See other 9/11 Articles
Title: John Kerry: WTC Building 7 Was a Controlled Demolition
Source:
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/220407_kerry_wtc7.html
URL Source: http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/220407_kerry_wtc7.html
Published: Apr 22, 2007
Author: A Dykes
Post Date: 2007-04-23 06:53:33 by Kamala
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: 911
Views: 144
Comments: 10
John Kerry: WTC Building 7 Was a Controlled Demolition: 2004 Presidential Candidate Says Weakened Building Was Brought Down Based on Danger Posed to Surroundings Aaron Dykes / JonesReport | April 22, 2007 Senator John Kerry was questioned concerning 9/11 during an appearance at Book People in Austin, Texas. Members of Austin 9/11 Truth Now asked Kerry about the officially unexplained collapse of WTC Building 7." Kerry responded: "I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things-- that they did it in a controlled fashion." This matches statements by leaseholder Larry Silverstein regarding the collapse of WTC7 where he said. "We've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." Furthermore, hundreds of police, fireman and other first responders have gone public reporting being informed of Building 7's controlled demolition prior to the building collapse, negating the government's official story that building collapse was due to fire. Additionally, an EMT, who recently went public only under the name 'Mike', said that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7 was about to be "pulled" and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse. The BBC and CNN also both reported the collapse of Building 7 more than twenty minutes before it actually fell. The misreporting not only stands out as a glaring error-- with the WTC 7 building still visibly standing in the background of the shot, but begs the question: how did BBC, BBC 24 and CNN all know in advance that Building 7 would collapse, when no steel building has ever collapsed from fires alone? Official reports from both NIST and FEMA state that they cannot explain why Building 7 fell, but maintain that it was related to a terrorist attack on the complex on 9/11. However, the FEMA report concludes that: "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. The best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue." A report by NIST regarding the collapse of Building 7 is officially underway, but such a report has yet to be published. The 9/11 Commission Report makes no mention of WTC 7 whatsoever. Senator John Kerry needs to disclose how he "knew" WTC 7 was brought down in a "controlled fashion" and who told him so. The official government story states no reason for the WTC 7 collapse. If Sen. Kerry has other information, he owes it to the victims, the families, who have been repeatedly lied to, and to the country at large to come forward with details that could answer outstanding questions. Preparing to demolish even a moderate sized building takes weeks of preparation; a building as large as WTC 7-- a 47- story skyscraper-- must have taken at least as long. Therefore, the idea that the building was demolished in response to fires spread from the Twin Towers is not a satisfactory response, as the building could not have been set up for unexpected demolition in only a few hours, much less while fires burned inside. Kerry was also asked about the research of Dr. Steven Jones, who has tested both samples of steel from the Twin Towers as well as recovered dust, which have both been tested positive for the chemical signature of Thermate, which is used to cut support beams in localized reactions during a controlled demolition. Kerry stated that he was not aware of the research and is "open to hearing anything based in fact and evidence." TRANSCRIPT Kerry was asked about an investigation into WTC7 and the connection with leasehold Larry Silverstein who publicly stated that the "decision was made to pull it," a term that refers to controlled demolition: "I don't believe there's been a formal investigation. I haven't heard that; I don't know that. I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things-- that they did it in a controlled fashion. You know he's part of the construction-- effort for the memorial and the use of the land, etc. There's been a long tug-of-war going on in New York and I've not been following every aspect of it because it's not in my jurisdiction, so to speak. But I'll check on the story-- I'll take a look at it based on what you've said. You're the first people anywhere in the country who've brought this to my attention
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Kamala (#0)
To reprise what I stated on another 9/11 thread.... So is this the new story? That, in fact, WTC 7 was indeed brought down by explosives set up in the time between 10:05 am (the time that the South tower collapsed) and 5:25 pm (the time that WTC 7 collapsed)? So you're saying that it is possible to rig a 47 story building to be brought down in a controlled demolition with explosives set up in less than a few hours? So, was the decision to bring WTC 7 down in a controlled demolition made at 10:06 am that day? Or was that decision made after 10:29 am, when the North tower collapsed? Now, that would leave less than seven hours for the decision to be made, the demolition experts to be contacted, for them to get the materials in hand, to get to the site, to plan the controlled demolition, to rig the building, and then get clear of it before it came down. All of this while choking thick dust clouds, smoke and fire are blanketing the area. All of this as people are panicking and freaking out from death and destruction all around. Roads blocked by debris, people, bodies and shattered pieces of bodies splattered by terrifyingly high falls; police, fire and emergency services overloaded and overwhelmed. Communications breaking down everywhere, people's nerves frayed, people screaming in agony, people crying and screaming in panic, pain and fear... and in the midst of this hellish maelstrom of panic and fear and death and destruction, a steely-nerved team of explosives experts supposedly arrived with hundreds of pounds of high explosives, walked into a burning building, designed a demolition plan on the spot and rigged it in a few short hours to come down in a perfectly controlled explosive demolition, bringing the building down into its own footprint. By the way, the "into its own footprint" form of explosive demolition is THE hardest thing of all to do, being considered the VERY highest form of the art of explosive demolition, something that only a tiny handful of experts in the world are considered qualified to be able to do. So, given all of that, Is THIS what you are claiming now, Senator Kerry? I just want to be clear on this story. For some detailed information on just what it takes to plan and execute a successful building implosion by explosives, and how very complex and difficult an "into the footprint" demolition is, check out this link: Here's what I think: Keep hammering on WTC7 - it's the weakest link in the official story. Keep hammering on it and hammering on it and hammering on it. Don't let go, don't stop, don't accept the official story, just keep hammering on WTC7 over and over and over. Eventually this is going to crack wide open.
 | Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#2. To: All (#0)
I think the case for 911 being an inside job is well established, save for a few pro-govt KooKs. Now what? The reason I ask this is b/c even tho the PTB kill presidents in broad daylight and launch wars based on lies the American public remains seated in a pool of apathy. Pardon me for being (gasp) negative (/gasp) but it's over. Over as in the country is done.
#3. To: Jethro Tull (#2)
Let us bow our heads in prayer and cower in the shadows forgetting forever the rebellious nature of those brave souls incapable of servitude to the Royal House of Shit-eating parasites, that preceeded us in the liberty that has degenerated into this apathetic lethargy of fat-assed mall waddling bafoons armed with I-Pods.
Pardon me for being (gasp) negative (/gasp) but it's over. Over as in the country is done.
2Pe 2:19 While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption:
Dying of old age is about as exciting a prospect as suicide by cigarettes.
#4. To: Elliott Jackalope (#1)
...in the midst of complete chaos and massive loss of life. Kerry's simply a liar.
it is possible to rig a 47 story building to be brought down in a controlled demolition with explosives set up in less than a few hours
"First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you. Then you win." --Mahatma Gandhi
#5. To: noone222 (#3)
haha...very good attempt at cynicism.
"First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you. Then you win." --Mahatma Gandhi
#6. To: Jethro Tull (#2)
No argument there. However, it is not widely known. Would that change anything? I surely don't know.
I think the case for 911 being an inside job is well established
"First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you. Then you win." --Mahatma Gandhi
#7. To: Kamala, BeaChooser (#0)
Where the fuck is BAC when you need him to refute this kook stuff??? Seriously, If John Kerry says it was a controlled demolition, 100 bucks says he recants and says he mis-spoke, ala Alberto "Lying Bastard" Gonzalez
Dying for old bastards, and their old money, isn't my idea of freedom.
#8. To: angle (#6)
That's the million dollar question. I understand the need for some to hold onto hope, but after a decade of hoping, I'm finished. I have no hope the sheeple will awaken before the door to the police is completely shut. If our side can’t agree on the basic proposition that open borders is a prelude to the NAU, and that the NAU isn't a good for American nationalism and culture (gasp), it's over.
Would that change anything? I surely don't know.
#9. To: Jethro Tull (#8)
NAFTA Superhighway hits bump in road Given severe blow as Texas Legislature voting to block program. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp? ARTICLE_ID=55331
2Pe 2:19 While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption:
Dying of old age is about as exciting a prospect as suicide by cigarettes.
#10. To: Kamala (#0)
I think Kerry is speaking from ignorance, not knowledge. He knows Silverstein said the building was being pulled, and he believes that. He probably doesn't know they would have had to put the explosives in place weeks ahead of time.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest