See other 4play Articles
Title: Coral Snake's Bites of the Week 2007-13
Source:
00-Hotherp Reports
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 23, 2007
Author: Coral Snake
Post Date: 2007-04-23 02:46:23 by Coral Snake
Keywords: None
Views: 66
Comments: 2
Coral Snake's Bites of the Week 2007-13 This week the Bites are going into gun grabber land due to the VTech massacre. As we all know the ghouls have been dancing again as they ALWAYS do when events like this occur. Actually this exploitation to events like this I feel REALLY shows the real concern that gun grabbers have for human life TOTALLY NON EXISTENT. To them the lives snuffed out by the killers in these school and workplace shootings are nothing but political brownie points for their cause. (The fact that many gun grabbers are also pro abortion and pro euthanasia also points to their lack of genuine concern for human life.) The fact is that "gun control" is and HISTORICALLY ALWAYS HAS BEEN the main enabling device for the depopulationist elite within the NWO. Bite recipients this week for individual gun grabbing go to George Shrubya Bush for his well known secret gun grabbing agenda, Dennis Kucinich for again pushing the tired idea of beginning the gun grabbing with handguns first in order to pit handgun and long gun (rifle and shotgun) owners against each other. Virginia Tech itself for supporting the defeat of a bill that would have allowed licensed to carry students, instructors and professors from having their guns on campus a week before the massacre, Michael Bloomburg for initiating a television brainwash advertising campaign against gun rights. Doug from Upland at FreeRepublic has also returned to the Bites radar this week for ignoring the current anti gun hysteria and then only acknowledging it with an old song parody from his archives rather than writing a new one to match the current gun grabber campaign against Second Amendment rights. In addition to these we will also be having our weekly look at the worst of http://www.gunguys.com. As always Remember the KEY and enjoy. In addition to being the front for the Neo-Cons the Papal/Jesuit order and their entire NWO did you know that Shrubya was also a GUN GRABBER?????!!!!! Yes that is the truth Doug from Upland. Shrubya just like the rest of the Bush Crime family and their equally criminal Neo-Con/Jesuit/NWO associates are in fact strong supporters of the gun grabbing plans of those associates. (In fact with few exceptions called the Usual Suspects amongst the DemocRATS like Chuckie Schumer, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Chriss Dodd (son of the late infamous Thomas Dodd), Teddy Kennedy, Dennis Kucinich, Rosie O. Donnel etc. Most of the really heavyweight gun grabbers these days are REPUBLICANS (Sarah Brady, Rudy Guiliani, Michael Bloomburg, Shrubya). Shrubya's own Gun Grabber record has been made crystal clear again in an article in the Alex Jones http://infowars.net site. {[ Second Amendment In Danger Under Anti-Gun Bush Gun control advocates should love the President Steve Watson http://Infowars.net Thursday, April 19, 2007 In the wake of the tragic shooting massacre in Virginia this week gun control advocates have once again come crawling out of the woodwork to capitalize on the ill informed and automated response of blaming the destructiveness of a mentally ill person's rampage on the second amendment. The problem is that the gun control advocates are preaching to the converted when they clamor and claw at the government to restrict gun ownership in America. Gun control advocates should applaud Bush for what he has done for their cause, instead they reveal the enormity of the false left/right paradigm that exists in US politics by berating him and his ilk as right wing gun nuts.] [Many point to the fact that Bush allowed the assault weapons ban to expire in 2004 as an indication that he caved in to the NRA. John Kerry even accused Bush of conspiring to "chose his powerful friends in the gun lobby over the police officers and families that he promised to protect." In Reality Bush wanted to renew the assault weapons ban but was forced to let it expire when it became clear that he may not retain office in 2004 should he alienate core Republican voters. At the time Bush was applauded by Democratic Senators Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer for his stance.] [The assault weapons ban is just one of the numerous anti-gun positions taken by the Bush Administration. Additional examples include disarming airline pilots, forfeiting gun rights for misdemeanors, and arguing that the total DC gun ban is a reasonable restriction on the 2nd Amendment.] [In the past another Republican Congressman, and now Presidential candidate, Ron Paul has accused the Bush administration of attempting to set in motion a militarized police state in America by enacting gun confiscation martial law provisions in the event of emergencies such as an avian flu pandemic or natural disasters. "I think they're concerned about the remnant, the remnant of those individuals who don't buy into stuff and think that they should take care of themselves on their own, that they should have their own guns and their own provisions and they don't want to depend on the government at all and I think that is a threat to those who want to hold power. They don't want any resistance to their authoritarian rule."]} Douggie from Upland, you have been supporting a GUN GRABBER every bit as bad as OR EVEN WORSE THAN the Hillary Clinton you fear so much ever since Shrubya assumed the Presidency. You should be soaking your Depends to the bursting point over this little bit of info if you are a GENUINE Second Amendment rights supporter. you can read the complete http://infowars.net article here: http://infowars.net/articles/april2007/190407Second.htm It may seem cruel to give a bite to the very School where the massacre occurred but if one reads on I thing he or she will find it justified. This bite is NOT for the massacre itself but for an event and speech by its President that happened the week before. Basically there was a bill before the Virginia State Legislature that would repeal the "gun free" designation for colleges and universities and allow students and employees of such facilities WITH VALID CCW PERMITS to carry their weapons on campus. If this law were made law it might have PREVENTED the VT Massacre by allowing an armed instructor, professor or student of 21 years of age or older to put the shooter out or force his surrender. The bill however was defeated and a spokesman for VT gave a speech in SUPPORT of that defeat and that is what this bite is for. The speech along with several incidents where guns in the hands of school employees PREVENTED school shootings can be found an an article posted at http://rense.com: {[This is undoubtedly the worst school shooting, high school, college or otherwise, in the history of our country. There are some facts, however, about some of these school shootings of which you probably are not aware. Do you know, for instance, that at least three shootings in high schools were stopped by civilians with guns? Civilians, not law enforcement. In one case a civilian was traveling past a school when he saw children running from the building. One told him that there was a student inside shooting people. The civilian pulled his gun, ran in side, and confronted the student. The student put down the gun and surrendered. In another case a high school vice-principal heard that there was a student in the hallways with a gun. He sprinted a half-mile to his car. He had a gun in his car so he had to park off campus. He then sprinted back with the gun to confront the student. Lives saved. There have been many other cases where civilians with guns have prevented further carnage at the hands of killers. The media isn't fond of reporting these episodes because they don't contribute to the cause of gun control.] [This is undoubtedly the worst school shooting, high school, college or otherwise, in the history of our country. There are some facts, however, about some of these school shootings of which you probably are not aware. Do you know, for instance, that at least three shootings in high schools were stopped by civilians with guns? Civilians, not law enforcement. In one case a civilian was traveling past a school when he saw children running from the building. One told him that there was a student inside shooting people. The civilian pulled his gun, ran in side, and confronted the student. The student put down the gun and surrendered. In another case a high school vice-principal heard that there was a student in the hallways with a gun. He sprinted a half-mile to his car. He had a gun in his car so he had to park off campus. He then sprinted back with the gun to confront the student. Lives saved. There have been many other cases where civilians with guns have prevented further carnage at the hands of killers. The media isn't fond of reporting these episodes because they don't contribute to the cause of gun control.] You can read the complete http://rense.com article here: http://www.rense.com/general76/boo.htm It seems that in addition to dumping the 9-11 Truth movement Dennis Kucinich has gone straight back to the kneepads before the Jesuits/NWO on the gun rights issue too. He became the first to bring out the tired old handgun ban gun grab in the form of legislation after the VT Massacre. The handgun ban has since 1969 became the main device to try to divide the handgun owners and the "sporting gun" (rifles and shotguns) owners into two separate camps and bring the "sporting weapon" camp into the gun grabber movement by saying that ONLY handguns or "assault" weapons are going to be affected. The fact is that ALL guns are going to be eventually grabbed if you allow one type of gun to be grabbed in order to save another type. The NWO knows quite well from the Castro Communist revolution in Cuba that in a civil war a side armed with "sporting weapons" can gain handguns and military weapons from the soldiers it brings down with "sporting" weapons. (Even though I'm NOT a Communist I'm referring to the Castro revolution as it is unique amongst Communist revolutions in that it was NOT fought with smuggled Russian military weapons but with AMERICAN military weapons obtained from the American supported Fascist regime of Batista that were obtained by the Communist rebels through the use of "sporting weapons" on the Batista soldiers in control of the best stuff like Browning Machineguns and Automatic Rifles.) The tgun grab of the NWO is FOR ALL GUNS, NOT just the target guns designated today amongst gun grabbers like Dennis Kucinich. The Kucinich handgun grab bill was reported at the Alex Jones http://prisonplanet.com site: {[ Hypocrite Kucinich Drafts Legislation To Ban Guns Entertains notion that bloodthirsty Neo-Fascists carried out 9/11, then says we should hand over our only protection against them Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet Friday, April 20, 2007 Dennis Kucinich has shot himself in the foot, pardon the pun, by alienating a huge majority of his most vocal and active online supporters, the 9/11 Truth Movement, in drafting legislation that will completely ban the purchase, sale, transfer, or possession of handguns by civilians. Kucinich has effectively ended any minute chance he had of becoming President in 2008. The Congressman from Cleveland has received plaudits for being the only man on Capitol Hill, besides Ron Paul, to even consider pushing for a new inquiry into the events of 9/11. Though Kucinich warned that the investigation "would be limited," he has promised to organize a committee before the end of the year to focus on "Some specific areas that to me represent the most egregious examples of distortion of truth or lack of information." "By focusing in on that, I'll be able to bring forward a new dimension to the discussions. And from there, we'll move ahead," said Kucinich. According to Raw Story, the Congressman has also selected a date to introduce articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney. Wonderful, empowering, a breath of fresh air - but you know it just sounded too good to be true, because now comes this; "Kucinich is currently drafting legislation that would ban the purchase, sale, transfer, or possession of handguns by civilians." That's right - our intrepid warrior in the fight to restore the Constitution, wants to gut the very bedrock of it - the Second Amendment. Just as the Bush administration exploited the immediate aftermath of 9/11 to ram through the Patriot Act, Kucinich cites the Virginia Massacre as evidence of a "national emergency" that requires an instant assault on the bill of rights to "protect" us all from the madmen. Kucinich is seemingly willing to entertain the notion that 9/11 was carried out by a ruthless gang of bloodthirsty Neo-Fascists within our own government, yet he thinks we should all hand in our only means of defense against such thugs when the men in black ski-masks come knocking. Notice Kucinich specifies that only "civilians" will be forced to turn in their weapons - the guardians of the state will still be allowed to arm themselves to the teeth to keep us all safe. Gun control is a religion, and no matter how many facts you throw out about how guns prevent hundreds of thousands of crimes every year, or arguments about how criminals don't obey laws and gun control only disarms the victims, the majority will never change minds that are already made up. Liberals still argue that the language of the Second Amendment applies only to a "well regulated militia" and not the individual, selectively ignoring the very framers of the Constitution, the founding fathers, who in their writings made it abundantly clear that the right to bear arms was included so Americans had a recourse to defend themselves against a tyrannical government - the very tyranny that Kucinich is grandstanding to oppose in his 9/11 and impeachment movements. A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks. --- Thomas Jefferson to Peter Carr, 1785. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, (Memorial Edition) Lipscomb and Bergh, editors. We established however some, although not all its [self-government] important principles . The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent, (as in electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or they may act by representatives, freely and equally chosen; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; ---Thomas Jefferson to John Cartwright, 1824. Memorial Edition 16:45, Lipscomb and Bergh, editors. No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms. ---Thomas Jefferson: Draft Virginia Constitution, 1776. [The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. ---James Madison,The Federalist Papers, No. 46. Zacharia Johnson argued that the new Constitution could never result in religious persecution or other oppression because: "[T]he people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them." Roger Sherman, during House consideration of a militia bill (1790): [C]onceived it to be the privilege of every citizen, and one of his most essential rights, to bear arms, and to resist every attack upon his liberty or property, by whomsoever made. The particular states, like private citizens, have a right to be armed, and to defend, by force of arms, their rights, when invaded. 14 Debates in the House of Representatives, ed. Linda Grand De Pauw. (Balt., Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1972), 92-3. Many more quotes can be found here. Activists within the 9/11 Truth Movement who believe that elements of the U.S. government attacked them on September 11 but support relinquishing the only defense against tyranny to these very same killers are in serious need of a wake up call. They should also immediately identify with George W. Bush, who also shares their zeal for gun control. Dennis Kucinich needs to understand that if he attempts to legislate away our fundamental liberties and our single defense against tyranny while proclaiming himself to be a champion of freedom, his hypocrisy will be his downfall and the 9/11 Truth Movement will desert him.]} This http://prisonplanet.com article can be found here: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/200407banguns.htm It seems there is no end to NYC Mayor Michael Bloomburg's gun grabbing attempts either. Now he is following in the footsteps of Elizabeth Taylor's advertising campaign hat helped bring us the Gun Control Act of 1968 with a new RADIO AND TELEVISION ad campaign of his own. A CBS News story posted on the Alex Jones http://infowars.com site reports: { Bloomberg To Fund Anti-Gun Ad Campaign CBS | April 19, 2007 Marcia Kramer Mayor Michael Bloomberg and a coalition of 214 mayors are using the Virginia Tech massacre to pressure Congress to give local cops the information they need to trace illegal guns used in crimes. CBS 2 has also learned that they're also launching a TV ad campaign starting Sunday. "We're fighting criminals and illegal guns. Why is Congress fighting us?" Bloomberg said Wednesday.] [The ads will start running in four days in New York, Washington and the congressional districts of key gun advocates. "I don't want my officers to have their hands tied when it comes to having to deal with the issue of illegal guns for criminals," Bloomberg said.]} The complete http://infowars.com version of the CBS article can be found here: http://www.infowars.com/articles/2nd_amendment/bloomberg_fund_anti_gun_ad_campaign.htm After about a year Douggie from Upland of FreeRepublic makes his return to the bites. What for, its simple. Douggie still claims to be a Second Amendment rights advocate even though the subject of gun rights hasn't graced his song FreeRepublic song parodies in years and has yet to grace his YouTube versions of such parodies. The only thing we have got from him in a week that the gun grabbers were loaded for bear with thanks to the not from VT was an OLD song parody from his "archives" to some Teddy Neugent trash. A genuine Second Amendment advocate should be loaded for bear him or herself in the weeks to come when the gun grabbers are going to take full advantage of their television monopoly to push their propaganda at us. (I'll admit much like I have been with the Bites this week.) The LEAST Douggie should have done if he is a genuine Second Amendment advocate is write a NEW parody and YouTube it. Could it be that Douggie is not doing this because he he has been supporting a GUN GRABBER ever since Shrubya assumed the presidency?????!!!! (See Bite One). You can see Douggie's RE RUN parody from the Clinton Administration here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1819023/posts Of course a gun grabber week at the bites would not be complete with out the worst of the http://www.gunguys.com website this week: {[Our Gun Culture Must End? We Cannot Abide Another Tragedy Lots and lots of voices, opinions, and editorials are coming out about Monday?s massacre at Virginia Tech. Here?s a quick runaround. At the Washington Post, EJ Dionne points out the problem? we?re stuck in the same old arguments. Monday?s shooting was a tragedy unlike any this country has ever seen? we need a change more than ever. And yet the same old players seem to be falling down in the same old holes. "Why do we have the same futile argument every time there is a mass killing? Advocates of gun control try to open a discussion about whether more reasonable weapons statutes might reduce the number of violent deaths. Opponents of gun control shout ?No!? Guns don?t kill people, people kill people, they say, and anyway, if everybody were carrying weapons, someone would have taken out the murderer and all would have been fine. And we do nothing. This is a stupid argument, driven by the stupid politics of gun control in the United States. In other spheres, we act reasonably when faced with new problems. When Richard Reid showed that nasty things could be done with shoes on airplanes, airport security started examining shoes. When liquids were seen as a potential danger, we regulated the quantity of liquids we could take on flights. We barred people from carrying weapons onto airliners long ago. If we can act pragmatically in the skies, why can?t we be equally practical here on the ground? In its zeal to defend our inviolable right to bear arms, is the National Rifle Association going to argue for concealed carry on airplanes? If not, won?t the organization be violating its core principle that all of us should be free to be armed at all times?" The NRA has turned our gun policies upside down. We need fewer firearms in this country, not more. And yet more is exactly what the gun guys are proposing after the tragedy that happened on Monday? and our legislators and media are listening to exactly that. Why? As the Austrailian newspaper The Age points out, it goes directly back to the NRA. They spend money on campaigns, and get legislators to vote their way even when public opinion says otherwise. "The National Rifle Association reported in its 2004 tax filing that it had raised $US234.4 million ($A281.2 million) for the calendar year. Last year, it spent $US5.1 million supporting some political candidates and attacking others. The independent Political Moneyline website reports that 85 per cent of that spending went to Republican Party candidates. ?The gun lobby in this country is very aggressive,? gun-control advocate Tom Mauser said after the Virginia shootings. ?They really punish people who don?t vote their way. They?re very unforgiving.? This was why the response of US political leaders to Monday?s mass shooting at Virginia Tech was so muted it was no louder than a sob. Mr Mauser knows these things. His son, Daniel, was one of 13 students killed at Columbine High School on April 20, 1999. The gunmen, both Columbine students, were armed with semi-automatics and a shotgun." Here's the thing: the NRA doesn't actually punish people. They don't have the numbers to do so. They talk a big game, and put the fear of the gun lobby into legislators. But when it comes down to it, their numbers are dropping. Our legislator's fears of the gun lobby are simply unfounded. And that's why this idiotic gun culture the NRA has perpetuated (at the direct request of the gun lobby, who profit off of each and every firearm sold) has got to go. It doesn't matter how overtly reckless and idiotic the ?let's arm everyone? argument is. What matters is millions actually believe in it. What matters is how many people, especially many who make the laws of the land (or coerce and lobby those who do) still believe this is some sort of core, defining ethos of the United States and even the world. It is, you have to admit, one hell of a way to run a planet. But it is not the only way. Here is the flip-side argument. It is at once simple and obvious and makes a calm sort of moral sense, and therefore is sneered at by every gun lover and bitter Second Amendment misinterpreter and NRA lobbyist in the land. It goes like this: If all guns were banned outright tomorrow, or even if we took the strict British/Swedish approach and only allowed them for hunting and in highly controlled shooting clubs, guns would slowly but surely disappear from popular culture. As a fetish, as a gang weapon, as some sort of bogus macho self-defense argument, as an obvious and too-easy means to a shocking schoolyard massacre, guns and the culture they create would, slowly but surely, fizzle and die. It would not be instantaneous. It would not be easy. But slowly, as manufacturing largely ceased, and gun shows shut down, and fewer and fewer new firearms entered the market, and the black market slowly dried up from lack of decent supply, and as the coming generation simply wouldn?t know a world where guns were prevalent and easy and stupid as paint, guns and the numb ultraviolence they inspire would disappear within a single generation, maybe two." That?s the key here. Firearms have been inserted by the NRA into the American Dream for too long? for some reason, we falsely believe that they?re necessary, that they?re important, and that they?re valuable for our safety. We can?t put this any clearer: They are not. Firearms are unnecessary. They are dangerous, they are unwanted by the majority of Americans, and it?s unthinkable that the NRA expects us to simply let them run rampant over our laws while these tragedies continue to occur. And that?s the bottom line. The NRA is not invincible. They are not overwhelming or untouchable. They are not even as strong as they claim to be. And there is exactly no reason why we should be forced by them to continue to put up with tragedy just so they can get their kicks on the shooting range. Walter Shapiro on http://Salon.com goes one step further: There is no reason at all why we should not simply repeal the Second Amendment. "Rather than ducking a debate with the conservatives over the eternal primacy of the Second Amendment, gun-control backers should embrace it. Since right-wing Republicans are zealously championing constitutional amendments on everything from abortion to a balanced budget, it would take intellectual jujitsu for them to explain why the First Amendment is worthy of improvement (by severing flag burning from free speech), but the Second Amendment unquestionably must remain sacrosanct. For only in Tom Clancy-esque mythology are weekend hunters carrying assault weapons a bulwark against tyranny. Only in a nation forged by 18th century concerns about liberty and states? rights do firearms have a hallowed place in the Constitution. It doesn't have to be that way. Any more than we as Americans have to continually face the real-life meaning of that gruesome, blood-soaked, gun-toting word ?massacre? because of the outmoded language of the Second Amendment." We don't have to go that far? there are lots of things we can do to make sure a massacre like the one that happened on Monday never happens again. But we must do something. It is unconscionable to simply stand by while tragedy after tragedy ends the lives of our citizens and our students alike.] 
Bite One ---> George w, Bush (aka Shrub, Shrubbie, Shrubya, Smirk, Smirking Chimp, Chimperor, *)
Bite Two ---> Verginia Tech
Bite Three ---> Dennis Kucinich
Bite Four ---> Michael Bloomburg
Bite Four ---> Doug from Upland
Bite Five ---> Gun Guys
More next week.
(139 images)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Coral Snake (#0)
Thanks for the weekly update CS.
Always read and always enjoyed. Keep 'em coming!
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
#2. To: Coral Snake (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest