See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Scientists Debunk 9/11 Myths
Source:
http://911blogger.com/node/8096
URL Source: http://911blogger.com/node/8096
Published: Apr 25, 2007
Author: GW
Post Date: 2007-04-25 06:41:05 by Kamala
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: 911
Views: 118
Comments: 3
Scientists Debunk 9/11 Myths Submitted by GeorgeWashington on Tue, 04/24/2007 - 3:35pm. essay Here's the original This essay is written to draw in people who don't know that many credible scientists believe the trade centers were demolished. It SOUNDS like its going to attack controlled demolition, but the theory which the scientists debunk is actually the GOVERNMENT's myth. Numerous credible scientists have recently disproven some of the most commonly-held theories about the collapse of the World Trade Centers on September 11, 2001: A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC, said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and World Trade Center building 7 collapsed "does not match the available facts" and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition A prominent physicist, former U.S. professor of physics from a top university, and a former principal investigator for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects, stated that the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolition A U.S. physics professor who teaches at several universities believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition A professor emeritus of physics and former division chairman from a small community college said "My wife and I, transfixed in front of a TV as the horror of 9/11 unfolded, watched as the topmost, undamaged floors of the WTC South Tower started to gradually lean (rotate) in the direction of the damage due to impact. In an instant, the rotation stopped, and that which was rotating began to fall, as if only under the influence of gravity! The fulcrum was no longer there! I blurted out, "My god, they wired the building." An expert on demolition said that the trade centers were brought down with explosives (and see TV interview here; both in Danish) An architect, member of the American Institute of Architects, who has been a practicing architect for 20 years and has been responsible for the production of construction documents for numerous steel-framed and fire-protected buildings for uses in many different areas, including education, civic, rapid transit and industrial use, has disputed the claim that fire and airplane damage brought down the World Trade Centers and believes there is strong evidence of controlled demolition (see also this video, part 2 here, and part 3 here A former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics and computer science at a university concluded that the Twin Towers "were brought down by planted explosives." An professor of mathematics said "The official explanation that I've heard doesn't make sense because it doesn't explain why I heard and felt an explosion before the South Tower fell and why the concrete was pulverized" Two structural engineers at a prestigious Swiss university said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here) A Dutch demolition expert stated that WTC 7 was imploded A safety engineer and accident analyst for the Finnish National Safety Technology Authority stated regarding WTC 7 that "The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition." A Danish professor of chemistry said, in a mainstream Danish newspaper, "WTC7 collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires or damage in one corner had played a decisive role, the building would have fallen in that direction. You don't have to be a woodcutter to grasp this" (translated) See this scientific journal and this web page for additional scientists who have disproven commonly-accepted misconceptions about 9/11. Military leaders, legal scholars, senators and presidents, liberals, conservatives, Christians, Jews and Muslims and the 9/11 Commissioners themselves have also all recently debunked widespread but false 9/11 theories.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Kamala, *9-11* (#0)
Good embedded links at the source.
"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Well let's just see how "credible" the ones that are
named really are ...
What? No name? Of course, the person they are talking about is David L.
Griscom. And yes, he worked at NRL for 33 years. But doing what? Working on
structures? Steel? Fire? Demolition? No, he worked in the Optical Sciences
Division. Researching the physics of silicon (for uses such as radiation
shielding, waste management and fiber optics). His papers and work product for
33 years have NOTHING to do with structures or anything remotely connected to
structures. But he considers himself an expert on those things, apparently.
ROTFLOL! What? No name? Are you now embarrassed to even say the
name? Well it's EX-professor Steven Jones he's talking about. An expert in sub-
atomic particles and cold fusion. And guess what ... a liar who claims, among
other things, that this is slag from a pool of molten steel: It isn't.
What? No name? Link doesn't work so it's hard
to know who they are talking about. Maybe Grimmer, the expert in solar cells?
ROTFLOL! What?
No name? Ahh ... I see it's Mike Hawryluk. Another graduate of Brown ... that
bastion of extreme liberals. And what kind of physics does he do? No clue. But
I doubt it has anything to do with the macro-world. ROTFLOL!
What? No name? Well maybe the poster can't read or
understand Danish either. Any here want to help me out? ROTFLOL!
Richard Gage? An architect? Founder of the Architects
and Engineers for 9/11 Truth? Well here's his organization's website: Not much to it.
Nope. It's all "Coming soon...." And no engineer's names mentioned.
And I found this by Mr Gage: http://stj911.org/gage/LunchAcc
ount.html Nope. No mention of any engineers there either, much less
structural engineers. But I do see that he was taken in by David Ray
Griffin's lies about 7 months ago. And cites 9/11 Mysteries as influencing
his beliefs. Guess he never actually looked into the claims of Griffin.
Or watched this: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-
6243624912447824934 Or seen any of the other material I've been
linking to this forum. Guess he's too busy setting up his "Architects and
Engineers for 9/11 Truth" website. Which will no doubt be filled with a
bunch of regurgitated lies and disinformation. Par for the course in the
*truth* movement. Oh and by the way ... Mr Gage has a Bachelors in
Architecture. And is from San Francisco (where else would he be from ...
ROTFLOL!) Mr Bruce R. Henry (they might as well just
give their names since we'll eventually find out anyway), guidance systems
engineer ... which makes him eminently qualified to be an expert on controlled
demolition. (sarcasm). Gary Welz ...
instructor of Mathematics at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. ROTFLOL!
These would be Hugo
Bachmann and Joerg Schneider. Both retired. Hugo is quoted saying that WTC7
was "with great probability, professionally demolished". But this is based
SOLELY on looking at a few video recordings presented to the professor by
conspiracists during an interview. And currently Bachmann seems to want
nothing to do with questions about his comments. Hmmmmmm.... And like
Bachmann, Joerg was only shown a small portion of the video and other
evidence ... the part that conspiracists who interviewed him chose to show.
His resume would indicate he focused on concrete structures and then, later,
the safety and reliability of structures, with special emphasis on human
error. Ah yes ... Mr Jowenko ... who also said that
WTC1 and WTC2 were clearly NOT controlled demolitions. ANd Jowenko's theory is
that Silverstein decided to demolish WTC 7 AFTER the WTC towers collapsed and
damaged the building. He theorizes that Silverstein wanted to avoid the cost
of repairing a highly damaged structure. In other words, he doesn't postulate
a pre-planned demolition. And like the two above, Jowenko reached his
conclusion after being shown only evidence selected by a conspiracist, without
being told this happened on 9/11 or that the building had been on fire for
almost 7 hours prior to the collapse and without being told that firemen on
the scene said they knew the structure was going to collapse because it began
leaning well before the actual collapse. Heikki Kurtilla. Accident analyst. He states in
his "analysis" that the collapse fracture began at the bottom. Really? I swear
I saw the penthouse disappear before the rest of the structure came down.
What is it with the Danes? His name is
Niels Harrit. Now I'm sure a chemist knows a lot about structures, mechanics
and dynamics. And didn't I just get done proving at this forum that this
chemist LIED about the Windsor Tower fire? And LIED about the temperature that
NIST simulations say the fires reached? And he's concerned about us being lied
to? ROTFLOL! Who have all been debunked in earlier
threads here at 4um.
--------------------------------------------------------- Aren't you lucky. You get to receive one of the 15 posts I'm allowed each day.
An accessory to mass murder after the fact needs a new line. A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC, A U.S. physics professor who teaches at several universities believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition A professor emeritus of physics An expert on demolition An architect, member of the American Institute of Architects, A former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics and computer science An professor of mathematics said Two structural engineers at a prestigious Swiss university s A Dutch demolition expert A safety engineer and accident analyst for the Finnish National Safety Technology Authority A Danish professor of chemistry
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/09/jones.html
#2. To: Kamala (#0)
This essay is written to draw in people who don't know that
many credible scientists believe the trade centers were demolished.
A prominent physicist with 33 years
of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC, said that the
official theory for why the Twin Towers and World Trade Center building 7
collapsed "does not match the available facts" and supports the theory that
the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition
A prominent physicist, former U.S. professor of
physics from a top university, and a former principal investigator for the
U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects, stated that
the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolition
![](http://debunking911.com/moltennothing.jpg")
A U.S. physics professor who teaches at several universities
believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled
demolition
A professor emeritus of physics and former
division chairman from a small community college
An expert on demolition said that the trade centers were
brought down with explosives (and see TV interview here; both in Danish)
An architect, member of the American Institute of Architects,
A former guidance systems engineer for Polaris
and Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics and computer science
at a university concluded that the Twin Towers "were brought down by planted
explosives."
An professor of mathematics
said "The official explanation that I've heard doesn't make sense because it
doesn't explain why I heard and felt an explosion before the South Tower fell
and why the concrete was pulverized"
Two structural engineers at a prestigious Swiss university
said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled
demolition (translation here)
A Dutch demolition expert stated that WTC 7 was
imploded
A safety engineer
and accident analyst for the Finnish National Safety Technology Authority
stated regarding WTC 7 that "The great speed of the collapse and the low value
of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition."
A Danish professor of chemistry said, in a mainstream Danish
newspaper, "WTC7 collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires or
damage in one corner had played a decisive role, the building would have
fallen in that direction. You don't have to be a woodcutter to grasp this"
(translated)
See this scientific journal and this web page
for additional scientists who have disproven commonly-accepted misconceptions
about 9/11.
#3. To: Kamala (#0)
NOT ONE...oops.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest