See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Martin: Paul's 9/11 explanation deserves to be debated
Source:
CNN
URL Source: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/05/18/martin/index.html
Published: May 18, 2007
Author: Roland S. Martin
Post Date: 2007-05-18 18:06:02 by mirage
Keywords: None
Views: 399
Comments: 11
(CNN) -- Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani was declared the winner of Tuesday's Republican presidential debate in South Carolina, largely for his smack down of Texas Rep. Ron Paul, who suggested that America's foreign policy contributed to the destruction on September 11, 2001. Paul, who is more of a libertarian than a Republican, was trying to offer some perspective on the pitfalls of an interventionist policy by the American government in the affairs of the Middle East and other countries. "Have you ever read about the reasons they attacked us? They attack us because we've been over there. We've been bombing Iraq for 10 years," he said. That set Giuliani off. "That's really an extraordinary statement," said Giuliani. "As someone who lived through the attack of September 11, that we invited the attack because we were attacking Iraq; I don't think I've ever heard that before and I've heard some pretty absurd explanations for September 11." As the crowd applauded wildly, Giuliani demanded that Paul retract his statements. Paul tried to explain the process known as "blowback" -- which is the result of someone else's action coming back to afflict you -- but the audience drowned him out as the other candidates tried to pounce on him. After watching all the network pundits laud Giuliani, it struck me that they must be the most clueless folks in the world. First, Giuliani must be an idiot to not have heard Paul's rationale before. That issue has been raised countless times in the last six years by any number of experts. Second, when we finish with our emotional response, it would behoove us to actually think about what Paul said and make the effort to understand his rationale. Granted, Americans were severely damaged by the hijacking of U.S. planes, and it has resulted in a worldwide fight against terror. Was it proper for the United States to respond to the attack? Of course! But should we, as a matter of policy, and moral decency, learn to think and comprehend that our actions in one part of the world could very well come back to hurt us, or, as Paul would say, blow back in our face? Absolutely. His real problem wasn't his analysis, but how it came out of his mouth. What has been overlooked is that Paul based his position on the effects of the 1953 ouster by the CIA of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. An excellent account of this story is revealed in Stephen Kinzer's alarming and revealing book, "Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq," where he writes that Iran was establishing a government close to a democracy. But Mossadegh wasn't happy that the profit from the country's primary resource -- oil -- was not staying in the country. Instead, the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (now known British Petroleum, or BP) was getting 93 percent of the profits. Mossadegh didn't like that, and wanted a 50-50 split. Kinzer writes that that didn't sit too well with the British government, but it didn't want to use force to protect its interests. But their biggest friend, the United States, didn't mind, and sought to undermine Mossadegh's tenure as president. After all kinds of measures that disrupted the nation, a coup was financed and led by President Dwight Eisenhower's CIA, and the Shah of Iran was installed as the leader. We trained his goon squads, thus angering generations of Iranians for meddling in that nation's affairs. As Paul noted, what happened in 1953 had a direct relationship to the takeover of the U.S. Embassy in 1979. We viewed that as terrorists who dared attack America. They saw it as ending years of oppression at the hands of the ruthless U.S.-backed Shah regime. As Americans, we believe in forgiving and forgetting, and are terrible at understanding how history affects us today. We are arrogant in not recognizing that when we benefit, someone else may suffer. That will lead to resentment and anger, and if suppressed, will boil over one day. Does that provide a moral justification for what the terrorists did on September 11? Of course not. But we should at least attempt to understand why. Think about it. Do we have the moral justification to explain the killings of more than 100,000 Iraqis as a result of this war? Can we defend the efforts to overthrow other governments whose actions we perceived would jeopardize American business interests? The debate format didn't give Paul the time to explain all of this. But I'm confident this is what he was saying. And yes, we need to understand history and how it plays a vital role in determining matters today. At some point we have to accept the reality that playing big brother to the world -- and yes, sometimes acting as a bully by wrongly asserting our military might -- means that Americans alive at the time may not feel the effects of our foreign policy, but their innocent children will. Even the Bible says that the children will pay for the sins of their fathers.
Poster Comment: Amen.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: mirage (#0)
Ron Paul certainly isn't the first to say it. Remember that fella, George Washington? ;)
Great article.
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
That Rudy claims he "had not heard that before" is ludicrous on it's face. His statememt shows he is used to saying huge falsehoods and used to not being called on them. America's Govenor - poppycock croppola. I think he scares me more than McCain.
McCain is at least aware of his treason as I've seen him in action opposite Buchanan on a Sunday talk show where he smiled like the cat that ate the canary as Buchanan babbled on about something of which McCain knew the inside story. Ghouliani is totally without remorse in his treason.
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
There really appears to be something psycologically wrong with the man.
Someone really needs to ask him what he was doing in London on 7/7/2005.
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
can somebody explain to me what exactly rudy g. did that made him such a hero? I was not a new yorker on 9-11 but I did live in d.c. at the time, and I simply could not understand then or now what the big deal was about rudy. he was on t.v. a lot. he didn't hide or read a book about goats, so that's something. I remember back then in d.c., people were saying he saved the day, and I just didn't get it, but it wasn't a good time to ask what they meant. sadly, it still isn't. one lesson I've learned in 6 years is to be very careful about expressing opinions that aren't the ones fed to us by the govt/media partnership. if I wanna ask a bot what's so great about rudy, I have to honestly consider that there could be consequences. even if that's far- fetched, an insight to rudy's greatness just isn't worth the risk for me. but I figured I could ask here :)
At the VERY least, it needs to be pointed out that the man is an imp and wherever he goes, corruption and disaster follow close behind. Not to mention that he's also an adulterer and a cross-dresser.
"I'd like to live just long enough to be there when they cut off your head and stick it on a pike as a warning to the next ten generations that some favors come with too high a price." Vir Cotto, Babylon 5
It was "America's Mayor"...don't go giving the evil fuck-tard any promotions he never got in the first place.
"I'd like to live just long enough to be there when they cut off your head and stick it on a pike as a warning to the next ten generations that some favors come with too high a price." Vir Cotto, Babylon 5
Ummm, he waited until sunset on 9/11 to start making his $100,000,000.00 fortune off the blood of 3000 American men, women and children...?
"I'd like to live just long enough to be there when they cut off your head and stick it on a pike as a warning to the next ten generations that some favors come with too high a price." Vir Cotto, Babylon 5
http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=52365&Disp=52#C52
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
blowback
#2. To: mirage (#0)
#3. To: christine (#1)
"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men" Plato
#4. To: tom007 (#3)
I think he scares me more than McCain.
#5. To: BTP Holdings (#4)
Ghouliani is totally without remorse in his treason.
"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men" Plato
#6. To: tom007 (#5)
There really appears to be something psycologically wrong with the man.
#7. To: tom007 (#3)
America's Govenor - poppycock croppola. I think he scares me more than McCain.
#8. To: BTP Holdings (#6)
Someone really needs to ask him what he was doing in London on 7/7/2005.
#9. To: tom007 (#3)
America's Govenor - poppycock croppola.
#10. To: kiki (#7)
can somebody explain to me what exactly rudy g. did that made him such a hero?
#11. To: orangedog (#8)
a cross-dresser.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest