[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Another No News Day

Surveillance Video Shows Illegal Alien Kidnapping Elderly Woman

Tucker's Epstein comments trigger official Israeli backlash

Houthis Launch Mach 16 Ballistic Missiles At Israel

“Treasonous Conspiracy” – Tulsi Gabbard Calls for Prosecution of Barack Obama, Jim Comey, John Brennan and Others

TOO MANY CRACKS ! ERUPTION LIKELY IN ITALY ! Volcanology Conference in Geneva !

"I Tried To Warn Everyone!" - Elon Musk (Joe Rogan not in this video)

They Are Gambling the National Security of the U.S. on a Single Point of Failure

Cloud Seeding and Chem Trails across America (EPA Word Games)

Israeli settlers killed 117 sheep and stole hundreds more during an overnight

CBS to cancel Late Show with Stephen Colbert just days after host blasted company's settlement with Trump as 'big fat bribe'

Joe Concha: Stephen Colbert's show was 'no longer entertainment at this point'

California bill SB549 lets state seize fire-damaged land.

Israel's DARK SECRET Genocide Economy EXPOSED | Francesca Albanese

TORNADO + WILDFIRE = FIRENADO ! UTAH

"False, Malicious, Defamatory" - Trump Demands Unsealing Of Epstein Files, Threatens Lawsuit After WSJ Hit Piece

Russia After Russia || Peter Zeihan

EUROPE IS COLLAPSING: €2 TRILLION MEGABUDGET Will Bankrupt the Entire Continent

Extending Microsoft 10

Trump Says Coca-Cola Agreed On Major Reformulation To Use Real Cane Sugar

Garland Favorito and VoterGA Appeal Inexplicable Dismissal of Curling vs. Raffensperger Election Ruling

Born to Revolution: The “Red Diaper Baby” Roots of Zohran Mamdani and Today’s Democrats

These Are Richest People In Every US State

Education Department Investigates Foreign Funding At University Of Michigan After Arrests of Chinese Scholars

Israel editing WIkipedia, Former Israeli Prime Minister Debunks Epstein

Paul Joseph Watson:

The Duran: Decisive battle for Pokrovsk

MUST WATCH: Radical Change to the Financial System Is Maybe Coming Sooner Than We Thought

Putin launches MASSIVE strike on Ukraine, Trump admits Ukraine CAN'T win - Col. Douglas Macgregor

BREAKING: POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE: DOJ FIRES Maurene Comey, Federal Prosecutor Who Filed Key Court Docs to Keep Epstein Files Under Seal


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: House Overwhelmingly Votes to Put Restrictions on Mexican Trucks
Source: Associated Press
URL Source: http://www.myfoxhouston.com/myfox/p ... S&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.3.1
Published: May 15, 2007
Author: Associated Press
Post Date: 2007-05-15 20:01:45 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 338
Comments: 8

WASHINGTON -- The House voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to delay a Bush administration plan to allow Mexican trucks full access to U.S. highways.

The measure, authored by Rep. Nancy Boyda, D-Kan., would require the trucks to be declared safe first, and Mexico would have to give U.S. truckers the same access south of the border.

The House voted 411-3 to approve a three-year Department of Transportation pilot program that would restrict opening the border to 100 carriers based in Mexico. They would be allowed to use a maximum of 1,000 vehicles under the pilot program.

The Bush administration wanted to start a pilot program this year that would run for a year before fully opening the border to Mexican trucks.

"If the DOT pilot program proceeds as planned, drivers in Kansas and across the United States will soon share their roads with unsafe Mexican trucks," Boyda said in a written statement. "By decisively approving the Safe American Roads Act, the House is protecting the millions of American families who drive on our highways every day."

The House bill specifies criteria for the pilot program before it can start, including setting up an independent panel to evaluate the test program and getting certification from the inspector general that safety and inspection requirements have been met.

The Department of Transportation says it could be as late as 2008 before Congress's criteria are met, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Lawmakers said their major concern is whether Mexican trucks, often older than U.S. cargo vehicles, and Mexican drivers will be able to meet rigorous U.S. safety standards.

"We do not need 90,000-pound unguided missiles on our highways," said Rep. Robin Hayes, R-N.C.

American trucking companies have spent years getting their vehicles up to the Transportation Department standards, lawmakers said. Letting Mexican trucks across the border without making them meet those standards is wrong, they said.

"We're going to have a major accident somewhere, and people are going to say, 'How did this happen?" said Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif.

Added Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich: "We need to ensure that this program only takes places after the Mexican companies meet the same conditions that American companies do."

Lawmakers also complained that allowing Mexican trucks greater access will cost American truckers their jobs.

"You can get a Mexican truck driver to work for a heck of a lot less than a Teamster in the United States, and you can get a Mexican dock worker to work for a heck of a lot less than a longshoreman in the United States and that's what this is ultimately designed to do," said Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore.

The Teamsters, the Sierra Club, Public Citizen and the Environmental Law Foundation sued in federal court in April to block the pilot program, citing safety and environmental concerns. "We don't know how safety laws such as hours of service and drug testing would be enforced," Teamster President Jim Hoffa said. "This vote by the House repudiates those questionable attempts to open our borders without adequate safeguards."

The Bush administration had planned to run a yearlong pilot program that would allow Mexican trucks beyond the current 20-mile limit from the border but the launch was halted after complaints from Congress.

Since 1982, trucks have had to stop within the buffer zone and transfer their loads to U.S. truckers to take them into the country. The legislation would allow Mexican drivers to take their loads from Mexico to any point within the country.

Supporters of the plan say letting more Mexican trucks on U.S. highways will save American consumers hundreds of millions of dollars. They include many in the trucking industry, the Bush administration and lawmakers who favor the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA.

Access to all U.S. highways was promised by 2000 under the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement, as was access through Mexico for U.S. carriers. That aspect has been stalled by lawsuits and disagreements between the two countries, though Canadian and U.S. trucks travel freely across the northern border.

------

The bill number is HR 1773.

On the Net:

For bill text: http://thomas.loc.gov

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

A bit more good news - thanks for this one.

Eff NAFTA,GATT, and the NWO.

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-05-15   20:22:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Brian S (#0)

Letting Mexican trucks across the border without making them meet those standards is wrong, they said.

Letting Mexican trucks across the border without making them meet those standards is wrong, they said.

Distraction / strawman corrected for accuracy.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

IndieTX  posted on  2007-05-15   21:40:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: IndieTX, lodwick (#2)

letting more Mexican trucks on U.S. highways will save American consumers hundreds of millions of dollars.

There's that old bullsh@t canard again..

Lady X  posted on  2007-05-16   8:54:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Brian S, *The Border*, *North American Union* (#0)

Unemployment is high and rising like our air pollution, but El Presidente would like them even higher.

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." ~George Washington

robin  posted on  2007-05-16   11:02:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Lady X (#3)

There's that old bullsh@t canard again..

It's all about cheap labor and higher corporate profits. No one in congress gives a rats ass about the public.

Richard W.

Arete  posted on  2007-05-16   11:15:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Lady X (#3)

There's that old bullsh@t canard again..

It will not save us one red cent. It will make the corporations millions more in profit.

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2007-05-16   11:58:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Brian S (#0)

The House voted 411-3 to approve a three-year Department of Transportation pilot program that would restrict opening the border to 100 carriers based in Mexico.

Unfortunately everyone in that vipers nest has their price. The 411 NO votes are up for sale as of today.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-05-16   14:09:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Brian S (#0)

it is just temporarilly stalling & harassing Bush's policy of bringing in the Mexican truckers. Rather than nix the policy, they pretend to oppose it.

The problem is that Mexicans live in Mexico and everything is inexpensive in Mexico compared to America. And so the Mexican drivers have an unfair advantage. So it will push down wages and destroy jobs for Americans. That is the problem. and they are not stopping the policy fundamentally, merely racking up sympathy points from voters for doing nothing in reality.

Galatians 3:29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Red Jones  posted on  2007-05-16   14:26:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]