[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: No Airfones on Flight 77 - DRG on Jack Blood
Source: http://911blogger.com/node/8247
URL Source: http://911blogger.com/node/8247
Published: May 2, 2007
Author: Reprehensor
Post Date: 2007-05-02 18:31:14 by Kamala
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: 911
Views: 423
Comments: 10

No Airfones on Flight 77 - DRG on Jack Blood

( Home » No Airfones on... )

Submitted by Reprehensor on Tue, 05/01/2007 - 3:49pm.

airfones | David Ray Griffin | Flight 77 | Jack Blood

(Edited for clarity.)

Jack http://Blood.com

You can D/L the April 24 Jack Blood show at http://nw0.info - follow the "radio" link.

File is .ogg which is the http://www.videolan.org format - (VLC player).

This excerpt starts at the 54:27 mark.

Transcript by "ratcat" at http://LibertyForum.org;

Jack Blood Radio Show Apr. 24, 2007

Interview with Prof. David Ray Griffin Excerpt

Discussion of Prof. David Ray Griffin’s latest book on 9/11:

Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory


Griffin: Let me tell you a new thing that most people don’t know. This was dug up by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall who wrote wrote the book, “9/11 Revealed.” ... it has to do with the alleged phone calls from Barbara Olson. Now you know and many of your listeners know that Ted Olson, her husband, who claims he got the call from her from………

Blood: They say he is going to be the new AG (Attorney General). I just had to thump that in. That’s the rumor going around [crosstalk]

Griffin: Yeah, more than likely. But he claims that he got this call from Barbara, his wife, from Flight 77 but he was unclear. First he would say it was from cell phone and then he would say, well no it was from one of the seat back phones. And he’s gone back and forth. So, it turns out now we know that cell phone calls were not possible. So, that makes everybody say, well sure maybe she did it on airfones. It turns out that particular Boeing, American Boeing 757 that Flight 77 was, was not equipped with airfones. This was a stunning development.

Blood: This was a stunning development. How come I haven’t heard that before, David?

Griffin: Because Roland’s book hasn’t got much attention. It’s a shame because it’s such a great book.

Blood: So it only could have been done by cell phone. They had no in flight phones on 77. Is that what you are saying?

Griffin: That’s right. And they checked and they double-checked and I quote all of their correspondence with American on that issue.

Blood: Did we have people on the record, David, saying that people used in-flight phones on that flight where there were no in-flight phones? Do we have them on the record trying to manipulate previous information to that level?

Griffin: Well, it was the call from Barbara Olson that some people have claimed was on the in-flight. I don’t know about other callers.

Comment:

» add new comment | printer friendly version » reply | 7 pointsNew Theodore Olson’s own words

Theodore Olson’s own words indicate that he would be prepared to do rather more than that.

On March 21, 2002 on its page A35, the Washington Post newspaper printed an article titled “The Limits of Lying” by Jim Hoagland, who writes that a statement by Solicitor General Theodore Olson in the Supreme Court has the ring of perverse honesty. Addressing the Supreme Court of the United States of America, US Solicitor General Theodore Olson said it is "easy to imagine an infinite number of situations . . . where government officials might quite legitimately have reasons to give false information out."

http://www.vialls.com/lies911/lies.htm

Submitted by Chris on Tue, 05/01/2007 - 3:51pm Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

#1. To: Kamala (#0) (Edited)

I believe 9-11 was an inside job. However, I would like to SEE this guy's correspondence with American.

757's and 767's, as well as smaller narrow bodies, have had flight fones for many years. This is a 1st party known fact. I need them to prove this one to me.

The only way it would not have been equipped with phones is if it was one of TWA's old planes that American got when it bought TWA that wasn't remodelled yet...and I'll have to research that because I don't remember what year that was.

IndieTX  posted on  2007-05-02   18:42:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: IndieTX (#1)

Sounds fishy, but I'd thought I would post it anyway.

Kamala  posted on  2007-05-02   18:44:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Kamala (#3) (Edited)

Thanks..that never hurts...as far as the cell phone issue being impossible, we need for someone to easily proove or disprove that to keep our credibility.

I'd go up in a small plane but they go so slow, they would work for sure...someone needs to go up in a JET and clandestinely open their cell phone at altitude and hit speed dial to someone waiting on the other end and time how long the call remains open.. SIMPLE! Wonder why that hasn't been done yet??

IndieTX  posted on  2007-05-02   18:48:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: IndieTX, *9-11* (#4) (Edited)

I'd go up in a small plane but they go so slow, they would work for sure...someone needs to go up in a JET and clandestinely open their cell phone at altitude and hit speed dial to someone waiting on the other end and time how long the call remains open.. SIMPLE! Wonder why that hasn't been done yet??

I have tested a digital cell phone on an airliner many times.

I can say with 100% certainty that a digital cell phone will not work on an airliner above 20,000 feet. Normally airliners cruise above 20,000 feet.

The so-called debunkers claim that analog cell phones were common in 2001 and the performance of analog cell phones and digital cell phones is different.

The debunkers claim it is impossible to reproduce the conditions today that existed in 2001 because the cell phone industry is different as the near complete conversion to digital technology has occurred.

However, if it could be established the type of cell phones that were used on 9/11, then this would be an area worth pursuing.

If anyone claims a digital cell phone was used to talk to someone on the ground while the plane was above 20,000 feet, they are wrong. It could not happen.

honway  posted on  2007-05-02   21:04:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: honway (#9) (Edited)

I can say with 100% certainty that a digital cell phone will not work on an airliner above 20,000 feet. Normally airliners cruise above 20,000 feet.

That would make perfect sense.

I spoke simplex to another ham radio unit on my ham radio handy-talkie from Pikes Peak to a vehicle well N of Denver [calculated range 120 miles] SIMPLEX...no repeater...but that was with FIVE WATTS and obviously perfect solar and atmospheric conditions and standing outside. Cellphones even in 2001 no longer used anywhere near 5 watts. 3/10ths of a watt maybe...?

And THEN the signal had to get OUTside of a large aluminum insulator [airplane]...which is why a ham radio handy-talkie with 5 watts and a rubber duck antenna will transmit about noplace inside a car without being hooked to a roofmount antenna. The car shields the signal!! Just think how much an airplane tube would shield a radio signal with much less power to begin with?

IndieTX  posted on  2007-05-02   22:13:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 10.

        There are no replies to Comment # 10.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]