[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Science/Tech See other Science/Tech Articles Title: Breaking the mould (A machine for the home that can make anything, even itself) Breaking the mould By Dean Irvine for CNN LONDON, England (CNN) -- (First published April 26, 2007) , sounds like the dream of a science fiction fan, but a device using open source software developed at Cornell University has been designed to do just that. It is in the early stages of development, but could it represent the dawn of the arts and crafts movement for the digital age or open the gateway to the destruction of intellectual property rights and copyright? Hod Lipson, Assistant Professor at Cornell University's Computing and Information Science department and PhD student Evan Malone are the brains behind the digital fabrication machine. It takes its technological cues from rapid prototyping machines that for over 20 years have been used by design and manufacturing industries to quickly produce components or simple items. These machines "print" 3D objects from blueprints on a computer by building up a number of layers. Lipson and Malone's machine is different in that it can use a number of materials, from plastics to metals with a low melting point, unlike the current rapid prototyping machines that tend to use just quick drying plastics. "This makes them useful for making parts or components, but not for making complete systems. We're aiming to make integrated systems, including circuitry and sensors," Lipson told CNN. If it looks a bit home made, that's because it is. DIY fabbers have been able to download plans on how to make their own Fab@Home devices from the web site and are able to build it using off-the-shelf components for around $2000, or buy a kit for $3,000. The machines can then be run from software on a desktop computer. Unsurprisingly the current model is more rudimentary than professional rapid prototyping machines. So far Lipson has made working batteries using his Fab@Home machine and believes he and Malone will use the technology to build a fully working proof-of-concept robot within three years. Perhaps the real innovation is the democratization of the development process. "Since the machine has been out there people have been experimenting with all sorts of materials including food. We've seen a lot of chocolate, cheese and peanut butter-based creations. This might not be the way the machine is used in the future, but it just goes to show how adaptable and open the creative impetus it is," said Lipson. "You do need to be fairly skilled to put these things together" Frank Pillar, Professor of Management at Aachen University and expert on open innovation told CNN. "It's a bit like when cars were first invented, you needed a mechanic to put it together." At the heart of the project then is customization and harnessing the creativity and talent of these DIY fabbers. "It's not technology that will replace existing manufacturing process, but is more likely to augment it, by doing things that current techniques can't do," Lipson told CNN. Lipson thinks that digital fabrication is currently in a similar situation to that of computers in the 1960s, but instead of kits in the hands of enthusiasts and boffins, the fabbing machines can be developed by creatives across the world thanks to the Internet, freeware and open source software. "It's a project that will be perfected and improved thanks to the online community of designers and creatives. Getting it into the hands of the people is very important. All the software and components are open source so can be changed or modified according to what people want," said Lipson. "It's hard to say if it will be in everyone's home in the next 20 years. It might follow the same trajectory as the laser printer. Who predicted that nearly every home would have one of them 20 years ago? What is certain is that in the long run it's sure to transform the manufacturing process, big companies won't have to focus so much on economies of scale," said Piller. "You won't have to wait for products. It will be similar to being your own publisher online, but with an enormous scope of what you can produce." How about replicating some Prada shoes or Aquascutum cuff links? A team led by Marc van der Zande for TNO Science and Industry in the Netherlands recently created a pair of ladies shoes from their own laser-sintering machine, so the potential for home fabbers to cobble together an identical pair luxury goods like the latest Ray-Band sunglasses or Manolo Blahnik shoes is possible if the technology develops. "Already people are customizing designs of existing products, like Ikea furniture, using designs tools and these types of machines. It's small scale now, but if this becomes big, then Ikea are going to step in and say:'Hey, you can't customize our designs.' If they're smart then they'll put these machines in their stores," said Piller. "There are important issues of intellectual property rights and copyright involved here and the debate and furore over it could make the mp3 issue look like a piece of cake," said Lipson. Not literally of course, although perhaps with an advanced fabbing machine, it might happen. For companies wanting to protect their brand and products adopting these machines and giving customers the option to customize to their own specifications could be the way to go. Lipson believes that companies providing specialized or high-end products might have a fabbing room in their shops where customers can adapt products to their own tastes or needs. "For example they're perfect for hardware store, where tools or components could be made to any size from any type of material. Just bring along a printed design, or adapt the shops selection and it could be made for you on the spot," he told CNN.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: gengis gandhi (#0)
This was predicted by a fellow named, I think, Avin Toffler in a book I know for sure was called "The Third Wave"... exciting times, for sure.
Paranoia is a survival trait in a Decidership.
I ordered today a robot for my swimming pool. It's supposed to vacuum it and scrub it, climb on the walls... I still need to empty the dirt bag and do other maintenance. It cleans the pool and I clean IT. I hope it works.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
It cleans the pool and I clean IT. I hope it works. I'm still waiting for my flying car and gravity boots.
I used to respect the law. Then I became a lawyer.
Flying cars will never happen. Do you really think that our national security state can afford millions of such devices, anyone of them a potential missile guided by a Sue Cider? They can't trust people with fertilizer or even 'water' these days.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Au Contraire, mon frere... We will have flying cars when the allmighty state figures out a way to control them centrally. And then we'll all be mandated to ride in them. Kinda like that forgettable Tom Cruise movie ... I forgot the name. Oh yeah. Minority Report.
Burning marihuana smells suspiciously like ... freedom.
We've been working on a 'self-driven' car solution the other day. It involves a protocol that would allow all cars within a half-mile to a mile radius to talk to each other and be aware of each other's position and intentions. They will also share information on the state of the road - black ice, for example - and, of course, their own state. Then, they all negotiate their path in agreement with the cars in their proximity. It should not be impossible in 10-20 years if we could find a way to handle the human-driven cars that may continue to be on the road for a while. Possibly, each human-driven car would be mandated to carry some transmitter that identifies it as human-driven.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Oh, that's definitely an area where the gummint needs to get involved. Can't have cars talking to each other without big brother listening.
Burning marihuana smells suspiciously like ... freedom.
It's got to be 'in the clear', of course, unless you use some form of PKI. But, I suppose, there is some value in all the cars knowing what all the other cars are taking with each other. All you need is some on-board computers that should be some 1000 to 1,000,000 times more powerful than today's toys.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||