[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

"Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination

CNN Stunned As Majority Of Americans Back Trump's Mass Deportation Plan

Israeli VS Palestinian Connections to the Land of Israel-Palestine

Israel Just Lost Billions - Haifa and IMEC

This Is The Income A Family Needs To Be Middle Class, By State

One Big Beautiful Bubble": Hartnett Warns US Debt Will Exceed $50 Trillion By 2032

These Are The Most Stolen Cars In Every US State

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Was the 17th Amendment strictly forbidden?
Source: US Constitution
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 31, 2007
Author: mostly madison?
Post Date: 2007-05-31 21:23:47 by Dakmar
Keywords: None
Views: 223
Comments: 21

Article 1

Section 4. The times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations, except as to the places of choosing Senators.


Poster Comment:

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I take this to mean that the FF meant that Senators must always be chosen by State legislatures, as described in Article 1, Section 3:

Section 3. "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote."

And, finally, the 17th Amendment:

Amendment 17 - Senators Elected by Popular Vote

The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.

When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.

This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

#1. To: Dakmar (#0)

Was the 17th Amendment strictly forbidden?

Sounds like it.

Critter  posted on  2007-05-31   22:14:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Critter, nolu_chan, Dakmar, all (#1)

Was the 17th Amendment strictly forbidden?

Absolutely. The Constitution is a contract, by and between the states. As such, you can not alter the status of any contractee without that contractee agreeing to the change. Thus, it would need 100% acceptance.

However, this amendment, just as the income tax amendment, was never completely ratified; it was adopted and declared adopted. An adoptive act is meant (according to Black's Law Dictionary) for a specific geographical area.

Now, since United States citizenship applies to Washington, DC, and all United States citizens are RESISDENT in the several states........ what geographical area to you suppose the 17th Amendment applies too?

richard9151  posted on  2007-06-01   1:30:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: richard9151, Critter, Dakmar (#3)

Absolutely. The Constitution is a contract, by and between the states. As such, you can not alter the status of any contractee without that contractee agreeing to the change. Thus, it would need 100% acceptance.

The compact entered into contained the following provision.

Article V.

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

nolu_chan  posted on  2007-06-01   3:43:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: nolu_chan, Critter, Dakmar, all (#4)

and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

Exactly what I said.

richard9151  posted on  2007-06-01   11:58:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 5.

#6. To: richard9151, Critter, Dakmar (#5)

and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

Exactly what I said.

No. The 17th does not deprive equal Suffrage in the Senate. It only changes (probably for the worse) the method the State uses to elect its senators. Each state still has two senators.

It should be noted that states were actually denied equal suffrage after the War Between the States (Civil War).

nolu_chan  posted on  2007-06-01 16:08:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]