[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Democracy = Terrorism?
Source: http://www.thesavedsect.com/
URL Source: http://www.thesavedsect.com/
Published: May 31, 2007
Author: http://www.thesavedsect.com/
Post Date: 2007-05-31 01:02:50 by Max
Keywords: Democracy = Terrorism?, western hypocracy
Views: 43
Comments: 2

Democracy = Terrorism?

One would immediately assume that to equate democracy with terrorism would be a contradiction in terms. Terrorism is described as the unnecessary use of violence in order to achieve an aim, whereas democracy is about peaceful and collective participation in the law-making process and is therefore a diplomatic and non-violent means to achieve an aim, or so we would assume.

Democracy is a concept that has become a standard for the world today according to which, everyone is expected to lead their lives. People are led to believe that democracy is the modern, progressive and ‘civilised' way to look after the affairs of society. They are made to believe that democracy will bring about progression and advancement, having seen the success western nations have achieved. It is seen as the only possible way of life that people are to live by and is promoted as being widely accepted by the masses. Failure to comply to it would render you an outcast, someone who is backward, regressive and in need of reform.

Democracy is the way of life of the Kuffaar (disbelievers) in which they believe, live their life by and are willing to die for. The US and UK are hailed as being the champions of democracy and are the most powerful and advanced nations in the world. Thus, the natural consequence of this is that they will do whatever they can to ensure that their way of life becomes dominant over all else, and that it is accepted by the world as being the norm. Hence, these nations deem it necessary to convey their democratic way of life to the rest of the world so that they are able to further sustain their dominance and ensure that any threat to their civilisation is made impotent.

Recent events in Iraq show us the way in which the Kuffaar are determined to make their way of life become dominant and how they aim to make others conform to their standards and principles to the extent where they use violence to ensure that this happens. They kill, murder, bomb, destroy, rape and pillage to achieve their aims and to subjugate the people into becoming subservient to their demands.

The handover of sovereignty to the Iraqis was gloated as being a symbol of self-determination for the Iraqi people by allowing them to determine their own affairs, when in fact the truth of it is that they are still very much dependent and subservient to the US.

If we were to look at the way in which this so-called democratic Iraq came about, we can see that the policy of the western regimes is to use terrorism as a means to further their own way of life and to impose it upon others. The Iraqi people had no choice in their leadership or in the fate of their government; rather the US took it upon herself to determine the government of Iraq and its political reality. The same can be said of Afghanistan, where the US stormed the country using all its military might in order to enforce their way of life (democracy) upon the people, against the will of its inhabitants.

In fact, if one were to look at Afghanistan and Iraq after their ‘liberation', it becomes clearly evident that the people of these countries have had no choice in the determination of their governments. Rather, what we find is that both countries were instilled with puppet regimes, whose rulers worked in American petroleum companies and at some point, with American intelligence agencies and remain fully subservient to the US. The claims of liberating these countries and establishing democratic regimes made by the US are now clearly understood. Their version of democracy in these countries is one that is subservient to the US with a ‘made in the USA' label firmly attached to it.

It seems that the western world is determined to make their system of governance dominant over the world by forcing others to live their lives according to it. For those who reject, they are subject to facing the military might of these regimes forcing them to succumb to their demands whilst those who are subjugated to adhere to it are left to suffer in slavery under them. This is the choice they offer to the people of the world enforcing their corrupt and evil way of life upon the masses either way.

The reality is such that terrorism is not exclusive to the Muslims, rather terrorism is the foreign policy of the western (non-Islamic) regimes and a means that they adopt in order to further their way of life and bully the world into submission. They employ state terrorism under the guise of liberation and fighting evil (Islamic) despotic regimes to fool the people into siding with them.

The Muslims who follow and practice the belief of Ahl ul-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah (the Messenger Muhammad [PBUH] and his companions) are not willing to accept such a reality where the Kuffaar are allowed to have the upper hand over us. The Muslim Ummah (nation) was raised to be the best nation among mankind given the highest status of ruling and looking after the affairs of the people. Hence, we hereby reject the deception and trickery of these nations and their filthy, rotten, democratic way of life for we have Islam which is the only divine unique and supreme way of life where the sovereignty is to Allah (SWT) alone and all obedience is to Him and all that He has legislated. It is only Islam that will elevate and dignify the Muslims bringing advancement and prosperity in this life and the Hereafter.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Max (#0)

Like Bush et al care a whit about democracy. This was pure power politics, aimed to make the U.S. and Western Europe dominant in the Arab world. Democracy was just the proverbial lipstick on a pig. I don't think we wanted to steal the oil, per se, we just wanted to make sure that they would continue to sell it to us, whether they wanted to or not. Invade one oil state and the others get the message.

Afghanistan was interesting to us until we found out the concept of an oil pipeline from the other Stans was pure fantasy. As soon as the Bushies got that news, which they should have been able to figure out themselves, we moved on to the first oil state we could make a case for attacking.

Without major changes, we're going to be totally dependent on OPEC oil within 10 or 20 years. The idea, I think, was to give them an offer they couldn't refuse, and keep China and Japan from outbidding us.

Mekons4  posted on  2007-05-31   3:16:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Max (#0)

Democracy = Terrorism?

in a word, YES!

Democracy = COMMUNISM. Communism = JUDAISM. Judaism = TERRORISM.

"...... the War Department’s 1928 Training Manual No.2000-25, which was intended for use in citizenship training, and what followed. The 1928 US government document correctly defined democracy as:

“A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of ‘direct expression’. Results in mobocracy. Attitude towards property is communistic — negating property rights. Attitude of the law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.”

This manual also accurately stated that the framers of the constitution “made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy... and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had formed a republic”.

But by 1932, pressure against its use caused it to be withdrawn. In 1936, Senator Homer Truett Bone took to the floor of the Senate to call for the document’s complete repudiation. By then, even finding a copy of the manual had become almost impossible.

Decades later, in an article appearing in the October 1973 issue of Military Review, Lt-Col Paul B. Parham explained that the Army ceased using the manual because of letters of protest “from private citizens”. Interestingly, Parham also noted that the word democracy “appears on one hand to be of key importance to, and holds some peculiar significance for, the communists”.

By 1952, the US Army was singing the praises of democracy, instead of warning against it, in Field Manual 21-13, entitled The Soldier’s Guide. This new manual incorrectly stated: “Because the United States is a democracy, the majority of the people decide how our government will be organised and run...” (emphasis in the original).

Yet important voices continued to warn against the siren song for democracy. In 1931, England’s Duke of Northumberland issued a booklet entitled The History of World Revolution in which he stated:

“The adoption of democracy as a form of government by all European nations is fatal to good government, to liberty, to law and order, to respect for authority, and to religion, and must eventually produce a state of chaos from which a new world tyranny will arise.”

In 1939, historians Charles and Mary Beard added their strong voices in favour of historical accuracy in their America in Midpassage: “At no time, at no place, in solemn convention assembled, through no chosen agents, had the American people officially proclaimed the United States to be a democracy. The constitution did not contain the word or any word lending countenance to it, except possibly the mention of ‘We, the People’ in the preamble... When the constitution was framed, no respectable person called himself or herself a democrat.”

During the 1950s, Clarence Manion, the dean of Notre Dame Law School, echoed and amplified what the Beards had so correctly stated. He summarised:

“The honest and serious student of American history will recall that our Founding Fathers managed to write both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution without using the term ‘democracy’ even once. No part of any of the existing State constitutions contain any reference to the word. [The men] who were most influential in the institution and formulation of our government refer to ‘democracy’ only to distinguish it sharply from the republican form of our American constitutional system.”

On 17 September 1961 (Constitution Day), the John Birch Society founder, Robert Welch, delivered an important speech, entitled “Republics and Democracies”, in which he proclaimed: “This is a Republic, not a Democracy. Let’s keep it that way!”

The speech, which was later published and widely distributed in pamphlet form, amounted to a jolting wake-up call for many Americans.

In his remarks, Welch not only presented the evidence to show that the Founding Fathers had established a republic and had condemned democracy, but he warned that the definitions had been distorted, and that powerful forces were at work to convert the American republic into a democracy, in order to bring about dictatorship..........."

America and Democracy

http://www.africasia.com/archive/na/01_01/cover2.htm

"Some call it Marxism; I call it Judaism"

Jew Watch - Jewish Genocidal Murders of Others The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with many of the highest ideals of Judaism." (Jewish Chronicle, London April, 4, 1919) "Some call it Marxism I call ... http:// http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-genocide-USSRchristians-usexpeditionaryforces.html

ADV -- All America Must Know the Terror That is Upon Us In the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise stated, "Some call it Marxism - I call it Judaism." In the 1912 book, A Racial Program for ... http://www.natvan.com/american-dissident-voices/adv081493.html

ZYDS=CHRISTKILLERS=BOLSHEVIKI=PARASITES - soc.culture.ukrainian ... "Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism." (The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935). "In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership ... http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.ukrainian/browse_thread/thread/6200b0d4a9d41147/2a48e055527c4690

Jews_America "Some call it Marxism -- I call it Judaism." (The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935). Today we find a push for world government by these ... http://www.jfkmontreal.com/jews_america.htm

JEWS AND COMMUNISM Part 1 Some call it Marxism -- I call it Judaism." (The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935). ______. "It is legitimate to adopt a critical attitude ... http://www.wake-up-america.net/jews_and_communism__part_1.htm

Jewish Rule As Stephen S. Wise, chief rabbi of the United States in the 1930s said, "Some call it Marxism - I call it Judaism!" Both Communists and Zionists desired to ... http://www.judicial-inc.biz/JB.Campbell.htm

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2007-05-31   13:18:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]