See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Between 9:03 and 9:37 a.m. September 11, 2001: Defense Official at Pentagon Says, ‘We’re Next’
Source:
Covering Catastrophe: Broadcast Journalists Report September
URL Source: http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/ ... ty.jsp?entity=jim_miklaszewski
Published: Apr 23, 2007
Author: Allison Gilbert et al.
Post Date: 2007-04-23 10:55:21 by honway
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 607
Comments: 20
Between 9:03 and 9:37 a.m. September 11, 2001: Defense Official at Pentagon Says, ‘We’re Next’ After the second WTC tower is hit, NBC News correspondent Jim Miklaszewski is heading down a hall inside the Pentagon when he runs into a Defense Department official. The official says he doesn’t yet know anything specific about the attack. But, he says, it is so coordinated that “[i]f I were you I would stay off the E-ring [the outermost corridor of the Pentagon] today, because we’re next.” According to Miklaszewski, the official had no specific information, “that was just his gut instinct.” [Gilbert et al., 2002, pp. 43] Entity Tags: Jim Miklaszewski
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/156625180X/centerforcoop-20
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
#9. To: honway (#0)
Pentagon intelligence official with an office in the Pentagon? That wouldn't, by any chance, be Steve Cambone? Because, if he had warning, you know Rumsfeld did as well.
#10. To: aristeides (#9)
Jim Miklaszewski should have testified before a Congressional hearing under oath and told the American people the name of the Pentagon intelligence official and then the official should have been called and placed under oath.
Here you go Brian....discuss!
Consider placing yourself in the shoes of the planner of 9/11 and assume for a moment the Bush version of 9/11 is accurate. Assume the planner of such a diabolically brilliant plan was smart enough to know the exterior walls of the Pentagon were the most hardened part of the structure.Just plain common sense,right? Would the planner instruct the pilot that demonstrated incredible skill on 9/11 to strike the exterior hardened wall or would the planner make full use of the maneuverability and destructive power of a fully fueled airliner and instruct the skilled pilot to fly into the center of the Pentagon? How could anyone unaware of the plan conclude that the attack would be on the E-ring? Didn't the practice scenario used in exercises at the Pentagon plan on a plane crashing into the center of the Pentagon, the worse case scenario because there would be restricted access for fire fighting equipment?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Replies to Comment # 9. Pentagon intelligence official with an office in the Pentagon?
#11. To: aristeides, Brian S (#9)
That wouldn't, by any chance, be Steve Cambone?
#14. To: aristeides, robin, ratcat, *9-11* (#9)
“[i]f I were you I would stay off the E-ring [the outermost corridor of the Pentagon] today, because we’re next.”
End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.