[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: U.S. Senate moves to restore detainee rights (JUDICIARY COMMITTEE APPROVES HABEAS RESTORATION)
Source: Reuters Alertnet
URL Source: http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N67205814.htm
Published: Jun 7, 2007
Author: Jane Sutton
Post Date: 2007-06-07 16:42:34 by aristeides
Keywords: None
Views: 107
Comments: 8

U.S. Senate moves to restore detainee rights

07 Jun 2007 17:23:19 GMT
Source: Reuters

By Jane Sutton

WASHINGTON, June 7 (Reuters) - Guantanamo prisoners and other foreigners got a step closer to regaining the right to challenge their detention in the U.S. courts in a bill approved in a U.S. Senate committee on Thursday.

The Judiciary Committee voted 11-8 to send the proposal to the full Senate for debate, with Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania the lone Republican joining the Democratic majority.

Congress last year revoked the rights of foreign terrorism suspects labeled "enemy combatants" to challenge their detention by the United States. The Bush administration said it was necessary to prevent them from attacking Americans if freed.

The move affected about 380 suspected al Qaeda and Taliban captives held at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba. It could also affect 12 million legal residents of the United States who are not U.S. citizens, said the committee chairman, Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont.

"I hope the Senate will reconsider the historic error in judgment," Leahy said.

The proposal would restore the right of habeas corpus, Latin for "have the body," which has been the foundation of Anglo-American justice. It prevents the government from locking people up without review by a court.

Leahy said the bill removing that right violated the U.S. constitution, ignored centuries of legal practice and conflicted with U.S. calls for other nations to respect human rights.

"I implore those who supported this change to think about whether eliminating habeas truly makes America safer in the world, and whether it comports with the values, liberties ad legal traditions we hold most dear," he said.

"It makes us less safe."

MILITARY TRIBUNALS

The removal of habeas rights was part of the Military Commissions Act, which also created new military tribunals to try the Guantanamo prisoners on war crimes charges. Congress was led by Republicans when it was rushed through, shortly before elections that put Democrats in control.

There was no opposition expressed at Thursday's committee meeting. But aides said that should not be construed as a sign of support from several Republicans who missed the meeting to take part in an important debate on immigration reform.

The Military Commissions Act was criticized on Monday when judges in the Guantanamo tribunals dropped all war crimes charges against the only two prisoners facing trial.

The judges said they lacked jurisdiction because the defendants had been classified as "enemy combatants" rather than "unlawful enemy combatants," as required by the Military Commissions Act.

The American Civil Liberties Union called the move to restore habeas corpus a good first step and urged Congress to go further and scrap the military tribunals.

"Guantanamo has been one illegal trial scheme after another," said Christopher Anders, legislative counsel for the rights group. "After more than five years of people wasting away without being charged and tried, it's time to convict the guilty and send the innocent to countries that don't torture. The habeas bill is a good first step."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: aristeides (#0)

Congress last year revoked the rights of foreign terrorism suspects labeled "enemy combatants" to challenge their detention by the United States. The Bush administration said it was necessary to prevent them from attacking Americans if freed.

That's the stupidest fucking rationale I can imagine. If they successfully challenge their detentions to the point that they are freed, it means the judicial system determines they aren't a threat.

The rationale is based on the premise that our justice system doesn't work, and only the dick-tater decider knows best.

And the publican, standing far off, would not so much as lift his eyes unto heaven, but smote his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner. I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather thant he other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted. -Luke 18: 14.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-06-07   16:45:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: bluedogtxn (#1)

The real motive was to give Republican congressional candidates an issue to use against Democrats. But they couldn't say that openly, so they had to dream up some excuse.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-06-07   16:47:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: bluedogtxn (#1)

and only the dick-tater decider knows best.

further, the dictator can decide at whim proving that he was right when he said, the constitution is a GD piece of paper.

christine  posted on  2007-06-07   17:10:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: aristeides (#0)

"Guantanamo has been one illegal trial scheme after another,"

Wait until they all sue.

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." ~George Washington

robin  posted on  2007-06-07   17:13:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: aristeides (#2)

If they think restoring habeas corpus is a losing issue, it's little wonder they're in free fall.

And the publican, standing far off, would not so much as lift his eyes unto heaven, but smote his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner. I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather thant he other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted. -Luke 18: 14.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-06-07   17:13:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: christine (#3)

and only the dick-tater decider knows best. further, the dictator can decide at whim proving that he was right when he said, the constitution is a GD piece of paper.

I think the day is coming when he'll learn different.

And the publican, standing far off, would not so much as lift his eyes unto heaven, but smote his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner. I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather thant he other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted. -Luke 18: 14.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2007-06-07   17:14:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: aristeides (#0)

Here's the You Tube video re this:

Zipporah  posted on  2007-06-07   19:04:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: bluedogtxn, aristeides (#1)

The rationale is based on the premise that our justice system doesn't work, and only the dick-tater decider knows best.

Well, Bushco has to say something, and apparently this pantsload is as good as any. If the prisoners could challenge their detentions in something other than a kangaroo court, we would find that many were nothing more than poor dumb slobs who were rounded up and sold to the U.S. for the offered bounty. Many have already been released into the custody of some country which then proceeds to simply set them free. Bushco would like to just drag out the process until the end of the administration and then pass it on to the next administration along with the war. Then they can blame the next adminstration for releasing hundreds of the most dangerous terrorists who ever existed.

If they had really wanted to proceed to trial, they could have accomplished that years ago.

nolu_chan  posted on  2007-06-07   20:59:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]