[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

US To Formalize Military Presence in Syria in Deal With al-Qaeda-Linked Govt

GOP Rep Introduces Resolution Labeling Free Palestine Slogan as Anti-Semitism

Two-thirds of troops who left the military in 2023 were at risk for mental health conditions

UK and France abandon plans to recognise Palestinian state at conference

Kamala Backs LA Protests After Rioters Attack Federal Officers

Netanyahu's ultra-Orthodox partners move ahead with Knesset dissolution plan

Former Prime Minister of Ukraine: Zelensky will leave the country

Man protesting Paramount ICE raid added to FBI's Most Wanted

JUAN O SAVIN- The Plan to Capture America

US Manufacturing By State: Who Gains Most From 'Made In America'?

Rickards: The Truth About Fort Knox And Gold Leasing

Los Angeles Warzone: "Insurrectionist Mobs" Attack Cops, Set Fires, Block 101 Freeway

The Attack on the USS Liberty (June 8, 1967) - Speech by Survivor Phillip Tourney At the Revisionist History of War Conference (Video)

‘I Smell CIA/Deep State All Over This’ — RFK Jr. VP Nicole Shanahan Blasts Sanctuary Cities,

we see peaceful protests launching in Los Angeles” - Democrat Senator Cory Booke

We have no legal framework for designating domestic terror organizations

Los Angeles Braces For Another Day Of Chaos As Newsom Pits Marxist Color Revolution Against Trump Admin

Methylene Blue Benefits

Another Mossad War Crime

80 served arrest warrants at 'cartel afterparty' in South Carolina

When Ideas Become Too Dangerous To Platform

The silent bloodbath that's tearing through the middle-class

Kiev Postponed Exchange With Russia, Leaves Bodies Of 6,000 Slain Ukrainian Troops In Trucks

Iranian Intelligence Stole Trove Of Sensitive Israeli Nuclear Files

In the USA, the identity of Musk's abuser, who gave him a black eye, was revealed

Return of 6,000 Soldiers' Bodies Will Cost Ukraine Extra $2.1Bln

Palantir's Secret War: Inside the Plot to Cripple WikiLeaks

Digital Prison in the Making?

In France we're horrified by spending money on Ukraine

Russia has patented technology for launching drones from the space station


All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Dem debate: Obama had a great statement
Source: me
URL Source: http://www.mememe.com
Published: Jun 3, 2007
Author: Me
Post Date: 2007-06-03 23:37:59 by Mekons4
Keywords: None
Views: 1112
Comments: 28

I'm already sold on Obama, but his line tonight that "fiscal responsibility is a progressive value" really hit home. I've always felt that a balanced budget and wiping out national debt is the best tax cut you can get. It truly floats all boats.

His statements about the squeeze on the middle class, universal healthcare, and the war all resonated with me.

I only watched some highlights, so I can't say who won or lost, although Richardson evidently didn't do well, but Obama is bringing the topics I want to hear about to the fore.

The war is probably my main issue, but it's a relatively short-term problem. Bush has EXPLODED the national deficit, and that, along with some sort of affordable, universal healthcare, are probably my two main long-term concerns.

We're going to end up individually bankrupt due to medical bills and paying off the interest on an $11 trillion national debt, and nationally, we're going to be a colony of China if this keeps up.

I think Obama is going to resonate with a lot of people, both Dems and others, next year. Whether he can beat Clinton and Edwards, I don't know, but I think he's offering something new from the Dem side.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

#4. To: Mekons4 (#0)

You'll note that not one of these Dems has a clue what any of this will cost nor do they have a clue as to how to pay for any of it.

Here's a hint: It'll be EXPENSIVE and YOU will pay through the nose for it.

Besides, where do you find "Universal Health Care" in the US Constitution?

These guys have never read it and are happy to wipe their asses with it.

mirage  posted on  2007-06-03   23:53:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: mirage (#4)

Besides, where do you find "Universal Health Care" in the US Constitution?

The same place you find workman's comp, social security, bank regulation, the GI Bill, the highway construction program, and a million other worthwhile uses of the public dollar. As a society grows and develops, it introduces more benefits for its citizens. That's the only purpose of a society. Once it stops doing that, it's through.

I dunno about you, but I have no interest in going back to a world where the life expectancy was 42. Or where only the very wealthy could attend college. Or where it took four days to go from Boston to New York. Or where an accident at work doomed an entire family to starvation.

Mekons4  posted on  2007-06-04   1:28:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Mekons4 (#9)

I dunno about you...

If you'd read the US Constitution, you'll find it has a process to amend it.

If its so important to become a Communist nation, then let's do it the right way at least.

The problem with our society is that we are an Entitlement Society. Everyone wants it all and they want it now. They aren't willing to do the real work it takes to make it happen the right way.

So they take a shortcut. Seems that there is a lot of advocacy for that. Which laws may I ignore too?

Now, with $9 Trillion in debt (and growing) and $59 Trillion minimum in unfunded liabilities, we want to spend ourselves into oblivion? Enjoy the 90% marginal tax rates. Obama wants amnesty and a massive increase in immigration too.

Also, understand that putting all of this into place is going to make what happened to Argentina and the former Soviet Union look like a walk in the park.

So, if you feel you are entitled to your neighbor's wallet, by all means, cast your ballot to send the goons with guns to pick it for you. Just understand that in doing so, you're also picking your own pocket. Nothing is free. Nothing.

This time, the bill will be QUITE heavy. I trust your offspring won't need an inheritance. Obama will spend it for you.

mirage  posted on  2007-06-04   2:30:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: mirage (#10)

$9 trillion and going to $12 trillion by the time Bush leaves office. It was $3 trillion and shrinking when Clinton left office. Don't blame debt on social services. We were doing fine until Bush came along, started stupid wars, gave an undeserved tax cut to people who didn't need one, passed a disastrous prescription bill that is really a payoff to the pharmaceutical and HMO industries, etc.

The purpose of a society is to make the lives of its citizens better. Not a small fraction of its citizens, all of them.

Healthcare now is a hodgepodge of for-profit organizations, mainly the insurance companies, who are barely overseen, much less regulated. This is a prescription for disaster, and we're getting it. Nearly 50 million citizens have no healthcare insurance, and if you want to buy it, it's $10K a year, which you can't even write off on your taxes. Sure sounds fair to me, when the wealthy can write off losses on their stock investments, and pay a low rate on their stock profits.

I live in a city. I don't need highways. So why don't we cut all spending on highways? If you use them, you're stealing from me. I can come up with examples like this all night, btw. We pay taxes to produce a better society. I think my tax dollars should go to providing low-cost healthcare to every citizen who needs it. I'd cheerfully cut the Pentagon's budget by $20 billion to pay for it, and that would only mean cutting off a few wasteful earmarks to build missile and other weapon programs the Pentagon doesn't even want.

If you want to make the argument that we shouldn't pay ANY taxes, fine. Ain't gonna happen. So if we're going to steal from each other's wallets anyway, I think it should be spent on things like health, education, food, and other stuff that makes people's lives better, not on military bases, wasteful wars, farm subsidies, welfare for those who don't want to work, and so on.

We piss away more money on "the troops" (really, the bureaucrats) than it would cost to make healthcare virtually free to every American.

Mekons4  posted on  2007-06-04   22:52:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Mekons4 (#17)

It was $3 trillion and shrinking when Clinton left office.

Shrinking???

Care to post a link with the figures indicating "shrinkage"???

Cynicom  posted on  2007-06-04   23:01:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 18.

#19. To: Cynicom (#18)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/411973.stm

For the first time in 25 years, the US Government plans to reduce the size of the national debt.

The news represents a transformation of the US budget position, after struggling with huge deficits for most of the last decade.

[ image: US Treasury Secretary Summers wants to cut the debt] US Treasury Secretary Summers wants to cut the debt And it comes as a riposte to Republican plans to use the budget surplus to fund more tax cuts.

The last time the US tried to reduce its debt was in 1972.

It now says it will begin repurchasing Treasury bonds before they fall due, as early as next February, cutting back on the $3.6 trillion (£2.4 trillion) it owes to the public.

I'll add that the national deficit shrank steadily under Clinton, after exploding from $1 trillion in our entire history through Carter, to over $3 trillion under Reagan and to a lesser extent, Bush 1. Clinton was the best thing that ever happened to financial responsibility. You may remember that Republicans went berserk when Clinton raised taxes on the wealthiest, predicting in 1993 that we would be in a recession instantly. You may also remember what happened next -- the most prosperous decade in history for the middle class, apart from the GI Bill-fueled 50s.

Mekons4  posted on  2007-06-04 23:16:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Cynicom, Neil McIver, Arator, Red Jones (#18) (Edited)

Care to post a link with the figures indicating "shrinkage"???

It may not have been shrinking, but the Ds fought, and defeated, the Rs attempt to change the accounting practices which would have removed substantial portions of the debt from the servicable debt and taken them off budget to reduce the interest payments.

The following was my debut post on ElPee. I know the three others I have pinged may well recall their welcome posts to me. It's been a long and fruitful relationship. ;0)

‘Bushonomics’ Plays Dangerous Game With Solvency, Deficit Spending, Shady Accounting, Social Security

Here is the link to the same article on my blog so we do not give Goldi too much traffic.

http://btpholdings.blogspot.com/2003/06/bushonomics-plays- dangerous-game-with.html

BTP Holdings  posted on  2007-06-04 23:26:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]