See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Rosie O'Donnell 'View' Booking Of 9/11 Conspiracists Made ABC Nervous
Source:
Tittle-Tattle Too
URL Source: http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_21283139.shtml
Published: May 28, 2007
Author: Tashi Singh
Post Date: 2007-05-29 15:00:27 by Red Jones
Keywords: None
Views: 212
Comments: 18
The Post Chronicle™ Tittle-Tattle Too Rosie O'Donnell 'View' Booking Of 9/11 Conspiracists Made ABC Nervous By Tashi Singh May 28, 2007 Rosie O'Donnell and Charlie Sheen have been the biggest supporters of the wacky 9/11 documentary "Loose Change" - which argues that the World Trade Center terror attack was part of a covert U.S. government conspiracy - but that support is dwindling quicker than John Edwards polling numbers. Rosie O'Donnell trumpeted her feelings about it on "The View" and her blog, making ABC bosses nervous and infuriating many viewers, writes the New York Post. Page Six reports that O'Donnell had reportedly booked the film's producers, Korey Rowe and Dylan Avery, for Thursday's show. But after the fight with Elisabeth Hasselbeck on Wednesday, and after her chief writer was caught defacing Hasselbeck's photos with mustaches, O'Donnell bolted from the show. Charlie Sheen "is having second thoughts" about being involved in an updated version of the film. Virgin Atlantic had announced it would offer the current, narration-free version of the film as an in-flight movie choice, but dumped the idea almost immediately. "Loose Change" attempts to argue the widely debunked "controlled demolition" theory, which claims the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center were an inside job. It alleges the jet-fuel fires inside the towers weren't hot enough to melt the buildings' steel reinforcements. It offers the ludicrous idea that the buildings were blown up from within. Those claims were soundly refuted by Popular Mechanics magazine, which methodically shot down every single one. © Copyright 2004-2007 by Post Chronicle Corp.
Poster Comment: Isn't the quality of their propaganda breath-taking?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
#11. To: Red Jones (#0)
Regarding the methodical, authoritative work of Popular Mechanics, we also have the following from their book Debunking 9/11 Myths, Why Conspiracy theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts, at page 57-8: A cleanup worker referred to the demolition of WTC 6: "... we're getting ready to pull building six." ... "We had to be very careful about how we demolished building six." http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/wtc6_pull.wmv WTC-6 BEING PULLED One may believe the meticulously researched material from Popular Mechanics or one's own lying eyes.
There are no replies to Comment # 11. End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest The contractors removing the debris tried on several occasions to pull over section of [World Trade Center buildings 5 and 6, both less than 10 stories tall] that were damaged by the fire and the collapse. They couldn't even pull those over.
Replies to Comment # 11.