[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Bush vetoes bill setting dates for Iraq pullout
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 1, 2007
Author: staff
Post Date: 2007-05-01 20:48:19 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 99
Comments: 8

Bush vetoes bill setting dates for Iraq pullout

By Bill Trott 52 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush on Tuesday vetoed legislation from the Democratic-controlled Congress that would have set dates for withdrawal of U.S. troops in Iraq, saying such a timetable would be "setting a deadline for failure." ADVERTISEMENT

"Members of the House and Senate passed a bill that substitutes the opinions of politicians for the judgment of our military commanders," Bush said on the fourth anniversary of the "Mission Accomplished" speech in which he prematurely declared an end to major hostilities in Iraq.

Bush's veto came as Iraqi Interior Minister Jawad al-Bolani said highly reliable information indicated Abu Ayyub al-Masri, leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, had been killed north of Baghdad. An al Qaeda-linked group, however, denied the report and U.S. officials said it could not be confirmed.

Democrats in Congress appear not to have enough votes to override Bush's veto, which was only the second of his term.

The withdrawal dates were part of a $124 billion funding package for the wars in Iraq in Afghanistan and Bush said congressional leaders from both the Democratic and Republican parties had been invited to the White House Wednesday to reconcile differences.

Bush had repeatedly promised to veto legislation that would set dates for troops withdrawals and in a televised address on Tuesday he called such a timetable "rigid and artificial." He said it also would demoralize the Iraqi people and encourage killers across the Middle East.

"Setting a deadline for withdrawal is setting a deadline for failure and that would be irresponsible," Bush said.

"... It makes no sense to tell the enemy when you plan to start withdrawing. All the terrorists would have to do is mark their calendars and gather their strength and begin plotting how to overthrow the government and take control of the country of Iraq."

Under the legislation, which won the support of only four Republicans in Congress, American troop withdrawals would have begun as early as July 1 and no later than October 1, with the nonbinding goal of removing all combat troops by March 31.

Both sides draped the bill in symbolism. Democratic congressional leaders waited to present the legislation to Bush on the "Mission Accomplished" anniversary while the president vetoed it with a pen given to him by the father of a Marine killed in Iraq.

The veto came as violence has been escalating in Iraq and after an April in which more than 100 troops died in Iraq.

Chester Crocker, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, said the speculated death of al-Masri would be "positive," even though it would not put an end to al Qaeda violence in Iraq, where it is blamed for trying to push the country into full-scale sectarian civil war.

Bolani said details about Masri's death would be released soon but when asked later to confirm the death said: "If he has not been killed today, he will be killed tomorrow."

There has been growing friction between Sunni Islamist al Qaeda and other Sunni Arab insurgent groups over al Qaeda's indiscriminate killing of civilians and its imposition of an austere brand of Islam in the areas where it holds sway.

If Masri was killed by insurgents, that would signal a deepening split at a time when the Shi'ite-led government is trying to woo some insurgent groups into the political process.

On the political front, Iraq's main Sunni bloc is considering quitting the Shi'ite-led government because it believes the concerns of Sunnis are not being addressed, members of the bloc including the vice president said.

Some members of the Sunni Accordance Front have been urging the bloc for several months to pull out of Shi'ite Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's cabinet, partly over accusations that reconciliation with minority Sunni Arabs has moved too slowly.

A pullout would not be enough to topple Maliki, as he would still have a majority in parliament through his ruling Shi'ite Alliance and a coalition of Kurdish parties. The Accordance Front has 44 seats in the 275-member parliament.

Maliki, a Shi'ite Islamist, insists the government is making progress toward reconciliation between majority Shi'ites and Sunni Arabs who were dominant under Saddam Hussein.

(Additional reporting by Mussab Al-Khairalla, Waleed Ibrahim and Ahmed Rasheed in Baghdad, Inal Ersan in Dubai and Sue Pleming and Richard Cowan in Washington)

* Email Story * IM Story * Printable View

RECOMMEND THIS STORY

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tom007, Christine, Honway, Robin, Aristeides, Diana, All (#0)

I think Bush is way screwed, more than ever.

I just hope Congress keeps returning the sam Bill for his signature.

By now, the troops are so homesick and sick of war, they're probably ready to listen to Congress for a change.

It remains to be seen. The Fat Lady is just warming up.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-05-01   21:33:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: tom007 (#0)

"... It makes no sense to tell the enemy when you plan to start withdrawing. All the terrorists would have to do is mark their calendars and gather their strength and begin plotting how to overthrow the government and take control of the country of Iraq."

Would someone please tell the idiot that the Iraqi people are not terrorists?

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." ~George Washington

robin  posted on  2007-05-01   21:41:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: SKYDRIFTER (#1)

I just hope Congress keeps returning the sam Bill for his signature.

Isn't going to happen. The Democrats already sent Hoyer out to reassure everyone, aka Wall Street, large political contributors and war profiteers, that he and Pelosi will be pushing through a funding bill "supporting our troops" asap. Murdering off another 1000 or so troops in the next year is a small price to pay to keep the economy humming and the political graft flowing.

Richard W.

Arete  posted on  2007-05-01   21:44:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: robin (#2)

Why does Bush hate the troops, the american people, the iraqi people, the afghani people, the palistinean people, the venezuelan people...

Call me cynical but I think it's a profit thing.

''the messianic side of Americans can be tiresome.'' - Nicolas Sarkozy

Dakmar  posted on  2007-05-01   21:46:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: robin (#2)

plotting how to overthrow the government and take control of the country of Iraq.

Isn't that exactly what the neocons did? So they're worried their puppet won't survive real freedom in Iraq. You have to be dumb as a box of rocks to fall for any of this BS.

Richard W.

Arete  posted on  2007-05-01   21:48:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tom007 (#0)

saying such a timetable would be "setting a deadline for failure."

failure without end is so much more profitable

He said it also would demoralize the Iraqi people and encourage killers across the Middle East.

hello????? I would wager the iraqi people are pretty darned demoralized now, and killers across the middle east are in their fifth year of being encouraged

kiki  posted on  2007-05-01   22:16:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: tom007 (#0)

Iraq Generals to President: You've Failed Us

05.01.2007 from http://nsnetwork.org (copied from http://buzzflash.com)

Today, two retired Generals who led troops in Iraq expressed outrage at the President's veto of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Health, and Iraq Accountability Act:

The President vetoed our troops and the American people. His stubborn commitment to a failed strategy in Iraq is incomprehensible. He committed our great military to a failed strategy in violation of basic principles of war. His failure to mobilize the nation to defeat world wide Islamic extremism is tragic. We deserve more from our commander-in-chief and his administration. --Maj. Gen. John Batiste, USA, Ret.

This administration and the previously Republican controlled legislature have been the most caustic agents against America's Armed Forces in memory. Less than a year ago, the Republicans imposed great hardship on the Army and Marine Corps by their failure to pass a necessary funding language. This time, the President of the United States is holding our Soldiers hostage to his ego. More than ever apparent, only the Army and the Marine Corps are at war - alone, without their President's support. --Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton, USA, Ret

kiki  posted on  2007-05-02   0:19:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: kiki, aristeides, Fred Mertz (#7)

The President vetoed our troops and the American people. His stubborn commitment to a failed strategy in Iraq is incomprehensible. He committed our great military to a failed strategy in violation of basic principles of war. His failure to mobilize the nation to defeat world wide Islamic extremism is tragic. We deserve more from our commander-in-chief and his administration. --Maj. Gen. John Batiste, USA, Ret.

This administration and the previously Republican controlled legislature have been the most caustic agents against America's Armed Forces in memory. Less than a year ago, the Republicans imposed great hardship on the Army and Marine Corps by their failure to pass a necessary funding language. This time, the President of the United States is holding our Soldiers hostage to his ego. More than ever apparent, only the Army and the Marine Corps are at war - alone, without their President's support. --Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton, USA, Ret

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." ~George Washington

robin  posted on  2007-05-02   10:42:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]