[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Science/Tech See other Science/Tech Articles Title: Sir Oliver Lodge FRS: The Mode of Future Existence. 1933 Lecture Sir Oliver Lodge FRS: The Mode of Future Existence. 1933 Lecture Linking survival after death with sub atomic physics is censored in Great Britain. Introduction by Michael Roll. This article by Sir Oliver Lodge was published in The Queen's Hospital Annual in 1933 (Birmingham). It is because this great scientist wrote articles and published books along these lines that he has been vilified by obscurants who have taken control of scientific teaching throughout the world. Sir Oliver Lodge was the first person to send a radio message, one year before Marconi! His great contribution to science has been deliberately played down solely because the powerful materialists are terrified that millions may find out he was correct in saying that we all survive death. The same treatment has been meted out to Sir William Crookes who actually proved by repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions that the subject of survival after death is a branch of physics - natural philosophy. Crookes was a President of the Royal Society, inventor of the Cathode-ray tube. Look up x-rays in the encyclopaedia, Crookes was the pioneer of subatomic physics - proving that reality exists beyond our five physical senses. Censorship and character assassination are the only weapons that those with a great deal to lose from the truth have in their armoury. The attack on Sir William Crookes has been so vicious that he now carries the emotive labels of liar, cheat, crank, fraud, gullible idiot, Spiritualist, and they have also tagged on that he was a heterosexual sex maniac, just in case the other labels are not enough. This Sir Oliver Lodge article will be censored by every large circulation paper and magazine in the world. People will only begin to find out just how badly they are being deceived by their leaders and teachers if this pamphlet is passed from hand to hand. 'There is not a crime, there is not a dodge, there is not a trick, there is not a swindle, there is not a vice which does not live by secrecy. Get these things out in the open, describe them, attack them, ridicule them in the press, and sooner or later public opinion will sweep them away. Joseph Pulitzer The Mode of Future Existence 1933 Lecture by Sir Oliver Lodge FRS When we consider the question of Survival from the physical point of view we are up against the ancient problem of the connection between mind and body. The body is certainly made of matter, but matter is inert, it never does anything, it is completely controlled by the forces acting upon it, which forces exist in the empty space surrounding the atoms. Left to itself, matter merely continues in whatever state it was last made to accept. If it was spinning, it continues to spin with constant angular momentum. It has no power of changing its state or of stopping. If it was in a state of locomotion, that motion also continues unaltered. This is called the law of inertia, and to it all material atoms are absolutely obedient, whether they form part of an engine or of a clockwork mechanism or of an animated body. There is no exception. All matter is inert. If any change is observed in atomic or material behaviour, it is a sign of some activity, some energy apart from matter, demonstrating its existence by acting upon matter, and causing some acceleration or retardation proportionate to the force exerted. This is called the second law of motion. Furthermore, every kind of energy known to us exists in the empty space between the atoms and exerts equal force upon the boundary atoms at either end of that space, so that every action is accompanied by an equal opposite reaction. This is called the third law of motion, or it might be called the law of energy. Energy only makes itself manifest by its effect on material bodies, but its main existence is in space. We have no sense organ for perceiving energy itself, our senses tell us of nothing but matter. We can see the results of energy as expended upon matter, but we have no direct apprehension of the energy. We are not acquainted with anything in the Universe save by its effect upon matter, and that is the origin of our tendency to philosophic materialism; we are liable to doubt whether things not apparent to the senses can have a real existence, though there is no justification for such a doubt. The physical Universe does not consist of matter alone. If it did, it would be absolutely inert, no change would ever occur. Experience shows us constant change, constant activity, and, when analysed, the source of this activity is always found in the field or space between the atoms. That is where the energy exists, that is where it is stored; and we can gradually realise that it is through interaction between the void and the material particles that every change or activity is accomplished. A field of force always exists in what we call vacuum or Ether, what the Ancients called 'void'; never does it exist in matter. Yet force is only made manifest by matter. It is only by observing the behaviour of material bodies that we can become aware of the existence of a field of force or of a seat of energy. Energy is constant in amount, but it takes various forms. The form with which we are best acquainted is the form of motion, and that is the only form ever associated with matter. All the other forms are hidden and make no impression upon us, save when they encounter material particles and thus display their existence. No one, for instance, could experience a magnetic field without a bit of iron to test it with. No one has any knowledge of the broadcast waves which now surround us unless he has a suitable detecting apparatus in the form of a wireless set and a telephone. And, strange to say, we can only appreciate light when it impinges upon some piece of matter and thence is deflected into the eyes. When we see a lighthouse or searchlight beam tracking its way across space, it is not the beam that we observe, but the dust particles which are illuminated by it. We can only see material objects: we have no sense for radiation itself, nor for an electric current, only for its activity in affecting various kinds of matter. These are only instances of a quite general law. We cannot understand the activity of the material Universe without taking energy into account, and this energy exists in the space between the particles. Matter is discontinuous, consisting of isolated particles, they are connected only through space. But inasmuch as this space is impregnated with energy, it must be something more than mere emptiness. It makes no impression on our senses, and yet it is full of energy, and is the reservoir of all activity; hence we have agreed to call it the Ether. A magnetic field exists wholly in the Ether, iron filings are only used to demonstrate it and map it out. An electric, a gravitational, field is in the same predicament. Cohesion, too, and indeed every action between material particles, is an affair of the Ether. In no other way can one piece of matter act on another. Every kind of physical action is really transmitted across space - that is, through the Ether - just as really, though not so obviously, as electric and magnetic attraction, gravitation, and light. Atoms and their constituents are never in contact. Ether forces or Ether strains have to be appealed to, when we try really to understand the most ordinary activities in daily life. Even a simple push is exerted through an infinitesimal layer of Ether. Every variety of potential energy exists in the Ether: matter has no energy except kinetic; and recently an ethereal explanation of even that kind of energy shows signs of emerging from the theory of relativity. Animated matter differs in no respect from every other kind of matter, except that it is subject to animation. So when we say that life only exists in a material organism, we ought to say that life only manifests itself in association with such an organism, and that when it is dissociated from matter we know nothing of its existence. We have no right to say that it is extinct. All that we know is that it is no longer manifest it has gone out of our ken. But the same may be said of every form of energy in itself, it has no power of becoming known to us but by its effect on material bodies. A body under the action of life can do many things, can initiate spontaneous movements, can build up an organism, can operate on the physical Universe, and leave structures behind it of interest and beauty, but it is not the material body that does these things; they are due to the life or animation of the body. If, then, we can adduce any evidence that life or mental activity exists in space, and only sporadically makes itself evident by some material activity, the state of our present knowledge of physics renders our acceptance of the fact entirely harmonious. We have to do no violence to our physical conceptions if we admit the fact of survival. Life and mind never were functions of the material body, they only displayed themselves by means of the material organism. The organism was not essential to their existence, but only to their display - that is, to our apprehension of them. If they ever find means of operating in a novel or unusual manner on a physical organism, then they may still manifest their continued existence; and that is exactly what they do. Why should we decline to receive the evidence? Telepathy shows that mind can act on mind without the use of any bodily organs, hence certain people may have a faculty of apprehending a spiritual world direct; and this may account for genius and inspiration. This has been well argued by F.W.H. Myers, and I shall not labour it now. If you have evidence of the existence of a spiritual world, a world of help and guidance and sympathy, then you can hold to it in spite of every denial of the materialists, who can only base their denial on the absence of any sensory stimulus to their material organism. Such a world may exist all round us, and yet can only be spiritually discerned. The faculty of discernment does exist in some people, and their positive evidence overweighs a wilderness of negation from people whose perceptions are limited to the bodily senses. One of the most elementary forms of discernment is (rather absurdly) called Psychometry. An object put into their hands may convey more information than the senses can give: a psychometrist can tell something of its history, something of its association, something of its possessor. By special faculty they can tell far more than could be arrived at by chemical tests. They can tell, for instance, that a bit of stone has formed part of a pyramid, or that a ring has taken part in a scene of slaughter, or that a piece of writing or drawing has been done by a certain person normally quite unknown to them, and can even tell what the circumstances of that person were at the time, and what they were doing. The existence of a spiritual world throughout the depths of space is becoming to me a great and fundamental, even a physical, reality. The manifestation of that world in connection with material organisms on one or other of the planets is a comparatively trifling and temporary episode, of great importance doubtless in the history of evolutionary development, but our real existence is not dependent on a material organism. Our spiritual and real home is in the Ether of space. Chemists and biochemists are liable to limit themselves unduly to the purely material aspect of things. A chemist's business is to deal with matter in its various forms; that is his job, and he need not be expected to go beyond it. A physicist takes into account the Ether as well, though he may, for a time, prefer to call it space. He is not limited to material particles, but studies the fields of force which connect them and make them active. The psychologist goes further still, and studies the action of the mind. I would I could say that the biologist is a student of life, but at present the tendency is for him only to study animated organisms and their behaviour, limiting his attention to what is manifested by the material processes brought about by life, and not thinking that life has any existence apart from its instrument of manifestation. We shall never understand the Universe by attending to matter alone and ignoring everything which makes it active and interesting. We cannot even understand the bending of a steel spring or the fall of a raised weight without implicitly taking the Ether into account. We are continually making experiments on the Ether and realising the consequences of its abundant qualities. If we make the assumption that it is a physical vehicle of life and mind too, we are only extending our generalisation in the same direction. A supplementary and semi-physical treatment of Survival is now becoming possible; a treatment which is well calculated to replace the old materialistic view that man had only a material body, and that when that body died and decayed, the animation, the personality, and the individual, necessarily ceased to exist. It is also well calculated to replace the popular idealistic notion that any spirit which survives the death of the material body must survive in an entirely disembodied condition, and be out of relationship with the physical Universe. Many people suppose that it then belongs to another order of existence, or, as some would say, of non-existence; that it is likely to be free from any relationship even with Space and Time, and must have departed entirely out of our ken; so that communication or intercourse with it is no longer possible, until perhaps at some future day when the material body shall have been somehow resuscitated and restored to its old function, in glorified form, so that the spirit can resume its active control. That this superstitious idea has been prevalent is testified to by popular modes of expression, such as: 'On the Resurrection morning, all their dead the graves restore. Father, mother, sister, brother meet once more.' This depressing notion of future existence - if it can be called existence in the interim - is not a scientific or psychological view at all; but it has been the religious, or at least the ecclesiastical, view through medieval times; hymns and liturgies are saturated with it, and it continues to this day the chief representation of what, by strictly orthodox people, is meant by Survival. A modern theory which seeks to provide the emancipated spirit with any kind of organism related to the physical world might thus be ranked as a return to a modified form of materialism. For though, when properly understood, the view I advocate ought to emancipate us from materialistic bugbears, and although it wholly condemns the idea that flesh and blood or any particles of terrestrial matter are revivified and inherit Eternal Life, yet popular ignorance of what is meant by the Ether, and of the certain fact that the Ether is a part of the physical Universe and has definite properties which can be experimented on and ascertained, may well suggest all manner of difficulties in understanding the hypothesis I am trying to expound. Wherefore it will probably be considered unsatisfactory, both by the scientific materialist and by the theologian; possibly also by some spiritualists. The necessity for some kind of organ or instrument or habitation for an emancipated spirit has been intuitively felt by many inspired writers. The most ancient classical idea was that of a condition rather melancholy - unhouseled, wistful, shadowy and sad - but this notion was improved upon even in later classical times. And towards the end, 'Not unclothed, but clothed upon,' 'God giveth it a body,' are modes of expression very familiar to modern ears. The existence of a spiritual body is an idea, in one form or another, at least as old as St. Paul. It has been upheld by some of the Greek Fathers of the Church; it has been vaguely in the mind of many modern investigators; sundry obscure and super-normal facts seem to lend it strong support. And recently an etheric version of such a body has been approved - and if not inculcated, at any rate, regarded as a step in the right direction - by some of the more thoughtful and philosophically minded communicators 'on the other side'. What they know by experience is that, though discarnate, they are certainly not disembodied; they feel no more disembodied than we do. They tell us that they still have substantial instruments of manifestation which serve for intercourse among each other, and that it is through this permanent instrument that they are able, occasionally and under certain conditions, to operate indirectly, through our organisms, on the matter of this planet. They operate with more difficulty than in the old days, partly because they have to make use of other people's mechanism; but still, subject to many restrictions, they exert influence in a somewhat similar way, and thereby are able occasionally to know what we are doing; and they claim sometimes to succeed in helping and stimulating us, not only mentally but physically. Now, although the departed may not understand fully and completely of what their present body is composed, or how they operate on it so as to produce the results they desire and aim at, they are still only in the same predicament as they were when here, and as we are now. For we do not know how we control our bodies of matter, nor what the nature of the connection between mind and matter is. We know that we have muscles and nerves and brain centres. We can dissect and describe this part of the mechanism. But how a physiological instrument - how any kind of mechanism - can think and feel and plan and will and remember and hope and love, we certainly cannot explain. And probably we shall never be able to explain how such a thing can happen; for the thing to be explained does not happen, it is only imagined to happen through a misapprehension. The truth is that it is we ourselves who really do all the psychical things; we employ our bodies only as instruments for recording and transmitting our thoughts and for exercising muscular action on matter. The body itself neither thinks nor wills nor sees nor feels. It is an instrument, a channel, a medium. Although full explanations about our method of controlling of a body are not yet forthcoming - either on this side or on that - yet those 'on the other side' are quite willing to accept the suggestion that their bodies, which to them feel so substantial, and all the surroundings in which they exist, are related to the thing which we here call the Ether, very much in the same way as they used to be related to the familiar thing known as Matter. That Ether is a very substantial entity, far denser than any form of matter, has been gradually becoming clear to physicists. At first, we only said that it must be denser than lead or gold or platinum, but now we find that it must be out of all proportion denser. I have made an estimate of its density, in the light of electromagnetic theory, and it comes out inevitably huge. Every cubic millimetre contains as much substance as what, if it were matter, we should call a thousand tons. As the Ether is not matter in the ordinary sense of the term, our ordinary units of measurement are inappropriate; but on the analogy of matter, the Ether is of the order a million million times as dense as water. All its properties are of supernormal magnitude. Its rate of vibration which enables us to see any ordinary object is five hundred million million per second: a number so great that to try to conceive such a number of vibrations per second simply dizzies us. The number of seconds which have passed since ancient geological periods of twenty million years ago is about this number. Yet we familiarly make use of these vibrations. Our wonderful organ, the eye, is constructed so as to cope with them, in the easiest possible manner. And most people are ignorant - as ignorant as are the animals - of the strange ethereal environment amid which we all live, and of which the vibrations convey to us so much information, and awaken so keenly our sense of beauty. Until instructed, we can hardly help thinking of matter as dense, and of Ether as tenuous, but that is a poetic illusion associated with the term 'ethereal'. It is an illusion based on the testimony of our senses, which, as so often happens, have to be corrected by deeper insight into the real nature of things. Matter appeals to us so strongly, not because it is anything but a gossamer-like or milky-way existence in the vast continuity of Ether, but because our obvious bodies are made of matter, and because our animal sense organs are specially adapted to existence in association with matter, and give us information about nothing else. Even light, which we know is an Ether vibration, tells us nothing about itself without study; what it tells us familiarly is - not about light, but - about the material objects which have emitted or scattered or differentially absorbed it. We get this information by lifelong, indeed age-long, inherited and instinctive experience. We interpret the luminous indications without difficulty, and we forget the strangely complex nature of the processes which underlie all our channels of information; we only find their true nature out when phenomena are fundamentally analysed and seriously cross-questioned. When we have pursued this line of investigation for many years, we find that the important thing in the physical Universe is Ether, and that matter is trivial in comparison. Yet we can freely admit that matter takes such splendid and beautiful forms that it is worthy of the continued study of generations of scientific men; and we need not wonder that they become so enthusiastic over its properties that they are able to imagine it the sole reality in existence. That, however, is a mistake; it constitutes a mechanism actuated and wielded by mental and spiritual power, which is dominant and supreme. Notes The Ether referred to in this article has now been discovered by our Bath-based scientist Ronald Pearson. His paper 'Quantum Gravitation and the Structured Ether' has been published by the Russian Academy of Sciences following the Sir lsaac Newton Conference that was held in 1993. Pearson's discovery was also published in 1997 by the Center for Frontier Sciences in the USA in an article called Consciousness as a Sub-Quantum Phenomenon. Every qualified scientist who does the same as Sir Oliver Lodge, connects survival after death with subatomic physics, is immediately censored in Great Britain! The work of Michael Faraday, the great scientist on the back of our 20 pound notes, connecting survival after death with subatomic physics, has also been censored: "Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature." The public do not know that the French Nobel Laureate for medical science, Professor Charles Richet, carried out the same repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions, proving survival after death, as Sir William Crookes FRS; Richet made this statement: "There is ample proof that experimental materialisations should take definite rank as a scientific fact." The Scottish pioneer of television, John Logie Baird, tells in his memoirs how one of his colleagues carried out an experiment where he took the fingerprints of a recently deceased person who materialised. These prints were identical to the ones on the dead physical body. This proof would have been good enough to hang somebody in Britain only a few years ago. We have put the word out on the Internet for a fully developed materialisation medium to come forward and let our scientific team go in with John Logie Baird's infrared camera to film deceased people being physically reunited with their loved ones who are still on earth. To avoid the inevitable accusations of fraud from professional bigots, the filming will be carried out under auspices of a current Nobel Laureate for Physics. Those with a great deal to lose from the truth had to wait for Sir William Crookes to die before they had the courage to accuse him of fraud. The British people are only allowed access to information that is harmless to orthodox, scientific teaching that says the mind and the brain are the same; that death is the end of everything. Qualified scientists who are adamant that we all survive death are never allowed on British television to balance the arguments of experts (psychologists) like Dr Susan Blackmore and Dr Richard Wiseman. Throwing out Christian Huygen's theory of the Ether (the "spirit" world), and replacing it with Einstein's Relativity, set scientific advancement back 100 years. Only one expert opinion is reaching the public in what is meant to be a free country. The people have not been told that the one million dollars offered by the magician James Randi is a trick. Randi says he will pay the money to anybody who can prove that so-called paranormal phenomena exist. He will never have to part with the money because he is the sole judge and jury. Randi does not recognise the experiments and conclusions of independent scientists. His legal contract consists of twelve conditions that make sure his money is protected. Why are we not told this on television? The astrophysicist, Sam Nicholls MSc, stood up during the filming of Randi's TV series on the paranormal and challenged him to give a balance. Randi panicked and ordered all the cameras to be switched off. Randi only takes on soft targets who have never read subatomic physics. The only reason the experimental proof of survival - carried out by international teams of scientists of the century - did not cause a revolution is because the experiments lacked a mathematical theory. The Nobel Laureate for Physics, Professor Richard Feynman says: "If your theories and mathematics do not match the experiment, then they are wrong.' This situation is summed up very well by Sir Oliver Lodge: "We have to be guided by the facts; and if the facts seem incredible as they do we have first of all to assure ourselves that they are facts, and then conclude that there is a department of knowledge to which we have as yet not got the key." "Any possible utilisation of the ether, however, by discarnate intelligence must be left as a problem for the future." Well the future is here at the beginning of the 21st century and we now have Sir Oliver Lodge's missing key. I list all the books in my thesis 'The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death'. These are the books that the establishment forces are praying with all their might never to come to the attention of ordinary, decent people with nothing to lose from the truth. Please help to tell millions about these wonderful, discoveries in physics that belong to every man, woman and child on earth. References Crookes, Sir William FRS. 'Experimental Investigation of a New Force', published in the 'Quarterly Journal of Science'. July 1st, 1871. Medhurst, Dr R.G. 'Crookes and the Spirit World'. 1972 (Souvenir) Richet, Prof. Charles. 'Thirty Years of Psychical Research', 1923 (W. Collins & Son). Lodge, Sir Oliver FRS. 'Ether and Reality'. 1925 (Hodder & Stoughton) Lodge, Sir Oliver FRS. 'Psychic Science', contribution to the encyclopaedia of Science 'The Outline of Science, volume two', (George Newness Ltd, London. 1920's). Findlay, Arthur. 'On The Edge Of The Etheric'. 1931. Available from the Psychic News Bookshop, Clock Cottage, Stansted Hall, Stansted, Essex CM24 8UD. 7.25 GBP post paid. Baird, John Logie. 'Sermons, Soap and Television'. 1988 (Royal Television Society) ISBN 1 871527 007 Pearson, R.D. 'Theoretical Physics Backs Survival', on the Internet. Included in Dr Victor Zammit's thesis 'A Lawyer Argues For The Afterlife' http://www.victorzammit.com Pearson, R.D. 'Intelligence Behind The Universe'. Pearson, R.D. 'Origin of Mind'. Essen, Dr Louis D.Sc. FRS. OBE. 'Relativity - Joke or Swindle?'. This criticism of Einstein's Theory of Relativity by the inventor of the atomic clock is sent free of charge to all students who send a stamped addressed envelope to Michael Roll. This is censored in all scientific publications. Much too close to the truth for comfort. Laurikainen, K.V. Professor Emeritus. Dept. of Physics. University of Helsinki, Finland. 'Science Has Its Limits. Ontological Implications of Quantum Theory'. 1997. Published by University of Oulu. Series in Physical Sciences. Report No. 8. ISBN 951 -42-4701-9. Feynman, Prof. Richard P. 'QED'. 1985. Crash course for laymen in subatomic physics. (Princeton University Press) ISBN 0-691-02417-0. Milton, Richard. 'Forbidden Science. 1994. (Fourth Estate Ltd) ISBN 1-85702-302-1. This best seller shows how every important discovery has been attacked by pseudo scientists protecting their reputations. Pearson's discovery of 'heaven and hell' is the greatest, scientific breakthrough in history, because it brings into play the most important code of ethic of them all - 'As you sow, so you will reap.' Censoring this is very much par for the course. Pearson, R.D. 'Consciousness as a Sub-Quantum Phenomenon'. This scientific paper has been peer-refereed and published by physicists at the Center of Frontier Sciences at Temple University Philadelphia, USA in 1997. This has been officially censored by the Managing Editor of the 'Journal of Consciousness Studies' the Rev'd Anthony Freeman, in Great Britain! Ronald Pearson's rational, scientific explanation for so-called psychic phenomena has been officially censored by the Editor of the 'Journal of the Society for Psychical Research' - Dr John Beloff, a psychologist from Edinburgh University. It is interesting to note that the thoughts of Dr Susan Blackmore are always published in this journal. The President of the SPR, Professor David Fontana, has written to me saying he thinks Dr Beloff has not published Pearson's work because it does not fit in with the guidelines of the Society that were laid down in 1882. For example, 'A journal on car mechanics confines itself to articles on cars.' All articles linking so-called psychic phenomena with subatomic physics have been censored by the Editor of the journal published by the Churches' Fellowship of Psychical and Spiritual Studies - Canon Michael Perry. Mr Perry has put in writing to me that it is the 'consensus of opinion amongst knowledgeable students of the subject that Crookes was sexually infatuated with the medium he worked with'! It was a materialist called Walter Mann who first floated this diabolical lie that Sir William Crookes was sexually involved with his medium Florrie Cook. This was just after Crookes died in 1919, otherwise Mann would have been on the receiving end of a hefty law suit. When it comes to the subject of survival after death and so-called psychic phenomena, the public are only allowed access to information that is no danger to orthodox, scientific teaching. And this is how things will remain all the time good people continue to do nothing, especially journalists and broadcasters. After Voltaire The Editor of 'New Scientist' has had the courage to publish the fact that the President of the Royal Society has recently unveiled a plaque at Oxford University on the very spot where Sir Oliver Lodge sent the first radio message. The Editor of The Dorling Kindersley Science Encyclopaedia has written to me confirming that they have now put the record straight that it was the British physicist Sir Oliver Lodge who sent the first radio message, and not the Italian Marconi. Let's hope somebody tells the British Post Office. They have issued a stamp saying Marconi was the first! Peter Rowlands and J. Patrick Wilson (editors) 'Oliver Lodge and the Invention of Radio'. (PD Publications 1994) ISBN 1 873694 02 4. This is the research that resulted in the President of The Royal Society unveiling a plaque at Oxford University on the very spot where Sir Oliver Lodge sent the first radio signal one year before Marconi. "To mislead another is a greater crime than murder, for killing stops with its accomplishment. Whereas to state what is not true is to spread errors that may lead generations astray." Professor de Morgan (Mathematics) Einstein, Albert. 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity'. An address delivered on 5th May 1920 at the University of Leiden, Holland. This shows his confused state of mind in relating Ether to Relativity. Related material on this site: Read an excerpt from Sir Oliver Lodge's diary (GIF file, 32KB) from July 12, 1926. Sir Oliver writes "My conviction about survival is absolute, and not likely to be shaken." JAMES RANDI: PSYCHIC INVESTIGATOR - Letter to Michael Roll from journalist Garry Bushell, written in 1991, and an article mentioning how James "The Amazing" Randi cut from his TV broadcast challenges made by astrophysicist Sam Nicholls The Chemist Sir William Crookes Proved Survival With Repeatable Experiments Under Laboratory Conditions - by Michael Roll Letter from Sir Oliver Lodge to The Times, providing clarification about his demonstration of wireless telegraphy in 1894
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#1. To: All (#0)
if you ever needed proof that the elite use belief systems, religion particularly, as a tool to manipulate consciousness and behavior, because it serves so well to enslave and reduce the intellect, this is a great example above.
The Chemist Sir William Crookes Proved Survival With Repeatable Experiments Under Laboratory Conditions by Michael Roll Adrian Berry, the science correspondent of The Daily Telegraph, says that few subjects more infuriate scientists than claims of paranormal phenomena, because if confirmed, "the whole fabric of science would be threatened." This statement is not correct because nothing can threaten science - the Latin name for seeking after knowledge. The only thing that is threatened by uncomfortable discoveries in physics are pseudo-scientists. Their reputations will be destroyed immediately ordinary people find out that Sir William Crookes proved that we all survive the death of our physical bodies with repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions. Following this revolutionary discovery in 1874 this outstanding British scientist was knighted, made President of the Royal Society, and King Edward VII gave him the highest decoration in the land - The Order of Merit. Sir William Crookes was able to wipe the floor with contemporary professional wreckers who dared to attack him. The following is how he dealt with Professor W.B. Carpenter, a biologist from London University, who made a very unfair and anonymous attack upon him in the 'Quarterly Review'. Carpenter had been unfortunate enough to describe Crookes as "a specialist of specialists". "My greatest crime (he wrote in his reply to Carpenter's diatribe in the 'Quarterly Journal of Science') seems to be that I am a 'specialist of specialists'. It is indeed news to me that I have confined my attention only to one special subject. Will my reviewer kindly say what that subject is? Is it General Chemistry, whose chronicler I have been since the commencement of the Chemical News in 1859? Is it Thallium, about which the public have probably heard as much as they care for? Is it Chemical Analysis, in which my recently published Select Methods are the result of twelve years work? Is it disinfection and the 'Prevention and Cure of Cattle Plague', my published report on which may be said to have popularized Carbolic Acid? Is it Photography, on the theory and practice of which my papers have been very numerous? Is it Metallurgy of Gold and Silver, in which my discovery of the value of Sodium in the amalgamation process in now largely used in Australia, California and South America? Is it Physical Optics, in which department I have space only to refer to papers of some Phenomena of Polarized Light, published before I was twenty one; to my detailed description of the Spectroscope and labours with this instrument, when it was almost unknown in England; to my papers on the Solar and Terrestrial Spectra; to my examination of the Optical Phenomena of Opals, and construction of the Spectrum Microscope; to my papers on the Luminous Intensity of Light; and my description of my Polarization Photometer? Or is it my speciality Astronomy and Meteorology, in as much as I was for twelve months at the Radcliffe Observatory, Oxford, where, in addition to my principal employment of arranging the meteorological department, I divided my leisure between Homer and Mathematics at Magdelen Hall, Planet-hunting and transit tracking with Mr. Pogson, now Principal of the Madras Observatory, and celestial photography with the magnificent heliometer attached to the Observatory? My photographs of the Moon, taken in 1855, at Mr. Hartnup's Observatory, Liverpool, were for years the best extant, and I was honoured by a money grant from the Royal Society to carry out further work in connection with them. These facts, together with my trip to Oran last year, as one of the Government Eclipse Expedition, and the invitation recently received to visit Ceylon for the same purpose, would almost seem to show that Astronomy was my speciality. In truth, few scientific people are less open to the charge of being a 'specialist of specialists'." There is a vast conspiracy to make sure exciting scientific discoveries never come to the attention of the general public. Genuine scientists are banned from supporting the work of Sir William Crookes in the press and on every radio and television programme that is made on the so-called paranormal. People are only allowed access to the views of "experts" who can be relied upon to play the Establishment game - suppress anything that could embarrass the orthodox scientists who hold the reins of power. Nobody is allowed to balance the opinions and conclusions of these self-styled experts on the "paranormal". These professional wreckers have unrestricted access to all media outlets, while my colleagues and I have been refused permission to write and broadcast by almost every editor and producer that we have approached. The British people are not allowed to hear the secular scientific case for survival after death in this "free" country of ours! Recent discoveries in subatomic physics confirm that Sir William Crookes was correct in his conclusions, and that he was not a liar, cheat, crank, a fraud or a sex maniac as we have been criminally led to believe. His only "crime" was to tell the truth.
#3. To: gengis gandhi (#2)
I've alway found interesting the fact that matter should really be dead, totally inert. But it's not. Even down to the subatomic level, the particles dance around, as if in some way alive.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||