[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

'I'll say every damn name': Marjorie Taylor Green advocates for Epstein victims during rally

The long-awaited federal crackdown on illegal alien crime in Chicago has finally arrived.

Cash Jordan: ICE BLOCKS 'Cartel Caravan'... HAULS 'Army of Illegals' BACK TO MEXICO

Berenson On Black Violence, Woke Lies, & Right-Wing Rage

What the Professor omitted about the collapse of the American Empire.

Israel Tried to Kill Hamas in Qatar — Here’s What REALLY Happened

Katie Hopkins: Laurence Fox and my beaver. NOT FOR THE WEAK

Government Accidentally Reveals Someone Inside Twitter Fabricated 'Gotcha' Accounts To Frame Conservative Firebrand

The Magna Carta Of 2022 – Worldwide Declaration of Freedom

Hamas Accuses Trump Of A Set-Up In Doha, After 5 Leaders Killed In Israeli Strike

Cash Jordan: Angry Voters Go “Shelter To Shelter”... EMPTYING 13 Migrant Hotels In 2 Hours

Israel targets Hamas leadership in attack on Qatar’s Doha, group says no members killed

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said on Monday that villages in the Israeli-occupied West Bank should look like cities in Gaza

FBI Arrests 22 Chinese, 4 Pharma Companies, Preventing Disaster That Could Kill 70 Million Americans

911 Make Believe

New CLARITY Act Draft Could Shield Crypto Developers From Past Liability

Chicago Builds a Wall To Protect Illegal ALiens From Ice

Sens. Scott, Johnson Launch Investigation into Palisades Fire; Demand Newsom's Cooperation

"Go Talk To Bill Gates About Me": How JP Morgan Enabled Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes, Snagged Netanyahu Meeting

Cash Jordan: Looters EMPTY Chicago Mall... as Mayor's 'No Arrests' Policy BACKFIRES

Caitlin Johnstone: They Just Bombed Greta Thunberg's Boat

Democrats MELTDOWN Over RFK Jr.

Bill Gates, Truth About Vaccines, & Big Pharma’s Plot to Destroy Doctors Who Question ”The Science”

Supreme Court upholds 'roving patrols' for immigration stops in Los Angeles

MN Gunman’s Pot Use Is Further Evidence Against Rescheduling Marijuana

Intense Exercise is Best

New Cars Are George Orwell 1984 Compliant

PEGASUS EVENT 201

Over Half Of Berlin's New Police Recruits Can't Speak Basic German, Officials Admit

Thomas Massie NAMES Epstein as a CIA and Israeli Asset


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Focus on the Family founder says he won't vote for Giuliani
Source: Associated Press
URL Source: http://www.wistv.com/Global/story.asp?S=6533823
Published: May 18, 2007
Author: Associated Press
Post Date: 2007-05-18 11:52:27 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 831
Comments: 27

Associated Press - May 17, 2007 9:03 PM ET

An evangelical Christian leader says he won't vote for Rudy Giuliani if the former New York mayor wins the Republican presidential nomination.

In an online column for WorldNetDaily, Focus on the Family founder James Dobson calls Guiliani an "unapologetic supporter of abortion on demand" and domestic-partnership benefits. Dobson adds that there are other "moral concerns" with Giuliani, including that he's on his third marriage to "his mistress" from his second marriage and "appears not to have remorse for cheating on his wife."

Dobson said he was speaking as a private citizen, but his words carry considerable weight with the some seven million listeners to his radio broadcasts.

Dobson previously said he won't back John McCain because of the Arizona senator's sponsorship of campaign finance reform and opposition to a constitutional ban on gay marriage.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

#9. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

Focus on the Family founder says he won't vote for Giuliani

He'll vote for whoever the RP puts in front of his party over principle ass. He'd vote for Hillary, Saddam Hussein, or Ossama bin Laden if they ran for office with a "R" behind their name.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2007-05-18   12:24:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Hayek Fan (#9)

This is about the GOP primaries, not the general election.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2007-05-18   12:32:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#10)

An evangelical Christian leader says he won't vote for Rudy Giuliani if the former New York mayor wins the Republican presidential nomination.

I beg your pardon, but this (Dobson's claim) is about the general election.

Enderby  posted on  2007-05-18   12:41:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Enderby (#11)

This is meant to signal his strong opposition to Giuliani. It's a lot stronger than saying that he won't support him during the primaries. The statement is meant to prevent Giuliani from winning the nomination.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2007-05-18   12:46:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Enderby (#13)

This is meant to signal his strong opposition to Giuliani. It's a lot stronger than saying that he won't support him during the primaries. The statement is meant to prevent Giuliani from winning the nomination

You may be right about this being the reason why he is saying it at this time, but after rereading the article I still come away with the notion that he was speaking about the general election.

In the end, I believe he will vote for whomever wins the RP primaries.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2007-05-18   12:52:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Hayek Fan (#14) (Edited)

I still come away with the notion that he was speaking about the general election.

Obviously, he was speaking about that but the end result would be to give Giuliani trouble winning his party's nomination. He may have to write off the 'bible belt' states if Dobson maintains his opposition and states it loudly and often.

If Giuliani wins the GOP nomination, it is likely that the vast majority of his delegates would come from 'blue states'. It would be actually interesting to watch a GOP convention where the candidate with the most delegates had them coming from states that the GOP could not hope to win in the general election. Now, THAT would be a nice spectacle because the MSM would probably notice the anomaly and would endlessly question the delegates on the topic because there are very few interesting events at these scripted shows.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2007-05-18   13:11:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#16)

Obviously, he was speaking about that but the end result would be to give Giuliani trouble winning his party's nomination. He may have to write off the 'bible belt' states if Dobson maintains his opposition and states it loudly and often.

Well I hope it works. Out of all the candidates running, both D and R, I believe the Giuliani is the most dangerous for the country.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2007-05-18   13:23:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Hayek Fan (#20)

Indeed, Giuliani would provide a rather smooth slide down the totalitarian slope. But, let's not forget that we may very well have a contest where Giuliani represented the GOP, Hillary were the selected Demo and Bloomberg was sitting right in the middle. All three Godless, amoral, fish-eyed totalitarians.

That would be a nice a la carte menu for the American voters to make.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2007-05-18   13:29:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 22.

#23. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#22)

Indeed, Giuliani would provide a rather smooth slide down the totalitarian slope. But, let's not forget that we may very well have a contest where Giuliani represented the GOP, Hillary were the selected Demo and Bloomberg was sitting right in the middle. All three Godless, amoral, fish-eyed totalitarians.

That would be a nice a la carte menu for the American voters to make.

I have lost all faith in the American people. Out of the above three, I think the American people would vote for the one promising them the most goodies. Except the the party ideologues of course. They are going to vote for their party's regardless of who the candidates are.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2007-05-18 13:33:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]