They'd be shocked at how well they work. I'm not talking about getting them to buy certain products, but to march off to war on the flimsiest of pretexts. No wonder the herd is called "the sheeple."

One man everyone should know is Edward L. Bernays, the American disciple and nephew of Sigmund Freud. He was for all practical purposes the founder of modern propaganda techniques.

Bernays despised most people and regarded them as his inferiors, especially because of intellectual or social claims. (See how it works? I just appealed to your emotions, and convinced you Bernays was attacking you. You fell for it, right?)

Bernays not only pretty much founded modern propaganda techniques, but was also the father of modern PR. Although, you could say they are same thing, and that there's really no difference between them.

In his 1928 book, Propaganda, Bernays wrote, "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country…"

Remember that quote. Burn it into your memory. Bernays thought people should be ruled by an extremely small elite, who should manipulate them through propaganda. That means you. People who believe in the wonders of government, and that it is their friend, should think twice about it.

In another book, In Crystallizing Public Opinion, Bernays wrote how governments and advertisers can "regiment the mind like the military regiments the body." This can be imposed, he said, because of "the natural inherent flexibility of individual human nature," and suggested the "average citizen is the world's most efficient censor. His own mind is the greatest barrier between him and the facts. His own 'logic-proof compartments,' his own absolutism are the obstacles which prevent him from seeing in terms of experience and thought rather than in terms of group reaction."

Bernays also thought "physical loneliness is a real terror to the gregarious animal, and that association with the herd causes a feeling of security. In man this fear of loneliness creates a desire for identification with the herd in matters of opinion."

Bernays claimed that "the group mind does not think in the strict sense of the word…In making up its mind, its first impulse is usually to follow the example of a trusted leader. This is one of the most firmly established principles in mass psychology." What Bernays called the "regimentation of the mind" is accomplished by taking advantage of the human tendency to self-deception [logic-proof compartments], gregariousness [the herd instinct], individualism [exalting their vanity] and the seductive power of a strong leader.

Good Lord, he's talking about the Borg, the scariest villains ever, the ultimate collectivists, Commies in a Cube! About group Borgification, the late Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, in his seminal book, Leftism Revisited, wrote that people have "a herd instinct, a strong feeling of community that regards another group with hostility." He believed it "tend[ed] to efface self, tend towards an 'usness' in which the ego becomes submerged."

I think he would call the Borg a "terrifying, bigger and more pitiless conformity." If you don't want to use the word "Borg," just use "Mass Man," "the herd," or "the sheeple." They all mean the same thing.

Bernay also expressed the opinion people "have to take sides...[they] must step out of the audience onto the stage and wrestle as the hero for the victory of good over evil." This means appealing to our narcissism, our inborn tendency to see everything as either good or bad, with little or nothing in-between.

He also noted the need for people to feel as if they belong to something larger than themselves. This also means appealing to our narcissism; it's why nearly every tribe in history -- and nations are just tribes writ large -- has called itself "the People" or "the Humans." Or "the Motherland" or "the Fatherland" or "the greatest nation on earth."

When people consider themselves as part of the Humans (by whatever name they call themselves), they exalt themselves. And, of course (and ominously) those outside the tribe are non-people. Although today we call them "collateral damage."

"Mental habits create stereotypes just as physical habits create certain definite reflex actionism," Bernays wrote. "...these stereotypes or clichés are not necessarily truthful pictures of what they are supposed to portray." Perception is everything, the truth matters little or not at all.

Now, let's boil all this down and see what we have:

Mass Man, the herd, cannot think, and is instead ruled by its feelings. The herd will look to a leader to save it. The best way to accomplish this is for the herd to feel it is under attack. The herd will draw together, expell those who see the truth and protest, and then march off to war.

Nazi leader Hermann Goering had this to say about the masses: "Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

Tell the herd they are the Humans, or the People, or best of all, have God on their side. Paint their enemies as insane and evil. Again, this is appealing to people's narcissism, the tendency to see everything as either good (us) or evil (them). Evoke paranoia and hysteria in them by convincing them the insane evil ones want to conquer and destroy them. What will happen? You can get them to march off to war by the millions, just as Goering noticed. The truth doesn't matter, only the manipulation of perception.

Americans have been manipulated through propaganda into marching off to war. Bush's handlers had him say, "They hate us for our goodness," and it was "evil ones" who attacked us. Keep it simple; make it into a contest between good and bad, with nothing in-between. We were told "the evil ones" were insane, and were going to fly drones of death across the Atlantic, or detonate nuclear weapons in the U.S., or feed us feet first into a woodchipper. People responded just as Bernays -- and Goering -- suggested. They went group-hysterical and overwhelmingly supported the wars. Protestors were branded as traitors.

If it's done right, you can get people to give up their freedom. This has been noticed for a long time. In the famous "Grand Inquisitor" scene in The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoevsky has the Inquisitor say, "For centuries...we have been wrestling with...freedom, but now it is ended and over for good." The author was commenting on the fact that many people want to give up their freedom to "authority," to that one leader who they believe will save them and take care of them, as if they are children and not adults. The Inquisitor goes so far as to claim, "they have brought their freedom to us and laid it humbly at our feet."

The mechanism of propaganda is available in many books. People should take a look at them. By bringing the techniques to light, people can immunize themselves against them.

Perception--Emotion--Reason. It's altogether too simple, and too easy.


Poster Comment:

"Manchurian Candidate" mind-control doesn't exist. The Virginia shooter was not turned into a robot who went on a killing spree. Such things are not possible.

Propaganda, however, does exist.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

From: New Straits Times | Date: March 29, 2004 | More results for: mind control

New Straits Times

03-29-2004

Microchips implant to test mind control technology Edition: Computimes; 2* Section: Outlook Trends

VOLUNTEERS are to have microchips implanted on the surface of their brains in the first human trials of a technology that will enable people to control machines using the power of thought alone.

The chips will enable the volunteers to do tasks such as turning on lights or drawing curtains just by thinking about them, according to a Sunday Times report. Electrical signals from the brain will be transmitted to a computer and a remote control unit. The technology has been tested on monkeys, which were able to move a cursor on a computer screen. The chips are expected to benefit disabled people first by making everyday tasks easier.

The trials of the "neural prosthetic" devices are to be conducted by Cyberkinetics, an American biomedical firm.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-04-19   21:06:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

11 Views - no comments ... the nice folks at Freedom4Um think you're mind controlled, but are keeping it to themselves.

You live in a black and white world free from "any" doubt or error.

14th Amendment / Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. [You have the right to remain silent, shut up and pay your taxes peasants ... hehehehehe].

noone222  posted on  2007-04-19   21:08:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: All (#1)

Victims of 1950s' Mind-Control Experiments Settle With CIA From: The Washington Post | Date: October 5, 1988 | Author: Lee Hockstader | More results for: mind control

Thirty years after a prominent Montreal psychiatrist performed a series of mind- control experiments on patients-including giving them heavy doses of LSD-seven of the former subjects yesterday reached a tentative settlement for damages with the CIA for its part in funding the doctor and his treatments.

Sources said the former patients would receive a total of $750,000 if the settlement is approved by the Department of Justice. The sources said it is one of the largest amounts the Central Intelligence Agency has ever agreed to pay resulting from civil litigation.

U.S. District Judge John Garrett Penn set a hearing this morning to review the proposed settlement.

The tentative accord came on the eve of a civil trial that had been scheduled to begin today in federal court. The case was expected to dwell on what some CIA critics call one of the most shameful episodes in the agency's history: its involvement in the psychiatric practice of Dr. D. Ewen Cameron in the late 1950s.

Cameron, who died in 1967, was a Scottish-born American who practiced at the Allan Memorial Institute of McGill University in Montreal. From 1957 to 1961, he treated more than 50 patients who sought help for various psychological ailments, such as depression and anxiety.

His goal was to reprogram behavior, and his methods caught the interest of CIA officials at the height of the Cold War. At the time, the intelligence agency was concerned with countering purported Soviet and Chinese breakthroughs in brainwashing and interrogation.

In their day, Cameron's techniques were unusual; today they sound harrowing.

To break or "depattern" habits and personality traits, Cameron subjected his patients to drug-induced "sleep therapy" for weeks at a time, gave them LSD and administered electroshock therapy at up to 75 times the usual intensity. At the same time, Cameron sought to impel new behavior by having his patients listen to recorded messages, played continuously for days at a time-a practice known as "psychic driving."

"He was inducing organic brain syndromes, damaging the central nervous system, reducing people to a zombielike state," said James C. Turner, the attorney for the seven former patients and one widower of a patient who are suing the government. "These are really horrific kinds of procedures, and the combination is unheard of."

Government lawyers have disputed that point. In pleadings filed in federal court here, they argue that Cameron's techniques, although controversial, were not outside the bounds of accepted psychiatric practice in the late 1950s.

Cameron, they stress, was one of the world's preeminent psychiatrists, a widely published scholar who was elected president of the American Psychiatric Association and the Canadian Psychiatric Association. Both before and after Cameron received $59,467 from a front organization funded by the CIA, he was awarded grants for his research from the Canadian government.

Cameron's "investigations were not dictated or controlled by the CIA in any way and there is no evidence that {he} was ever aware that the CIA was the source of his funding," the government said. "Dr. Cameron was a well meaning and well motivated doctor who genuinely hoped he could relieve some of his patients' suffering."

Nearly all the former patients now suing the government are elderly, and all say their lives were impaired by Cameron's treatment.

In a 1985 interview with The Washington Post, Velma Orlikow described what she said was the legacy of her treatment by Cameron, which included 14 shots of LSD as well as psychic driving.

"I suffer from chronic depression which sometimes becomes acute," said Orlikow, the wife of a Canadian member of Parliament. "I call these periods my black holes. I don't see anybody and I won't leave the house. I can't read and I used to love to read. I can't write a letter. I have unexplained fears. I wake up at night afraid and I don't know why. I'm trying to limp through my life like someone who's been in a terrible accident that leaves them crippled."

Orlikow and the other plaintiffs say they never consented to the specific treatments they received, nor were they told their cases were being used for research.

The government said that Cameron's actions must be considered in their historical context: in the late 1950s, government lawyers contended in court papers, "the doctrine of informed consent, as it is now understood, did not exist." By having his patients sign a general consent form that did not specify treatments and methods, Cameron was following the dictates of medical ethics as they existed in Canada and the United States at the time, the government contended.

The government further argued that there is no evidence that Cameron's patients were injured by the treatment they received. In any event, government lawyers said, the CIA should not be found negligent because Cameron's program was under way before the CIA channeled money to him and after the funding stopped.

Cameron was like an independent contractor, government lawyers argued: His actions were not guided or controlled by the CIA, and his decisions on treating patients were discretionary. As such, the government argued, they are not open to lawsuits under the Federal Tort Claims Act. But the former patients said the CIA should have known that the experiments were dangerous.

They cited the now-notorious case of Dr. Frank Olson, an Army scientist whose after-dinner liqueur was secretly spiked with LSD by CIA agents in 1953 as part of the agency's brainwashing research program. That night Olson jumped to his death from a 10th-floor hotel room.

The incident prompted an internal investigation at the CIA, and more than 20 years later, President Ford apologized for Olson's death and signed legislation providing $750,000 to his survivors.

Alice W. Olson, the scientist's widow, was scheduled to be the first witness for the plaintiffs in the trial that was to have started today.

The former patients said it was the agency's responsibility to oversee Cameron's experiments, particularly because they entailed the use of LSD. The CIA's failure to do so, they say, amounts to negligence.

"The case is about whether an agency of this government should have allowed this thing to go forward when it was so destructive to people," said Leonard S. Rubenstein, legal director of the Mental Health Law Project and an attorney for the former patients.

"The only real question . . . is the CIA's legal guilt," said veteran civil rights lawyer Joseph Rauh Jr., who handled the case until his retirement two years ago. "Their moral guilt is already admitted."

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-04-19   21:11:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

More Drivel from the Drivel Meister.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-19   21:21:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Paul Revere, Jethro Tull, YertleTurtle (#4)

MKULTRA

MKULTRA survivors testimony

"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2007-04-19   21:28:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

"Manchurian Candidate" mind-control doesn't exist.

I disagree. With the right candidate, such as the highly religious or superstitious, I do believe mind control can be easily accomplished.

Richard W.

Arete  posted on  2007-04-19   21:38:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: YertleTurtle, Critter, Christine, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#0)

"Mind control" with respect to 'robotics' isn't yet possible, but movements such as Nazism and Next Generation Nazism are close enough.

The high-grade version is "Coercive Persuasion" - the stuff of Jonestown. That's quite real.

Those such as Sirhan and McVeigh attest to the next level - the Manchurian Patsy, at least. Maybe Hinkley was a true Manchurian Candidate. Maybe Cho.

Whatever the history, the matter goes to the possibility/probability of herding mass numbers of people into terrible scenarios. 9-11 is one such case, hence, we post here.

SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-19   21:45:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#5)

YertleTurtle refuses view vids that might provide insight contary to his notion of fact. I enjoyed it tho.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-04-19   21:48:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: SKYDRIFTER (#7)

These same people who think "mind control" is some sort of paranoid fantasy will sit nodding in agreement once I start in on how Sharpton is a cult leader.

Unlike Hollywood action shows, I encourage everyone to try this at home.

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-19   21:51:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Jethro Tull (#8)

I think someone should relief Wally of his Glock soon...

“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"

Eoghan  posted on  2007-04-19   22:13:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

The Virginia shooter was not turned into a robot who went on a killing spree. Such things are not possible.

Have you ever heard of Sujit Kumar?

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-19   22:21:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

The Day Elizabeth Clayton's Life Changed Forever. Honest, I'm not trying to be flip to make a few chicken boy jokes, these articles really made me think about what it means to be human.

"People like truth, it gives us a fucking benchmark." - dakmar

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-19   22:35:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

http://www.blackvault.com/documents/mkultra/MKULTRA2/DOC_0000190691/0000190691_0001.TIF


A new truth movement friendly digg type site: Zlonk it!

Critter  posted on  2007-04-19   22:59:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

Many years ago, a friend agreed to be hypnotized by me just to see if it would work.

I "suggested" that he would find the room to be too warm, that he would remove his shoes, go outside, slap his shoes together and utter a particular nonsense word. He did exactly that. I dropped this practice.

I had a girlfriend that became a bible thumper in less than a week after attending a thumper service.

I don't go for the explination of "weak-minded." And "suggestible" isn't specific enough. There is something deeper happening, but I'm at a loss as to what that is.

As for "robotic:" that's a loaded description; not specific enough. Why did a horse jockey (Sirhan Sirhan) shoot at Robert Kennedy?

There was a program on the Discovery channel (I think) that had an exploration of brain injured persons. One was a man that was "blind." He couldn't conciously recognize what his eyes saw but a sub-system of vision allowed him to avoid obstacles. This showed that there are at least two pathways of vision.

What I'm promoting is that the functions of the human brain and the integration of its functions is more complicated than currently understood.

Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder.

rack42  posted on  2007-04-20   0:02:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: noone222 (#2)

You live in a black and white world free from "any" doubt or error.

Read the article next time.

By the way, if mind control exists, I'll tell you the same thing I tell everyone: prove it. I don't mean link to a bunch of circle-jerk sites that link to each other, I mean, do it yourself.

I'm still waiting. I'll always be waiting.

"Be convinced that to be happy means to be free and that to be free means to be brave. Therefore do not take lightly the perils of war." -- Thucydides

YertleTurtle  posted on  2007-04-20   7:06:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Paul Revere (#4)

More Drivel from the Drivel Meister.

Beyond your limited mentality, hmmm?

"Be convinced that to be happy means to be free and that to be free means to be brave. Therefore do not take lightly the perils of war." -- Thucydides

YertleTurtle  posted on  2007-04-20   7:07:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Eoghan (#10)

You seem to have me confused with some guy named "Wally."

By the way, I said, "I owned a Glock," past tense. Simple English is not hard to understand.

I also said I now own a .357 Sig Sauer, present tense.

Does your principal know your using the school computer?

"Be convinced that to be happy means to be free and that to be free means to be brave. Therefore do not take lightly the perils of war." -- Thucydides

YertleTurtle  posted on  2007-04-20   7:23:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: YertleTurtle (#17)

*burp*....wooo.

“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"

Eoghan  posted on  2007-04-20   7:26:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: SKYDRIFTER (#7)

What about that Malvo(Washington sniper) person? Do ya'll think that he was a Manchurian Candidate?

Lady X  posted on  2007-04-20   7:28:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Eoghan (#10)

I think someone should relief Wally of his Glock soon...

But he might tell Mrs. Cleaver?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-04-20   7:44:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: YertleTurtle (#15)

I don't mean link to a bunch of circle-jerk sites that link to each other, I mean, do it yourself.

The Wash Post article I posted details a law suit, re; mind control - a suit which was lost by the CIA. Now that I've proved government dabbles in the 'art' please prove to us that they've stopped. Thanks, and please stop beating your pug.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-04-20   7:52:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Yertle Turtle, Jethro Tull (#3)

Murder or suicide? Forensic experts attempt to unravel mystery of scientist's 1953 death after CIA gave him LSD.

(Originated from Knight-Ridder Newspapers)

From: Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service | Date: July 13, 1994 | Author: Detjen, Jim | More results for: CIA drug testing

YORK, Pa. _ In a crime lab adorned with human skulls and skeletons, John Levisky examines the X-rays of a man who plunged to his death 41 years ago. Nobody disputes that CIA agents gave the man, Frank R. Olson, a drink laced with the hallucinogenic drug LSD in November 1953.

Nobody disputes that nine days later, Olson smashed through a window of a New York City hotel room and fell 10 stories to his death.

What is disputed is this:

The CIA says Olson committed suicide. His family says the CIA murdered him.

Now, 41 years later, Levisky is part of a team of forensic experts assembled by Olson's sons in an effort to unravel the mystery of Olson's death, a strange episode left over from the Cold War era.

``Skeletons can talk,'' Levisky said as he examined X-rays attached to a lighted screen on the wall of his lab in the Life Sciences Building at York College. ``I can tell that Frank Olson probably landed on his feet after he fell out the window. You can see it in the way the legs are fractured.''

Olson's two surviving sons, Eric and Nils, decided to exhume their father's remains after their mother, Alice Olson, died last year. Their two parents were buried in different cemeteries in Frederick, Md., and the sons wanted to move their father's body to the same cemetery their mother is in. They felt this was a good opportunity to try to resolve questions that had haunted their family for decades.

``I do believe he was murdered,'' said Eric Olson, 49, during a recent interview. ``I can't prove it, but I believe it. If you review the government's story about how he died, you see that it is unbelievably unlikely.''

Eric Olson contacted James E. Starrs, a professor of law and forensic sciences at George Washington University, in Washington, and asked him whether scientific techniques (such as the genetic testing now being used in the O.J. Simpson murder investigation) might shed new light on his father's death.

Starrs began looking into the case and determined that an autopsy done at the time of Olson's death had been superficial. ``There were no X-rays, no internal examination, no search for drugs other than alcohol,'' he said. ``I felt there was a mystery that needed to be solved.''

Starrs assembled a team of more than a dozen legal and forensic experts and obtained the necessary permits and consents to have the body exhumed June 2. A new, more rigorous autopsy was performed, and X-rays and photographs were taken.

On Tuesday, Patrick Zickler, a spokesman for the forensic team analyzing Olson's remains, said preliminary results seemed to cast doubt on the government's version of events. Zickler said skull injuries and the lack of cuts on Olson's body were inconsistent with the CIA's description of how he died.

Zickler said a fracture found on the bottom half of the skull was significant because ``it shows that the skull suffered a more powerful blow or series of blows than the original medical examination indicated.''

And Starrs said it's not possible that Olson suffered the injuries simply by falling out of a window. ``It would not be possible unless he were on a trampoline,'' he said. ``You don't bounce around like that. When you hit pavement, you hit pavement.''

More tests remain to be done on Olson's skull, to determine exactly how the injuries were caused.

Eric Olson, who was 9 years old when his father died, said his father's death was rarely discussed when he was growing up. ``My mom said, `He's dead. We have to go on,''' Olson recalled. ``She developed a tough attitude and started to drink. Eventually, she became a severe alcoholic.''

But in 1975, 22 years after Frank Olson's death, several things happened that raised the family's suspicions.

First, the Washington Post published stories revealing that the CIA had performed drug experiments on civilians _ without their knowledge or consent _ beginning in the 1950s. The Post said one of those individuals committed suicide after taking LSD. Subsequent investigations determined that that person was Frank Olson.

Also in 1975, the Olson family was contacted by Armond Pastore, who was night manager of the Statler Hotel, where Frank Olson was staying when he died. ``He found my father on the pavement and held him in his arms as my father died,'' Eric Olson said. ``Pastore was convinced that my dad's death was a homicide. He said he had been haunted by his death all of these years.''

One of the things that bothered Pastore, according to Eric Olson, was a comment the hotel's telephone operator had reported to him. After Olson had fallen to his death, Robert V. Lashbrook, a CIA scientist sharing the room with Olson, made a phone call in which Lashbrook reportedly said, ``Well, it's over.'' A voice on the other end of the line is said to have replied, ``That's good.''

Lashbrook, who is retired and living in Ojai, Calif., disputes this account. ``It sure sounds sinister,'' he said in an interview. ``But it's absolutely not true.''

Pastore could not be reached for comment.

Beginning in the 1950s, the CIA conducted more than 400 secret drug experiments on private citizens as part of an effort to learn more about mind and behavior control. Over the course of a quarter-century, the CIA reportedly experimented on college students, drug addicts, federal prisoners, prostitutes, federal employees and its own agents. In many cases, the subjects were not told of the experiments in advance.

On Nov. 19, 1953, CIA agents gave Frank Olson, a civilian biochemist who helped develop germ warfare at an Army base at Fort Detrick, Md., a drink of Cointreau that was laced with LSD. The agency acknowledges that Olson was given the mind-altering drug while he was visiting Deep Creek Lodge, a log building in the woods of western Maryland.

According to an account of the incident in John Marks' book, ``The Search for the Manchurian Candidate,'' Olson had worked closely with CIA officials in developing germ warfare and was attending a retreat when the LSD episode occurred. In the days following the incident, Olson became disturbed, agitated, depressed and paranoid, Marks reports. CIA officials sent Olson to see Harold Abramson, an allergist in New York City who had been working with LSD under CIA contract for several years.

Olson became more and more depressed and ``began to think ... the agency was out to get him,'' Marks reports. Abramson recommended that Olson be put in a Maryland hospital.

The night before Olson was scheduled to return to Maryland, he spent the night on the 10th floor of the Statler Hotel with Lashbrook, the CIA scientist. About 2:30 a.m. Nov. 28, Olson crashed through the drawn blinds of the window and fell to his death.

Eric Olson has questioned the accounts of Lashbrook and other CIA officials.

``The room my dad stayed in was very small,'' he said. ``He would have had to run at top speed and dive through the window and closed blinds like Superman in order to do what the CIA says he did.''

Eric Olson said Lashbrook had also given different accounts of the incident. One time he said he saw Olson plunge to his death; another time he said he was asleep when the incident occurred, according to Eric Olson.

Lashbrook said last week that he woke up when he heard the crashing sound of Olson going out the window. ``I'm not sure if the window was open or closed,'' he said. ``I just remember that the roll-up blind was flapping around at the top when I woke up.''

Eric Olson also wonders why his father, who reportedly was extremely depressed, would be put into a 10th-floor hotel room. Lashbrook said that Frank Olson did not seem suicidal to him at the time, and that they stayed in the hotel room they were given.

Many details about the incident are still disputed. The federal government has expressed remorse. President Gerald Ford apologized to the Olson family, and, in 1976, Congress passed a bill to pay $750,000 in compensation to Olson's widow and children.

As of late last week, Levisky was nearing the end of his painstaking analysis of each bone in Olson's body. ``Almost anything that happens from childhood to death is recorded in the bones,'' he said.

Using special measuring tools, Levisky can determine sex, age, race and numerous other facts. He sometimes can tell a person's occupation by the way the bones are worn; a laborer who had done a lot of heavy lifting is likely to have more wear and tear on the vertebrae than, say, a secretary.

Levisky said the analysis had taken longer than he expected because so many of Olson's bones were broken. ``His body is reminiscent of what Evel Knievel's body must look like.''

Among the members of the team is Yale Caplan, a forensic toxicologist in Baltimore, who is examining Olson's organs and tissues for traces of drugs or medications that might have been in his body at the time of his death.

Starrs said he hoped publicity might encourage people with knowledge about the case to contact him in Washington. He hopes to track down witnesses, including the doorman who found Olson's body, the telephone operator, the priest who gave last rites to Olson, and the New York City policemen who investigated his death.

Starrs said he hoped the scientific team could complete its sampling of Olson's remains this month and inter Olson again during the summer.

The forensic team plans to report its findings by October.

Dempsy  posted on  2007-04-20   8:48:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: YertleTurtle (#16)

Beyond your limited mentality, hmmm?

You're an idiot.

Get back to me when you have something that's NOT your idea.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-04-20   9:28:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Dempsy (#22)

Fascinating article. Did the forensics research eventually come to some sort of conclusions?

Fred Mertz  posted on  2007-04-20   9:48:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Lady X (#19)

Just a screwed up pair. Nothing more interesting than that.

BUT, when Bush didn't declare their attacks as a form or 'terrorism,' you know where the 'terrorism' came from.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-20   10:04:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

Very good article, right on the mark.

Diana  posted on  2007-04-20   18:43:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

"Manchurian Candidate" mind-control doesn't exist. The Virginia shooter was not turned into a robot who went on a killing spree. Such things are not possible.

If you say so. We all know about your great intellect.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2007-04-20   18:48:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]