See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Between 9:03 and 9:37 a.m. September 11, 2001: Defense Official at Pentagon Says, ‘We’re Next’
Source:
Covering Catastrophe: Broadcast Journalists Report September
URL Source: http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/ ... ty.jsp?entity=jim_miklaszewski
Published: Apr 23, 2007
Author: Allison Gilbert et al.
Post Date: 2007-04-23 10:55:21 by honway
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 270
Comments: 20
Between 9:03 and 9:37 a.m. September 11, 2001: Defense Official at Pentagon Says, ‘We’re Next’ After the second WTC tower is hit, NBC News correspondent Jim Miklaszewski is heading down a hall inside the Pentagon when he runs into a Defense Department official. The official says he doesn’t yet know anything specific about the attack. But, he says, it is so coordinated that “[i]f I were you I would stay off the E-ring [the outermost corridor of the Pentagon] today, because we’re next.” According to Miklaszewski, the official had no specific information, “that was just his gut instinct.” [Gilbert et al., 2002, pp. 43] Entity Tags: Jim Miklaszewski
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/156625180X/centerforcoop-20
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
#9. To: honway (#0)
Pentagon intelligence official with an office in the Pentagon? That wouldn't, by any chance, be Steve Cambone? Because, if he had warning, you know Rumsfeld did as well.
Consider placing yourself in the shoes of the planner of 9/11 and assume for a moment the Bush version of 9/11 is accurate. Assume the planner of such a diabolically brilliant plan was smart enough to know the exterior walls of the Pentagon were the most hardened part of the structure.Just plain common sense,right? Would the planner instruct the pilot that demonstrated incredible skill on 9/11 to strike the exterior hardened wall or would the planner make full use of the maneuverability and destructive power of a fully fueled airliner and instruct the skilled pilot to fly into the center of the Pentagon? How could anyone unaware of the plan conclude that the attack would be on the E-ring? Didn't the practice scenario used in exercises at the Pentagon plan on a plane crashing into the center of the Pentagon, the worse case scenario because there would be restricted access for fire fighting equipment?
#16. To: All (#14)
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/linkscopy/ContPlanP.html Contingency planning Pentagon MASCAL exercise simulates scenarios in preparing for emergencies
That center looks kinda soft. A nose dive?
Excellent point! No real terrorist would have attacked the outside of the E-ring.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#14. To: aristeides, robin, ratcat, *9-11* (#9)
“[i]f I were you I would stay off the E-ring [the outermost corridor of the Pentagon] today, because we’re next.”
Replies to Comment # 14. Didn't the practice scenario used in exercises at the Pentagon plan on a plane crashing into the center of the Pentagon, the worse case scenario because there would be restricted access for fire fighting equipment?
Photos by Dennis Ryan 
#18. To: honway (#14)
Would the planner instruct the pilot that demonstrated incredible skill on 9/11 to strike the exterior hardened wall or would the planner make full use of the maneuverability and destructive power of a fully fueled airliner and instruct the skilled pilot to fly into the center of the Pentagon?
#20. To: honway (#14)
How could anyone unaware of the plan conclude that the attack would be on the E-ring?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.