[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork

Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More

The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome

Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files

Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7, 2023

100m Americans live in areas with cancer-causing 'forever chemicals' in their water

Scientists discover cancer-fighting bacteria that "soak up" forever chemicals in the body

Israel limits entry of baby formula in Gaza as infants die of hunger

17 Ways mRNA Shots May CAUSE CANCER, According to Over 100 STUDIES

Report: Pentagon Halts Some Munitions Shipments To Ukraine Over Concerns That US Stockpiles Are Too Low

Locals Fear Demolitions as Israeli Troops Set Up New Base in Syrias Quneitra

Russian forces discover cache of Ukrainian chemical drone munitions FSB

Clarissa Ward: Gaza is what is turning people overseas against the US

What Parents Wish Their Children Could Grow Up Without

WHY SO MANY FOREIGN BASES IN AFRICA?

Trump called Candace Owens about Brigitte Macron's P*NIS?

New Mexico Is The Most-Dependent State On The Federal Govt, New Jersey The Least


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Family Feud: Why agribusiness giants are facing off over corn ethanol
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.grist.org/comments/food/ ... thanol/index.html?source=daily
Published: May 26, 2007
Author: Tom Philpott
Post Date: 2007-05-26 11:09:33 by innieway
Keywords: None
Views: 143
Comments: 13

As recently as 2005, a buck fifty could get you a bushel of corn -- about three days' rations for a confined dairy cow. Today, that same bushel would run you nearly $4.

That rapid price increase, inspired by a slew of federal policies that encourage transforming corn into ethanol, is rippling through the global food system, jacking up food prices and squeezing low-income people throughout the world.

The situation has given rise to a renewed "food vs. fuel" debate. The discussion plays out something like this: You either support cheap corn, and thus a food supply that serves the world's vast poor population, or you support the ethanol boom, whose goal is to "break our dependence on foreign oil."

But these terms of debate merely mimic a growing rift within the agribusiness lobby. If we accept them, we risk reinforcing the centrality of industrial corn -- an environmentally and nutritionally suspect product -- in supplying our food and fuel.

King Corn's Divided Subjects


A blunt recent report by The Wall Street Journal's Kimberley Strassel outlines the growing rift within the agribiz lobby over ethanol. (The article is locked behind the subscription gate, but a useful summary recently appeared on Gristmill.)

Strassel writes that when corn was cheap and way overproduced -- as it has been for most of the past 30 years -- the entire agribusiness lobby rallied around the ethanol cause. What did it matter to feedlot meat powerhouses like Tyson and Smithfield if corn traders like Archer Daniels Midland made a tidy profit from turning corn into fuel, with a major assist from the government?

"But now that ethanol is literally taking food from their beasts' mouths, much of the [feedlot meat] community has grown less friendly," Strassel writes. Tyson execs have been complaining bitterly about corn prices for a while now. Its CEO recently told the Journal that elevated grain prices, which he explicitly linked to ethanol, would add $300 million to the company's costs this year.

And the National Cattlemen's Beef Association is raising its voice as well. For decades, the politically powerful group has joined Archer Daniels Midland in lobbying hard for the farm subsidies that help keep corn cheap. Suddenly, the group finds government intervention into ag markets distasteful. According to Strassel, the group has demanded "an end to any government tax credits [subsidies] for ethanol and an axe to the import tariff on foreign ethanol." She saltily adds: "Put another way, the cattlemen are so angry that they are demanding free markets and free trade -- a first."

Strassel reports that the growing rift in the agribiz lobby is flummoxing the politicians who cater to it. Presidential hopefuls still feel compelled to mouth platitudes in favor of the allegedly "green fuel" that's going to free us from the clutches of Middle East oil barons, but underneath the public rhetoric, reflexive support for corn-based ethanol is starting to wane.

Legislators continue to issue bill after bill mandating ever-increasing ethanol use, but a funny thing is happening, Strassel reports: More and more of them are quietly capping the amount of corn that can be used, in an attempt to spur the use of other feedstocks (although cellulosic technologies, needed for rival feedstocks like switchgrass, remain commercially unviable, even with loads of government subsidies).

In short, Strassel writes, "the shine is off corn ethanol, and oh, what a comedown it has been." Now, that doesn't mean that corn ethanol is going away -- just that its explosive growth appears to have peaked.

False Choices


That's all to the good. The corn-based ethanol boom, a completely government-contrived phenomenon, never had a shot at significantly reducing petroleum use. By all accounts, its energy-saving potential over gasoline is thin -- if not imaginary. Corn ethanol has always been a fake -- and dramatically expensive -- stand-in for real energy-conservation policy.

Although I support any and all efforts to halt the runaway train that is corn ethanol, I fear that the backlash plays into the hands of Tyson and its peers, who hate ethanol because it interferes with the business model of feeding cheap corn to confined animals.

They may well get their wish. Last fall, spurred by high corn prices, U.S. farmers scrambled to plant corn anywhere they could -- on idle land, on land devoted to other crops like soybeans. This summer, provided there's no major weather disaster, they will likely harvest the largest corn crop in U.S. history.

If Congress pulls back support for ethanol, the corn price will likely tumble. Lower prices will mean a windfall for feedlot operators like Tyson -- and will likely spur a slew of government commodity payments to corn growers under the farm bill.

We'll be back where we started: with our government using our tax dollars to prop up corn production.

In essence, we're being asked to choose between low-quality food and low-quality fuel. We should reject both. Let's demand an end to policies that place industrial corn at the center of food and fuel production alike.


Poster Comment:

Ribeyes: Sale price $16.79/lb

Coming soon to a store near you, and brought to you by your government. "Meddling in the people's everyday lives in unseen ways for the last 150 years"...

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

#1. To: innieway (#0)

Ribeyes: Sale price $16.79/lb

Coming soon to a store near you, and brought to you by your government. "Meddling in the people's everyday lives in unseen ways for the last 150 years"...

Part of the equation is the unholy fuel prices that truckers must pay to get products to market: locally, prime tenderloin of beef is $24.99/lb.

Lod  posted on  2007-05-26   11:43:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: lodwick (#1)

Part of the equation is the unholy fuel prices that truckers must pay to get products to market

I've thought of fuel prices in that way too, but a friend said something to me that made a lot of sense.

Look how many lives have been lost over that vile substance (oil). Thousands of our soldiers, countless civilians - and not just in the current "war on terror". If even ONE person has had to give their LIFE over the crap, that's one too many. What is a life worth? The heart surgeon and the hospital certainly seem to think it's a pretty high amount based upon what they charge. So when you factor in all the lives lost because of the filthy slimy mess, gasoline would be a BARGAIN at $1000/gal...

innieway  posted on  2007-05-26   21:24:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 4.

#5. To: innieway (#4)

Interesting

But worthy of much more study.

Thanks.

Lod  posted on  2007-05-26 22:33:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]