[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Fox News Rigs Entire Debate To Savagely Attack Ron Paul
Source: Prison Planet
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2007/160507rigsdebate.htm
Published: May 16, 2007
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2007-05-16 15:48:39 by Esso
Keywords: None
Views: 265
Comments: 24

Fox News Rigs Entire Debate To Savagely Attack Ron Paul

Texas Congressman targeted by Giuliani, Hannity & Colmes as pre-screened audience applause torture and warmongering, Fox limits post-election polls to three hours and no Internet voting yet Paul still successful

Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

In a sickening display of cronyism and as a consequence of the sheer terror elicited amongst the establishment after his previous success, Fox News rigged last night's entire presidential debate in a crass effort to smear Ron Paul - yet the Texas Congressman still beat Rudy Giuliani in Fox's own poll.

If you thought the MSNBC debate was somewhat unfair towards Ron Paul, then this was an absolute debacle.

The audience for the debate was clearly pre-screened and pre-selected to include only mainly geriatric 75 year old plus Fox News viewers who are scared of their own shadow. How else can the bizarre applause for warmongering and torture, which polls show are both clearly opposed by the majority of American people, be explained?

Guantanamo Bay is uniformly abhorred, even to the point where George W. Bush himself said he wanted to close it down, and yet Romney is clapped for saying he would like to double it!

Are these audience members robots or did Fox News dub the audio to include the applause?

Giuliani clearly endorses torture and the mindless drones in attendance rapaciously lap it up! Fox News manufactured a fictitious scenario to rig the debate - the notion that terrorists are about to detonate a nuclear bomb and that only torture can lead to its discovery.

Host Bit Hume failed to mention the fact that obtaining confessions from torture is notoriously unreliable because the victim simply tells the interrogator what he wants to hear, and not necessarily the truth. In fact, using torture in place of more traditional investigative techniques would only create false leads, waste more time and put the country in more danger.

Under the Constitution of the United States, which any of these potential Presidents will have to swear an oath to uphold, evidence obtained from torture is not admissible in court. In effect, Giuliani, Romney and Tancredo (who has now completely discredited himself) have promised to violate the Constitution before they even get into office.

After the show, Hannity and Colmes double-teamed Paul in an attempt to discredit him in the eyes of both liberals and conservatives, with Colmes going after him on abortion and Hannity chomping at the bit to smear the Texas Congressman as weak on terrorism.

This followed a showdown between Giuliani and Paul in which the Texas Congressman pointed out the fact that U.S. foreign policy has bred hatred of America throughout the world, a self-evident truth that is even embraced by the CIA itself, and was scorned by Giuliani in response.

Despite the fact that Paul was given the more difficult questions and less time to answer them and was then savagely attacked after he debate, he still came out on top when the early polling began, eventually finishing a close second to Romney and easily ahead of Giuliani.

Fox News were obviously desperate to prevent Ron Paul winning the poll because they restricted it to text message only, no Internet voting, and closed it down declaring Romney the winner after just three hours.

Fox News anchor Carl Cameron immediately tried to spin Paul's success in the poll when it became apparent he was winning with 30% of the vote shortly after 11PM. Cameron roared that Paul had been "slapped down" by Giuliani in the debate and that his success was merely because his office was unfairly flood voting - ignoring the fact that McCain had openly told his supporters to spam the polls on his own website.

Around thirty minutes before the poll closed, Ron Paul had a commanding lead over Mitt Romney, yet Romney was the supposed winner with 29% to Paul's 25% - this is very suspicious as polls don't usually have these kind of giant swings.

An MSNBC poll again shows Ron Paul trouncing the other candidates, beating his nearest contenders hands down in every category.

ABC News' poll has Ron Paul at 18,500+ votes, with his nearest rivals Romney and Giuliani barely making it into the 200's. This is an emphatic win for the Texas Congressman.

Despite the fact that this whole event was a giant orchestrated smear job on behalf of Fox News to eliminate Ron Paul from the race, his message of liberty and real conservatism still resonates with the American people and no amount of vitriol on behalf of Neo-Con Rupert Murdoch and his underlings is going to change that fact.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Esso (#0) (Edited)

The audience for the debate was clearly pre-screened and pre-selected to include only mainly geriatric 75 year old plus Fox News viewers who are scared of their own shadow. How else can the bizarre applause for warmongering and torture,

Was there really applause for torture?

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." ~George Washington

robin  posted on  2007-05-16   16:05:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Esso (#0)

From http://vote.com just now - this formatting sucks, but Ron Paul is back up to 62%!

SAM BROWNBACK (27) (1%)

JIM GILMORE (13) (0%)

RUDY GIULIANI (671) (14%)

MIKE HUCKABEE (103) (2%)

DUNCAN HUNTER (141) (3%)

JOHN MCCAIN (82) (2%)

RON PAUL (2,927) (62%)

MITT ROMNEY (548) (12%)

TOM TANCREDO (152) (3%)

TOMMY THOMPSON (37) (1%)

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-05-16   16:06:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: lodwick (#2) (Edited)

He's still at 62%

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." ~George Washington

robin  posted on  2007-05-16   16:09:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: robin (#1)

The series of "debates" is taking on a very real American Idol flavor to them.

Richard W.

Arete  posted on  2007-05-16   16:09:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: robin (#1)

Was there really applause for torture?

Yes. I'm ashamed to be from this faggotty shithole country anymore.

I do not say this lightly, but anyone who cannot handle the content of another's speech may not be suitable for this forum. Such a person may be better suited for a forum whose moderators control and steer the forum's ideas and speech in a given direction. -- Christine, Freedom4um

Esso  posted on  2007-05-16   16:16:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Esso (#0)

Some reporter they had on C-SPAN this morning said he had heard this would be the last debate Ron Paul would be in. So they were probably anxious to come up with an excuse for excluding him from the debates in the future.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-05-16   16:35:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Esso (#0)

Despite the fact that this whole event was a giant orchestrated smear job on behalf of Fox News to eliminate Ron Paul from the race, his message of liberty and real conservatism still resonates with the American people and no amount of vitriol on behalf of Neo-Con Rupert Murdoch and his underlings is going to change that fact.

Ron Paul doesn't fit anyone's mold, and won't conform to fit. He's an antiwar Republican. He's an anti-abortion libertarian.

And all the media just say, "huh?"

Because he doesn't fit their definition of what a Republican is and he doesn't fit their definition of what a Democrat is they have to just say "he's a flake" and leave it at that.

He's probably the best thing that could happen to this country, which is why he won't get elected. The media don't want good things to happen here.

Good things aren't news.

The more laws, the more offenders.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-05-16   16:37:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: bluedogtxn (#7)

Ron Paul doesn't fit anyone's mold, and won't conform to fit. He's an antiwar Republican. He's an anti-abortion libertarian.

And all the media just say, "huh?"

Because he doesn't fit their definition of what a Republican is and he doesn't fit their definition of what a Democrat is they have to just say "he's a flake" and leave it at that.

He's probably the best thing that could happen to this country, which is why he won't get elected. The media don't want good things to happen here.

Good things aren't news.

well said bump

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-05-16   16:45:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: lodwick (#8)

I wonder, as his candidacy gains momentum, how far the media will go to kill it?

The more laws, the more offenders.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-05-16   16:46:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: bluedogtxn (#9)

...how far the media will go to kill it?

If they do, I expect that they'll experience a term that Dr.Paul used last evening, "Blowback."

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-05-16   16:51:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Jethro Tull, Critter, Arator (#0)

christine  posted on  2007-05-16   16:54:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: lodwick (#10)

...how far the media will go to kill it? If they do, I expect that they'll experience a term that Dr.Paul used last evening, "Blowback."

Man, I don't know. They're pretty powerful. Just by deciding to exclude him from the debates they'll marginalize him. The sheeple undeservedly still have a lot of faith in the media, and you can expect such lights of reason as Keith Olberman and Jon Stewart on the left and Shawn Hannity and Shit Fume on the right to make a joke out of Ron Paul as much as they can.

He's got a hell of a tough row to hoe just to get out his message. If he can do that, he's got a chance, but they will do everything they possibly can to get rid of him. Look for an SNL skit mocking him like they did with Perot.

The more laws, the more offenders.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-05-16   16:58:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: bluedogtxn (#12)

He's got a hell of a tough row to hoe just to get out his message. If he can do that, he's got a chance, but they will do everything they possibly can to get rid of him. Look for an SNL skit mocking him like they did with Perot.

I guess that it depends on how far sold-out is our country - I don't know.

This will be the most interesting election in my lifetime, I'll say that.

Paul and Gravel are actually giving the voters a choice, for a change.

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-05-16   17:03:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: lodwick (#13)

It will be interesting to see how Beck tries to destroy Dr. Paul on his television show tonight...

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil  posted on  2007-05-16   17:06:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: who knows what evil (#14)

It will be interesting to see how Beck tries to destroy Dr. Paul on his television show tonight...

If CNN is truly "left-leaning media" then they will try and BOOST him simply to give the neocons fits.

Press 1 to proceed in English. Press 2 for Deportation.

mirage  posted on  2007-05-16   17:08:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: who knows what evil, lodwick (#14)

It will be interesting to see how Beck tries to destroy Dr. Paul on his television show tonight...

I guarantee you that he will try to do exactly that. It's funny, because he's about the only hope the GOP has of being competitive in the 2008 election; he's fresh, he's smart, he's not married to the Iraqcle...

But the GOP machine really, really wants to tear him down, and the Democrats aren't going to be coming to his defense at all. The folks who really should get behind him are the anti-war crowd, but they may be mostly co-opted by AIPAC and the Dems.

If I were a Republican (I'm NOT!), I'd be pushing for a Ron Paul ticket. He's the Republican Party's past, their real base, and their future. He's the one Republican I would vote for, and that is saying a hell of a lot. I haven't voted for a Republican in my life.

Laws are like spiderwebs; they hold the weak and delicate who are caught in their meshes, but are torn apart by the rich and powerful.-Anacharsis.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-05-16   17:12:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: mirage (#15)

If CNN is truly "left-leaning media" then they will try and BOOST him simply to give the neocons fits.

They won't though. They are establishment leaning and "respectability" leaning. They will throw him into the "marginal" or "radical" category from jump.

Laws are like spiderwebs; they hold the weak and delicate who are caught in their meshes, but are torn apart by the rich and powerful.-Anacharsis.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-05-16   17:14:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: who knows what evil, all (#14)

It will be interesting to see how Beck tries to destroy Dr. Paul on his television show tonight...

As the Ghoul found out last evening, it's tough to destroy someone who knows what they're talking about and who is telling the truth.

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-05-16   17:19:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: lodwick (#2)

I fixed it. Worth doing for Dr. Paul.

Pinguinite.com

Neil McIver  posted on  2007-05-16   17:31:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Esso (#5)

Yes. I'm ashamed to be from this faggotty shithole country anymore.

Hello from Ecuador...

Kinda nice to live in a country where the entire Ecuadorian military is, well.... in Ecuador.

Pinguinite.com

Neil McIver  posted on  2007-05-16   17:35:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Neil McIver (#19)

Thanks much.

Cheers down your way.

Dr.Ron Paul for President

Lod  posted on  2007-05-16   17:37:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: bluedogtxn (#17)

They are establishment leaning and "respectability" leaning.

Then I'm proud to be one of the disreputable masses that is anti-establishment.

Press 1 to proceed in English. Press 2 for Deportation.

mirage  posted on  2007-05-16   18:11:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Esso (#5)

:P

christine  posted on  2007-05-16   22:25:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Esso (#0)

Despite the fact that this whole event was a giant orchestrated smear job on behalf of Fox News to eliminate Ron Paul from the race, his message of liberty and real conservatism still resonates with the American people and no amount of vitriol on behalf of Neo-Con Rupert Murdoch and his underlings is going to change that fact.

CNN and Blitzer did their best to cow Paul...

Paul has to become quicker on the draw when he is undergoing questioning by openly hostile MSM.

For example, when asked by Blitzer if he would support Rudy for prez, Paul should have thrown it in Blitzers face by saying of course not as Rudy would not support me so we are even there. Have done with the question.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-05-16   22:32:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]