[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: Gonzales: ‘I Haven’t Really Thought About’ Habeas Corpus Gonzales: I Havent Really Thought About Habeas Corpus Under the Bush administration, U.S. citizens can be detained as enemy combatants and arrested without being charged of any crime. At todays House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) asked Attorney General Alberto Gonzales whether any U.S. citizens are being held today, for over a month, who have been denied habeas corpus or access to an attorney. Instead of giving an answer, Gonzales replied, [Y]oure asking me a question I hadnt really thought about. Sherman then followed up and asked whether there any U.S. citizens being held now by foreign governments or foreign organizations, without access to attorneys, as a result of rendition. Gonzales again said, Its just quite frankly, I hadnt thought about this. Watch it: When Gonzales testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee in January, he claimed that there is no express grant of habeas in the Constitution. Today, Sherman asked Gonzales, Wouldnt it be your duty as Attorney General to make sure that their [U.S. citizens] rights to habeas corpus were honored? After some hedging, Gonzales finally agreed: Yes. Matt Stoller and Glenn Greenwald have more on the habeas fight. Sign a petition telling Congress to restore habeas corpus HERE. SHERMAN: The administration has put forward various theories under which anyone, even American citizens, could be arrested without being charged with a crime. One of these is the theory that you could be classified as an enemy combatant. Are there any American citizens being held today, for over a month, who have been denied habeas corpus or access to an attorney? GONZALES: I dont believe so, Congressman. SHERMAN: Wouldnt it be your duty as Attorney General to make sure that their rights to habeas corpus were honored? GONZALES: Well, you know, theres a lot of people in this government and sometimes people do things that they shouldnt be And Im not suggesting thats occurring here. But youre asking me a question I hadnt really thought about. SHERMAN: Is there any agency answerable to the Department of Justice GONZALES: Were all answerable to put the Constitution into our laws, yes. SHERMAN: Now, are there any U.S. citizens being held now by foreign governments or foreign organizations, without access to attorneys, as a result of rendition, where agents of the administration have taken people into custody and then given them up to foreign officials? GONZALES: I dont Congressman, I dont know if I have the question to that question either. Its something I would have to look at. SHERMAN: Wouldnt you, as the chief officer responsible for protecting our civil rights, want to know? GONZALES: Yes. And Im not suggesting that that is occurring Its just quite frankly, I hadnt thought about this. SHERMAN: Would you respond for the record? GONZALES: Id be happy. If I can respond to the question, I will. SHERMAN: Let me move on to another question. You now have focused more on these GONZALES: I dont want the press to run out and say, Oh my gosh, U.S. citizens are being held by the government secretly, other governments. I dont think thats the case. I just want the American public to understand that. SHERMAN: I look forward to a definitive answer for the record. Lets move on. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Zipporah (#0)
Unbelievable.
There are no replies to Comment # 1. End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|