[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Whitney Webb: Foreign Intelligence Affiliated CTI League Poses Major National Security Risk

Paul Joseph Watson: What Fresh Hell Is This?

Watch: 50 Kids Loot 7-Eleven In Beverly Hills For Candy & Snacks

"No Americans": Insider Of Alleged Trafficking Network Reveals How Migrants Ended Up At Charleroi, PA Factory

Ford scraps its SUV electric vehicle; the US consumer decides what should be produced, not the Government

The Doctor is In the House [Two and a half hours early?]

Trump Walks Into Gun Store & The Owner Says This... His Reaction Gets Everyone Talking!

Here’s How Explosive—and Short-Lived—Silver Spikes Have Been

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors

Rasmussen Poll Numbers: Kamala's 'Bounce' Didn't Faze Trump

Trump BREAKS Internet With Hysterical Ad TORCHING Kamala | 'She is For They/Them!'

45 Funny Cybertruck Memes So Good, Even Elon Might Crack A Smile

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means

New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have

More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico

New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: CHEAP LABOR? Isn't that what the whole immigration issue is about?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 11, 2007
Author: None
Post Date: 2007-06-11 10:50:23 by richard9151
Keywords: None
Views: 547
Comments: 59

CHEAP LABOR? Isn't that what the whole immigration issue is about?

Business doesn't want to pay a decent wage.

Consumers don't want expensive produce.

Government will tell you Americans don't want the jobs.

But the bottom line is cheap labor. The phrase "cheap labor" is a myth, a farce, and a lie. There is no such thing as "cheap labor."

Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children.

He takes a job for $5.00 or $6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return (And he will as he learns the rules), he gets an "earned income credit" of up to $3,200 free.

He qualifies for Section 8 housing and subsidized rent.

He qualifies for food stamps.

He qualifies for free (no deductible, no co-pay) health care.

His children get free breakfasts and lunches at school.

He requires bilingual teachers and books.

He qualifies for relief from high energy bills.

If they are or become, aged, blind or disabled, they qualify for SSI. Once qualified for SSI they can qualify for Medicare. All of this is at (our) taxpayer's expense.

He doesn't worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowners insurance.

Taxpayers provide Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material.

He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in benefits.

Working Americans are lucky to have $5.00 or $6.00/hour left after paying their bills and his.

The American taxpayers also pay for increased crime, graffiti and trash clean-up.

Cheap labor? YEAH RIGHT! Wake up people. I hope enough of you understand that this issue has nothing to do with cheap labor; it has to do with reducing America to the level of Mèxico so that the two nations can be joined together - along with Canada, of course - now, and later, merged into the NWO.)

THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BE ADDRESSING TO THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR EITHER PARTY.

'AND WHEN THEY LIE TO US AND DON'T DO AS THEY SAY, WE SHOULD REPLACE THEM AT ONCE!'


Oh nononono! You just don`t understand! We just need to build a fence on the border! That will take care of the problem! Oh, and hire another 250,000/500,000/maybe a million or so new cops! That's the ticket!

Ummmm. That is a thought! Where, do you suppose, THEY will get the next generation of police, willing to work cheaply, from? And, what do you suppose those police will be doing? And if you answer, working on the illegal immigration problem, then you ain't got a clue. In fact, I could say, you probably don't know s--- about illegal immigration. But hey! WHAT DO I KNOW!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

#5. To: richard9151, mirage (#0)

CHEAP LABOR? Isn't that what the whole immigration issue is about?

HELLO....we're talking ILLEGAL immigration with this brown surge......

That said, when in the history of America hasn't LEGAL immigration been about cheap labor?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-06-11   15:48:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Jethro Tull (#5)

I think of two types of early immigration in our history, those seeking religious freedom (supposedly, they often wouldn't allow the same for others after they got here), and those fleeing economic oppression. The Virgina colony was the only colony founded just for investment purposes by investors in the Old World.

That said, 15 years ago a coworker and I were once speculating that when these two groups intersect (religion and economics), you have the very worst that America has to offer (the money-making television evangelists). Today they rear their ugly heads again, but with an added oily rapture twist.

robin  posted on  2007-06-11   15:58:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: robin (#6)

Today they rear their ugly heads again, but with an added oily rapture twist.

Has this clique of psychotics (rapture folk) been silent during this debate, or is it just my preception?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-06-11   16:12:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Jethro Tull (#7)

I think the Catholics are quiet (read "aid and abetting") but the evangelical Protestants are mostly against illegal immigration. However, they don't seem to have much to say, you're right about. Teletubbies and other homosexual cartoons take precedence.

robin  posted on  2007-06-11   16:16:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: robin (#8)

I think the Catholics are quiet (read "aid and abetting") but the evangelical Protestants are mostly against illegal immigration.

Tell me a single one, in any so-called church, that said a single thing when the immigration laws were changed back in the 1960s to only permit non-whites into the United States. Just one.....

"It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed...In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political coming of age, the Jewish community had a leadership role in effecting those changes." (Earl Raab, Jewish Bulletin, July 23, 1993, p. 17)

richard9151  posted on  2007-06-12   14:41:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: richard9151 (#16)

There have been a great many white immigrants since 1960. To which immigration law are you referring?

robin  posted on  2007-06-12   14:55:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: robin, mirage, Jethro Tull, all (#18)

To which immigration law are you referring?

http://www.heritage. org/Research/Immigration/SR9.cfm

In 1963, President Lyndon Johnson launched the War on Poverty with the goal of eliminating poverty in the United States. Since that time, the U.S. has spent over $11 trillion on anti-poverty programs ...

Since the immigration reforms of the 1960s, the U.S. has imported poverty through immigration policies that per­mitted and encouraged the entry and residence of millions of low-skill immigrants into the nation ...

Today’s immigrants differ greatly from historic immigrant populations. Prior to 1960, immigrants to the U.S. had education levels that were similar to those of the non-immigrant workforce and earned wages that were, on aver­age, higher than those of non-immigrant workers. Since the mid-1960s, however, the education levels of new immigrants have plunged relative to non-immigrants; consequently, the average wages of immigrants are now well below those of the non-immigrant population. Recent immigrants increasingly occupy the low end of the U.S. socio- economic spectrum.[2]

The current influx of poorly educated immigrants is the result of two factors: first, a legal immigration system that favors kinship ties over skills and education; and second, a permissive attitude toward illegal immigration that has led to lax border enforcement and non-enforcement of the laws that prohibit the employment of illegal immigrants. In recent years, these factors have produced an inflow of some ten and a half million immigrants who lack a high school education.

http://usinfo.s tate.gov/journals/itsv/0699/ijse/capop.htm

... the population of the United States continues to grow increasingly diverse. In recent years, Hispanics and minority racial groups (defined here as racial and ethnic groups that make up less than 50 percent of the population and include non-Hispanic blacks, Asians and American Indians) have each grown faster than the population as a whole. In 1970 these groups together represented only 16 percent of the population. By 1998 this share had increased to 27 percent. Assuming current trends continue, the Bureau of the Census projects that these groups will account for almost half of the U.S. population by 2050. Although such projections are necessarily imprecise, they do indicate that the racial and ethnic diversity of the United States will expand substantially in the next century. Immigration has been the key to this demographic evolution. It has contributed to the rapid growth of the Asian and Hispanic populations since the 1960s.

http://www.csulb.edu/%7Ekmacd/books-immigration.html

Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review

This paper discusses Jewish involvement in shaping United States immigration policy. In addition to a periodic interest in fostering the immigration of co- religionists as a result of anti-Semitic movements, Jews have an interest in opposing the establishment of ethnically and culturally homogeneous societies in which they reside as minorities. Jews have been at the forefront in supporting movements aimed at altering the ethnic status quo in the United States in favor of immigration of non-European peoples. These activities have involved leadership in Congress, organizing and funding anti-restrictionist groups composed of Jews and gentiles, and originating intellectual movements opposed to evolutionary and biological perspectives in the social sciences.

Carefully note; Jews have been at the forefront in supporting movements aimed at altering the ethnic status quo in the United States in favor of immigration of non-European peoples.

http://www.white- history.com/hwr67.htm

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - Third World Immigration Starts After 1960

Until the 1960s, most immigrants to the United States came from Europe. Mexicans had however long since been crossing the border to seek employment in the White created prosperity that was North America: an estimated 500,000 Mexicans entered America, legally and illegally, in the 1930s; one million in the 1940s; and 2.5 million in the 1950s.

Starting from 1975, the vast majority of immigrants into America have been from non-White World countries from Asia and Latin America. More than 4 million newcomers entered the United States during the 1970s, rising to more than 6 million arrived in the 1980s; with at least 80 percent of these from Latin America or Asia.

During the 1990s another 10 million entered the country: the largest influx of immigrants in any decade in American history. In the 1980s, concern about the surge of illegal immigrants led Congress to pass legislation aimed at curtailing illegal immigration.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any other questions, robin?

richard9151  posted on  2007-06-12   16:51:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: richard9151 (#24)

I may have missed it, but I still don't see the law that disallows white immigrants.

robin  posted on  2007-06-12   17:03:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: robin (#29)

I may have missed it, but I still don't see the law that disallows white immigrants.

It is called quotas, robin, and the quotas for whites are about nill. I will do the post, prhaps today, and put the figures in.

richard9151  posted on  2007-06-12   17:44:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: richard9151 (#34)

I understand the quotas change from year to year.
It's fairly easy for someone from Europe/UK to immigrate here if they arrive first as a skilled worker. I've met Kiwis, Brits, a variety who became citizens that way. And there is a large Christian Ukrainian population in the Sacremento area, recent immigrants. There aren't that many oppressed whites, except maybe in Russia and parts of Eastern Europe.

robin  posted on  2007-06-12   17:56:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: robin (#38)

I understand the quotas change from year to year.

Do you truly understand, robin?

Since the implementation of the law, the relative proportion of the white population has been in steady decline, with whites projected to lose their majority status during the 21st century. Hispanics, a group composed of Spanish- speaking whites, blacks, indigenous tribes, and those of mixed ancestry have replaced English-speaking African Americans as the largest minority in the U.S. There has also been enormous growth of immigration from non-European nations since the implementation of the law.

There is a general law which states that the INTENT of any law can bested be determined by the result of that law. The above paragraph accurately protrays exactly what was intended by the change in immigration law in 1965.

By the way, I have put up the first immigration post.

richard9151  posted on  2007-06-12   18:40:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: richard9151 (#39)

As I pointed out, it's also possible that not that many White Europeans want to emigrate anywhere, least of all to America. The Dutch are emigrating to Canada. And, as I also pointed out, there is another easy way for skilled Europeans to emigrate here through the foreign visa program.

The problem we have is with illegal immigration, mostly from Mexico and further south.

robin  posted on  2007-06-12   18:47:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 40.

#41. To: robin (#40)

not that many White Europeans emigrate anywhere,

Bingo.

By 1965, the Post WW2 Western European surge was done with.

Apart from entertainers in stratospheric tax brackets, many preferred the quality of life in Europe to America. Hard f'us to believe, but there it is, high gas prices notwithstanding.

After the Berlin Wall came down, there was and still is somewhat of an Eastern European surge.

But the fact remained that nonEuros were far more motivated to come here than Euros, the English in fact, in the 60's preferred South Africa and Australia.

The Mexican bulge now is partially designed to help save SocialSecurity as they eventually become "normalized", the hope being that their reproductive ratios will raise the US above the ZeroPopulationGrowth stage. FWIW,IMO, but it's still a fact :>>

swarthyguy  posted on  2007-06-12 19:02:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]