[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

CNN doctor urges neurological testing for Biden Nashville Trans Shooter Left Over 100 GB Of Evidence, All To Be Kept Secret Who Turned Off The Gaslight? Head Of Chase Bank Warns Customers: Era Of Free Checking Is Likely Over Bob Dylan - Hurricane [Scotty mar10] Replacing Biden Won't Solve Democrats' Problems - Look Who Will Inherit His Campaign War Chest Who Died: Late June/Early July 2024 | News A top Russian banker says Russia's payment methods should be a 'state secret' because the West keeps shutting them down so fast Viral Biden Brain Freeze During Debate Sparks Major Question: Who’s Really Running the Country? Disney Heiress, Other Major Dem Donors: Dump Biden LAWYER: 5 NEW Tricks Cops Are Using During DWI Stops 10 Signs That Global War Is Rapidly Approaching Horse Back At Library. This Video Needs To Be Seen By Every Cop In America 'It's time to give peace another chance': Thousands rally in Tel Aviv to end the war Biden's leaked bedtime request puts White House on damage control Smith: It's Damned Hard To Be Proud Of America Lefties losing it: Rita Panahi slams ‘deranged rant’ calling for assassination of Trump Stalin, The Red Terror | Full Documentary Russia, Soviet Union and The Cold War: Stalin's Legacy | Russia's Wars Ep.2 | Documentary Battle and Liberation: The End of World War II | Countdown to Surrender – The Last 100 Days | Ep. 4 Ethereum ETFs In 'Window-Dressing' Stage, Approval Within Weeks; Galaxy Americans Are More Likely To Go To War With The Government Than Submit To The Draft Rudy Giuliani has just been disbarred in New York Israeli Generals Want Truce in Gaza, Joe Biden's felon son Hunter is joining White House meetings The only Democrat who could beat Trump Ukraine is too CORRUPT to join NATO, US says, in major blow to Zelensky and boost for Putin CNN Erin Burnett Admits Joe Biden knew the Debate questions.. Affirmative Action Suit Details How Law School Blackballed Accomplished White Men, Opted For Unqualified Black Women

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: "Seven is exploding"
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58h0LjdMry0
Published: Apr 16, 2007
Author: Canale 5
Post Date: 2007-05-05 10:55:52 by honway
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 1200
Comments: 92

From:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/8267

On April 16, 2007, a major Italian network (Canale 5) has aired some conclusive evidence that Building 7 did not collapse on its own, but was deliberately taken down with the use of explosives.

The piece was part of a larger presentation we provided to the network as an update on the ongoing research on 9/11. In particular, we included a clip we had all seen many times before, but possibly never listened to with the full attention it deserved. Here is the 6 min. segment (please ignore yellow subtitles): Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

#30. To: honway, AGAviator, honway, critter, ALL (#0)

This video is complete deceptive ... so it epitomizes the *truth* movement.

First, it claims "no steel structure had ever collapsed before due to fire". That is complete false. Why do honway and critter think we have fire codes that require special protection of steel structural members in steel buildings in the first place?

Then it shows videoclips of the WTC 7 collapse that are deceptive. They are deceptive because the videos begin more than 7 seconds after the collapse actually began. You see, the east penthouse mechanical room, on the same side of the building as the diesel tank, suddenly sank into the structure more than 7 seconds before the rest of the building collapsed.

Here it is:

Something serious was happening inside WTC 7 well before the clips they show.

Next the video is deceptive when it discusses the views of Danny Jowenko. Deceptive because it fails to mention that Mr Jowenko was only shown (by a member of the *truth* movement) the 6.5 second clip. Furthermore, he was not initially told that there were serious fires in the building for about 7 hours prior to the collapse (fires that firemen did not fight). Nor was he told initially that the building was seriously damaged by falling debris from the towers. And Jowenko also didn't know that firemen had observed that the building was starting to lean long before the collapse took place. That's not something that controlled demolitions do. That's not something healthy structures do.

The viewer is also misled because they aren't told that Jowenko does NOT believe the structure was prepared for demolition before hand ... like the *truth* movement claims. He theorizes that it was so badly damaged by the tower debris, that Silverstein then made the decision to bring it down rather than attempt repair. And finally, earlier in the recorded conversations he stated that the collapse of the towers looked nothing like a controlled demolition. So you see, there is more to this story than the makers of this video would have you believe.

But that's not the end of the dishonesty.

It again repeats the claim that "no steel structure has ever collapsed before due to fire". And at the same time its shows a picture of the Windsor Tower in Madrid. What the viewer doesn't know is that all portions of the Windsor Tower that relied solely on steel frames did indeed collapse. What is shown still standing is the portion of that tower that was primarily reinforced concrete.

Next the video makes a big deal out of police clearing people away from the WTC 7 saying ominously, "they knew the building was going to be brought down". More likely, police were clearing the area because firemen were saying the building was likely to collapse given a huge hole in the south face (that firemen said was 20 stories high), because of fires that were still burning and because of an observed tilting of the building.

And then they quote a woman, Indira Singh, claiming that about noon or 1 pm, firemen said they were "going to have to bring the building down". But maybe the video should also mention that a year earlier she was a whistleblower (http://www.madcowprod.com/mc4522004.html ) making somewhat outrageous claims about the Saudis, CIA and 9/11 ... and also was one of those complaining about WTC dust (http://www.upi.com/inc/view.php?StoryID=07122001-080718-7129r ). In other words, she might have underlying issues with the government and seems a little enamored with public attention. Now perhaps she's right about them bringing down WTC 7 due to damage (which is what Jowenko suggested) but its odd that so many ordinary firemen and police must be *in on it* since none have come forward to tell the public about anyone arriving with explosives to do the job.

BeAChooser  posted on  2007-05-05   21:51:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 30.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]