[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: Why Karl Rove Cared [About getting rid of attys.] Why would Karl Rove want to fire a bunch of U.S. attorneys? If you think it seems out of character, you don't know Rove -- or more precisely, you don't know the two sides of Rove. President Bush's powerful adviser is one part spreadsheet-carrying, vote-counting political wonk, and one part no-holds-barred, brass-knuckled political operative. Vote-counting Rove knows that -- particularly in battleground states, where a few votes can make all the difference -- every little bit helps. Brass-knuckled Rove has energetically used government power to meet political ends. Vote-counting Rove has long been obsessed by voter fraud, either because (according to him) it threatens the integrity of the elections process or because (according to his critics) it gives Republicans an excuse to pursue measures that suppress poor and minority turnout. They also disagree on whether fraud is widespread (Rove) or rare (his critics). And it's not hard to believe that brass-knuckled Rove decided at some point that politically appointed federal prosecutors were important tools in his bag of tricks -- tools that occasionally needed a little sharpening, or replacement. Dan Eggen and Amy Goldstein write in today's Washington Post: "Nearly half the U.S. attorneys slated for removal by the administration last year were targets of Republican complaints that they were lax on voter fraud, including efforts by presidential adviser Karl Rove to encourage more prosecutions of election-law violations, according to new documents and interviews. . . . "It has been clear for months that the administration's eagerness to launch voter-fraud prosecutions played a role in some of the firings, but recent testimony, documents and interviews show the issue was more central than previously known. The new details include the names of additional prosecutors who were targeted and other districts that were of concern, as well as previously unknown information about the White House's role. . . . "New information also emerged showing the extent to which the White House encouraged investigations of election fraud within weeks of November balloting. "Rove, in particular, was preoccupied with pressing [Attorney General Alberto] Gonzales and his aides about alleged voting problems in a handful of battleground states, according to testimony and documents. "Last October, just weeks before the midterm elections, Rove's office sent a 26-page packet to Gonzales's office containing precinct-level voting data about Milwaukee. A Justice aide told congressional investigators that he quickly put the package aside, concerned that taking action would violate strict rules against investigations shortly before elections, according to statements disclosed this week." Margaret Talev and Marisa Taylor wrote for McClatchy Newspapers on Friday: "Only weeks before last year's pivotal midterm elections, the White House urged the Justice Department to pursue voter-fraud allegations against Democrats in three battleground states, a high-ranking Justice official has told congressional investigators." I've written a fair amount on voter fraud over the past several months. The Monica Problem Dan Eggen and Paul Kane write in The Washington Post: "A federal judge yesterday paved the way for a former aide to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales to testify in Congress about the firings of U.S. attorneys, granting her limited immunity from prosecution so she can tell the House Judiciary Committee what she knows. "Under the order from Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan, Monica M. Goodling 'may not refuse to testify, and may not refuse to provide other information' if asked by Congress." Eric Lipton has more on Goodling in the New York Times. Among other things, he writes, Goodling "helped maintain lists of all the United States attorneys that graded their loyalty to the Bush administration, including work on past political campaigns, and noted if they were members of the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group. "By the time Ms. Goodling resigned in April -- after her role in the firing of the prosecutors became public and she had been promoted to the role of White House liaison -- she and other senior department officials had revamped personnel practices affecting employees from the top of the agency to the bottom."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: ... (#0)
She who attended the worst law school in the country is grading US attorneys.
"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." ~George Washington
Isn't Dan Froomkin a neocon? His resume says he was 2nd in command of the WP editorial department. That would certainly qualify him as a confirmed globalist and ardent supported of the NWO. Hey Dan, why does The Washington Post refuse to report on the Bilderberg meetings?
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
This is more distraction. The motivation for the firings had nothing to do with the vote fraud issue and everything to do with Carol Lam going after administration corruption that goes all the way to the top. This is a confession to being at a whorehouse when you don't have an alibi to a murder.
The more laws, the more offenders.
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||