[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval, China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence Happy fourth of july The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande! Lightning Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge Mister Roberts (1965) WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread] I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden... Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything. How Romans Built Domes My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today. They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029] Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean The Siege (1998) Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger Skateboarding Dog

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: "Seven is exploding"
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58h0LjdMry0
Published: Apr 16, 2007
Author: Canale 5
Post Date: 2007-05-05 10:55:52 by honway
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 3550
Comments: 92

From:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/8267

On April 16, 2007, a major Italian network (Canale 5) has aired some conclusive evidence that Building 7 did not collapse on its own, but was deliberately taken down with the use of explosives.

The piece was part of a larger presentation we provided to the network as an update on the ongoing research on 9/11. In particular, we included a clip we had all seen many times before, but possibly never listened to with the full attention it deserved. Here is the 6 min. segment (please ignore yellow subtitles): Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

#30. To: honway, AGAviator, honway, critter, ALL (#0)

This video is complete deceptive ... so it epitomizes the *truth* movement.

First, it claims "no steel structure had ever collapsed before due to fire". That is complete false. Why do honway and critter think we have fire codes that require special protection of steel structural members in steel buildings in the first place?

Then it shows videoclips of the WTC 7 collapse that are deceptive. They are deceptive because the videos begin more than 7 seconds after the collapse actually began. You see, the east penthouse mechanical room, on the same side of the building as the diesel tank, suddenly sank into the structure more than 7 seconds before the rest of the building collapsed.

Here it is:

Something serious was happening inside WTC 7 well before the clips they show.

Next the video is deceptive when it discusses the views of Danny Jowenko. Deceptive because it fails to mention that Mr Jowenko was only shown (by a member of the *truth* movement) the 6.5 second clip. Furthermore, he was not initially told that there were serious fires in the building for about 7 hours prior to the collapse (fires that firemen did not fight). Nor was he told initially that the building was seriously damaged by falling debris from the towers. And Jowenko also didn't know that firemen had observed that the building was starting to lean long before the collapse took place. That's not something that controlled demolitions do. That's not something healthy structures do.

The viewer is also misled because they aren't told that Jowenko does NOT believe the structure was prepared for demolition before hand ... like the *truth* movement claims. He theorizes that it was so badly damaged by the tower debris, that Silverstein then made the decision to bring it down rather than attempt repair. And finally, earlier in the recorded conversations he stated that the collapse of the towers looked nothing like a controlled demolition. So you see, there is more to this story than the makers of this video would have you believe.

But that's not the end of the dishonesty.

It again repeats the claim that "no steel structure has ever collapsed before due to fire". And at the same time its shows a picture of the Windsor Tower in Madrid. What the viewer doesn't know is that all portions of the Windsor Tower that relied solely on steel frames did indeed collapse. What is shown still standing is the portion of that tower that was primarily reinforced concrete.

Next the video makes a big deal out of police clearing people away from the WTC 7 saying ominously, "they knew the building was going to be brought down". More likely, police were clearing the area because firemen were saying the building was likely to collapse given a huge hole in the south face (that firemen said was 20 stories high), because of fires that were still burning and because of an observed tilting of the building.

And then they quote a woman, Indira Singh, claiming that about noon or 1 pm, firemen said they were "going to have to bring the building down". But maybe the video should also mention that a year earlier she was a whistleblower (http://www.madcowprod.com/mc4522004.html ) making somewhat outrageous claims about the Saudis, CIA and 9/11 ... and also was one of those complaining about WTC dust (http://www.upi.com/inc/view.php?StoryID=07122001-080718-7129r ). In other words, she might have underlying issues with the government and seems a little enamored with public attention. Now perhaps she's right about them bringing down WTC 7 due to damage (which is what Jowenko suggested) but its odd that so many ordinary firemen and police must be *in on it* since none have come forward to tell the public about anyone arriving with explosives to do the job.

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-05-05   21:51:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 30.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]